ライフサイエンスコーパス: be evaluated by

1 Content validity was evaluated by 12 gastroenterologists and nutritionist

2 The presence of lesions compatible with PC was evaluated by 2 independent readers.

3 y 3000-meter run test, and anaerobic fitness was evaluated by 2-minute sit-ups and 2-minute push-ups,

4 The effect of the intervention study was evaluated by 2-sample t tests.

5 The IHC results were evaluated by 2 pathologists and the nuclear intensi

6 Peri-injection effects of FA were evaluated by 2-tailed paired t test comparison of m

7 Aerobic fitness was evaluated by 3000-meter run test, and anaerobic fitn

8 Classifier performance was evaluated by 5-fold cross-validation and on an indep

9 Diagnostic efficacy is evaluated by a panel of hematologists performing a bl

10 Rejection was evaluated by a nephropathologist.

11 The feasibility was evaluated by a set of in vitro and in vivo tests.

12 ion impact on lipid digestion and absorption was evaluated by a static in vitro digestion model for p

13 eriodontal clinical parameters and esthetics were evaluated by a calibrated periodontist at baseline

14 c Accuracy Studies (STARD), and risk of bias was evaluated by adherence to the Quality Assessment of

15 Reporting quality was evaluated by adherence to the Standards for Reportin

16 Safety was evaluated by adverse events and ACM through follow-u

17 Antimicrobial activity was evaluated by agar diffusion and microdilution method

18 Evidence of shared genetic effects was evaluated by aggregating meta-analyzed univariate re

19 Performance of the clinical SAB assay was evaluated by altering Anti-HLA Ab concentration, sub

20 ts as well as adequacy of antibiotic therapy was evaluated by an independent expert panel.

21 CRT started from January 7 to June 30, 2019, were evaluated by an ML algorithm.

22 results generated with the developed method was evaluated by analysis of a set of incurred chickpea

23 Accuracy was evaluated by analysis of a standard reference materi

24 The performance of the proposed approach was evaluated by analysis of monosaccharides, oligosacch

25 Its accuracy and precision was evaluated by analyzing 40 standard mixtures composed

26 ces between the resveratrol and placebo arms were evaluated by ANCOVA adjusting for corresponding pre

27 The efficacy of EPIT was evaluated by applying patches containing cashew alle

28 ase-9 (MMP-9), and cardiac Troponin-T (cTnT) were evaluated by appropriate biochemical methods.

29 Performance was evaluated by area under the receiver operating chara

30 These models were evaluated by area under the concentration-time curv

31 ility of the indicator of latent soda demand was evaluated by assessing its association with the neig

32 The clinical efficacy was evaluated by assessing symptom scores by Japanese rh

33 The clinical efficacy was evaluated by assessing symptom scores by Japanese rh

34 death in different durations of reperfusion was evaluated by assessing the iron content, malondialde

35 All morphological features of lesions were evaluated by B-mode US.

36 SIBO was evaluated by bacterial culture of duodenal aspirate,

37 ve response and median duration of response, were evaluated by blinded independent central review in

38 s version 1.1) and duration of response, and were evaluated by blinded independent central review.

39 Ninety-day outcomes were evaluated by blinded telephone interviewers.

40 The response of forest to drought can be evaluated by both its sensitivity to drought (resista

41 , and inflammation as well as liver fibrosis were evaluated by both immunohistochemistry in liver sec

42 Sixteen different microalgae biomasses were evaluated by both strategies.

43 Endothelial function was evaluated by brachial artery flow-mediated dilation

44 Transcriptomic comparisons were evaluated by bulk RNA sequencing.

45 The neuronal activation was evaluated by c-Fos expression and calcium imaging at

46 The effect of clinical risk was evaluated by calculating hazard ratios for distant r

47 Muscle performance was evaluated by calculating power output during work-lo

48 raction between protein and stationary phase was evaluated by calculating the SEC distribution coeffi

49 Interobserver agreement was evaluated by calculating weighted kappa coefficients

50 ps between double-Maddox rod and other tests were evaluated by calculating mean differences with 95%

51 oral hygiene effectiveness (dental calculus) were evaluated by calibrated dentists through oral exami

52 The device was evaluated by capturing two types of tumor cells spik

53 and ultrastructural levels, and the patients were evaluated by cardiac and cutaneous work-up.

