コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 receiving infliximab,and 1 patient receiving azathioprine).
2 i.e. rituximab, belimumab, mycophenolate and azathioprine).
3 ent (116 to mycophenolate mofetil and 111 to azathioprine).
4 of a subsequent NMOSD relapse compared with azathioprine.
5 , especially in those who are not commencing azathioprine.
6 mission at month 28 with rituximab than with azathioprine.
7 gs were mycophenolate mofetil, sirolimus, or azathioprine.
8 es within 2 weeks of starting treatment with azathioprine.
9 ond-line treatments such as methotrexate and azathioprine.
10 travenous cyclophosphamide and equivalent to azathioprine.
11 ethnicity, thrombocytopenia, and the use of azathioprine.
12 his effect can be negated by the addition of azathioprine.
13 its safety and tolerability in comparison to azathioprine.
14 hen compared with those receiving placebo or azathioprine.
15 ed corticosteroids, oral corticosteroids and azathioprine.
16 tocilizumab and 59 were randomly assigned to azathioprine.
17 d lastly to both weekly adalimumab and daily azathioprine.
18 ne (6-TP) prodrugs include 6-thioguanine and azathioprine.
19 th heterozygous range TPMT activity received azathioprine 1.0 mg/kg daily, compared with 2.5 mg/kg da
21 e-only group required immunosuppression with azathioprine (17% vs. 48%, P<0.001) or were hospitalized
22 nd 14 plus daily oral placebo capsules; oral azathioprine 2.5 mg/kg daily plus placebo infusions on t
23 mycophenolate mofetil (2 g per day) and oral azathioprine (2 mg per kilogram of body weight per day),
24 ral combination of danazol (10-15 mg/kg) and azathioprine (2 mg/kg) was given to 18 of the 35 patient
25 tocilizumab (8 mg/kg every 4 weeks) or oral azathioprine (2-3 mg/kg per day) by an independent stati
26 ients were randomly assigned to groups given azathioprine (2.5 mg . kg(-1) . day(-1), n = 68) or plac
27 ers were randomly assigned to treatment with azathioprine (2.5 mg kg(-1) day(-1), n = 65) or conventi
28 Cyclosporine (66.4%), methotrexate (47.3%), azathioprine (30.9%), and anti-TNFs (30.9%) were the mos
29 lavulanate (21 of 96; 22%), diclofenac (6%), azathioprine (4%), infliximab (4%), and nitrofurantoin (
30 in the first 90 days following initiation of azathioprine, 40 acute pancreatitis events occurred (inc
31 weeks of treatment, 30 patients treated with azathioprine (44.1%) and 23 given placebo (36.5%) were i
32 limited ANCA-associated vasculitis) received azathioprine (58 patients) or rituximab (57 patients).
34 5 and on CIST (steroids and/or cyclosporine, azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, FK-506, methotrexate) we
35 corticosteroids (OR, 3.4; 95% CI, 1.8-6.2), azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (OR, 3.1; 95% CI, 1.7-5.5)
37 e metabolism of their respective substrates, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, 5-fluorouracil and sulind
38 and all prescriptions for 5-aminosalicylates azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, and corticosteroids were
39 lled trials (N = 39) comparing methotrexate, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, infliximab, adalimumab, c
41 xposed or not exposed to 5-aminosalicylates, azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine, or corticosteroids during
43 d infliximab + azathioprine were superior to azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine: adalimumab (OR, 2.9; 95%
44 000; 95% CI, 4-24), 1 of 133 patients taking azathioprine (752 of 100,000; 95% CI, 205-1914), 1 of 14
45 s predicted to be therapeutic for IF/TA were azathioprine, a drug to prevent acute rejection in renal
48 of infliximab and azathioprine (infliximab + azathioprine), adalimumab, and vedolizumab were superior
50 r a Sweetlike presentation in the setting of azathioprine administration is azathioprine hypersensiti
58 inhibitor and statin, 378 (9.2%) were taking azathioprine and an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibi
