ライフサイエンスコーパス: aversion

1 ize punishment than to maximize reward (loss aversion).

2 ective preferences for incentive (i.e., loss aversion).

3 than to acquire the equivalent reward (loss aversion).

4 ir detrimental side effects (e.g., dysphoria/aversion).

5 o each monotherapy, without inducing a taste aversion.

6 fects decision making and can result in risk aversion.

7 simistic prior beliefs can explain ambiguity aversion.

8 s risk taking for losses, and increases loss aversion.

9 correlated with the original degrees of risk aversion.

10 isk preferences in the loss domain, and loss aversion.

11 both of which depended on individuals' risk aversion.

12 g behaviors through encoding itch-associated aversion.

13 rospective gains were both predicted by loss aversion.

14 ontostriatal circuits that encode reward and aversion.

15 probability condition, possibly due to risk-aversion.

16 expectancy, they had no effect on ambiguity aversion.

17 glutamate/Homer2 expression in MA preference/aversion.

18 tiates their synapses on targets that encode aversion.

19 tivation caused neither place preference nor aversion.

20 ed rewards, is associated with loss and risk aversion.

21 nocifensive responses and conditional place aversion.

22 and stress-related behaviors, such as social aversion.

23 h loss-sensitivity, and thus diminishes loss aversion.

24 (gain only)-were exclusively driven by risk aversion.

25 eption while activation of LC(:PFC) produced aversion.

26 five sessions that tested conditioned flavor aversion.

27 relin signaling can both inhibit and enhance aversion.

28 risk aversion but equivalent levels of loss aversion.

29 health, and individual prosociality and risk aversion.

30 reward as a measure of an individual's risk aversion.

31 secretion, body weight, or conditioned taste aversion.

32 d not induce conditioned place preference or aversion.

33 osite limb, as assessed by conditioned place aversion.

34 ecision-making tasks assessing risk and loss aversion.

35 the naloxone-precipitated MWD induced place aversion.

36 mesoaccumbens glutamatergic fibers promotes aversion.

37 r 2; VGluT2), which play roles in reward and aversion.

38 y inaccessible population elicits behavioral aversion.

39 as icv TTR did not cause a conditioned taste aversion.

40 behavior when it was guided by innate taste aversion.

41 tificial activation is sufficient to mediate aversion.

42 ns, which have been implicated in reward and aversion.

43 al for imprinted, but not for adult-learned, aversion.

44 d by their efferent targets, code reward and aversion.

45 n, NS9283 enhanced ethanol-conditioned place aversion.

46 2 (VP(VGluT2))], whose activation generates aversion.

47 tors and is critical for nicotine intake and aversion.

48 with 3 or more triggers were at risk of food aversion.

49 id not promote either approach motivation or aversion.

50 c changes in neurons classically linked with aversion.

51 ed in the regulation of feeding, reward, and aversion.

52 on in vivo, as well as in sodium conditioned aversion.

53 R pathway is involved in KOR agonist-induced aversion.

54 their different behavioural tendency of loss aversion.

55 An aversive odor does not reverse object aversion.

56 t is important for the development of social aversion.

57 ng properties of AMPH without affecting AMPH aversion.

58 During conditioned food aversion - a.k.a. sauce bearnaise syndrome - the ingesti

59 re absolutely required for conditioned taste aversion, a learned behavior.

60 Hypotheses include inequity aversion, a moral sense that inequality is intrinsically

61 hlights the biological heterogeneity of loss aversion across individuals.

62 ocial expectations, and to what extent guilt aversion affects subsequent decision-making.

63 ences in light-evoked behaviors or real-time aversion after nerve injury despite marked hypersensitiv

64 However, little is known about whether loss aversion also exists during decisions where the cost is

65 s, produced dose-dependent conditioned place aversion and a reduction in the above optical ICSS in Vg

66 under conditions that prevented KOR-mediated aversion and analgesia.

67 d test whether this is sufficient to prevent aversion and anxiety when animals then experience immobi

68 ext for analysis of PBN circuits involved in aversion and avoidance, and consider how information of

69 ) activity exacerbated pain, produced strong aversion and canceled the analgesic effect of low-dose k

70 predict participants' risk preferences (loss aversion and decreasing marginal utility), even on a sin

71 baseline-dependent effects of L-DOPA on loss aversion and delay discounting.

72 dings indicate a broad RMTg role in encoding aversion and driving VTA responses and behavior.

73 Careful scrutiny of research on taste-aversion and fear learning, language, and imitation indi

74 Two hypotheses, gaze aversion and gaze indifference, are commonly cited to ex

75 ated differences in the degree of inequality aversion and in the updating of beliefs about others.

