1 ltammetry (DPV) whose lowest detection limit
was calculated as 0.001ngmL(-1).
2 ate-CH(3), lactate-CH(2)D and lactate-CHD(2)
was calculated as 0.0033, 0.0071, and 0.0.012 umol/10(6)
3 The detection limit of the prepared material
was calculated as 0.030 nM.
4 electrode, and the limits of detection (LOD)
was calculated as 0.1 nM (S/N = 3) using differential pu
5 ty, and the limit of detection toward biotin
was calculated as 0.102 ng mL(-1) (equivalent to 6 muL o
6 00.0 fM was achieved and the detection limit
was calculated as 0.21 fM.
7 The total cardiac clearance of amitriptyline
was calculated as 0.316 L/h.
8 End-systolic pressure
was calculated as 0.9 x systolic arterial pressure at th
9 ediction and ground truth for COVID-19 cases
was calculated as 0.92 for PO (P < .001), 0.97 for PHO (
10 LODs
were calculated as 0.014, 0.016 and 0.093 ng mL(-1), res
11 cobalamin and cobalt for HPLC-ICP-OES system
were calculated as 0.07 mg/kg (as Co) and 0.06 mg/kg, re
12 LODs
were calculated as 0.071, 0.023, 0.016 and 0.034ngmL(-1)
13 tion (LOD) and limit of quantification (LOQ)
were calculated as 0.13 mug L(-1)and 0.41 mug L(-1) resp
14 K(M)(app), Imax, LOD and sensitivity
were calculated as 0.229 mM, 42.37 nA, 3.3 x 10(-4)nM an
15 The sensitivities
were calculated as 0.7 uA/nM (Cd(II)) and 3.5 uA/nM (Pb(
16 The detection limits of AA and AD
were calculated as 0.96 muM and 0.38 muM, respectively.
17 lidation R(2) for simple calibration and PLS
were calculated as 0.989 and 0.951, respectively.
18 VE
was calculated as 1 - adjusted odds ratio of vaccination
19 The vaccine effectiveness (VE)
was calculated as 1 - OR.
20 Vaccine efficacy
was calculated as 1 - relative risk derived from a robus
21 The average effective dose for coronary CTA
was calculated as 1.11 mSv (0.47-2.01 mSv) for method A
22 The right-to-left ratio
was calculated as 1.55 : 1 for right colon tumours and 2
23 Vaccine effectiveness
was calculated as (
1 - matched odds ratio) x 100%.
24 VE
was calculated as (
1 - odds ratio) x 100, where the odds
25 Vaccine effectiveness
was calculated as (
1-odds ratio)x100.
26 Conventional lesion volume
was calculated as (
1/6)xpix(AxB(2)+CxD(2)/2).
27 d and unvaccinated individuals; VE estimates
were calculated as (
1 - odds ratio) x 100%.
28 In this design, VE
is calculated as 100% x (1 - odds ratio) for vaccine rec
29 for monovalent pandemic vaccine and TIV and
was calculated as 100 x [1 - adjusted odds ratio], where
30 for CuNP/CNT/GCE, AuNP/CNT/GCE and p-XO/PGE
were calculated as 100 ug/L, 125 ug/L and 80 ug/L, respe
31 notransferase (AST)-to-platelet ratio (APRI)
was calculated as =
100*(aspartate aminotransferase [AST
32 Vaccine effectiveness
was calculated as 100x(1-OR).
33 t, limit of detection (LOD), and sensitivity
were calculated as 12.0+/-0.05pM and 3.3772nAnM(-1)cm(-2
34 aximal inhibitory concentration (IC50) of BA
were calculated as 13.93microM and 25.66microM for diphe
35 cer (MCF-7) cells and the limit of detection
was calculated as 148 cells mL(-1).
36 lobal Warming Potential (GWP) for (CF3)2CFCN
was calculated as 1490, a factor of 15 less than that of
37 he quadratic model, the optimal range of INR
was calculated as 2.1 to 2.5.
38 detection (LOD) for the complementary strand
was calculated as 2.32 nM.
39 The sensitivity of the developed sensor
was calculated as 2.6Hz/pg.
40 f detection and quantification (LOD and LOQ)
were calculated as 2.0 and 6.6 ug L(-1), respectively.
41 the limit of quantification values for maneb
were calculated as 2.22 mug L(-1) and 7.32 mug L(-1), re
42 ug L(-1) (n=21), the preconcentration factor
was calculated as 200 and the relative standard deviatio
43 contribution from the mantle of 2.9%, which
is calculated as 21 Gmol/y.
