戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ow dopamine signals evolve throughout active avoidance learning.
2 e offers a simple computational solution for avoidance learning.
3 res relates to individual biases in approach-avoidance learning.
4 s may influence the balance between approach-avoidance learning.
5 uated approach learning but had no effect on avoidance learning.
6 ynapses of the fruit fly following olfactory-avoidance learning.
7 lamic circuitry in instrumental approach and avoidance learning.
8 fear conditioning or single-trial inhibitory avoidance learning.
9 or amygdalar and cingulothalamic TIA and for avoidance learning.
10 e human reward network promoting approach or avoidance learning.
11 o the medial septum on memory for inhibitory avoidance learning.
12 contextual stimuli) and step-down inhibitory avoidance learning.
13 al population dynamics underlie rapid threat avoidance learning.
14  define the timing of mPFC DA signals during avoidance learning.
15 utations dopamine signals perform to support avoidance learning.
16 aseline) and at 1 h and 6 d after inhibitory avoidance learning.
17 y distinct but complementary roles in active avoidance learning.
18 s underlying action inhibition in punishment avoidance learning.
19 eight gain and impaired one-trial inhibitory avoidance learning.
20 .9 mg/kg i.p.) impaired one-trial inhibitory avoidance learning.
21 the role of the VTA-mPFC DA circuit in rapid avoidance learning.
22 ng fear and threat detection [1], escape and avoidance learning [2], and endogenous analgesia [3].
23 er, there is considerable variance in active avoidance learning across a population.
24 riatum-dependent memory, including footshock avoidance learning and "response" learning in the cross
25    However, stressed-reared pups showed odor avoidance learning and both olfactory bulb and amygdala
26              In mice, it enhances inhibitory avoidance learning and causes the formation of silent sy
27 e induced at discrete times after inhibitory avoidance learning and co-localize with phosphorylated C
28   Using tests of hippocampus-dependent place avoidance learning and dentate electrophysiology in mice
29 lamic lesions severely impair discriminative avoidance learning and that they block development of tr
30            We compared the effects of active avoidance learning and yoked extinction on threat respon
31 ence of the stimulus resulting in escape and avoidance learning) and tonic pain (to enforce recuperat
32 orrelated with the early stage of inhibitory avoidance learning, and our data show that E2 improved i
33 synaptic plasticity and one-trial inhibitory avoidance learning are eliminated in mice deficient in C
34 injections of D-AP5 before training impaired avoidance learning at doses that did not impair performa
35 copolamine at a dose (1 mg/kg) that impaired avoidance learning but spared spatial tuning and shock-e
36  developmental iron deficiency on inhibitory avoidance learning, but contrasts with the persistent de
37 d pain and unexpected pain absence can drive avoidance learning, but whether they do so via shared or
38 ss receptors contribute to both approach and avoidance learning by detecting both the phasic DA incre
39                   It is widely accepted that avoidance learning by naive predators is fundamental in
40                            One-trial passive avoidance learning can be established by coating the met
41 edicts participants' switching behaviour and avoidance learning, directly implicating the thalamostri
42 intake and digestion, breast feeding, poison-avoidance learning, eyeblink conditioning, sexual condit
43  activity of dmPFC projections during active avoidance learning has never been recorded.
44                    Studies of discriminative avoidance learning have shown changes in learning-relate
45 the basolateral amygdala (BLA) during active avoidance learning in both male and female mice.
46 erotonin reuptake inhibitor--SSRI) on active avoidance learning in fish.
47 minergic mechanisms contribute to reward and avoidance learning in humans.
48  was conducted to characterize discriminated avoidance learning in mice by using a Y-maze task.