76 :PFC) exacerbated spontaneous pain, produced aversion and increased anxiety-like behaviour.

77 also show selective insensitivity to alcohol-aversion and increased novelty-seeking, which may be rel

78 activation of VTA GABA neurons caused place aversion and inhibited cocaine, but not heroin, self-adm

79 he lateral habenula (LHb) has been linked to aversion and mood regulation through modulation of the d

80 attenuated the peripheral CGRP-induced light aversion and motility behaviors.

81 ther with the propensity to induce reward or aversion and physical dependence.

82 contributors to the balance between nicotine aversion and reward.

83 inancial decision-making task measuring loss aversion and risk attitude.

84 These are termed loss aversion and risk aversion, respectively.

85 in regulating expression of ethanol-induced aversion and suggest a mechanism for its role in modulat

86 lly, both the ability to elicit pain-related aversion and the decrease in excitation were specific to

87 ery and ambiguity aversion, and between loss aversion and the endowment effect.

88 were able to reliably estimate risk and loss aversion and their respective contribution to gambling d

89 t of the normative assumptions of inequality aversion and time preferences, the agreement constitutes

90 prevented naloxone-induced conditioned place aversions and decreases in sensitivity to brain stimulat

91 ural substrates for the strategies of 'guilt aversion' and 'inequity aversion', even under conditions

92 gests behavioral factors (eg, increased risk aversion) and/or allocation inefficiencies may have play

93 tant in feeding behaviors, conditioned taste aversion, and alarm.

94 ence, between compound lottery and ambiguity aversion, and between loss aversion and the endowment ef

95 variational, maxmin, constant absolute risk aversion, and constant relative risk aversion utilities.

96 e integration of the RE in circuits of fear, aversion, and defense.

97 A), alters BLA neuronal activity, conditions aversion, and increases anxiety-like behavior.

98 c setup implements bounded rationality, loss aversion, and inhibition in a natural fashion, which all

99 rticularly comorbidity, family history, food aversion, and poor body weight gain.

100 b) nuclei play important roles in processing aversion, and recent work has focused on the critical in

101 isrupted anxiety and mPFC representations of aversion, and reduced theta synchrony in a pathway-, fre

102 have been implicated in nicotine withdrawal, aversion, and reinforcement.

103 ecific functional roles in mediating reward, aversion, and stress.

104 from a single receptor can block innate odor aversion, and that instinctive behavioral responses to o

105 rast, unlike U50,488H, nalfurafine caused no aversion, anhedonia, or sedation or and a low level of m

106 Patients with CKD suffer from food aversion, anorexia, and malnutrition.

107 upon an MR template and included the reward/aversion areas of the brain.

108 h decreased reciprocity and diminished guilt aversion as levels of psychopathic traits increase.

109 references changed substantially toward risk aversion as reward accumulated within a context, and blo

110 induced aversive states as measured by place aversion assays.

111 r cingulate cortex (ACC) is thought to drive aversion associated with chronic neuropathic pain.

112 icted by interindividual differences in risk-aversion attitudes expressed during the gambling task.

113 Empathy is more effective than risk-aversion because when infectious individuals change beha

114 d gene expression and eliminated the feeding-aversion behavior resulting from contact with the analog

115 y microbial colonization elicits a microbial aversion behavior.

116 inal bloating and are required for microbial aversion behavior.

117 ns, with corresponding changes in attraction/aversion behavior.

118 Finally, a light-aversion behavioral assay to assess functionality reveal

119 dition, participants exhibited a strong risk aversion bias; strikingly, this bias reversed in the rea

120 abstinence likely involve the 5 main reward-aversion brain centers (i.e., nucleus accumbens, bed nuc

121 anxious participants exhibited enhanced risk aversion but equivalent levels of loss aversion.

122 ard attributes, both of which depend on risk aversion but in opposite directions.

123 lso prevented the establishment of the place aversion by a CB1 mechanism of action.

124 r individual differences in behavioural loss aversion can be predicted using scalp potentials (EEG) r

125 t two reports that the mTOR pathway mediates aversion caused by KOR activation.

126 may be explained by increased clinical risk aversion, changes in unmeasured donor factors or logisti

127 ne predominantly shapes the so-called reward/aversion circuitry, with major influence on negative aff

128 males, 9; males, 9) show a reduction in loss aversion compared with age-matched control subjects (fem

129 ted attenuated KOR-induced conditioned place aversion (considered a beta-arrestin signaling-dependent

130 Risk and loss aversion correlated with each other in the depressed pat

131 strong conditioned place preference (CPP) or aversion (CPA) in rodents.