44 The inactivation energy of the enzyme
was calculated as 218kJmol(-1).
45 een 5 and 400 ng/mL, and the detection limit
was calculated as 22 ng/mL (n = 6) using the 3 Sb/m form
46 For guaiacol, the Km and Vmax values
were calculated as 24.88mM and 3.23EU/mL, respectively f
47 ve change in Pa(CO(2)) in the first 24 hours
was calculated as (
24-h post-ECMO Pa(CO(2)) - pre-ECMO P
48 the direct band gap E(g) of PbPdT thin films
was calculated as 3 eV.
49 bsequent analysis and dissociation constants
were calculated as 3.24-5.24x10(-8) M.
50 For H2O2, the Km and Vmax values
were calculated as 3.247mM and 0.799EU/mL, respectively
51 maging-detected malignant or benign lesions)
were calculated as 30.7% (95% CI confidence interval : 2
52 he ratio of analyte signal to chemical noise
was calculated as 31 for DMMP and 106 for 1-hexanol.
53 alpha of 0.05 and power 80%, the sample size
was calculated as 35 patients for each group with a drop
54 The limit of detection
was calculated as 4.7 pmol/L.
55 of SPECT HMR with UM and that of planar HMR
was calculated as 5.5 and 1.6, respectively.
56 y, the range of laundry wastewater flow rate
was calculated as 6.23-17.58 m(3)/day; also studied were
57 Maximum peak sediment fluxes
were calculated as ~
600 kg s(-1) m(-1), exceeding maximu
58 overies and enhancement factor for As and Sb
were calculated as 7.5 ng L(-1)/15.6 ng L(-1), 2.1% /2.7
59 ntation of ROH(2)(+) to primary carbocations
were calculated as 76 to 97 kJ/mol and enthalpies for su
60 (3) O-H bond dissociation free energy (BDFE)
was calculated as 81.8 +/- 1.5 (BDE = 86.8) kcal/mol.
61 An equivalent dose
was calculated as 9.6E-02 mSv/MBq for [(55)Co]Co-DOTATAT
62 tion, the diffusion coefficient of carbonate
is calculated as (
9.03 +/- 0.91) 10(-6) cm(2) s(-1), whi
63 A105 over its target (intraocular TNF-alpha)
was calculated as 96-fold (cohort III) to 359-fold (coho
64 ity, positive and negative predictive values
were calculated as 98.1, 94.4, 94.5, and 98.1 %, respect
65 y range is from 10(1) to 10(7)CFU/ml and LOD
is calculated as 9x10(2)CFU/ml.
66 eta) of the probe reacting with two proteins
is calculated as a ratio of conversion factors (k(obs) v
67 Progression-free survival (PFS)
was calculated as a composite end point of progressive e
68 Potential renal acid load (PRAL; mEq/d)
was calculated as a DAL proxy to characterize participan
69 g the degree of diffuse myocardial fibrosis,
was calculated as a function of the ratio of T1 change o
70 I), covering the first 7 postoperative days,
was calculated as a measure for early cumulative postope
71 Bayes factor
was calculated as a measure of statistical evidence, wit
72 The kappa coefficient
was calculated as a measure of the reliability of intero
73 ated with the self-assembly of macrocycle 3b
was calculated as a measure of the solvophobic interacti
74 ) of each metabolite variable in a PLS model
was calculated as a metric for the reliability of measur
75 Choroidal vascular density (CVD)
was calculated as a percent area occupied by choroidal v
76 The ITC index
was calculated as a percentage of the angle that was clo
77 ometric analysis, the newly formed bone area
was calculated as a percentage of the total area.
78 is, mean density in the region of the defect
was calculated as a percentage relative to the native bo
79 een commercial and threatened species ranges
was calculated as a proxy of the potential threat posed
80 bserved in both species, and an entropy rate
was calculated as a quantitative measure of degree of pr
81 min CZT SPECT and (13)N-ammonia PET, and MFR
was calculated as a ratio of hyperemic over resting MBF.
82 The global PTD
was calculated as a sum of individual PTD values, rangin
83 IR score, a correlate of insulin resistance,
was calculated as a weighted combination of size and con
84 intended and postoperative refractive errors
were calculated as a compound spherocylinder, outliers w
85 All-cause and cause-specific mortality rates
were calculated as a function of cumulative low, moderat
86 thickness, elastic properties and hysteresis
were calculated as a function of pressure.