54 he duodenum by various disease processes can be evaluated by careful CT technique and proper attentio

55 Enzyme kinetic was evaluated by catalytic assay, protein structure was

56 lococcus hominis, and Staphylococcus warneri were evaluated by cefoxitin and oxacillin broth microdil

57 Generally, the homogeneity of a battery pack is evaluated by characterizing the cells individually in

58 physiological importance of the three mtACPs was evaluated by characterizing the single, double, and

59 Each digestion fraction was evaluated by chromatography, as well as for antioxid

60 on correlating to the quantity of pesticides was evaluated by chronoamperometrically monitoring the e

61 Fold and thermal stability were evaluated by circular dichroism analysis, and enzym

62 sport-matched males, mean age: 23+/-5 years) were evaluated by clinical, resting, and exercise electr

63 yn-methoxy methyl moiety in natural material is evaluated by comparing its optical rotation with that

64 ance of multiple machine learning algorithms was evaluated by comparing internal five-fold cross-vali

65 , transfer learning effectiveness in the CNN was evaluated by comparing its performance to four CNNs

66 Model performance was evaluated by comparing model estimates of gross prim

67 The performance of each method was evaluated by comparing the obtained results to those

68 s surveys, and the effects of community data were evaluated by comparing models for six selected rare

69 alcoholic liqueurs prepared from rose petals were evaluated by comparing the potential of three culti

70 The methods were evaluated by comparing the resulting causal relatio

71 Accuracy was evaluated by comparison of the vitamin C tablet resu

72 ated intake and disease association analyses were evaluated by comparisons with previously reported s

73 l inflammatory cells and remodelling markers were evaluated by computed image analysis.

74 EI has not been evaluated by concurrent echocardiography and cardia

75 rificed at week 12 and the augmented tissues were evaluated by cone-beam computed tomography, microco

76 the abundance of cell-cell junction proteins were evaluated by confocal microscopy.

77 cific probe for the nuclear medicine imaging was evaluated by conjugating A9 with the DTPA chelator a

78 ond fermentation step for distiller's grains are evaluated by considering three different processing

79 Regional restitution properties in each case were evaluated by constructing a probability density fun

80 Fat fraction estimator performance was evaluated by correlation, linearity, and bias.

81 en baseline factors and cardiovascular death was evaluated by Cox proportional hazards modeling.

82 h progression-free survival (PFS; by RECIST) were evaluated by Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier statis

83 The resulting device was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry and electrochemical

84 The modified electrode was evaluated by cyclic voltammetry, scanning electronic

85 Spectral lens density was evaluated by detecting the intensity of the IVth Pur

86 an crosstalk of lipid and glucose metabolism was evaluated, by determining postprandial hepatic and i

87 Bone defects were evaluated by digital subtraction radiography (DSR)

88 extracts from Antarctic Streptomyces strains was evaluated by disk diffusion assays and minimum inhib

89 mplex (1 + X(-)) against its disintegration, were evaluated by dissociation studies using a mass spec

90 patients answered the clinical DD score and were evaluated by DRE and BET [standard and variable vol

91 At PN80 cardiac function was evaluated by echocardiography and Doppler analysis a

92 LV structure and function were evaluated by echocardiography at Y25.

93 Myocardial structure and function were evaluated by echocardiography, ECG, and in Langendo

94 Moreover, tissue stiffness was evaluated by elastography.

95 safety, efficacy, and durability at 30 days were evaluated by electroanatomical mapping and histopat

96 The rebinding features of the MIP film were evaluated by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy

97 Their ability to trap hydroxymethyl radical was evaluated by electron paramagnetic resonance spectro

98 GH, IGF-1 and IGFBP-2 levels were evaluated by ELISA at baseline and 6-12 months afte

99 Levels of PTX3 and IL-1beta in human samples were evaluated by ELISA.

100 hildren with septic shock (this latter topic was evaluated by evidence update).

101 The composite measure's suitability was evaluated by examining whether it captured the quali

102 Desorption was evaluated by exposing the deactivation system to was

103 d SaOS2 and PDX lines OS-17, OS-33 and OS-31 was evaluated by FACS.

