戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 zed hearing acuity, rivaling that of today's barn owl.
2 ral and/or adaptation related changes in the barn owl.
3  This is consistent with observations in the barn owl.
4  of an ITD map in the laminar nucleus of the barn owl.
5  that map high best frequencies in the adult barn owl.
6  the auditory nuclei of the brainstem of the barn owl.
7 of auditory space in the optic tectum of the barn owl.
8  the process of auditory localization in the barn owl.
9 separately, together and in combination with barn owls.
10 t-based saliency in the optic tectum (OT) of barn owls.
11  system that underlies sound localization in barn owls.
12 T, superior colliculus in mammals), in awake barn owls.
13 ditory neurons responses recorded in vivo in barn owls.
14  issue was studied in the auditory system of barn owls.
15 idence detectors in the nucleus laminaris of barn owls.
16 inferior colliculus of adult male and female barn owls.
17 grated in the study of sound localization in barn owls.
18 bnormal experience in adult than in juvenile barn owls.
19 idbrain auditory localization pathway of the barn owl, a map of auditory space is relayed from the ex
20                                          The barn owl, a sound localization specialist, exhibits a ci
21                                       In the barn owl, an auditory specialist relying on sound locali
22 l appears to be realized in the brain of the barn owl, an auditory specialist, and has been assumed t
23                               Studies in the barn owl, an auditory specialist, have shown that spatia
24                                          The barn owl, an auditory specialist, is a classic model for
25 llels between the attentional systems of the barn owl and the rhesus macaque.
26                                      In both barn owls and chickens, Kv3.1 mRNA was expressed in the
27  of a sound source, may be very different to barn owls and to the model proposed by Jeffress.
28 nsisting exclusively of owls: the Tytonidae (barn owls) and the Strigidae (true owls), united by a su
29 ry and visual maps of space in the OT of the barn owl, and they lead to a number of experimental pred
30                                              Barn owls are capable of great accuracy in detecting the
31                                         When barn owls are raised wearing spectacles that horizontall
32                            We found that, in barn owls, at each location there is a frequency range w
33 firmed these predictions using EFPs from the barn owl auditory brainstem where we recorded in nucleus
34 pproaches in the mammalian neocortex and the barn owl auditory localization pathway provide some of t
35     Here, we exploit a unique feature of the barn owl auditory localization pathway that permits retr
36                                       In the barn owl, both ITD detection and processing in the midbr
37 in the midbrain spatial selection network in barn owls, but also that it is necessary for categorical
38 n of the biomimetic device can supersede the barn owl by orders of magnitude.
39 llularis (Ipc) from the optic tectum (OT) in barn owls by reversibly blocking excitatory transmission
40 he findings give rise to the hypothesis that barn owls, by active scanning of the scene, can induce a
41                                              Barn owls can localize a sound source using either the m
42 s, while auditory specialized birds like the barn owl compute sound sources more precisely and integr
43                      The optic tectum of the barn owl contains a map of auditory space.
44 al nucleus of the inferior colliculus in the barn owl contains an auditory map of space that is based
45                     The optic tectum (OT) of barn owls contains topographic maps of auditory and visu
46 ntified sensitive periods for the developing barn owl during which visual experience has a powerful i
47                                           In barn owls, early experience markedly influences sound lo
48                                              Barn owls enable investigation of neural mechanisms unde
49 he large size and physical separation of the barn owl first-order cochlear nucleus magnocellularis (N
50  of the auditory localization pathway of the barn owl has shed new light on this important question.
51                  Here, we investigate in the barn owl how classical as well as extraclassical (global
52                                              Barn owls hunt in the dark by using cues from both sight
53 ere we demonstrate that the brainstem of the barn owl includes a stage of processing apparently devot
54 atural and critically important behavior for barn owls, increases auditory map plasticity in adult ow
55                        Behavioral studies in barn owls indicate that both the optic tectum (OT) and t
56                                       In the barn owl, interaural time difference (ITD) serves as a p
57 leus of the inferior colliculus (ICX) of the barn owl is calibrated by visual experience during devel
58  nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICX) of barn owls is highly plastic, especially during early lif
59 ITD.Significance Statement The early life of barn owls is marked by increasing sensitivity to sound,
60 putational map inside the auditory cortex of barn owl known for its exceptional hunting ability in co
61  the midbrain map in the optic tectum of the barn owl matches these predictions using in vivo multiel
62                                          The barn owl midbrain contains mutually aligned maps of audi
63 vation of a single inhibitory circuit in the barn owl midbrain tegmentum, the nucleus isthmi pars mag
64 tual acuity in the auditory space map in the barn owl midbrain.