87 alyzed, and precursor-to-product PUFA ratios
were calculated as a marker of the capacity of tissues (
88 ndard deviations of the torque moments (STD)
were calculated as a measurement of postural stability a
89 between predicted and observed MD (DeltaMD)
were calculated as a reliability measure.
90 Cortical (11)C-Pittsburgh compound B values
were calculated as a standard uptake value ratio normali
91 out and the value of (G + C)/(A + T) of DNA
was calculated as about 0.77 for various DNA samples.
92 tween March 2011 and May 2012, fetal density
was calculated as actual birth weight at delivery divide
93 The energies of the microstates
are calculated as additive contributions from hydrogen b
94 Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4)
was calculated as (
age x AST)/(platelet x radical alanin
95 al information by combining relevance, which
is calculated as an average F-statistic value across dif
96 length of stay and cost from all procedures
was calculated as an estimate of public health relevance
97 Kynurenine to tryptophan ratio
was calculated as an estimate of trp degradation.
98 and treatment in hospitals and nursing homes
was calculated as annual cost for Flanders, per patient,
99 pping efficiency of the isolated chromosomes
was calculated as approximately 0.01-0.02.
100 f (11)C-PiB signal in the lateral ventricles
was calculated as area under the curve from 35 to 80 min
101 Hormone responses
were calculated as area under the curve (AUC).
102 Adipose DI
was calculated as ATIS: (1/GlyRa x fasting insulin) x fi
103 The CCP score
was calculated as average expression of 31 CCP genes, no
104 s downstream influence on another, which can
be calculated as B-relaxation distance gradually relaxes
105 Annual incidence
was calculated as cases per 100 000 population.
106 Recovered S. aureus
was calculated as cfu/g.
107 e of aortic root dilation before cardiac MRI
was calculated as change in echocardiographic aortic roo
108 Growth
was calculated as change in Z-scores for weight-for-age
109 Ejection fraction (%)
was calculated as changes between 0 and 120 minutes.
110 Microvascular resistance (MR)
was calculated as coronary pressure divided by flow velo
111 volume (ie, the estimated penumbral volume)
was calculated as critically hypoperfused tissue volume
112 ials without an available reference standard
were calculated as cryptotanshinone-bioequivalents.
113 Liver-attenuation-index (LAI)
was calculated as difference between liver- and spleen-a
114 Lever arms
were calculated as distances between published extraocul
115 The density of the enzyme
was calculated as distribution volume using a 2-tissue-c
116 TTE RVol(AR)
was calculated as Doppler left ventricular outflow minus
117 Impact of DMSA
was calculated as end-course VBLL as a percentage of pre
118 Rates
were calculated as events/100 person-years at risk (PYR)
119 Adipo-IR and Hep-IR
were calculated as (
FFA0-120min ) x (Ins0-120min ) and (
120 (CDFS3) estimates at "x" year after surgery
were calculated as follows: CDFS3 = DFS(x+3)/DFS(x).
121 3) estimates at the "xth" year after surgery
were calculated as follows: CS3 = CS (x + 3)/CS (x).
122 A concordance score
was calculated as [
Formula: see text] so that a higher s
123 Relative risks of incident HF in RA
were calculated as hazard ratios (HRs).
124 value predicting survival, independently of
being calculated as HVPG-Free or HVPG-IVC.
125 Net emissions
are calculated as increased system emissions from chargi
126 Simulated diagnostic yield
was calculated as initial screening yield x positive pre
127 The precursor purity metric
is calculated as "
intensity of a selected precursor divi
128 Percent difference
was calculated as (
interobservation difference/mean)x100
129 Precision
was calculated as intra-day repeatability (RSD in the 5-
130 Bioactivity quotients (BQs)
are calculated as iR/OED to obtain estimates of potentia
131 rates for DAPT cessation and adverse events
were calculated as Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to the
132 uously; cutaneous vascular conductance (CVC)
was calculated as laser-Doppler flowmetry/mean arterial
133 ted from concentrations in blood, and the LC
was calculated as ln(1 - E*)/ln(1 - E).