132 operant runway task and by conditioned place aversion (CPA).

133 tion of sexual behavior in a conditioned sex aversion (CSA) paradigm where mating is paired with illn

134 Here, we use conditioned taste aversion (CTA) in rats, a cortically dependent learning

135 Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) is a form of one-trial learning dependent

136 Conditioned taste aversion (CTA) is an associative learning paradigm, wher

137 sed versus no-choice-based conditioned taste aversion (CTA) tasks in rats.

138 kg(-1) 20% ethanol, i.p.) conditioned taste aversion (CTA) to saccharin taste.

139 and after ethanol-induced conditioned taste aversion (CTA) to saccharin.

140 form of learning known as conditioned taste aversion (CTA).

141 quisition and retention of conditioned taste aversions (CTAs) in rodents, but large lesions in this a

142 hould switch between risk proneness and risk aversion depending on state and circumstances, especiall

143 A new study finds that, in Drosophila, taste aversion depends on the immune system and the mushroom b

144 c silencing of the LH-to-LHb pathway impairs aversion-driven escape behaviors.

145 by the trade name Antabuse), an old alcohol-aversion drug that has been shown to be effective agains

146 The degree of change in risk aversion due to decoy presentation was positively correl

147 cipants (females, 16; males, 6) exhibit loss aversion during effort-based decision-making by exerting

148 ulators, cortisol and noradrenaline, on loss aversion during financial decision making.

149 vels that was largely specific to the reward/aversion (e.g., saliency) areas of the brain.

150 eural mechanism accounts for well-known risk aversion effects in human decision-making.

151 on of SC neurons reproduced the pain-related aversion elicited by activating MD inputs.

152 However, whether aversion encoding requires these neural circuits to ulti

153 ver LHb neurons monosynaptically innervating aversion-encoding midbrain GABA cells.

154 contrast to their role in inflammatory pain aversion, EP3 receptors on serotonergic cells were dispe

155 ndling, while pick up by tail induced strong aversion even when handling was brief and infrequent.

156 strategies of 'guilt aversion' and 'inequity aversion', even under conditions where the two strategie

157 s of both persistent licking and conditioned aversion evoked by stimuli (including skin pinching and

158 Further, the insensitivity to alcohol-aversion exhibited by male mice can be mimicked by the l

159 t attention, it remains unclear whether loss aversion exists during effort-based decision-making.

160 We test the hypothesis that risk aversion extends the length of stay in the dwelling and,

161 cular outcomes has been associated with risk aversion for potentially lifesaving procedures and may h

162 ix principles in behavioural economics (loss aversion, framing effect, present bias, status quo bias,

163 trust between dissimilar users and that risk aversion has an inverse relationship with trust given hi

164 A marked bias towards risk aversion has been observed in nearly every species teste

165 anisms underlying ethanol-induced reward and aversion have not been thoroughly investigated.

166 The results falsify the gaze aversion hypothesis; instead, at the time of initial dia

167 ific differences in codon frequencies, codon aversion, identical codon pairing, co-tRNA codon pairing

168 ed behaviors, with one neuron type mediating aversion imposed by multiple poisons.

169 Reducing risk aversion, improving allocation, and more often pumping l

170 ntegrating information about both reward and aversion in a common currency.

171 onic pain enhanced KOR agonist-induced place aversion in a sex-dependent manner.

172 r the experience of both nicotine reward and aversion in an intra-VTA (ventral tegmental area) self-a

173 Activating MD inputs elicited pain-related aversion in both models.

174 that estradiol is sufficient to promote risk aversion in both sexes.

175 on, constipation, and displayed no reward or aversion in CPP/CPA assays, suggesting that analogs migh

176 otional states in humans can inhibit learned aversion in male and female rats.

177 uced naloxone-precipitated conditioned place aversion in rats chronically treated with oxycodone.

178 own about the mechanisms underlying cannabis aversion in rodents.

179 ative to either drug by itself, reduced loss aversion in the absence of an effect on risk attitude or

180 trategy, was positively correlated with loss aversion in the depressed patients, also implicating imp

181 s could predict behavioural tendency of loss aversion in the medium loss condition across subjects.

182 is necessary for sodium attraction, but not aversion in the nematode.

