コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ts along the cochlea, similar to that of the basilar membrane.
2 traveling wave to amplify the motion of the basilar membrane.
3 nd that the stapes vibrates earlier than the basilar membrane.
4 lieved to provide mechanical feedback to the basilar membrane.
5 orce acting between the reticular lamina and basilar membrane.
6 through waves that propagate on the elastic basilar membrane.
7 thus has an equivalent role to the mammalian basilar membrane.
8 amina, but only a slow tuned response of the basilar membrane.
9 ously measured close to the sensory tissue's basilar membrane.
10 increases the sound-evoked vibrations of the basilar membrane.
11 line in motion amplitude occurred across the basilar membrane.
12 ular lamina, to the transverse motion of the basilar membrane.
13 fer of electrical to mechanical power at the basilar membrane.
14 on caused motion of a minimal portion of the basilar membrane.
15 seen when the beam was directed towards the basilar membrane.
16 interferometry to measure vibrations of the basilar membrane.
17 and were enhanced compared with those at the basilar membrane.
18 f sensory and supporting cells riding on the basilar membrane.
19 ng the organ of Corti than in displacing the basilar membrane.
20 nge well below the resonant frequency of the basilar membrane.
21 decouples active hair-bundle forces from the basilar membrane.
22 ar to be related in part to the width of the basilar membrane.
23 rvating different loci on the left and right basilar membranes.
24 rwise damped sound-induced vibrations of the basilar membrane [2-4], a mechanism known as negative da
25 erilymphatic chloride level manipulations of basilar membrane amplification in the living guinea pig.
26 by the passive mechanical properties of the basilar membrane and active feedback from the outer hair
28 ncy ratio, and measured as vibrations at the basilar membrane and at the stapes, and as sound pressur
29 of OHC electrical activity, pressure at the basilar membrane and basilar membrane displacement gave
31 is fully expressed in the vibrations of the basilar membrane and renders unnecessary additional ("se
33 ugh the fluid-tissue interaction between the basilar membrane and the fluid in scala tympani (ST) has
35 hese mice have a low-frequency hearing loss, basilar-membrane and neural tuning are both significantl
36 al coupling between adjacent sections of the basilar membrane, and such coupling may be critical for
37 o Deiters' cells, the sulcus epithelium, the basilar membrane, and the surface of the spiral limbus.
38 partition and active frequency tuning of the basilar membrane are enhanced in the cochleae of CD-1Cx3
39 ratchet: Sound-evoked forces, acting on the basilar membrane, are transmitted to the hair bundles, w
43 to a constant suppressor displacement on the basilar membrane (as in experiments with wild-type anima
44 the extracellular voltage referenced to the basilar membrane at a frequency approximately one-half o
45 isplacements of the reticular lamina and the basilar membrane at the 19 kHz characteristic place in g
46 body vibrations normal to the surface of the basilar membrane (BM) at 0.8 (d(1)), 5.8 (d(2)), 15.6 (d
51 changing the timing of its feedback, altered basilar membrane (BM) responses to tones at all measured
55 served to propagate longitudinally along the basilar membrane (BM) ultimately stimulate the mechano-s
56 h in vivo physiological measurements for the basilar membrane (BM) velocity, V(BM), frequency tuning
58 rimentally tested in this study by measuring basilar membrane (BM) vibrations at the cubic distortion
59 ween internal structures such as hair cells, basilar membrane (BM), and modiolus with external surfac
60 ty, harmonic distortion, and DC shift on the basilar membrane (BM), tectorial membrane (TM), and OHC
61 situated within the organ of Corti atop the basilar membrane (BM), which supports sound-evoked trave
64 comparisons of the magnitudes and phases of basilar-membrane (BM) vibrations and auditory-nerve fibe
65 nds on not only the passive mechanics of the basilar membrane but also an active amplification of the
66 duced comparable amplitudes of motion of the basilar membrane but differed in the polarity of their f
67 fferences in wave propagation time along the basilar membrane can provide the necessary delays, if th
68 h constrain outer hair cells standing on the basilar membrane, causes a leftward shift in outer hair
70 resenting ~25% basicranial width, and a long basilar membrane, collectively suggest that the kind of
72 gy is that tuned mechanical vibration of the basilar membrane defines the frequency response of the i
73 As a means to verify the computer model, the basilar membrane deformations because of static and dyna
74 tivity, pressure at the basilar membrane and basilar membrane displacement gave direct evidence for p
75 tory nerve fibers closely paralleled that of basilar membrane displacement modified by high-pass filt
77 generated extracellular voltage relative the basilar membrane displacement, which was initiated at a
78 ve relations between transducer currents and basilar membrane displacements are lacking, as well as t
79 sured acoustically and electrically elicited basilar membrane displacements from the cochleae of wild
81 continuous minor adjustments of tone-evoked basilar membrane displacements over their entire dynamic
84 hick fibers that coursed radially across the basilar membrane in small fascicles, gave off small bran
85 to pure-tone stimuli were recorded from the basilar membrane in the basal turn of the guinea-pig coc
86 on (reflecting the nonlinear response of the basilar membrane in the cochlea), followed by linear sum
88 between measured frequency responses of the basilar membrane in the inner ear and the frequency tuni
89 er hair cells, which transduce motion of the basilar membrane induced by sound and generate forces to
90 Acoustic stimulation vibrates the cochlear basilar membrane, initiating a wave of displacement that
97 furosemide injection, the vibrations of the basilar membrane lost the best frequency (BF) peak and s
99 are characterized here through recordings of basilar membrane motion and hair cell extracellular rece
100 was found by taking the phase difference of basilar membrane motion between two longitudinally space
101 sducer currents (or receptor potentials) and basilar membrane motion in an excised and bisected cochl
102 istortion product otoacoustic emissions, and basilar membrane motion indicate that the TM remains fun
106 he OHCs were reduced by up to 65 dB, and the basilar membrane moved with similar phase across its ent
107 have demonstrated that efference suppresses basilar membrane movement, there is still much unknown a
110 o measure in vivo the distribution along the basilar membrane of nonlinear, saturating vibrations to
111 odel could be tested by measuring TTS on the basilar membrane of the Otoa(EGFP/EGFP) mice to improve
112 ries are very similar to the trajectories of basilar-membrane peak velocity toward scala tympani.