134 The limit of detection
was calculated as low as 0.25pgL(-1) (from SWSV) and 3.0
135 ences with 95% CIs, and dichotomous outcomes
were calculated as Mantel-Haenszel risk ratios with 95%
136 Continuous outcomes
were calculated as mean differences with 95% CIs, and di
137 PPG and PPI responses
were calculated as mean incremental area under the curve
138 Physical activity
was calculated as metabolic equivalent task hours per da
139 Q-TWiST
was calculated as muTOX x TOX + TWiST, with muTOX calcul
140 using a new comparative parameter "n", which
was calculated as:
n=c0DPPHIC100 (mol/L(mol/L)(-1), (mol
141 Diuretic efficiency
was calculated as net fluid balance per total furosemide
142 angiographic reference vessel diameter (RVD)
was calculated as (
nominal stent diameter-RVD)/RVDx100 (
143 HIV incidence based on HIV seroconversion
was calculated as number of events/100 person-years.
144 Prevalence
was calculated as observed proportion with 95% confidenc
145 ration method, by which the optimal template
was calculated as part of the registration process, prov
146 Odds ratios (ORs)
were calculated as part of the logistic regression analy
147 Myocardial flow reserve (MFR)
was calculated as peak stress myocardial blood flow/rest
148 ercentage effective filtration length (PEFL)
was calculated as PEFL = FL/TL x 100%, where TL = total
149 Planar HMR
was calculated as per standard guidelines (manual tradit
150 Change in mammographic density
was calculated as percentage change from baseline.
151 Vertebral tortuosity index
was calculated as previously described.
152 QA-PFS
was calculated as progression-free survival function x t
153 Oxylipin ratios
were calculated as proxy markers of in vivo sEH activity
154 ermined by immunonephelometry, and the AIJCV
was calculated as published.
155 The likelihood to be helped or harmed (LHH)
was calculated as ratio of NNH to NNT.
156 Finally, simplified outcome measures
were calculated as ratio, with reference to cerebellar c
157 dation, prediction, and RPD ratios (SD/SECV)
were calculated as references for the model effectivenes
158 Summary effects
were calculated as relative risk and relative log surviv
159 180-minute incremental area under the curves
were calculated as responses for glucose, insulin, C-pep
160 The RO(2):GFR (ms/mL/min)
was calculated as RO(2) (T2*, ms) divided by GFR (mL/min
161 Accuracy
was calculated as slide-level agreement (e.g., parasite
162 Refractive error
was calculated as sphere plus half negative cylinder, wh
163 Global and regional left ventricular MFR
was calculated as stress/rest myocardial blood flow usin
164 EW
was calculated as stroke volume (echo)xend-systolic pres
165 o (SUR) of each volume of interest and voxel
was calculated as (
target uptake - reference uptake) / r
166 Mercury BAFs
are calculated as the fish Hg concentration (Hg(fish)) d
167 Total emissions
are calculated as the product of activity factors and em
168 sessing prognosis than WHVP-IVC, HVPG should
be calculated as the gradient between WHVP and FHVP, but
169 The filtration efficiency of a filter can
be calculated as the sum of the contributions of individ
170 permits direct monitoring of HDX, which can
be calculated as the sum of the fractional peak magnitud
171 Tooth replacement rate
is calculated as the difference between the number of da
172 The thickness of the weathered zone
is calculated as the difference between the predicted to
173 age structure metric, fractional size, which
is calculated as the length of an individual divided by
174 cedure-specific cost variation burden, which
was calculated as the aggregate sum of absolute cost dif
175 Loss of economic welfare
was calculated as the amount of deadweight loss in exces
176 orrected for the water content of drinks and
was calculated as the amount of water retained at 2 h af
177 The peripheral ischemia or leakage index
was calculated as the area of capillary nonperfusion or
178 Cumulative exposure to tacrolimus
was calculated as the area under curve of trough concent
179 Cumulative BP
was calculated as the area under the curve (mm Hgxyears)
180 The cumulated activity
was calculated as the area under the curve of the organ
181 Best spirometry
was calculated as the average of 2 highest measurements
182 Best spirometry
was calculated as the average of 2 highest measurements
183 For each image, mean gray level
was calculated as the average of eight preset regions, a
184 The Global Dispersion Score (GDS)
was calculated as the average score of all the pixels of
185 ity of climatic conditions along the flyways
was calculated as the correlation and slope between onse
186 The individual mealtime protein distribution
was calculated as the CV (i.e., SD divided by the mean)
187 Protein distribution across meals
was calculated as the CV of protein ingested per meal, w
188 This
was calculated as the depth of hypotension below a MAP o
189 The visual acuity decrement due to VI
was calculated as the difference between BCVA and 20/30,
190 phetamine-induced change in BPND (DeltaBPND)
was calculated as the difference between BPND in the pos
191 Low-luminance deficit (LLD)
was calculated as the difference between LLVA and BCVA.
