ライフサイエンスコーパス: be calculated by

1 th open fractures and high density fractures are calculated by 3-D counting.

2 ed anomalous outgoing Gibbs state, which can be calculated by a simple sampling algorithm verified by

3 This coefficient was calculated by a quantum-chemistry-based method with

4 ancy reported as quality-adjusted life-years were calculated by a decision analytic model that integr

5 oma (HCC), and death according to HIV status were calculated by a Fine-Gray model adjusted for age.

6 tion to individual spectra, averaged spectra were calculated by accumulating free induction decays ov

7 The CEP scores are calculated by adding the weights of all the items co

8 ement; a completeness score (range, 0 to 14) was calculated by adding the number of elements reported

9 Rasch scores were calculated by age group for each distinct domain wi

10 The estimated rates were calculated by age, sex and according to the Socio-D

11 Breakage rates were calculated by analyzing the capsular surrogate unde

12 ial pressure, regional myocardial work could be calculated by applying the standard LV pressure curve

13 oprevalence in Philadelphia during 2010-2013 was calculated by applying National Health and Nutrition

14 p, 5-year number-needed-to-treat estimations were calculated by applying an 18% relative CHD reductio

15 tition coefficients (lipid-water, air-water) were calculated by applying the new concept of a polymer

16 adverse events with ticagrelor or prasugrel were calculated by applying treatment effects from rando

17 CRS was calculated by assigning 1 point each for initial dis

18 A 4-point cardiac risk score was calculated by assigning 1 point each for renal failu

19 of your recommending our practice to others" was calculated by assigning a value (0-100) to the Liker

20 Destruction removal efficiency (DRE) was calculated by assuming a flare natural gas input com

21 pecific bleaching response index (taxon-BRI) was calculated by averaging taxon-specific response over

22 code-level estimates of 24-hr average PM2.5 were calculated by averaging concentrations within ZIP c

23 Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by binary logistic regression.

24 tions, the electrical conductivity of SLMoS2 is calculated by Boltzmann equations.

25 RVol(MR) was calculated by both the proximal isovelocity surface

26 Incidence and remission rates were calculated by calibrating against real-world preval

27 e source categories to the ambient PM burden was calculated by combining primary emission, SOA produc

28 ident's overall performance for each station was calculated by combining scores of the individual ski

29 Model inputs were calculated by combining data from representative ho

30 The know-do gap was calculated by comparing fractions of practitioners a

31 Mortality attributable to IT was calculated by comparing IT patients to a propensity-

32 Enhancement factor was calculated by comparing the absorbance values measur

33 The IHD burden attributable to TFA was calculated by comparing the current level of TFA int

34 The PTE was calculated by comparing the effect of IOP on the ris

35 ificity, and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated by comparing AUS findings to pathology r

36 Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by comparing findings with final diagnos

37 Although invariants may be calculated by computational algebraic methods, such a

38 Odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) were calculated by conditional logistic regression.

39 n achievable rate of secure key distribution is calculated by considering complementary choices betwe

40 The number of stromal nerves was calculated by counting the nerve trunks at the corne

41 The BRS was calculated by counting the number of biomarkers abov

42 dian prevalence of intimate partner homicide was calculated by country and region overall, and for wo

43 zed incidence rates per 100,000 person-years were calculated by country and sex.

44 d hazard ratios (HRs) for development of HCC were calculated by Cox regression analysis.

45 Hazard ratios (HR) were calculated by Cox regression.

46 HRs of time to the first kidney stone event were calculated by Cox regression.

47 rates and population attributable fractions were calculated by CVH category.

48 PDR prevalence was calculated by demographics and codon, stratifying by

49 ent dipole moment on the sulfobetaine moiety was calculated by density functional theory.

50 The PPVs were calculated by determining the ratio of the confirme

51 f free radical scavenging by flavonoid morin were calculated by DFT and PM6 methods in gas-phase, wat

52 relative energies of the MOLP and OA isomers were calculated by DFT methods, and the possibility of s

53 ed by NMR spectroscopy, and their structures were calculated by DFT.