104 e difference in prevalence of tumor response was evaluated by Fisher exact test, whereas differences

105 Immune cell numbers and phagocytic activity were evaluated by flow cytometry and lymphocyte prolifer

106 mbers and phenotype, and platelet activation were evaluated by flow cytometry.

107 Local bevacizumab-800CW accumulation was evaluated by fluorescence microscopy.

108 Procoagulant properties were evaluated by fluorescence flow cytometry and calibr

109 tage and in vitro apoptosis functional tests were evaluated by fluorescence-activated cell sorting; i

110 Publication bias was evaluated by funnel plots and the Egger test.

111 etween units packaged from a batch of RM can be evaluated by gas chromatography coupled to flame ioni

112 onsisted of plastic bags, tetrabrik and box, were evaluated by gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass s

113 ited to identify essential genes that cannot be evaluated by gene deletion analysis.

114 experimental periodontitis, and the outcomes were evaluated by gene expression, microcomputed tomogra

115 long time, and those with GI symptoms should be evaluated by GI endoscopy.

116 ocks from two locations (Sevilla and Huelva) was evaluated by harvest season.

117 Grafts were evaluated by hemocompatibility studies and a prelim

118 d urine albumin excretion, and kidney injury was evaluated by histopathology and gene expression anal

119 containing Goji berries (Lycium barbarum L.) was evaluated by ICP OES after two digestion procedures.

120 Immunologic effects of PD-L2 overexpression were evaluated by IFN-gamma ELISPOT.

121 daily; or 24 mg upadacitinib once daily and were evaluated by ileocolonoscopy at weeks 12 or 16 of t

122 Presence of PE was evaluated by imaging modalities, when ordered as par

123 Differentiation induced by a range of agents was evaluated by immunoassays of neural protein biomarke

124 epertoire of raw and heated protein extracts was evaluated by immunoblotting using five allergen-spec

125 gnaling, cytokine production, and cell death were evaluated by immunoblotting, ELISA, and cell death

126 Immune cell infiltrate was evaluated by immunohistochemistry and flow cytometry

127 PD1, CD3, CD8 and CD68 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in tumor infiltrat

128 Islet graft morphology and vascularization were evaluated by immunohistochemistry.

129 adipose tissue biopsies, changes in fibrosis were evaluated by immunohistological examination and by

130 The CNV area of choroidal flatmounts was evaluated by immunostaining with isolectin B4, and v

131 Histologic slices were evaluated by immunostaining for cell density and as

132 ib in NSCLC.Methods: Functional significance was evaluated by in vivo models of NSCLC and metastasis

133 operties of a sulfonamide moiety replacement were evaluated by incorporation of a SaRNA-monomer into

134 Donor serum samples were evaluated by indirect immunofluorescence antibody a

135 ning models, including six other algorithms, was evaluated by internal 5-fold cross-validation statis

136 fic CD4 (CD40L(+)) and CD8 (CD69(+)) T cells were evaluated by intracellular IL-2, IFN-gamma, and TNF

137 Here, these possibilities are evaluated by investigating the oxidative and toxicol

138 Tumor assessments were evaluated by investigators per immune-related RECIS

139 The performance of this method has been evaluated by its application to the detection of pr

140 biological activity of the released TGFbeta2 was evaluated by its ability to affect SMC proliferation

141 reated after disease activity-free intervals was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier estimates.

142 Time to an event and cumulative incidence were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier analysis, and relative ri

143 HCC occurrence rates were evaluated by Kaplan-Meier.

144 ither a-PAC or p-PAC at different w/w ratios were evaluated by LDA modeling.

145 All patients were evaluated by lower extremities CTA protocol allowin

146 echanisms of ER activation in regulating ECM were evaluated by luciferase reporter assays for activat

147 consecutive, normal patients < 18 years old being evaluated by Lurie Children's Ophthalmology.

148 21 days, and 1 to 21 days after vaccination was evaluated by means of a self-controlled case-series

149 base dynamics of these acylated anthocyanins was evaluated by means of pH jump techniques.