192 Survival benefit
was calculated as the difference between post-transplant
193 EMW
was calculated as the difference between the interval fr
194 -lamina cribrosa pressure difference (TLCPD)
was calculated as the difference between the IOP and ICP
195 The refractive prediction error (PE)
was calculated as the difference between the postoperati
196 The organic selenium content
was calculated as the difference between total Se and in
197 Regional treatment response, DeltaR(r),
was calculated as the difference in regional gas distrib
198 Energy balance
was calculated as the discrepancy between EI and EE and
199 Maternal-to-fetal Ca transfer
was calculated as the enrichment in cord blood at delive
200 Lipid core burden index (LCBI)
was calculated as the fraction of pixels with the probab
201 The mean single-nephron GFR
was calculated as the GFR divided by the number of nephr
202 RP progression
was calculated as the loss of EZ width over time for all
203 HRR
was calculated as the maximal HR achieved minus the HR a
204 residence time in the remainder of the body
was calculated as the maximum possible residence time mi
205 ion (standardized uptake value ratio [SUVr])
was calculated as the maximum standardized uptake value
206 Monthly school meal participation
was calculated as the mean number of daily meals served
207 ean absolute distance (MAD) in months, which
was calculated as the mean of the absolute values of the
208 Urinary sodium excretion
was calculated as the mean of two 24-h urine excretions.
209 e) by optical coherence tomography (OCT) and
was calculated as the mean value of both eyes without op
210 The Hedges g value
was calculated as the measure of effect size.
211 The risk
was calculated as the number of events divided by the nu
212 Incidence
was calculated as the number of new cases divided by the
213 The medication administration error rate
was calculated as the number of observed doses administe
214 Treatment uptake
was calculated as the number of people treated for HCV i
215 Incidence rate of HIV transmission
was calculated as the number of phylogenetically linked
216 An asymmetry ratio
was calculated as the peak velocity of the slower eye mo
217 5-HT2AR occupancy
was calculated as the percent change in cerebral 5-HT2AR
218 Cerebrovascular reactivity
was calculated as the percent increase of normocapnic to
219 Adherence
was calculated as the percentage of doses taken on time
220 The yield of each reaction
was calculated as the percentage of initial sucrose conv
221 Incremental increase in cancer detection
was calculated as the percentage of mammographically occ
222 Lift use prevalence
was calculated as the percentage of patients that met in
223 ally worthwhile and relevant to the patient,
was calculated as the probability that a random patient
224 eterization, as an index of the RV MVO2, and
was calculated as the product of systolic pulmonary arte
225 DR
was calculated as the proportion of PSMA PET-positive pa
226 Binocular summation
was calculated as the ratio between binocular and better
227 Myocardial CCL
was calculated as the ratio between insoluble and solubl
228 LA stiffness
was calculated as the ratio of echocardiographic E/e'-to
229 Side-to-side asymmetry in patients with TLE
was calculated as the ratio of ipsilateral to contralate
230 Free leptin index (FLI)
was calculated as the ratio of leptin to soluble leptin
231 LV-MV ring mismatch
was calculated as the ratio of LV to ring size (LV end-d
232 Relative survival
was calculated as the ratio of observed survival to expe
233 Reporting accuracy
was calculated as the ratio of reported sodium intake to
234 RLE
was calculated as the ratio of signal intensity measurem
235 Hysteresis
was calculated as the ratio of the area enclosed by the
236 The incretin effect
was calculated as the ratio of the OGTT-betaCGS to the 2
237 Myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) index
was calculated as the ratio of the stress and rest K1 va
238 to richness and diversity, a dysbiosis index
was calculated as the ratio of the sum of relative abund
239 Iodine absorption
was calculated as the ratio of urinary iodine excretion
240 distances, and the viscosity scaling factor
was calculated as the ratio of zero-shear viscosities, e
241 Activity fragmentation
was calculated as the reciprocal of the average activity
242 Daily atrophy rate (DeltaTdi/d)
was calculated as the reduction in percentage from the p
243 BP variability in the time domain
was calculated as the SD.