60 t with immunosuppressants such as rituximab, azathioprine and cyclophosphamide resulted in a marked r
62 ies have shown an association between use of azathioprine and increased risk of acute pancreatitis in
64 t risk of hepatotoxicity was associated with azathioprine and infliximab, but the actual number of ca
66 (Evaluating the Effectiveness of Prednisone, Azathioprine and N-Acetylcysteine in Patients with IPF)
71 receive a three-drug regimen of prednisone, azathioprine, and acetylcysteine; acetylcysteine alone;
72 given triple immunosuppression (tacrolimus, azathioprine, and corticosteroids), which was continued
75 evidence favors the use of corticosteroids, azathioprine, and mycophenolate mofetil in ocular myasth
77 fibrosis in a clinical trial of prednisone, azathioprine, and N-acetylcysteine underwent HRCT at stu
78 ps -- receiving a combination of prednisone, azathioprine, and NAC (combination therapy), NAC alone,
80 steroids, vitamin D analogues, fluorouracil, azathioprine, and oral prednisolone with improved outcom
83 one noting no increased risk of cancer with azathioprine, another suggesting that anti-tumor necrosi
85 overlap syndromes, whereas mycophenolate and azathioprine are also used for both skin and lung diseas
86 6-thioguanine ((S)G), 6-mercaptopurine, and azathioprine are effective anticancer agents with remark
87 k meta-analysis, adalimumab and infliximab + azathioprine are the most effective therapies for induct
88 ugs (i.e., thioguanine [TG], mercaptopurine, azathioprine) are commonly used for the treatment of can
90 6-thioguanine ((S)G), 6-mercaptopurine, and azathioprine, are widely employed anticancer agents and
91 ercaptopurine (MP), 6-thioguanine ((S)G) and azathioprine, are widely used for the treatment of many
93 e aimed to assess the safety and efficacy of azathioprine as systemic monotherapy for moderate-to-sev
96 is associated with less acute rejection than azathioprine (AZA) early after kidney transplantation.
97 ferior to cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA) for remission-induction in severe ANC
98 s against acute rejection when compared with azathioprine (AZA) in heart and renal transplantation.
101 mmatory bowel disease (IBD), who have failed azathioprine (AZA) or mercaptopurine (MP) due to adverse
102 blood and tissue from CD patients receiving azathioprine (AZA) therapy, and posttreatment Vdelta2 T
103 nous (IV) cyclophosphamide (CYC) followed by azathioprine (AZA) treatment in pulmonary fibrosis in SS
104 ndomized, and controlled trial comparing CsA/azathioprine (Aza) versus Tac/MMF in 289 kidney transpla
105 rial evidence was identified for apremilast, azathioprine (AZA), baricitinib, ciclosporin A (CSA), co
106 proach includes the use of immunomodulators [azathioprine (AZA), or 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP)] and newe
112 Unlicensed treatments include methotrexate, azathioprine, ciclosporin, and subcutaneous terbutaline
113 t) improvement in mean disease activity with azathioprine compared with a 20% (6.6 unit) improvement
114 (49 of 78) of patients receiving infliximab/azathioprine, compared with 54.6% (42 of 77) receiving i
115 (31 of 78) of patients receiving infliximab/azathioprine,compared with 22.1% (17 of 77) receiving in
117 xic immunosuppressive agents other than MTX (azathioprine, cyclosporine, and leflunomide) were also a
119 rst 4 weeks, all participants received lower azathioprine doses (0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg daily, respectivel
120 caps compiled prospective data files on the azathioprine dosing patterns of 180 adult renal transpla
121 allow clarification of the relation between azathioprine effectiveness and metabolite profiles in ot
124 oliferative therapy use at our center (early azathioprine era: 1990-2000 vs modern mycophenolate era:
125 ersely, nonbiologic combination therapy with azathioprine exhibited the highest DR owing to ADRs.
