戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 mporal iris in both eyes using AS-OCT (3-mum axial resolution).
2 -um depth, achieving 3.6-um lateral and 6-um axial resolution.
3 ll as phototoxic effects and provides a true axial resolution.
4  the multilayered retina at high lateral and axial resolution.
5 opic imaging with ~120-nm lateral and 160-nm axial resolution.
6  3D imaging of biological samples with 20-nm axial resolution.
7 n optical microscopy because it improves the axial resolution.
8 wavelength and 100000 A-lines/sec with 6 mum axial resolution.
9 les strut-level assessment due to its higher axial resolution.
10 ce of volumetric measurement errors and lost axial resolution.
11 ronal structures and a threefold increase in axial resolution.
12 0 time points with 120-nm lateral and 360-nm axial resolution.
13 lar structures at <50 nm lateral and <100 nm axial resolution.
14 how it can be used advantageously to improve axial resolution.
15 ment in contrast and apparent restoration of axial resolution.
16 al collimation added to the septa to improve axial resolution.
17 ary phase particles at nanoscale lateral and axial resolutions.
18 e and 2.5-microm (transverse) and 20-microm (axial) resolution.
19 scale samples with 375 nm lateral and 750 nm axial resolution (4x expansion), including entire mouse
20 nfiguration, ctASLM provides up to 260 nm of axial resolution, a three to tenfold improvement over co
21 y Tomography (AT), with its native 50-100 nm axial resolution achieved by physical sectioning of resi
22 om 35 women aged 29-81 years with 3.5-microm axial resolution and 6-microm transverse resolution at 1
23 s based on dithered optical lattices improve axial resolution and beam uniformity compared Gaussian b
24 nation for reduced photo-damage and superior axial resolution and contrast.
25 hieve invariant 12.2 um (~ 9.1 um in tissue) axial resolution and optimum point spread function throu
26           We demonstrate that 3D-iLLS has an axial resolution and single-particle localization precis
27 grees field of view with approximately 7-mum axial resolution and up to 70 frames/s (512 A-scans/fram
28 d operating at 57,000 A-lines/s with 5.9 mum axial resolution and was used to collect 3D images with
29                 However, the former degrades axial resolution and/or optical sectioning, while the la
30 olution Fourier-domain corneal OCT (5 mum of axial resolution) and corneal topography were performed
31 how it impacts quantitative measurements and axial resolution, and what can be done to avoid SA and t
32 of the gut wall at 30 mum (lateral) x 7 mum (axial) resolution as it travels through the digestive tr
33  system provides 363 mum lateral and 119 mum axial resolution at a depth of 3.1 mm and supports 3D vo
34 bling imaging with 150 nm lateral and 570 nm axial resolution at a depth of 80 um through Caenorhabdi
35                  Tomographic imaging with an axial resolution better than 18 nm is demonstrated for l
36  1.25 mm, the probe provided imaging with an axial resolution better than 50 um, and a real-time imag
37 with pharmacological selectivity and with an axial resolution between 5 and 10 um.
38 des superior optical sectioning and improves axial resolution beyond the typical axial resolution of
39       However, it is difficult to achieve an axial resolution close to the diffraction limit in real
40 s is highly amplified due to the microscopic axial resolution (depth of field) and demonstrates a mic
41 y transfer (MIET) imaging, which achieves an axial resolution down to nanometers.
42            Consequently, we could achieve an axial resolution fairly close to the diffraction limit s
43 biological specimens with low light dose and axial resolution far beyond the diffraction barrier.
44                                          The axial resolution for 2D (3D) was 4.8 mm FWHM (5.8 mm) an
45                                          The axial resolution for IFBP and 3DRP was unaffected by thi
46                              The lateral and axial resolutions for two-photon imaging are 0.8 and 10
47 use of the practical limit that prevents the axial resolution from reaching its diffraction limit.
48 ion of 43 normal subjects with a 3.5-microm, axial-resolution, high-speed, UHR OCT prototype instrume
49 tion imaging was performed with a 2.8-microm axial-resolution, high-speed, UHR OCT research prototype
50 tion limit of optical microscopy compromises axial resolution, hindering accurate three-dimensional s
51  transaxial resolution improved 52%, and the axial resolution improved 39%.
52 sampling as a method for computed tomography axial resolution improvement.
53  a strong regularization, the transaxial and axial resolution improvements were reduced to 6% and 5%,
54 o distinct, complementary methods to improve axial resolution in 3D SIM with minimal or no modificati
55 ch achieves ultrahigh-resolution (1.7 microm axial resolution in tissue and 6 microm transverse resol
56 e SS-OCT with a 325 kHz A-scan rate, 12.2 um axial resolution (in air), and 15.5 mm depth range (in a