183 2 food triggers, the risk of developing food aversion increased in cases triggered by 3 or more foods

184 Second, higher risk aversion increases both the [Formula: see text] price an

185 s cognate ligand from blocking predator odor aversion, indicating that the blocking requires sensory

186 We found that place aversion induced by inflammatory pain depends on prostag

187 able for acute nociceptive behaviors and for aversion induced by thermal pain or a kappa opioid recep

188 glutamatergic input to nAcc shown to mediate aversion instead of reward, and the first pathway shown

189 Glucose-aversion is a heritable trait that evolved in a number o

190 Although loss aversion is a well-known and intensively studied phenome

191 Loss aversion is a well-known behavioral regularity in financ

192 This indicates that dopamine-dependent loss aversion is crucial for explaining effort-based decision

193 In addition, we show that sodium conditioned aversion is dependent on TMC-1 and disrupts not only sod

194 Consequently, ambiguity aversion is more likely caused by general caution than b

195 gdala (BLA) in response to conditioned taste aversion is necessary to form a memory for a taste of ne

196 Loss aversion is particularly sensitive to how the decision i

197 Therefore, loss aversion is present during effort-based decision-making

198 city onto DA neurons is causally involved in aversion learning is unknown.

199 irect role for amygdalocortical LTD in taste aversion learning.

200 on (they overweight low probabilities), loss aversion (losses loom larger than gains), and reference

201 Loss aversion manifests itself in rejecting a gamble of gaini

202 Although humans display inequality aversion, many people appear to be untroubled by widespr

203 On the one hand, loss aversion may be hardwired due to asymmetric evolutionary

204 Thus, chronic pain-related aversion may reflect activity changes in specific pathwa

205 teral habenula (LHb), which is implicated in aversion-mediated learning, show accelerated escalation

206 egulation of drug-seeking behaviours through aversion-mediated learning.

207 egulation of drug-seeking behaviours through aversion-mediated learning.

208 this is dissociable from AIC-dependent taste aversion memory.

209 the adjacent insular cortex-dependent taste aversion memory.

210 ther further modifications could reduce risk aversion, more efficiently allocate resources, and incre

211 omal direct pathway, the Tshz1 neurons cause aversion, movement suppression, and negative reinforceme

212 eceptor-expressing neurons throughout reward-aversion networks, characterize their adapted phenotype

213 cture of mu opioid receptor-associated brain aversion networks.

214 eep arousal (locus coeruleus) and preference/aversion (nucleus accumbens) demonstrate the unique capa

215 Acute MWD induced place aversion occurs when naloxone is administered 24 h follo

216 Superhydrophobicity stems from an aversion of water for the hydrophobic surface texture, s

217 g but does not convey approach motivation or aversion on its own.

218 Furthermore, conditioned place aversion or preference induced by natural stimuli was si

219 was sufficient to induce a conditioned place aversion or preference, respectively.

220 e ventral tegmental area that mediate either aversion or reward.

221 psychological biases of investors, ambiguity aversion, or omitted permanent components to valuation.

222 sucrose devalued using the conditioned taste aversion paradigm in males and female rats.

223 y we subjected mice to the conditioned taste aversion paradigm, where animals learn to associate nove

224 ursuit of reward.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Loss aversion-preferring to avoid punishment rather than to a

225 in a remarkably precise fashion and induces aversion, presumably signaling the presence of harmful m

226 a vital role in their host seeking and risk aversion processes.

227 The TPNs essential for conditioned aversion project to the superior lateral protocerebrum (

228 neurons, but it also encloses a subgroup of aversion-promoting glutamatergic neurons.

229 measures of reward, drive, mood, and sexual aversion, providing functional significance.

230 ral physiological processes, including light aversion, pupillary light reflexes, and photoentrainment

231 lated with the extinction of the conditioned aversion (R(2) = 0.58, p < 0.005).

232 ger than gains," computational approaches to aversion-related decision making (ARDM) for psychiatric

233 at VP(VGluT2) neurons preferentially contact aversion-related neurons, such as lateral habenula neuro

234 and abstinence, the VP(VGluT2) input to the aversion-related structures is potentiated, whereas the

235 ence may allow VP(VGluT2) neurons to recruit aversion-related targets more readily and therefore be p

236 tatory inputs whose contributions to cocaine aversion remain uncharacterized.

237 eased alcohol self-administration, increased aversion-resistant alcohol intake and enhanced stress-in

238 These are termed loss aversion and risk aversion, respectively.

239 hus directly implicating the Aedae-KR in the aversion response.

240 recognized as a critical circuit modulating aversion, reward, and social behavior.

