戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 eurologic Assessment in Neuro-Oncology scale was drafted.
2 tage 3: recommendations based on the meeting were drafted.
3                                    Questions were drafted after a review of the literature and subseq
4        A preliminary list of recommendations was drafted and further validated using a modified Delph
5                                The statement was drafted and iterative refinements were made by the p
6 nsensus statement with supporting references was drafted and revised.
7            The definitions and flow diagrams were drafted and adapted in consecutive (online) meeting
8 surveys of 89 IOIBD members, recommendations were drafted and modified in 2 surveys and 2 voting roun
9 ontrol procedures and release specifications were drafted as part of a clinical trial application tha
10 or the conduct of TBM clinical research that were drafted at an international tuberculous meningitis
11                                  The article was drafted based on the most up-to-date existing inform
12                      Provisional definitions were drafted based on existing literature and discussion
13 sive vs disease-conducive apple rhizospheres were drafted based on genome-resolved metagenomes, compr
14                       The PRO questionnaires were drafted based on results from a literature review a
15                                A process map was drafted by both institutions to establish the order
16                               New guidelines were drafted by a writing committee and reviewed by the
17                                      Answers were drafted by an expert group based on a comprehensive
18                              Recommendations were drafted by section writing committees and reviewed
19                                   Guidelines were drafted by section writing committees and were then
20    Recommendations made through this process were drafted by the panel chair and circulated twice for
21 s regarding nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions were drafted by the participants to address patient sele
22 network of zigzagging lines, where the lines were drafted directly with a straightedge and a compass.
23 ualitative synthesis, a conclusion statement was drafted for each question and the evidence supportin
24 esized qualitatively, a conclusion statement was drafted for each question, and evidence supporting e
25                   Age-appropriate extensions were drafted for children (8-12 years) and young people
26 ch was supported by their grants; the policy was drafted in 2004 and took effect in 2008.
27                                 When the AUC was drafted, the writing committee recognized that some
28 n the absence of such data, clinical reviews were drafted to discuss pros and cons of care choices.
29                            Thirty statements were drafted to encompass major topics relevant to venou
30  2022 to develop a scientific statement that was drafted with front-line clinicians in mind and focus