57                                              Axial resolution is consistent with the parallel-beam re
58                                              Axial resolution is maximized by concurrently applied to
59       In case of typical clinical system the axial resolution is much lower than the planar one.
60 r structured illumination microscopy and the axial resolution is similar to that of a standard confoc
61                                 The obtained axial resolution is up to 10 times higher than that of t
62 and lattice light sheets on beam uniformity, axial resolution, lateral resolution, and photobleaching
63 n human brain are problematic because of the axial resolution limit of light microscopy and the diffi
64                                              Axial resolution measured 13 +/- 3 microm with OCT and 9
65 r temporal scale, improving both lateral and axial resolution more than twofold while simultaneously
66 -sector angular resolution and submillimeter axial resolution, nanomolar sensitivity to NIR fluorochr
67                           The transverse and axial resolution near the center is 4.8 mm.
68                           The transverse and axial resolutions near the center are 4.0 and 5.0 mm, re
69                           The transverse and axial resolutions near the center are 5.5 and 5.6 mm, re
70  10 microm with up to 20 nm planar and 80 nm axial resolution, now enabling DNA-based super-resolutio
71                     The system enabled 4-mum axial resolution (OCT and OCM) with 14-mum (OCT) and 2-m
72 z, with a lateral resolution of 3 mum and an axial resolution of 1 mum within the microfluidic channe
73 (volumes per second) and minimum lateral and axial resolution of 1.0 um and 3.8 um respectively.
74 A compact lens assembly provides lateral and axial resolution of 1.1 and 13.6 mum, respectively.
75 g with a lateral resolution of 145 nm and an axial resolution of 350 nm at acquisition speeds up to 1
76                    An Fd-OCT instrument with axial resolution of 4 to 4.5 microm and transverse resol
77  confocal Raman spectroscopy system, with an axial resolution of 50 microns, was used to assess nonin
78 a lateral resolution of 36 mumx52 mum and an axial resolution of 657 mum.
79  microscopy (SIM) can double the lateral and axial resolution of a wide-field fluorescence microscope
80                               The effects on axial resolution of adding supplemental collimation to t
81 n be measured as a function of depth with an axial resolution of approximately 10 microm.
82 ents using 4Pi microscopy, which features an axial resolution of approximately 100 nm.
83 surface membrane of red blood cells, with an axial resolution of approximately 90 nm.
84                                          The axial resolution of coherence tomography is thus improve
85 improves axial resolution beyond the typical axial resolution of conventional 3D-structured illuminat
86  systems and is expected to also improve the axial resolution of existing imaging systems.
87  structure is challenging due to the limited axial resolution of fluorescence microscopes and the het
88 e present manuscript, we combine the extreme axial resolution of MIET imaging with the extraordinary
89                               The 20-microns axial resolution of OCT allowed small structural details
90 al wavelengths, which are commonly used, the axial resolution of OCT is limited to about 1 mum, even
91                                 Although the axial resolution of OCT system, which is a function of t
92                                          The axial resolution of our TPF system was 6 mum, and a line
93 hickness data, with errors comparable to the axial resolution of the SD-OCT instrument.
94             The calibrated imaging depth and axial resolution of the system were 3.1 mm and 2.8 mum (
95 brane, thereby distorting the otherwise high axial resolution of the technique.
96                                          The axial resolution of this technology is determined by the
97                                          The axial resolution of three-dimensional structured illumin
98 With the current array design, we achieve an axial resolution of ~ 2 mm at clinically-relevant depths
99                    We show that thanks to an axial resolution of ~100 nm, z-STED can be used to disti
100 peed of ~20 s per volume, with a lateral and axial resolution of ~350 nm and ~1.1 um, respectively.
101  microscopy (~300 nm), achieving lateral and axial resolutions of 108.5 and 140.1 nm, respectively.
102  of soft biological samples, preserving high axial resolution on cells.
103 n patterns can be tuned to prioritize either axial resolution or optical sectioning.
104               We achieve unprecedented 50-nm axial resolution over a range of 800 nm above the covers
105 xperimental characterisation of phonon-based axial resolution provided by the response to a sharp edg
106 al resolution remained under 2.0 mm, and the axial resolution remained under 2.5-mm FWHM within the c
107                      However, its much lower axial resolution results in blurred fine details in that
108 asured lateral resolution 0.5-1.0 microm and axial resolution (section thickness) 3-5 microm at near-
109 optics, this microscope achieves lateral and axial resolutions that are comparable to the square illu
110 ss the section surface, thereby limiting the axial resolution to the typical size of cellular vesicle
111 te the topography of cells with a nanometric axial resolution, typically 10-20 nm.
112 A transcripts, and protein factors with 5 nm axial resolution using isotope-enrichments and label-fre
113  (5.2-mm radial, 3.1-mm tangential), and the axial resolution was 3.5 mm (4.0 mm).
114 idth at half maximum) at the center, and the axial resolution was 5.7 mm.
115                                     The best axial resolution was demonstrated to be better than 10 n
116       A Fourier-domain OCT system with 5-mum axial resolution was used.
117 ,000-Hz Fourier-domain OCT system with 5-mum axial resolution was used.
118                     The estimated radial and axial resolutions were 3.7 +/- 1.8 mm and 3.9 +/- 0.4 mm
119                                   Radial and axial resolutions were measured from lifetime profiles a
120 btained <10-nm lateral resolution and <20-nm axial resolution when imaging biological specimens.
121  exists a remarkable gap between lateral and axial resolution, which is by a factor of 2 to 3 worse.
122 simple back-reflecting mirror to enhance the axial resolution without additional phase control or com
123 e distribution along the magnetic field, the axial resolution worsens and shine-through artifacts may

 
Page Top