ライフサイエンスコーパス: bacterial adherence

1 binding domains are required for full-level bacterial adherence.

2 en antibody raised to each protein inhibited bacterial adherence.

3 pifluorescence assay of chloride efflux, and bacterial adherence.

4 roscopy (scanning EM) was used to quantitate bacterial adherence.

5 (IgA), the main immune mechanism preventing bacterial adherence.

6 g such infection, likely by interfering with bacterial adherence.

7 ivalis but had no influences on F. nucleatum bacterial adherence.

8 g, and secretion of ECM proteins to increase bacterial adherence.

9 exposure of the polysaccharide receptor for bacterial adherence.

10 serum increased significantly ULVWF-mediated bacterial adherence.

11 st evidence of a novel mechanism to regulate bacterial adherence.

12 lC2 is necessary for K. kingae piliation and bacterial adherence.

13 ates and sterilizes the crypt, thus reducing bacterial adherence.

14 abrogate LT's ability to promote subsequent bacterial adherence.

15 s directed against either SpaB or SpaC block bacterial adherence.

16 nd in the cell-attached form participates in bacterial adherence.

17 ree energy of the metal probes, facilitating bacterial adherence.

18 ty of sera from immunized animals to inhibit bacterial adherence.

19 , which acts to bind fibronectin and promote bacterial adherence.

20 n results in antibody-mediated inhibition of bacterial adherence, a critical early event in the patho

21 R phosphorylation by AG1478 had no effect on bacterial adherence, actin recruitment to sites of attac

22 letion of aggR or aggA significantly reduced bacterial adherence and (independently) translocation of

23 d a collective/cooperative increase in their bacterial adherence and aggregation.

24 establish CAUTIs, specifically to facilitate bacterial adherence and biofilm formation on the implant

25 ariety of cell surface factors which mediate bacterial adherence and colonization at the intestinal e

26 en implicated as an important determinant of bacterial adherence and colonization of the urinary trac

27 (Microfluidic system for Rapid Evaluation of bacterial Adherence and Communication in Trans-kingdom i

28 infection and in vitro cell culture model of bacterial adherence and defense gene and signaling pathw

29 f the beta-amino HMOs significantly inhibits bacterial adherence and eliminates the ability of both m

30 rabbit tracheal explant cultures and assayed bacterial adherence and host cell Ca(2+) signaling.

31 the important functions of the CBP family to bacterial adherence and identify a pneumococcal vaccine

32 d immunity, to explore the trade-off between bacterial adherence and immune evasion.

33 l surface virulence factors involved in both bacterial adherence and inflammation.

34 Abnormal bacterial adherence and internalization in enterocytes h

35 pstS loss significantly decreased bacterial adherence and invasion into A549 cells and inc

36 The hpIgR-mediated bacterial adherence and invasion were abolished by eithe

37 ggesting a novel mechanism for regulation of bacterial adherence and microcolony formation.

38 to rabbits, produced antibodies that reduced bacterial adherence and neutralized the cell-killing act

39 ding proteins (Gbp) that play major roles in bacterial adherence and pathogenesis.

40 of Escherichia coli K12 (E. coli), promoting bacterial adherence and phagocytosis.

41 ptor for Escherichia coli K-12 that promotes bacterial adherence and phagocytosis.

42 hypothesis that keratinocyte injury promotes bacterial adherence and the development of group A strep

43 he overexpression of ANR drastically reduces bacterial adherence and the formation of AE lesions in t

44 ich are produced after skin injury, modulate bacterial adherence and the initiation of group A strept

45 his interaction significantly contributes to bacterial adherence and thus may play a significant role

46 ne designed to generate antibodies to reduce bacterial adherence and to neutralize the cytotoxic acti

47 viral surface-exposed proteins that enhance bacterial adherence and/or invasion.

48 cterium have been suggested to play roles in bacterial adherence, and also in inflammation, by trigge

49 anslocation, that intestinal mucus modulates bacterial adherence, and that increased levels of mucosa

50 Bacterial virulence gene expression, bacterial adherence, and transepithelial electrical resi

51 Bacterial adherence assay was performed on in vivo corne

52 , we examined their binding specificities in bacterial adherence assays by using porcine brush border

53 es of S. epidermidis associated with initial bacterial adherence, biofilm formation, and intercellula

54 ype 1 pilus adhesin, FimH, mediates not only bacterial adherence, but also invasion of human bladder

55 esion interference and the susceptibility of bacterial adherence by these plasma preparations were al

56 neumoniae has been implicated as a factor in bacterial adherence, colonization, and invasion in the p

57 neumoniae has been implicated as a factor in bacterial adherence, colonization, and invasion in the p

58 the ability of elicited serum Abs to inhibit bacterial adherence compared with immunization with the