241 ve behavior in wild-type CD1 mice similar to aversion seen previously after central (intracerebrovent

242 rstood; they may be driven by differences in aversion sensitivity, motivation for reward, and/or inst

243 slaf = ball, slaflaf = balls), the doubling aversion shifts into a reliable (morphological) preferen

244 ity clusters representing distinct reward or aversion signals, including a population that responded

245 Disbudded calves on Day 20 did not show this aversion, suggesting that they traded off the short-term

246 enorhabditis elegans leads to a long-lasting aversion that requires distinct sets of neurons for the

247 ons and that this signaling sequence induced aversion through GABA-mediated inhibition of dopaminergi

248 e found that systemic inflammation triggered aversion through MyD88-dependent activation of the brain

249 oth a TAAR ligand and a common odorant block aversion to a predator odor, indicating that this abilit

250 Fed flies show taste aversion to acetic acid, whereas starved flies show a ro

251 It has been suggested that this aversion to ambiguity is linked to people's assumption o

252 the valence of carbon dioxide responses from aversion to approach in Drosophila [1, 2], whereas mosqu

253 Hunger shifts the behavioral response from aversion to attraction by enhancing the appetitive sugar

254 show that CO(2) response valence shifts from aversion to attraction during starvation, a change that

255 The transition from aversion to attraction is regulated by biogenic amine si

256 late the temporal dynamics of the shift from aversion to attraction such that animals lacking octopam

257 ared with the other groups exhibited greater aversion to both risk and loss during gambles involving

258 Sensory hypersensitivity (aversion to certain sounds, touch, etc., or increased ab

259 ulation but not on the entire population; an aversion to controlled but not to uncontrolled experimen

260 This aversion to effort is believed to arise from a cost-bene

261 The aversion to feeding elicited by analog 1728 suggests tha

262 They tend to have an aversion to foods rich in fat.

263 rodent pain assay based on conditioned place aversion to formalin injection, an inflammatory noxious

264 f the dorsal raphe nucleus failed to form an aversion to formalin-induced pain, as did mice lacking t

265 date that system-justifying beliefs diminish aversion to inequality in economic contexts.

266 Here we show that aversion to information gathering can be beneficial even

267 p cooperating even if conditions change, and aversion to information gathering helps to interact pref

268 ed conditioned flavor (i.e., taste and odor) aversion to intravenously self-administered (IVSA) nicot

269 ciated with neuropathic pain, including pain aversion to light touch (allodynia).

270 wever, this is not the only reason for their aversion to light.

271 pensity to take risks rather than a stronger aversion to losses.

272 rons, while also impairing conditioned place aversion to multiple aversive stimuli.

273 y about the decision outcome (e.g., risk) or aversion to negative outcomes (e.g., loss).

274 ceptor activation elicited conditioned place aversion to pain via inhibition of serotonergic neurons.

275 icide suggest that certain traits may reduce aversion to physical threat and increase the probability

276 tification of subgroups with a propensity or aversion to pursue HCV treatment.

277 bug (Acanthocephala femorata) triggering an aversion to red.

278 cidal behavior is associated with heightened aversion to risk and loss, which might produce negative

279 ce of handling stress that results in strong aversion to the handler, while mice familiarised with be

280 s non-aggressors develop a conditioned place aversion to the intruder-paired context.

281 with delta opioid-induced seizure activity, aversion to the kappa drug U50, 488H, or alpha2-mediated

282 ion marked by a selective loss of behavioral aversion to these compounds.

283 to pathogenic bacteria results in persistent aversion to those bacterial odors, whereas adult exposur

284 wever, this bias could be driven by enhanced aversion to uncertainty about the decision outcome (e.g.

285 age 8 and is rooted in the development of an aversion to unequal resource distributions.

286 a combination of altruistic concerns and an aversion to viewing oneself as a thief, both of which in

287 ever, was mediated by winter severity, where aversion to well pads decreased as winter severity incre

288 experiences that shape odor preferences and aversions to explore developmental plasticity in circuit

289 h aversive odors triggering otherwise hidden aversions to particular prey colors.

290 on of a spoiled food item leads to a lasting aversion towards cues reminiscent of the item.

291 te risk aversion, and constant relative risk aversion utilities.

292 y, we demonstrated that inflammation-induced aversion was not an indirect consequence of fever or ano

293 g in the LHb contributing to ethanol-induced aversion, we recorded neural firing in the LHb of freely

294 Furthermore, participants' degree of guilt aversion were negatively correlated with PPI total score

295 mixed)-could be driven by both loss and risk aversion, whereas choices on the other type-featuring on

296 ons and supports conditioned taste and place aversions, while the anorexia it causes can be blocked b

297 othetical rewards, suggesting increased loss aversion with real monetary rewards.

298 adaptively switch between guilt and inequity aversion, with a corresponding switch observed in their

299 hway by rapamycin abolished U50,488H-induced aversion, without affecting analgesic, anti-scratch, and

300 and associated hormonal changes affect loss aversion, yet the underlying neuroendocrine mechanisms a