54 National rates were calculated by diagnosis group.

55 impurities/additives in light materials can be calculated "by difference" from the scattering calibr

56 enzyme assay, the average polyP chain length is calculated by dividing the total polyphosphate concen

57 The SUV ratio (SUVR) for each RR was calculated by dividing cortex activity by RR activit

58 Fraction of aspirated contrast was calculated by dividing estimated volume of aspirated

59 Myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) was calculated by dividing left ventricular (LV) stroke

60 Dietary energy density from SSBs was calculated by dividing the energy content (kcal/gram

61 Cost per SVR was calculated by dividing the median cost by the SVR ra

62 An excess mortality ratio (EMR) was calculated by dividing the risk-standardized predict

63 n-health concerns, benchmark quotients (BQs) were calculated by dividing concentrations by the human-

64 FFMI and FMI were calculated by dividing FFM and FM by height squared

65 Mean proficiency scores were calculated by dividing the combined PT scores by th

66 alized changes in mean gradient (mm Hg/year) were calculated by dividing the difference between the m

67 Effect sizes were calculated by dividing the differences between prei

68 Risk scores were calculated by dividing the individual regression co

69 Annual mortality rates were calculated by dividing the Kaplan-Meier 5-year mort

70 Target-to-background ratios (TBRs) were calculated by dividing the mean fluorescence intens

71 s (SIRs), a proxy measure for relative risk, were calculated by dividing the observed number of subse

72 Functional volumes were calculated by dividing the volume of normal ventila

73 The Kd of anti-ATX aptamer was calculated by electrochemical methods as well as the

74 different time steps, with redundancy, which is calculated by employing dynamical time warping approa

75 e absorbed radiation dose for the whole body was calculated by entering the residence time in OLINDA/

76 d pore-water-concentration-based EC50 values were calculated by equilibrium partitioning using soil/p

77 Propensity scores for induction treatment were calculated by estimating probability of induction u

78 Incident asthma cases were calculated by excluding children with a history of

79 Costs were calculated by extracting Diagnosis-Related Group co

80 ctive moisture diffusion coefficients (Deff) were calculated by Fick's diffusion model and their valu

81 PSS was calculated by finite element analysis in whole vesse

82 The proposed TIL abundance (TILAb) score is calculated by first segmenting the whole slide images

83 dose (ID50) of 2.60 x 10(6) CFU for fetuses was calculated by fitting the data to a logistic model.

84 ibution of coral reefs and open sea plankton were calculated by fitting a Rayleigh distillation model

85 Mutation rates can be calculated by following mutant accumulation during gr

86 The genome quality score for each was calculated by four different assembly quality, numbe

87 CHA2DS2-VASc-R score was calculated by giving 1 additional point for African-

88 The ASP score was calculated by grading the measured angle of attenuat

89 of clinical AIDS/death in HIV seroconverters was calculated by HB status.

90 raphy, and the degree of tissue inflammation was calculated by histological analyses.

91 Estimates were calculated by incorporating HSV-2 and HIV infection

92 Observed to expected (O:E) ratios were calculated by indirect standardization and compared

93 Rupture and mortality rates were calculated by initial and final known AAA diameter.

94 Isotopic values for the separate peaks are calculated by integrating the product of the water a

95 V(RM) was calculated by integrating the flow-time waveform dur

96 The expected lifetime was calculated by integrating the predicted survival cur

97 The cumulated disintegrations in each organ were calculated by integration of a fitted exponential f

98 edicted prevalence in the general population were calculated by inverting 99% certainty tolerance lim

99 The adjusted mean LoS was calculated by level of pregnancy risk (high vs. low)

100 dard automated perimetry and rates of change were calculated by linear regression analysis of mean de

101 Isotopic ratios were calculated by linear regression slope (LRS), an adv

102 ASD, and the examined psychiatric disorders were calculated by linkage disequilibrium score regressi

103 th and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) were calculated by linking all foods consumed in their 2

104 riage before and after introduction of PCV10 were calculated by log-binomial regression.

105 rvival (CSS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were calculated by log-rank and Cox regression.

106 tios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated by logistic regression analyses.

107 Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% CIs were calculated by logistic regression with adjustment f

108 Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) were calculated by malignancy type.

109 ercent and absolute serum creatinine changes were calculated by maximizing sensitivity and specificit

110 on (n = 230), the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated by means of a receiver operating characte

111 The glomerular filtration rate (GFR) was calculated by means of the Modification of Diet in R

112 eir dynamic response to a step change in MAP was calculated by means of transfer function analysis.

113 ues with maximal sensitivity and specificity were calculated by means of receiver operating character

114 The index is calculated by measuring the degree to which the test

115 ABL was calculated by measuring cemento-enamel junction and

116 Economic burden defined by Welfare Loss (WL) was calculated by measuring disability-adjusted-life-yea

117 The permeability was calculated by measuring the interstitial fluid veloc

118 ker, pooled odds ratios for clinical outcome were calculated by meta-analysis, and biomarkers were ra

119 Patient risk was calculated by modeling the predicted risk of a posto

120 The models are calculated by ModPipe, an automated modeling pipelin

121 The spontaneous curvature of palmitate was calculated by molecular dynamic simulations and was

122 nd the corresponding cross-linked peptide II were calculated by molecular modeling.