126 icantly increased risk of SCC in relation to azathioprine exposure (1.56, 95% confidence interval [CI
130 olled trials using mycophenolate mofetil and azathioprine for maintenance therapy have been performed
132 ly results suggest that MMF is equivalent to azathioprine for remission maintenance, although large r
133 nce--via oral delivery of cyclosporine A and azathioprine for two months at the time of initiation of
134 tudy found great success in transitioning to azathioprine from mycophenolate mofetil prior to pregnan
135 dverse events occurred in 14 patients in the azathioprine group (20.6%) and 7 in the placebo group (1
136 r relapse had occurred in 17 patients in the azathioprine group (29%) and in 3 patients in the rituxi
137 til group (42/76 patients) compared with the azathioprine group (30/80 patients), with an unadjusted
138 lso longer in the tocilizumab group than the azathioprine group (67.2 weeks [IQR 47.9-77.9] vs 38.0 [
139 was longer in the tocilizumab group than the azathioprine group (78.9 weeks [IQR 58.3-90.6] vs 56.7 [
140 tocilizumab group had a relapse than in the azathioprine group (five [20%] of 25 patients vs 15 [68%
144 events occurred in 33.3% of patients in the azathioprine group and in 23.5% of those in the mycophen
145 e adverse events in 13 patients (16%) in the azathioprine group and there were 8 severe adverse event
146 compared with 29 (56%) of 52 patients in the azathioprine group at the end of the study (HR 0.188 [95
148 mab group and 28 (47%) of 59 patients in the azathioprine group had a relapse at the end of the study
151 mab group and 13 (35%) of 37 patients in the azathioprine group had relapsed by the end of the study.
152 core >220, showed lower relapse rates in the azathioprine group than in the placebo group (11.8% vs 3
153 her cumulative proportion of patients in the azathioprine group were free of perianal surgery than in
154 3-year follow-up period, 16 patients in the azathioprine group were switched to mercaptopurine or me
157 in the tocilizumab group and one (2%) in the azathioprine group, but neither of the deaths were treat
158 53% of the patients in the cyclophosphamide-azathioprine group, had a complete remission by 6 months
163 ated with antimetabolites (mycophenolate and azathioprine) have a lower risk of PTLD than those witho
170 In addition, MMF was shown to be superior to azathioprine in decreasing the incidence of treatment fa
172 e the safety and efficacy of tocilizumab and azathioprine in patients with highly relapsing NMOSD.
173 uppression with cyclophosphamide followed by azathioprine in patients with severe (organ-threatening)
174 eterozygous range TPMT activity responded to azathioprine in similar proportions to other participant
175 ls has implications for the long-term use of azathioprine in the management of inflammatory disorders
177 oliferative agents (such as mycophenolate or azathioprine) in preventing deterioration after steroid
179 tivity syndrome and review the literature on azathioprine-induced eruptions with features of Sweet sy
180 se (TPMT) polymorphism (a key determinant of azathioprine-induced myelotoxicity) by using TPMT enzyme
181 nfliximab, the combination of infliximab and azathioprine (infliximab + azathioprine), adalimumab, an
182 ment of cultured pancreatic tumor cells with azathioprine inhibited Vav1-dependent invasive cell migr
190 th African American ethnicity and the use of azathioprine; it appears to exert an impact on damage bu
191 The antimetabolites, such as methotrexate, azathioprine, leflunomide, and mycophenolate, are often
192 higher in recipients prescribed cyclosporine/azathioprine maintenance therapy (aIRR 1.79, 95% CI 1.09
193 r time after transplantation but higher with azathioprine maintenance therapy (IRR=1.35, 95% CI 1.03-
194 let radiation exposure, and cyclosporine and azathioprine may contribute as photosensitizing or DNA d
196 ks of treatment with infliximab monotherapy, azathioprine monotherapy, or the 2 drugs combined in tum
198 include the chemotherapies cyclophosphamide, azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate.
199 round treatment was evenly distributed among azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, and methotrexate.
200 and selenium) and immunosuppression regimes (azathioprine, mycophenolate mofetil, calcineurin inhibit
201 h NMO and NMO spectrum disorder treated with azathioprine, mycophenolate, and/or rituximab at the May
203 A total of 156 patients were assigned to azathioprine (n = 80) or mycophenolate mofetil (n = 76)
204 te optimum topical therapy to treatment with azathioprine (n=42) or placebo (n=21) for 12 weeks.