65 vents that lead to the reorganization of the barn owl NL take place during embryonic development, sho
66  NM axons and terminals in the region of the barn owl NL.
67 noreactivity along the tonotopic axis of the barn owl NM and NL and a less prominent gradient in the
68                                              Barn owls not only localize auditory stimuli with great
69 ope coding in the two cochlear nuclei of the barn owl, nucleus angularis (NA) and nucleus magnocellul
70  noise) and record neural responses of awake barn owls of both sexes in subsequent midbrain space map
71  competitive interactions within the Imc, in barn owls of both sexes.
72 mic target, nucleus rotundus (nRt), in awake barn owls of both sexes.
73 calibration of the auditory space map in the barn owl optic tectum.
74 omplemented by simulations of aspects of the barn owl phenotype and of the experimental environment.
75                                              Barn owls reared with horizontally displacing prismatic
76 th GPS tags and accelerometers, we show that barn owls reduce their landing force as they approach th
77 o gaze control circuitry in the forebrain of barn owls regulates the gain of midbrain auditory respon
78 his process in the auditory space map of the barn owl's (Tyto alba) inferior colliculus using two spa
79 ure tone and noise stimuli in neurons of the barn owl's auditory arcopallium, a nucleus at the endpoi
80                               Neurons of the barn owl's external nucleus of the inferior colliculus (
81                                          The barn owl's head grows after hatching, causing interaural
82                                    Since the barn owl's head width more than doubles in the month aft
83                Space-specific neurons in the barn owl's inferior colliculus have spatial receptive fi
84 lays to explain the detection of ITDs by the barn owl's laminaris neurons.
85                                          The barn owl's midbrain features a map of auditory space whe
86                                          The barn owl's optic tectum contains a map of auditory space
87 he auditory spatial tuning of neurons in the barn owl's optic tectum in a frequency-dependent manner.
88 e that neurons in the retinotopic map of the barn owl's optic tectum specifically adapt to the common
89                   In this study, we used the barn owl's sound localization system to address this que
90  results demonstrate that the white color of barn owls serves as camouflage tailored to the moonlit s
91 al inference in sound-localizing behavior of barn owls.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT While the tuning of sin
92                                       In the barn owl, spatial auditory information is conveyed to th
93 s and auditory nerve fiber responses for the barn owl strengthens the notion that most OAE delay can
94 y responses by gaze control circuitry in the barn owl suggests that the central nervous system uses a
95  Here, we demonstrate that OT neurons in the barn owl systematically encode the relative strengths of
96                                       In the barn owl, tectal neurons reveal these associations in th
97  correlation analysis, we demonstrate in the barn owl that the relationship between the spectral tuni
98 eraural time differences (ITDs), in juvenile barn owls that experience chronic abnormal hearing.
99                                 We tested in barn owls the hypothesis that an ongoing delay, equivale
100                        We found that, in the barn owl, the Ipc responds to auditory as well as to vis
101                                       In the barn owl, the ITD is processed in a dedicated neural pat
102 or responses and a demonstration that in the barn owl, the result is that expected by theory.
103 re ILD is detected in the auditory system of barn owls, the posterior part of the lateral lemniscus (
104                                           In barn owls, the visual system is important in teaching th
105 n of spatial working memory and that, in the barn owl, this region encodes auditory spatial memory.
106                                           In barn owls, this process takes place in the external nucl
107 uronal responses within the space map of the barn owl to sounds presented with this same paradigm.
108             Here we show that the ability of barn owls to orient their gaze towards and fly to the re
109 nd compare these results with those from the barn owl (Tyto alba) and the domestic chick (Gallus gall
110 aps of auditory space in the midbrain of the barn owl (Tyto alba) are calibrated by visual experience
111  receptive fields in the optic tectum of the barn owl (Tyto alba) is maintained through experience-de
112                                          The barn owl (Tyto alba) uses interaural time difference (IT
113   The cochlear nucleus angularis (NA) of the barn owl (Tyto alba) was analyzed using Golgi, Nissl, an
114  concealment through BM of a typically white barn owl (Tyto alba) when hunting rodents, based on its
115                                       In the barn owl (Tyto alba), the external nucleus of the inferi
116 igh-resolution movement data to quantify how barn owls (Tyto alba) conceal their approach when using
117                  The present work shows that barn owls (Tyto alba) experience phase-ambiguity in the
118 dorsal pallial structures from freely flying barn owls (Tyto alba), a central-place nocturnal predato
119 y (SFOAE) otoacoustic emissions from a bird (barn owl, Tyto alba) and a lizard (green anole, Anolis c
120              In the optic tectum (OT) of the barn owl, visual and auditory maps of space are found in
121                    Using gerbils and trained barn owls, we conducted the first (to our knowledge) fie
122            Finally, hunting strike forces in barn owls were the highest recorded in any bird, relativ
123                      Our results show that a barn owl with highly reflecting underparts may approach
124                                Raising young barn owls with a prismatic displacement of the visual fi
125                 We hypothesized that hunting barn owls would modulate their landing force, potentiall

 
Page Top