150 The optimal model was evaluated by means of the coefficient of determinati

151 Tissue properties can be evaluated by measuring contractile function, responsi

152 The approach is evaluated by measuring the (13)C polarization of ethy

153 he MERS-CoV-induced proinflammatory response was evaluated by measuring the expression levels of key

154 mulate the biodegradation of these compounds was evaluated by measuring the PCDD/F concentration redu

155 The hydrolytic capacity of BglA was evaluated by measuring the released volatiles in the

156 Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid was evaluated by microscopy; bronchoalveolar lavage flui

157 The translational potential of our results was evaluated by miRNA-seq analysis of human control and

158 Fifty patients were evaluated by modified intention-to-treat analysis.

159 Cell properties can be evaluated by monitoring gene/protein expression, oxid

160 The effect of RS was evaluated by monitoring body fat, glucose metabolism

161 Hemophilic synovitis was evaluated by monitoring joint bleeding, change in jo

162 The formation of PNA/miRNA-492 adduct was evaluated by monitoring the interaction between the

163 ef development and coral population dynamics were evaluated by monitoring populations from 2000-2019,

164 in gelatin-based and fibrin-based scaffolds was evaluated by MTT and live/dead assay.

165 re, cell viability in a cancerous cell lines was evaluated by MTT assay in the presence and absence o

166 GNP-HCIm cytotoxicity was evaluated by MTT assay, apoptosis/necrosis and phosp

167 e and bone indexes as the response variables were evaluated by multiple linear regression.

168 Few test metrics were evaluated by multiple studies.

169 Products were evaluated by multiplexed activity profiling (MAP),

170 tion, including timing, and HO-CDI incidence were evaluated by multivariable logistic regression.

171 cterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were evaluated by NG-Test Carba 5 (NG Biotech, Guipry, F

172 fermentation on green canephora coffee beans were evaluated by observing the changes to selected non-

173 proteins in MTEX, non-MTEX and HDs exosomes were evaluated by on-bead flow cytometry.

174 Objective image quality was evaluated by one reader; two readers assessed subjec

175 cells, and their differentiation capability was evaluated by organoid culture.

176 Quality of life was evaluated by PEmb-QOL scores at 30 days, 90 days, 18

177 r, stability of the chain elongation process was evaluated by performing repeated batch experiments.

178 rototype dual-particle imager's capabilities were evaluated by performing measurements with a (252)Cf

179 Safety of US-triggered MB destruction was evaluated by physiologic monitoring, changes in live

180 act of the catholyte on the pathogen killing was evaluated by plating Salmonella typhimurium on agar

181 nces in post- vs. pre-vaccination (baseline) were evaluated by Poisson regression.

182 n after AMI, and 30-day mortality after AMI) were evaluated by practice-level socioeconomic disadvant

183 The networks were evaluated by predicting the presence, extent, and G

184 Protein expression changes were evaluated by principal component analysis, 1-way AN

185 Cytokine profiles were evaluated by proteome microarray and Kaplan-Meier s

186 7(phox) (NOX2 regulatory subunit) and p52Shc was evaluated by proximity ligation and coimmunoprecipit

187 troscopic signature of the mu-hydride ligand was evaluated by pulse EPR studies.

188 e performance of the strong cationic cryogel was evaluated by purification of lysozyme from egg white

189 The photocatalytic performance is evaluated by quantifying the rate of Congo red dye de

190 Activity of residual cccDNA was evaluated by quantifying 3.5 kB HBV RNA (preC/pgRNA)

191 The efficacy of the device was evaluated by quantifying TNF-alpha in the cell cultu

192 Optimal ferumoxytol uptake time was evaluated by quantitative relaxometry maps indicatin

193 termined, and target gene expression changes were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chai

194 Retinal sections and whole-mounts were evaluated by quantitative, immunohistochemical, and

195 The vitamin D level was evaluated by quartile divide or used the classificat

196 Six weeks after surgery, IVDs were evaluated by radiologic IVD height, histological gr

197 vely, and the distributions of these indices were evaluated by range during supine rest in 61 healthy

198 ginase-1 and chitinase-like 3 (Chil3 or YM1) were evaluated by real time polymerase chain reaction.