59 We conclude that Iha is a novel bacterial adherence-conferring protein and is contained

60 showed that this toxin-mediated increase in bacterial adherence correlated with an Stx-evoked increa

61 ory effects of CsrRS and environmental pH on bacterial adherence correlated with their effects on the

62 ated that glycan:glycan interaction-mediated bacterial adherence could be competitively inhibited by

63 BALB/c mice that were better able to inhibit bacterial adherence demonstrated an increase in Abs able

64 Proteins important in bacterial adherence deserve consideration as potential v

65 containing fibronectin, which is involved in bacterial adherence, from basolateral to the apical memb

66 milks on intestinal barrier function repair, bacterial adherence in Caco-2 and HEp-2 cells, intestina

67 Bacterial adherence in cellulose-binding assays was sign

68 ned beta1 integrin clustered at locations of bacterial adherence in porcine and bovine tissue.

69 d agar contact assays, thus better mimicking bacterial adherence in the oral cavity.

70 ased the susceptibility of murine corneas to bacterial adherence in vivo.

71 proteins, but hyaluronic acid could increase bacterial adherence independently of M proteins.

72 h the time course of S. aureus invasion, and bacterial adherence induced the MAPK pathway.

73 mine whether stress and/or diet influence(s) bacterial adherence-induced changes in epithelial permea

74 gate the potential relations between mucosal bacterial adherence, intestinal mucus and mucin content,

75 disease, the absolute level of inhibition of bacterial adherence is insufficient to reduce the bacter

76 noclonal human IgA1 substrate and to enhance bacterial adherence, linking localization to enzyme func

77 To explore the relations between intestinal bacterial adherence, mucus bacterial binding, and bacter

78 There was no convincing evidence that bacterial adherence on the cornea was increased in Muc1

79 rnalization was associated with preferential bacterial adherence on the exposed enterocyte lateral su

80 rnalization was associated with preferential bacterial adherence on the exposed lateral surface of en

81 The variation in bacterial adherence only partially accounted for these d

82 l vaccine would induce antibodies to prevent bacterial adherence, promote opsonophagocytic killing by

83 ndings suggest that nucleolin is involved in bacterial adherence promoted by all intimin types and th

84 novo purine biosynthesis but did not impact bacterial adherence properties in vitro or in the bladde

85 These interactions affect bacterial adherence, resistance to serum killing and pha

86 g-Gly-Asp peptide, to TPBM culture inhibited bacterial adherence similarly to the inhibition previous

87 -8 and MCP-1 production was not dependent on bacterial adherence since similar results were obtained

88 he probes used in this study likely promoted bacterial adherence through two different mechanisms: th

89 y, we observed that PH mediated an increased bacterial adherence to alveolar epithelial cells in the

90 ) in Y. pestis KIM is required for efficient bacterial adherence to and internalization by cultured H

91 is a matricellular glycoprotein facilitating bacterial adherence to and invasion into eukaryotic cell

92 specifically block type 1 fimbriae-mediated bacterial adherence to bladder epithelial cells in situ

93 gen is believed to be important in promoting bacterial adherence to both intravascular catheters and

94 e for IRF-1 activation, which is enhanced by bacterial adherence to cells.

95 -mediated viral co-infection correlated with bacterial adherence to cells.

96 ding proteins, other than FnBPs, can mediate bacterial adherence to cells.

97 portant role in bacteriophage attachment and bacterial adherence to certain host cells, suggesting th

98 adhesin in HCG is called Cha, which mediates bacterial adherence to cultured human epithelial cells.

99 , including adhesive force that results from bacterial adherence to epithelial cells and fluid shear

100 FHA mediates bacterial adherence to epithelial cells and macrophages

101 ustering of the DAF receptor at the sites of bacterial adherence to epithelial cells is proposed as a

102 cosphingolipid asialo-GM1 (aGM1) can mediate bacterial adherence to epithelial cells, but the steps s

103 and 3) to analyze the effect of HNP-1 on the bacterial adherence to epithelial cells.

104 Bacterial adherence to extracellular matrix proteins (EC

105 nant N23 effectively inhibited ClfB-mediated bacterial adherence to fibrinogen, and N123 caused some

106 specific attachment to fibronectin, blocked bacterial adherence to fibronectin-coated slides, and su

107 cal in meningococcal pathogenesis, mediating bacterial adherence to host cells, and modulating human

108 vidence that these ligands indeed do promote bacterial adherence to host cells, and with new insights

109 YadA deletion decreased bacterial adherence to host cells, whereas invasin delet

110 ) have been reported to significantly reduce bacterial adherence to host cells.

111 rmeability and acid sensitivity, and reduced bacterial adherence to host cells.

112 glycoprotein fibronectin, which facilitates bacterial adherence to host cells.

