戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 orts, the effectiveness of this planning has been criticised.
2              Lower-agency interventions have been criticised as constraining individual choice.
3 compared to controls, but this technique has been criticised as the associated stress artefacts may c
4                                This work has been criticised as the SPECT results may have resulted f
5                         Deviations in others were criticised as irrational and explained as superfici
6 ors induces significant reflex responses can be criticised because of the likelihood of concomitant s
7 roplastics quantification in the environment are criticised creating problems with data validity.
8  for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) has been criticised due to the limited evidence of benefits
9                                           It is criticised due to its low reproducibility, problemati
10 r publications.This evaluation can of course be criticised for its bias towards papers describing nov
11 s and increases government revenues, but has been criticised for disproportionately affecting poorer
12                       However, hospices have been criticised for inequality of access with respect to
13           However, these two approaches have been criticised for lacking ecological validity and prov
14 ethod for assessing perceptions has recently been criticised for lacking ecological validity.
15 based on trials with novel designs that have been criticised for reasons of ethics and clinical relev
16 implified mechanistic models in ecology have been criticised for the fact that a good fit to data doe