199 AHR- and Nrf2-pathway genes in Caco-2 cells were evaluated by real-time qPCR.

200 he performance of GRS in SLE risk prediction was evaluated by receiver operating characteristic (ROC)

201 gnostic accuracy of (18)F-FET PET parameters was evaluated by receiver-operating-characteristic analy

202 Diagnostic accuracies of PET parameters were evaluated by receiver-operating-characteristic anal

203 Novel variants were evaluated by recombinant phenotyping to assess thei

204 Their metabolic potential was evaluated by reconstructing 31 Chloroflexi genomes f

205 on spectrometry and the digestion efficiency was evaluated by residual carbon content.

206 ies were taken and mitochondrial respiration was evaluated by respirometry.

207 xpression of CD69 and NR4A nuclear receptors was evaluated by reverse transcription-polymerase chain

208 Lipotoxic factors and insulin resistance were evaluated by reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain

209 h influences IgG activation of Fc receptors, was evaluated by Sambucus nigra lectin blotting.

210 hotoelectrochemical response of the platform was evaluated by Scanning Electrochemical Microscopy and

211 At baseline, psychological status was evaluated by self-administered questionnaire (Depres

212 The microstructure of the samples was evaluated by SEM microscopy, sugars content by HPLC

213 lysed by ESI-LTQ-ORBITRAP, and 11 attributes were evaluated by sensory analysis.

214 Fecal microbiome composition was evaluated by sequencing the 16S ribosomal RNA gene V

215 Cardiac remodeling was evaluated by serial echocardiography, morphometric a

216 Performance of VTM was evaluated by several quality assurance measures.

217 All products were evaluated by several spectroscopic techniques (Rama

218 caftaric acid to inhibit tyrosinase activity was evaluated by spectrophotometric assays.

219 inally, validation of the proposed biosensor was evaluated by spiked wheat samples and average recove

220 for quantification purposes, matrix effects were evaluated by spiking VGO samples with deuterated py

221 Hepatic fibrosis was evaluated by staining for desmin, Sirius Red/Fast Gr

222 ous findings in MTLE-HS patients with IF who were evaluated by stereotactic implanted depth electrode

223 Interactions with bacterial components were evaluated by stimulating cells with lipopolysacchar

224 ations of oligonucleotides (model compounds) were evaluated by stoichiometric displacement and linear

225 ) theory suggests that potential choices can be evaluated by strategies that may or may not be sensit

226 using interaction terms; 3-way interactions were evaluated by stratifying 2-way interactions by the

227 Bioaccessibility of both compounds was evaluated by studying gastric and intestinal digesti

228 The sense of smell was evaluated by studying olfactory behavior and recordi

229 Anterior chamber angle status was evaluated by swept-source optical coherence tomograp

230 NP1 efficacy in vivo was evaluated by systemic administration to tumor-bearin

231 In total 730 patients were evaluated by targeted metagenomics (n = 573 patient

232 Five pigments were evaluated by TEM, of which four had a size median b

233 esis gene module associated with weight loss was evaluated by testing the function of member genes in

234 both strategies for A1 allele identification were evaluated by testing decreasing dilutions of A1 all

235 Diagnostic accuracy was evaluated by the agreement with histology using weig

236 Accuracy was evaluated by the analysis of CRM of rice flour and b

237 The experimented data was evaluated by the analysis of variance.

238 performance of multivariate models obtained was evaluated by the coefficient of determination (R(2))

239 Model performance was evaluated by the concordance index after correction

240 e performance of the resulting MIP electrode was evaluated by the current obtained from the oxidation

241 sed of 500 chest radiographs in 500 patients was evaluated by the CV19-Net and three experienced thor

242 The efficacy of the proximity sensation was evaluated by the initial contact force during telero

243 The assay was evaluated by the naked eye (on/off) and quantitative

244 3-kilometer run test, and anaerobic fitness was evaluated by the numbers of sit-ups and push-ups per

245 Heterogeneity across studies was evaluated by the Q test in conjunction with I(2) sta

246 The evidence was evaluated by the subgroup members and further discus

247 The patient was evaluated by the surgical oncology team, who believe

248 ell viability, proliferation, and cell cycle were evaluated by the MTS assay, Ki-67 staining, and flo

249 cephalitis, who had a recent deer tick bite, were evaluated by the relevant serologic tests to determ

250 The top ranked phenolics were evaluated by their molecular and pharmacokinetics p

251 d successful of molecular encapsulation have been evaluated by thermal and spectroscopic techniques.