113 urface-exposed PepO-C1q interaction mediates bacterial adherence to host epithelial cells.

114 slational modification important for initial bacterial adherence to host epithelial cells.

115 Bacterial adherence to host tissue involves specific mic

116 that these proteinaceous fibers are used for bacterial adherence to host tissues and for the establis

117 nt increase in the inflammatory response and bacterial adherence to human ciliated epithelial culture

118 of the serum from immunized mice to inhibit bacterial adherence to human salivary agglutinin by a BI

119 s of these genes in surface properties using Bacterial Adherence to Hydrocarbons assays, negative sta

120 lar metabolic processes, this toxin promotes bacterial adherence to intestinal epithelial cells.

121 Bacterial adherence to intravenous catheters may be medi

122 patients and those with retinal detachments, bacterial adherence to lenses, prophylactic measures, an

123 ling activity of neutrophils, and preventing bacterial adherence to lung epithelial cells.

124 loss-of-function mutations in pilU increased bacterial adherence to ME-180 human epithelial cells eig

125 ised to purified rabbit SI complex inhibited bacterial adherence to microvilli.

126 LXA4 stable analogs did not alter bacterial adherence to nor internalization by epithelia,

127 The disruption of hfq did not affect bacterial adherence to or invasion of host cells but did

128 However, loss of Scl-1 did not alter bacterial adherence to or invasion of skin keratinocytes

129 The SpaA pili are known to mediate bacterial adherence to pharyngeal epithelial cells.

130 P4-mediated bacterial adherence to pharynx, type II alveolar, and br

131 In vitro, bacterial adherence to platelets, fibrin matrices, or fi

132 Paramyxoviruses augmented bacterial adherence to primary bronchial epithelial cell

133 We found that Hap promotes bacterial adherence to purified fibronectin, laminin, an

134 After bacterial adherence to receptors on the mammalian cell m

135 d by the removal of unbound virus, increased bacterial adherence to respiratory epithelial cells in c

136 sted their effect in a colonization model of bacterial adherence to respiratory epithelial cells in c

137 asopharynx, a process that likely depends on bacterial adherence to respiratory epithelial cells.

138 dhesins are homologous proteins that promote bacterial adherence to respiratory epithelium and are th

139 athogenesis of K. kingae disease begins with bacterial adherence to respiratory epithelium, which is

140 In contrast, SP-A and SP-D effects on bacterial adherence to SAEC differed between the two str

141 may be indispensable in establishing stable bacterial adherence to saliva-coated surfaces in the ora

142 It is possible that bacterial adherence to salivary pellicle occurs as a cum

143 ificant difference in the ability to inhibit bacterial adherence to salivary-agglutinin-coated hydrox

144 -aspartate repeat protein SdrC promotes both bacterial adherence to surfaces and biofilm formation.

145 in O-glycans contribute to the prevention of bacterial adherence to the apical surface of corneal epi

146 tributed, at least in part, to inhibition of bacterial adherence to the bladder surface by s-FimH1-25

147 SP-A can provide innate immunity by blocking bacterial adherence to the ciliated epithelium.

148 related to pathogenetic events subsequent to bacterial adherence to the damaged endocardium.

149 eraction increases avidity, thus stabilizing bacterial adherence to the epithelial surface, despite p

150 een the duration of protein malnutrition and bacterial adherence to the intestinal mucosa (r = 0.62,

151 equently, studies focusing on the biology of bacterial adherence to the intestinal mucosa likely are

152 function are characterized by depressed IgA, bacterial adherence to the intestinal mucosa, and permea

153 on was evaluated by measuring secretory IgA, bacterial adherence to the intestinal mucosa, and transe

154 Disrupting bacterial adherence to the intestinal surface could pote

155 ignificantly impairs secretory IgA, promotes bacterial adherence to the mucosa, and results in increa

156 Evidence documents the involvement of bacterial adherence to the plasma membrane of the endoth

157 meric autotransporter subfamily and mediates bacterial adherence to the respiratory epithelium.

158 eading frame (ORF) in GBS strain 515 reduced bacterial adherence to VK2 vaginal epithelial cells in v

159 HL-60 cells were compared for differences in bacterial adherence, type III secretion induction, and E

160 of complement, specific IgA induced minimal bacterial adherence, uptake, and killing.

161 Bacterial adherence was also reduced.

162 Finally, increased bacterial adherence was observed when apical secretion o

163 Bacterial adherence was restored by incubation of postex

164 aken together, PepO facilitates C1q-mediated bacterial adherence, whereas its localized release consu

165 le acid responsiveness enables tight mucosal bacterial adherence while also allowing an effective esc

166 of phospholipase D was necessary to increase bacterial adherence, while the absence of a functional a