戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1                      Diagnosis, motivated by auscultatory findings (n=557) or incidental (n=276), was
2                                   Similarly, auscultatory findings were not associated with pneumonia
3 athing are more important than tachypnea and auscultatory findings.
4 pendently associated with the presence of an auscultatory gap.
5     This study provides strong evidence that auscultatory gaps are related to carotid atherosclerosis
6                    Patients with and without auscultatory gaps had similar blood pressures, left vent
7 e confirmed prospectively, they suggest that auscultatory gaps may have prognostic relevance.
8                                      Classic auscultatory gaps were present in 21% of patients and we
9 has equivalent accuracy to the gold standard auscultatory method, and is significantly better than th
10 nts taken were averaged using a standardized auscultatory method.
11                       A higher prevalence of auscultatory midsystolic click (26 [72%] versus 6 [38%];
12  mitral annulus abnormalities, together with auscultatory midsystolic click, may identify MVP patient
13 cate that there is very little difference in auscultatory proficiency between internal medicine and f
14                       To compare the cardiac auscultatory proficiency of medical students and physici
15 ter, cross-sectional assessment of pulmonary auscultatory skills among medical students and housestaf