206 day(-1), n = 65) or conventional management (azathioprine only in cases of corticosteroid dependency,
208 g the immunosuppressant and anticancer drugs azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine contains 6-thioguanine
209 ived 50% of the standard dose of thiopurine (azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine), and patients homozygo
210 nticancer and immunosuppressant thiopurines, azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine, is associated with acu
212 patients receive maintenance treatment with azathioprine or methotrexate, the relapse rate remains h
215 aim was to determine whether rituximab with azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil improves the high-
216 nce immunosuppression included cyclosporine, azathioprine or mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone.
220 for patients receiving weekly adalimumab and azathioprine or weekly adalimumab alone if failure crite
222 ab (OR, 1.6; 95% CrI, 1.0-2.5), infliximab + azathioprine (OR, 3.0; 95% CrI, 1.7-5.5) for maintenance
223 i-tumor necrosis factor agents, infliximab + azathioprine (OR, 3.1; 95% CrI, 1.4-7.7) and adalimumab
226 aced by oral prednisolone with cyclosporine, azathioprine, or mycophenolate as steroid-sparing agents
229 n of chronic GVHD therapy (P < .001); use of azathioprine, particularly when combined with cyclospori
230 ce therapy included mycophenolate mofetil or azathioprine plus glucocorticoids in combination with Gr
233 drug immunosuppressive regimen (cyclosporine+azathioprine+prednisone) affects the islet engraftment p
234 lacement was first accomplished in 1967 with azathioprine, prednisone, and antilymphoid globulin.
235 interval: 1.15, 1.74), whereas former use of azathioprine (rate ratio = 1.02, 95% confidence interval
236 Due to the potential for anaphylaxis with azathioprine rechallenge, a better term for a Sweetlike
238 tarium, replacing the antimetabolite prodrug azathioprine, reports have associated certain forms of w
241 ignificant heterogeneity between studies for azathioprine risk estimates and the outcomes of SCC, BCC
243 mab, mycophenolate, and, to a lesser degree, azathioprine significantly reduces relapse rates in NMO
245 ditioning cytoreduction with hydroxyurea and azathioprine starting at -45 days pretransplant, and flu
248 ted with 6-thioguanine (6-TG, a DNA-embedded azathioprine surrogate), the fluoroquinolones ciprofloxa
249 ors before retransplantation, treatment with azathioprine, T cell-depleting antibodies, and delayed r
250 drawal due to adverse events was higher with azathioprine than with mycophenolate mofetil (39.6% vs.
252 h severe chronic GVHD were also treated with azathioprine, the independent effects of these factors c
253 rative efficacy and safety of infliximab and azathioprine therapy alone or in combination for ulcerat
255 an with colonic Crohn disease on maintenance azathioprine therapy presented with right upper quadrant
256 study of adults with Crohn's disease, early azathioprine therapy was no more effective than placebo
258 Upon treatment with the immunosuppressant azathioprine there was significant resolution of the les
264 dial effusion occurred with sirolimus versus azathioprine treatment in a cardiac transplantation tria
278 that prolonged immunosuppressive therapy and azathioprine use were also significant risk factors for
279 Disease duration, lymphocyte count, and azathioprine use were shown to be significant independen
281 tment (within 6 months after diagnosis) with azathioprine versus conventional management of patients
282 ermore, nonbiologic combination therapy with azathioprine was associated with a higher DR owing to AD
285 in survival outcome occurred (Theme IV) when azathioprine was replaced by cyclosporine (1979), which
290 lts, a European trial concluded that MMF and azathioprine were equivalent in the ability to prevent r
291 te to severe UC treated with infliximab plus azathioprine were more likely to achieve corticosteroid-
292 Adalimumab, infliximab, and infliximab + azathioprine were superior to azathioprine/6-mercaptopur
294 Some localized melanomas may result from azathioprine, which acts synergistically with UV radiati
295 olitis responded well to corticosteroids and azathioprine, which is supportive of their immune pathog
299 lts from a clinical trial, administration of azathioprine within 6 months of diagnosis of CD was no m
300 ed after immunosuppression with steroids and azathioprine without administration of calcineurin inhib