123 n, and cell viability and metabolic activity was calculated by MTT assay.

124 Healthcare costs will be calculated by multiplying used healthcare services wi

125 Incidence was calculated by multiplying norovirus prevalence among

126 Choroidal vessel volume was calculated by multiplying the average CVD by macular

127 The central macular CVV was calculated by multiplying the average CVD by macular

128 eover, the risk reduction potential of foods was calculated by multiplying the RR by optimal intake v

129 SSDE was calculated by multiplying the size-dependent convers

130 Values of the DLP were calculated by multiplying measured CT dose index va

131 Years lived with disability (YLDs) were calculated by multiplying prevalence (based on syst

132 rian refugees in Jordan, Lebanon, and Turkey were calculated by multiplying the estimated direct canc

133 sts and length of stay for each complication were calculated by multiplying the independent cost of e

134 Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated by multivariable logistic regression mod

135 Odds ratios were calculated by multivariable logistic regression, wi

136 Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis and compare

137 Pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated by noncompartmental analysis.

138 ion using digital image analysis, and strain was calculated by normalizing the change in alveolar per

139 Cumulative AUC was calculated by numerical integration using non-linear

140 Hydrogen and oxygen isotopic compositions were calculated by numerical integration of the individu

141 Summary effect measures were calculated by odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence in

142 Equivalent doses were calculated by OLINDA/EXM using the MIRD formalism.

143 A weighted CST lesion load (wCST-LL) was calculated by overlaying the patient's lesion map on

144 ve perfusion parameters, such as blood flow, were calculated by parametric deconvolution for each myo

145 Correlations were calculated by Pearson correlation (or Spearman rank

146 ith microbial diversity or individual genera were calculated by permutational analysis of variance or

147 CMR RVol(AR) was calculated by phase-contrast velocity mapping at the

148 syndrome (AIDS) or death on suppressive ART were calculated by PIR status.

149 on volume, and mean transit time) parameters were calculated by placing regions of interest in the la

150 nated amines, pK values of basic amino acids were calculated by plotting the fraction of protonated a

151 Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated by Poisson regression analysis.

152 tus (DM), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were calculated by Poisson regression stratified by age

153 Incidence rate ratios (IRRs) were calculated by Poisson regression to determine diffe

154 evalence ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by Poisson regression.

155 The degree of deacetylation was calculated by potentiometric titration and (1)H NMR.

156 Sensitivity is calculated by quantifying NT-proBNP, a clinical bioma

157 The economic burden was calculated by quantifying the costs incurred by the

158 The economic burden was calculated by quantifying the costs incurred by the

159 Population-based rates of hospitalization were calculated by race for ARI and laboratory-confirmed

160 of these parameters on predicting responders were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (RO

161 Predictive values and optimal thresholds were calculated by receiver operating characteristic (RO

162 lations between MRI and functional variables were calculated by repeated measures analysis of varianc

163 Mean per-patient transfer distances were calculated by scenario.

164 Benefit scores are calculated by scoring of cost, durability, and corro

165 e-standardized incidence and mortality rates were calculated by sex, country, and level of human deve

166 Additionally, long-run scenarios are calculated by simulating the total cost of ownership

167 n recumbent position, postoperative rotation was calculated by software.

168 The binding affinity of MIP was calculated by static and kinetic adsorption study.

169 e indoor compartment over their service life was calculated by statistically analyzing data from 50 p

170 stainable water quantity available to humans is calculated by subtracting an annual estimate of the w

171 ic market (assumed equal to invisible sales) is calculated by subtracting the registered, also called

172 Specific binding of (18)F-florbetapir was calculated by subtracting nonspecific from total bin

173 Autotrophic respiration (Ra) was calculated by subtracting Rh from Rs.

174 he population subject to impoverishing costs was calculated by subtracting the baseline number of imp

175 Attributable mortality was calculated by subtracting the in-hospital mortality

176 The subcutaneous fat area at each site was calculated by subtracting the lean/visceral area fro

177 the adjacent tooth at the interproximal area was calculated by subtracting the radiographic crestal B

178 Absolute excess risks were calculated by subtracting cause-specific mortality

179 Excess days were calculated by subtracting each patient's shortest e

180 Regional Vts were calculated by subtracting end-expiration from end-i

181 Pandemic-associated excess mortality rates were calculated by subtracting observed rates during pan

182 Intraplatelet (IP) levels of 5-HT were calculated by subtraction of plasma 5-HT from serum

183 Years in each dependency state were calculated by Sullivan's method.

184 wders where total vitamin A content data can be calculated by summing the innate long-chain vitamin A

