ライフサイエンスコーパス: auditory stimulation

1 ertness and neuronal response to tactile and auditory stimulation.

2 ertness and neuronal response to tactile and auditory stimulation.

3 ye movements, is transiently modulated after auditory stimulation.

4 ectable waveforms evoked by 8, 16, or 32 kHz auditory stimulation.

5 k loop delays estimated using electrical and auditory stimulation.

6 id signaling selectively alters responses to auditory stimulation.

7 pha frequency band (~7-12 Hz) in response to auditory stimulation.

8 lected by greater activity in the absence of auditory stimulation.

9 lative timing of motor cortical activity and auditory stimulation.

10 gions during painful stimulation relative to auditory stimulation.

11 ject to systematic influences through simple auditory stimulation.

12 nhibition (gating) of response to repetitive auditory stimulation.

13 ry areas contained neurons that responded to auditory stimulation.

14 onse to visual, auditory, and bimodal visual-auditory stimulation.

15 rior auditory cortex N1 sources by preceding auditory stimulation.

16 se (MMN) by changes in repetitive aspects of auditory stimulation.

17 ing of pyramidal neuron response to repeated auditory stimulation.

18 ptibility to seizure induction by kainate or auditory stimulation.

19 are organized during naturalistic visual and auditory stimulation.

20 activity that was strongly suppressed during auditory stimulation.

21 n, transcranial stimulation, and closed-loop auditory stimulation.

22 the inferior colliculus (IC) in response to auditory stimulation.

23 ignal presented, but only for high intensity auditory stimulation.

24 cts cross-over comparison of BBs vs. control auditory stimulation.

25 e been modulated in humans by phase-targeted auditory stimulation.

26 specificity and selectivity, using targeted auditory stimulation.

27 nd-to-sound intervals and a baseline without auditory stimulation.

28 in response to noxious, tactile, visual, and auditory stimulation [7-10].

29 ted in hippocampal habituation to repetitive auditory stimulation, a phenomenon thought to involve in

30 neurophysiological responses associated with auditory stimulation across the sleep-wake cycle.

31 We introduce Alpha Closed-Loop Auditory Stimulation (alphaCLAS) as an EEG-based method

32 rapidly inhibits its response to repetitive auditory stimulation, an example of an auditory sensory

33 somatosensory cortex (increased responses to auditory stimulation and decreased responses to somatose

34 ncy and safety of this modality in long-term auditory stimulation and its ability to be integrated wi

35 The interval between the auditory stimulation and the following R peak was signif

36 of gestation, the brain begins to respond to auditory stimulation and to code the auditory environmen

37 rupt and salient onsets in the energy of the auditory stimulation and without any rhythmic structure

38 rupt and salient onsets in the energy of the auditory stimulation and without any rhythmic structure

39 tive experience of hearing in the absence of auditory stimulation, and is useful for investigating as

40 diometry, in which brain responses evoked by auditory stimulation are collected and analysed, removes

41 However, responses to standardized auditory stimulation are far from being used in a clinic

42 entially confounding influence of peripheral auditory stimulation arising from TUS pulsing at audible

43 ronal adaptation to the mean and contrast of auditory stimulation as one ascends the auditory pathway

44 ansition from responding to both tactile and auditory stimulation before LOC to only tactile modality

45 tion from responding to bimodal (tactile and auditory) stimulation before LOC to only tactile modalit

46 2nd group of embryos was exposed to the same auditory stimulation but in the opposite order of presen

47 s and increased entrainment induced by 40 Hz auditory stimulation but lack stimulus-specific adaptati

48 In certain situations, preceding auditory stimulation can actually result in heightened s

49 stage 3 sleep (N3), phase-locked pink noise auditory stimulation can amplify slow oscillatory activi

50 Open-loop pink noise auditory stimulation can amplify slow oscillatory and de

51 nt of slow waves' phase-targeted closed-loop auditory stimulation (CLAS) in rats.