49     SIB-1663 also increased the retention of avoidance learning in normal rats when administered imme
50           We found that one-trial inhibitory avoidance learning in rats produced the same changes in
51                       Here, using inhibitory avoidance learning in rats, we provide evidence that ret
52 on into the ACC during conditioning produces avoidance learning in the absence of a peripheral noxiou
53  thus act simultaneously as (i) toxins, (ii) avoidance-learning inducers, and (iii) aposematic odoran
54 oaches also indicate that biases in approach-avoidance learning involve hemispheric asymmetries in do
55 it is unclear if the heterogeneity in active avoidance learning is explained by differences in dopami
56                         Moreover, inhibitory avoidance learning is impaired only in adult KO mice.
57     Compared with reward seeking, punishment avoidance learning is less clearly understood at both th
58 ing, but the neural circuitry mediating such avoidance learning is poorly understood.
59 ogether, our results suggest that human pain-avoidance learning is supported by separate threat- and
60                                   Inhibitory avoidance learning leads to an increase in hippocampal e
61                                              Avoidance learning-learning to avoid bad outcomes-is an
62                                       Active avoidance learning may be stimulated by the 5-HT(1A) rec
63  too frequently or if their model is absent, avoidance learning of noxious models is disrupted (Bates
64  in mediation of discriminative instrumental avoidance learning of rabbits.
65 y moving rats after a session of conditioned avoidance learning or a control session.
66 ing, but castration did not modulate passive avoidance learning or memory.
67               Rats were trained on a passive-avoidance learning (PAL) protocol that was followed by 6
68 ipulations of the amygdala in the inhibitory avoidance learning paradigm have recently called this vi
69           Here, using a step-down inhibitory avoidance learning paradigm in rats, we show that intrah
70 tudies based on fear conditioning instead of avoidance-learning paradigms.
71 7) leaving the prefrontal mechanisms driving avoidance learning poorly understood.
72                                    As during avoidance learning, posterior cingulate cortical neurons
73                                Variations in avoidance learning predicted both their self-reported av
74 uts that signal avoidability and drive rapid avoidance learning remain poorly understood.
75 void punishments (i.e., enhanced approach or avoidance learning, respectively).
76  in conditioned place preference and passive avoidance learning seen in Kal7(KO) mice are abrogated w
77  reward learning signals, and increased loss avoidance learning signals, with similar psychomotor slo
78 gions is associated with better approach (vs avoidance) learning, specifically in participants with l
79 all of a weak version of the 1-trial passive avoidance learning task could be achieved by behavioral
80 this issue, we combined an instrumental pain-avoidance learning task with computational modeling, fun
81        Rats were trained on a two-way active avoidance-learning task.
82             All rats were then tested on the avoidance-learning task.
83 utoimmune mice perform very poorly on active avoidance learning tasks.
84 JL and CD1 mice showing significantly better avoidance learning than C57 mice, which were better than
85  exhibited dose- and age-related deficits in avoidance learning that closely corresponded with specif
86             Our findings reveal that, during avoidance learning, the PL rapidly generates novel repre
87                         Thus, D-AP5 impaired avoidance learning through its interaction with telencep
88 kg) conditioned place preference, and active avoidance learning to paired light and footshock were in
89 limited role of the amygdala in instrumental avoidance learning was indicated by the finding that int
90  responses to aversive stimuli contribute to avoidance learning, we recorded NAc core (Core) and NAc
91 d deficits in spatial navigation and passive avoidance learning were investigated with a rat model of
92 al geniculate (MG) nucleus in discriminative avoidance learning, wherein rabbits acquire a locomotory
93 essed the neural mediation of discriminative avoidance learning, wherein rabbits step in a wheel appa
94 ponents underlying individual differences in avoidance learning, which may be important contributors
95 al fear learning and enhances future passive avoidance learning, which may model certain behavioral t
96       Amisulpride impaired both approach and avoidance learning, while memantine mildly attenuated ap
97 ction errors that guide the consolidation of avoidance learning, while vmShell dopamine guides initia
98          Strain differences were observed in avoidance learning, with BALB, DBA, C57 x SJL and CD1 mi