185 Potentially preventable spending was calculated by summing costs for avoidable emergency

186 A genetic risk score (GRS) was calculated by summing the number of risk alleles ove

187 genetic risk score (GRS) for each individual was calculated by summing the number of risk-increasing

188 and 1) and open (grades 2, 3, and 4) angles were calculated by summing over the corresponding grades

189 Differences in volume and defect depths were calculated by superimposition of the scans and test

190 arasitic, juvenile sea lampreys in the lakes is calculated by surveying wounding rates on lake trout

191 wPRx was calculated by taking the cosine of the wavelet trans

192 with the previous survey for each parameter was calculated by taking the ratio of the maximum and mi

193 reduced models based on exact QSS, which can be calculated by the computational packages provided in

194 5-year relative survival was calculated by the Ederer-2 method.

195 Survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method, and a Cox pro

196 Overall survival was calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

197 ichotomous data as an odds ratio with 95% CI was calculated by the Mantel-Haenszel or the DerSimonian

198 membranes invagination (cristae) complexity was calculated by the mitochondrial complexity index (MC

199 A weighted genetic risk score was calculated by the natural log of the odds ratio mult

200 icient (ADC) of the thymic epithelial tumors was calculated by the same observer at two settings and

201 Flow signal was calculated by the split-spectrum amplitude-decorrela

202 Apparent digestibility of dry matter (ADDM) was calculated by the total collection method and from d

203 oncentration of As(V) in the sample solution were calculated by the difference in concentration betwe

204 rences in (31)P NMR shifts upon complexation were calculated by the gauge-independent atomic orbital

205 of value (CV) of the endothelial cell layer were calculated by the instruments' built-in software.

206 Annualized event rates were calculated by the ISTH, TIMI, GUSTO, and BARC scale

207 Overall and rectal cancer-specific survival were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method.

208 expectancies for the three regions combined were calculated by the Sullivan method, which applies th

209 ECD spectra of 1 and 4 were calculated by time-dependent density functional the

210 nce and arterial-cardiac baroreflex function were calculated by transfer function gain between PAD an

211 ciated with the freezing of metals and salts are calculated by treating crystal growth as an assignme

212 children aged from 18 weeks to 23 months and was calculated by unconditional logistic regression.

213 metric data), and differences between groups were calculated by unpaired t test (or Mann-Whitney U te

214 d the 5-year cumulative incidence of relapse was calculated by use of a competing risk model.

215 Nitrate intake from vegetables was calculated by use of a newly developed comprehensive

216 ratio of HIV among MSM relative to adult men was calculated by use of direct age-stratification.

217 the nondisplaceable binding potential (BPND) was calculated by use of the simplified reference tissue

218 Rate constants were calculated by use of a 3-compartment model.

219 5% confidence interval for volume categories were calculated by use of logistic regression for each Q

220 95% confidence intervals for each predictor were calculated by use of random effects models.

221 The minimum sample size can be calculated by using a sample size formula that incorp

222 The edge tension of a lipidic pore is calculated by using the theory to quantitatively acco

223 ate of aneurysm detection for subsequent DSA was calculated by using a fixed-effects model.

224 p were necessary to acquire 80% power, which was calculated by using a one-sided alpha level of 2.5%.

225 Initial performance of AI TI-RADS was calculated by using a test for differences between b

226 The recombination frequency was calculated by using an RNA 3 reporter carrying restr

227 Interobserver agreement was calculated by using Cohen kappa values.

228 (REE) of the perfusion curves of each joint was calculated by using in-house developed software.

229 The relative prevalence (RP) of AD was calculated by using log-linear binomial regression.

230 Baseline bleeding risk was calculated by using modified Mehran bleeding risk sc

231 Efficacy of transpedal MR lymphangiography was calculated by using radiographic lymphangiography as

232 Relative risk (RR) was calculated by using random-effects models and was te

233 rent diffusion coefficient (ADC) at baseline was calculated by using segmentations by two readers at

234 scale, and categorical intermethod agreement was calculated by using the Cohen kappa.