252 The thermal stability of PSOP was evaluated by thermogravimetric (TGA) and differentia

253 se distributions to close-ended survey items were evaluated by these variables.

254 The quality of particles in each iteration is evaluated by three energy functions, and the non-domi

255 MR venography images were evaluated by three radiologists for presence of ste

256 o develop into different quality classes has been evaluated by time domain Nuclear Magnetic Resonance

257 ombinant GCSF-based homo-dimeric derivatives were evaluated by total internal reflection ellipsometry

258 aracteristics that determine quality and can be evaluated by trained tasting panels.

259 Residual shunt was evaluated by transthoracic echocardiography with sal

260 Hematopoietic supportive capacity of MSCs was evaluated by transwell migration assay and 2D cocult

261 Method performance was evaluated by trapping acetaminophen reactive metabol

262 Outcomes were evaluated by treatment exposure, including historic

263 Changes in (18)F-FET uptake were evaluated by tumor-to-brain ratios in residual tumo

264 Test performance was evaluated by two comparators and latent class analys

265 erior-posterior (AP) diameters of all groups were evaluated by two different radiologists who were un

266 Afterwards, images were evaluated by two experienced radiologists who were

267 NR), nerve diameter and fracture dislocation were evaluated by two radiologists and correlated with n

268 weeks post-injection, the newly formed bone was evaluated by uCT, histology, nanoindentation, and ge

269 f these devices to quantitative measurements was evaluated by use of an iodine clock reaction to quan

270 e potential and forces at each time step can be evaluated by using a recurrence relation which avoids

271 The system was evaluated by using 105 chest CT scans of patients ad

272 atistical significance of these associations was evaluated by using a sample permutation test and the

273 Cluster robustness was evaluated by using an independent cohort of patients

274 Brain inflammation in patients with HE was evaluated by using archived GSE41919.

275 ormance to a MACE within 12 months after AMI was evaluated by using Cox proportional hazards models a

276 The role of Glp1r in NTS was evaluated by using Glp1r(-/-) mice or C57BL/6 mice t

277 lcoxon signed rank test, and reproducibility was evaluated by using intraclass correlation coefficien

278 Treatment efficacy was evaluated by using modified Response Evaluation Crit

279 Risk of bias of individual studies was evaluated by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic

280 Risk of bias was evaluated by using Quality Assessment of Diagnostic

281 minations were analyzed, and tumor evolution was evaluated by using Response Evaluation Criteria in S

282 The FFDM model was evaluated by using SM datasets from two institutions

283 f(lumen)), and the strength of correlations was evaluated by using Spearman correlation coefficients

284 Accuracy was evaluated by using the Dice similarity coefficient (

285 Certainty of evidence was evaluated by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendat

286 intensity of subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH) was evaluated by using the Hunt-Hess and Fisher scales.

287 The quality of each study was evaluated by using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomize

288 MC mediator-related symptoms were evaluated by using a specific physician-reported qu

289 (AEs) and serious adverse events to infusion were evaluated by using an intent-to-treat analysis.

290 Myofibrillar protein synthesis rates were evaluated by using intravenous [ring-2H5]phenylalan

291 ence (within 2 years) and overall recurrence were evaluated by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.

292 elated complications up to 1 year postpartum were evaluated by using multivariate log-binomial regres

293 ative image features and basic clinical data were evaluated by using random forest machine learning a

294 ed with PE and arterial obstruction severity were evaluated by using statistical analysis.

295 Clinical outcomes were evaluated by using the GRADE (Grading of Recommenda

296 Both tumor and TIL analyses were evaluated by using three convolutional neural netwo

297 erol, carotenoids and chlorophylls when EVOO was evaluated by UV-Vis spectroscopy.

298 otential of the photoelectroactive materials were evaluated by UV-Vis spectroscopy and electrochemica

299 lation of adoptively transferred macrophages was evaluated by various imaging methods in transgenic P

300 electroanalytical performance of this device was evaluated by voltammetric and flow injection analyse