244 Fidelity
was calculated as the similarity between pairs of foragi
245 CFVR
was calculated as the stress/rest ratio of diastolic pea
246 Each month's adherence percentage
was calculated as the sum of daily adherence percents, d
247 RSDc
was calculated as the sum of difference between peak rad
248 exposure), a hazard index (HI) for each man
was calculated as the sum of HQs for the individual phth
249 The PRAL
was calculated as the sum of major mineral nonbicarbonat
250 Polyp burden
was calculated as the sum of the diameters of polyps.
251 cients, and a predictive score (IPSYS score)
was calculated as the sum of the weighted scores.
252 A total brain score
was calculated as the summed scores in the individual re
253 The time to the cataract event
was calculated as the time between recruitment and the d
254 Patient follow-up time
was calculated as the time from hospital discharge until
255 Vt
was calculated as the time-weighted average over the fir
256 lized to injected activity (residence times)
were calculated as the area under the curve of the time-
257 lized to injected activity (residence times)
were calculated as the area under the curve of the time-
258 lation with VFMD of RNFL regions thicknesses
were calculated as the area under the receiver operating
259 O age- and sex-adjusted z scores, deviations
were calculated as the change in z score between adjacen
260 ut the study, and the low-luminance deficits
were calculated as the difference between the letter sco
261 Net margins
were calculated as the difference between total hospital
262 Missing patient-reported outcome assessments
were calculated as the expected number of assessments fo
263 Mean differences
were calculated as the mean of all the individual percen
264 Confidence intervals (CIs) for each variable
were calculated as the mean of Bernoulli random variable
265 Incidence rate ratios
were calculated as the measure of relative risk.
266 Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs)
were calculated as the observed numbers of ovarian cance
267 imals were killed, and ablation zone volumes
were calculated as the primary outcome measure by using
268 DO2_IR and MO2_IR
were calculated as the products of F and O2A, and F and
269 Frequency effect sizes
were calculated as the proportion of studies reporting a
270 Pricing differentials
were calculated as the proportions (%) obtained by divid
271 st-enhanced (DCE) imaging, odds ratios (ORs)
were calculated as the ratio of odds of cancer of two co
272 The multipliers
were calculated as the simple inverses of the proportion
273 overall compliance, PRISMA and AMSTAR scores
were calculated as the sum of adequately reported domain
274 Total direct medical costs
were calculated as the sum of hospitalizations, outpatie
275 Total doses for lungs, heart, and breast
were calculated as the sum of the dose from localizer ra
276 Costs
were calculated as the sum of the value of resources rep
277 Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs)
were calculated as the sum of years of life lost (YLLs)
278 Methods and Results The DALY
were calculated as the sum of years of life lost and yea
279 Disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs)
were calculated as the sum of YLLs and YLDs.
280 ADIRs and ADBRs
were calculated as the total number of events divided by
281 Between-group differences
were calculated as the value in the nonsedation group mi
282 Gaps
were calculated as time (days) between the last sexual e
283 The OSI
was calculated as [(
TOS/TAOC) x 100].
284 The H/CL ratio
was calculated as total counts in a region of interest o
285 Cumulative fluid overload %
was calculated as [(
total fluid in - out in L)/admission
286 l cortex binding potential (BP(ND)(frontal))
was calculated as (
V(T)(frontal)/V(T)(cerebellum)) - 1.
287 LC for (1)(8)F-FDGal
was calculated as (
V*(max)/K*(m))/(V(max)/K(m)).
288 sine and acetylcholine coronary flow reserve
were calculated as vasodilator/resting coronary blood fl
289 al contraction (VOLbac) were measured; LAPEF
was calculated as (
VOLmax-VOLbac)/VOLmaxx100.
290 ade, and change within the patients with LGG
was calculated, as was minimal detectable change.
291 o discriminate malignant from benign lesions
was calculated, as was specificity at a sensitivity leve
292 Body mass index (BMI)
was calculated as weight (kg)/height (m)(2) Compared wit
293 Body mass index
was calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height
294 , symptom prevalence, and diagnostic methods
were calculated as weighted proportions.
295 difference in the mean between 2007 and 2013
was calculated, as well as the 95% confidence intervals
296 ciency, and the rates of these complications
were calculated as well.
297 Lake Huron and through the Chicago Diversion
were calculated, as well as flows related to the interna
298 er the ROC curves (AUCs) for each model pair
were calculated, as well as sensitivity, specificity, ac
299 ct size magnitudes for individual parameters
were calculated, as were summary effect sizes for each C
300 and the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)
were calculated, as were T2 relaxation time and proton s