235 Specificity was calculated by using the control population.

236 Interreader agreement was calculated by using the Fleiss kappa.

237 Interreader association was calculated by using the Fleiss kappa.

238 Survival was calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

239 Median survival was calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method.

240 Lesion diameter was calculated by using the measured length and width of

241 Association with observer's scores was calculated by using the Pearson correlation coeffici

242 The target CL power was calculated by using the postoperative refraction at

243 Intra- and interobserver reproducibility was calculated by using the root mean square average coe

244 DCE perfusion MRI parameter V(p) was calculated by using the Tofts pharmacokinetic two-co

245 r detecting 50% or greater arterial stenosis were calculated by using a bivariate summary receiver op

246 HRs and 95% CIs were calculated by using a Cox proportional hazards anal

247 = 0.95) were selected and correction factors were calculated by using a linear model to convert each

248 ces in comfort and radiation dose reductions were calculated by using a mixed logistic regression mod

249 ined by using bootstrap resampling; P values were calculated by using a t test.

250 Crude and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated by using a time-varying Cox proportional

251 nuclear explosions at North Korean test site were calculated by using an empirical Green's function a

252 Rates were calculated by using census population estimates.

253 Fat fraction maps were calculated by using combined compressed sensing and

254 r the 90th compared with the 10th percentile were calculated by using conditional logistic regression

255 Multivariable ORs and 95% CIs were calculated by using conditional logistic regression

256 RRs and 95% CIs were calculated by using conditional logistic regression

257 Hazard ratios for mortality were calculated by using Cox regression models with emph

258 ve CS with vaginal delivery as the reference were calculated by using Cox regression.

259 Direct and indirect costs were calculated by using data from national registries.

260 nitored for 5 h postingestion, and GI values were calculated by using different area under the curve

261 zed incidence rates per 100 000 person-years were calculated by using direct adjustment to the 2010 U

262 Performance measures were calculated by using end-of-day assessment and occur

263 Global, endocardial, and epicardial MBF were calculated by using Fermi-constrained deconvolution

264 heats of formation and detonation properties were calculated by using Gaussian 03 and EXPLO5 v6.01 pr

265 Relative risks (RRs) were calculated by using general linear models adjusted

266 ponse (LR-TR) category (viable or nonviable) were calculated by using generalized mixed-effects model

267 tween the beneficiary and the laser provider were calculated by using Google Maps distance and travel

268 d nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio within the tumor were calculated by using image-based segmentation on fou

269 ch tumor, RENAL nephrometry and PADUA scores were calculated by using imaging-derived tumor morpholog

270 Incidence rates were calculated by using incident cases as the numerator

271 , and local progression-free survival (LPFS) were calculated by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

272 y DNA target with the immobilized DNA probes were calculated by using kinetic evaluation software, an

273 Sensitivity and specificity were calculated by using leave-one-out cross validation.

274 hanges and injuries and descriptive analysis were calculated by using logistic regression and Fisher

275 ive odds of maternal asthma with viral cause were calculated by using logistic regression.

276 Diagnostic accuracy measures were calculated by using pathologic diagnosis as the ref

277 ymptoms (binary outcome) and severity scores were calculated by using Poisson and linear regression,

278 Rate ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by using Poisson regression to evaluate

279 Data were extracted, and mean effect sizes were calculated by using random effects models.

280 dividual studies and the overall pooled beta were calculated by using random-effects meta-analysis.

281 Mitochondria-sarcomere diffusion distances were calculated by using serial block-face scanning elec

282 r-age, weight-for-height, and weight-for-age were calculated by using the 2006 WHO growth standards,

283 meal GI and GL and insulin index (II) values were calculated by using the incremental area under the

284 and interobserver agreement of aortic volume were calculated by using the intraclass correlation coef

285 urvival and relapse-free survival statistics were calculated by using the Kaplan-Meier method for sta

286 The z scores were calculated by using the observed and expected effec

287 pharmacokinetic parameters of breast cancer were calculated by using the Tofts model with T1 values

288 Confidence intervals were calculated by using the Wilson method, without corr

289 or control period and 12 months of follow-up were calculated by using Trimbos and Institute of Medica

290 fic odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were calculated by using unconditional logistic regressi

291 VNC images were calculated by using vendor-specific algorithms.

292 Offspring body mass index z scores (BMIZs) were calculated by using weight and length or height mea

293 es of the prostate and seminal vesicles (SV) were calculated by using whole-volume segmentation on T2

294 sensitivity and specificity of these methods were calculated by using, as reference method, the manua

295 ty average molecular weight of beta-chitosan was calculated by viscometry and size average molecular

296 Composite measures of hemispheric Abeta load were calculated by volume-weighted mean values of neocor

297 sions (RDEs) and fuel consumption (FC) rates were calculated by weighted averaging of the results fro

298 The IR of HZO was calculated by year, 10-year age groups, gender, race

299 tandardized and standardized incidence rates were calculated by year, 10-year age groups, sex, and ra

300 Admission rates were calculated by year, age, sex, and county of residen