ライフサイエンスコーパス: authentic sample

1 FT calculations and by the preparation of an authentic sample.

2 e artificial generation of outliers from the authentic samples.

3 ilic and aqueous extracts of 20 monovarietal authentic samples.

4 as unambiguously assigned by comparison with authentic samples.

5 by using them to predict the identity of new authentic samples.

6 y Fe(II)/ascorbic acid through spiking in of authentic samples.

7 ion products were confirmed by comparison to authentic samples.

8 mined by total synthesis and comparison with authentic samples.

9 and general lack of cooperation in providing authentic samples.

10 ures could not be confirmed by comparison to authentic samples.

11 nfirm the relationship between the model and authentic samples.

12 A total of 66 authentic samples, 198 adulterated with sucrose solution

13 ivative with Marfey's reagent and that of an authentic sample (7) obtained by enantiospecific synthes

14 emical profiling was applied for analysis of authentic samples (7 apricot and 5pumpkin samples) and s

15 In the authentic samples, 73% of all 777 drug intakes were dete

16 ions were detectable in the ESI(-)-MS of the authentic samples aged in oak (m/z 197, 241, 301 and 307

17 ble differences between the ESI(-)-MS of the authentic samples (aged in oak or amburana casks) and th

18 These authentic samples allowed the definition of a confidence

19 ataset, with DD-SIMCA focusing on validating authentic samples and PLS-DA enhancing the discriminatio

20 analysis (HCA) were used to find patterns of authentic samples based on their distribution maps.

21 as validated with an independent test set of authentic samples belonging to the seven selected brands

22 taste differences between counterfeited and authentic samples but the assessors were unable to corre

23 dered adulterated (C4(SUGARS) > 7%), 92 were authentic samples (C4(SUGARS) - 7 to 7%) and 19 unadulte

24 Obtaining an authentic sample containing 2uPFOA and 2HPFOA, we optimi

25 The results from analysis of authentic samples demonstrated that the SPE-UPLC-MS/MS m

26 X-ray studies and syntheses of authentic samples establish that the published assignmen

27 Methanolic extracts of 33 authentic samples from two harvest years were analyzed a

28 MS, (1)H and (13)C NMR, and comparison to an authentic sample made by reaction of MeGeCl(3) with NaOM

29 ate the transient anhydride 5 en route to an authentic sample of 4.

30 Correlation with an authentic sample of Novo29 through (1)H NMR spectroscopy

31 An authentic sample of obtusallene V was studied by NMR spe

32 orted by voltammetric investigations with an authentic sample of the anionic [AuI2](-) complex.

33 ynthetic MC-LF were identical to those of an authentic sample of the natural product.

34 thyl sulfides were proven by comparison with authentic samples of 2a-f, thus eliminating one of two p

35 Here, the elemental and isotopic profiles of authentic samples of buffalo milk and the corresponding

36 culations (B3LYP/LanL2DZ) and comparisons to authentic samples of PIDA have confirmed the data analys

37 olecular details of sulfoglycolysis requires authentic samples of the various metabolites in these pa

38 ansformation studies were also undertaken on authentic samples of two of the identified photoproducts

39 ied by GC and GC-mass spectral comparison to authentic samples produced independently; in some cases,

40 e same compounds; however, without access to authentic samples this cannot be unequivocally proven.

41 hesized using this approach are identical to authentic samples when tested by a variety of analytical

42 could differentiate between counterfeit and authentic samples with a reference standard but did not