52 Disruptive auditory stimulation degraded sleep with frequent arousa

53 enotonsillectomy who received intraoperative auditory stimulation demonstrated a clinically meaningfu

54 y from parietotemporal cortex in response to auditory stimulation, demonstrating reorganized cortical

55 d age-matched control children using passive auditory stimulation during functional magnetic resonanc

56 ulation, such as training-associated cues or auditory stimulation, during sleep can augment consolida

57 tone and shock rather than to nonassociative auditory stimulation, foot shock sensitization, or unpai

58 t imaging of neurovascular changes following auditory stimulation; (ii) wide-area tonotopic mapping;

59 he limits of driving SOs through closed-loop auditory stimulation in healthy humans.

60 cy band were consistently observed following auditory stimulation in inferior frontal, superior tempo

61 in alpha 7-mediated inhibition to repetitive auditory stimulation in rat hippocampus.

62 strong as visual responses, selectivity for auditory stimulation in visual cortex was stronger in bl

63 In visual cortices, auditory stimulation induced widespread inhibition irres

64 lection process wherein spatially discrepant auditory stimulation is grouped with synchronous attende

65 tympani in response to both auditory and non-auditory stimulation is mediated by the tensor tympani m

66 tinuity should be a primary consideration if auditory stimulation is used to enhance slow-wave activi

67 Sensory flooding, particularly during auditory stimulation, is a common problem for patients w

68 dulation of area X output, in the absence of auditory stimulation, is sufficient to bidirectionally m

69 that simultaneous visual mental imagery and auditory stimulation led to an illusory translocation of

70 h is needed to assess whether intraoperative auditory stimulation may decrease POA and ED in children

71 hat this inhibition was driven by peripheral auditory stimulation, not direct neuromodulation.

72 hering our knowledge of how the intensity of auditory stimulation of noise may elicit this phenomenon

73 ed the effects of specific types of prenatal auditory stimulation on the auditory learning capacity o

74 ceived no supplemental stimulation, unimodal auditory stimulation, or bimodal (audiovisual) stimulati

75 ological, stop signal, saccadic control, and auditory stimulation paradigms) characterizing diverse a

76 nial alternating current stimulation, visual-auditory stimulation, photobiomodulation and transcrania

77 l visual responsiveness, suggesting that the auditory stimulation precocial avian embryos encounter 1

78 nd before and after paired somatosensory and auditory stimulation presented with varying intervals an

79 e tonotopic regions that had not experienced auditory stimulation prior to insertion.

80 to the occluded ear that had not experienced auditory stimulation prior to insertion.

81 ition of multiple neuronal clusters based on auditory stimulation responses.

82 In response to elevated auditory stimulation, short-term mechanisms such as prot

83 ant massage and enhanced visual stimulation, auditory stimulation, social interactions, and support f

84 respond more strongly to coincident tactile-auditory stimulation than to either modality alone.

85 eep corroborated the notion that appropriate auditory stimulation that does not disrupt sleep can nev

86 in an animal model has suggested that visual-auditory stimulation therapy, which exploits the multise

87 ng the acquisition and expression of fear to auditory stimulation, thus further strengthening the pro

88 nals continuously and simultaneously control auditory stimulation to evoke appropriate brain response

89 deep learning algorithms in combination with auditory stimulation to improve prognostication of coma

90 tion techniques (such as treadmill training, auditory stimulation, visual biofeedback, etc.) train ga

91 ogram (EEG) to different rates (20-40 Hz) of auditory stimulation was recorded from 15 patients with

92 ctive experience of sound, in the absence of auditory stimulation, was associated with content-specif

93 it neurophysiological methods and free-field auditory stimulation, we present data on biologically re

94 n can be effectively enhanced by closed-loop auditory stimulation, when clicks are presented in synch

95 c vesicle storage and release, is induced by auditory stimulation with birdsong in the caudomedial ni

96 se in the NCM of males and females following auditory stimulation with conspecific song.

97 ere randomized to 1 of the following groups: auditory stimulation with music, auditory stimulation wi

98 ing groups: auditory stimulation with music, auditory stimulation with noise, ambient noise insulatio

99 isted of two stimuli, treadmill training and auditory stimulation, with symmetric or asymmetric ratio