116 he amplification and frequency tuning of the basilar membrane responses to sounds are almost normal.
119 10], we show that the nonlinear component of basilar-membrane responses to sound stimulation leads th
122 tion result from longitudinal differences in basilar membrane stiffness and numerous individual grada
124 itude of the crista stiffness was similar to basilar membrane stiffness in mammals, and as in mammals
125 efrom, may not involve the usual wave on the basilar membrane, suggesting that additional cochlear st
126 nt of the biophysical characteristics of the basilar membrane that critically underlies cochlear pass
127 lfrog's amphibian papilla lacks the flexible basilar membrane that effects tuning in mammals, its aff
128 zing their responses to the vibration of the basilar membrane, the radial vibrations of the tectorial
130 ar partition having three subpartitions, the basilar membrane, the reticular lamina, and the tectoria
131 n physical and geometrical properties of the basilar membrane, the sensitivity or gain of the hearing
132 's cells region than in the proximity of the basilar membrane, their frequency selectivity increased
133 ning which OHCs enhance the vibration of the basilar membrane, thereby tuning the gain of cochlear am
134 her than an immediate local vibration of the basilar membrane; this travelling wave vibrates in phase
135 ane in hearing: it enables the motion of the basilar membrane to optimally drive the inner hair cells
136 also found in the response of the mammalian basilar membrane to sound, signals the operation of an a
137 ructures range from a few hundred (e.g., the basilar membrane) to a few micrometers (e.g., the stereo
138 vibration collaboratively interacts with the basilar membrane traveling wave primarily through the co
139 hlear outer hair cells (OHCs) to amplify the basilar membrane traveling wave; however, it is unclear
145 peaked at a higher frequency than transverse basilar membrane tuning in the passive, postmortem condi
146 apical ends of outer hair cells and from the basilar membrane using a custom-built heterodyne low-coh
147 in the cochlea, as shown by measurements of basilar membrane velocity and auditory nerve responses t
148 ived electromotile force near to that of the basilar membrane velocity at frequencies above the shift
151 sh-pull" forces that drive the motion of the basilar membrane via the spatial feedforward and/or feed
152 n discrepancies between previously published basilar membrane vibration and auditory nerve single uni
154 The phase relation of reticular lamina to basilar membrane vibration changes with frequency by up
155 difference between the reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibration decreases with frequency by ~
156 ate that outer hair cells do not amplify the basilar membrane vibration directly through a local feed
157 difference between the reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibration has been thought to result fr
158 ear amplifier from available measurements of basilar membrane vibration in sensitive mammalian cochle
159 best to different sound frequencies because basilar membrane vibration is mechanically tuned to diff
161 a vibration is substantially larger than the basilar membrane vibration not only at the best frequenc
162 difference between the reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibration results from the cochlear act
164 that the reticular lamina vibration lags the basilar membrane vibration, and it is physiologically vu
165 ve yielded ever-better descriptions of gross basilar membrane vibration, the internal workings of the
168 ase differences between reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations are absent in postmortem coc
169 electrically in the second turn and measured basilar membrane vibrations at two longitudinal location
170 oncern, we measured the reticular lamina and basilar membrane vibrations in the transverse direction
171 n longitudinal location, electrically evoked basilar membrane vibrations showed the same tuning and p
172 generate forces for amplifying sound-induced basilar membrane vibrations, yet how cellular forces amp
174 uter hair cells that generates forces on the basilar membrane, we demonstrate that these forces inter
175 bing amplification in narrow segments of the basilar membrane, we further show that a cochlear travel
177 echanical filters analogous to the cochlea's basilar membrane, which deconstructs complex sounds into
178 tion, OHCs need to amplify the motion of the basilar membrane, which is much stiffer than themselves.
180 erferometer at up to 15 locations across the basilar membrane width in the basal turn of the guinea p