戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 roteases are similar, their FPs are found to be quite different.
2 t the optimum pH and isoelectric point could be quite different.
3 ximodistal axis (base to tip) are thought to be quite different.
4 lecules of cccDNA), and replicating DNAs may be quite different.
5 opulation genetics of sexual populations may be quite different.
6 n patients lacking these lifestyle risks may be quite different.
7 plar for 5-OH-PCB91 and 5-OH-PCB95 proved to be quite different.
8 sion that involves these proteins appears to be quite different.
9 ity in 5-enolexo processes are calculated to be quite different.
10 rlying structure of environmental influences is quite different.
11 the linker region that joins the two domains is quite different.
12 trend for the perfluorocarbon (PFC) radicals is quite different.
13  but the reality of DNA's physical existence is quite different.
14      In the germline, however, the situation is quite different.
15 inding to the -152 to -86 bp SPRR1B promoter is quite different.
16 se tissues in energy storage and utilization is quite different.
17 n Fas-deficient autoimmune mice, the picture is quite different.
18 ferases, although the adenine-binding domain is quite different.
19  action of progesterone in these two systems is quite different.
20 rom EXT1 and EXT2, its pattern of expression is quite different.
21 duction of stereoselectivity in DA reactions is quite different.
22 histories of C. albicans and C. dubliniensis are quite different.
23  series, even when their expression profiles are quite different.
24 ekeeping genes to normalize microarrays that are quite different.
25 e two pathogens, their pathogenic lifestyles are quite different.
26 aternary structures between the heterodimers are quite different.
27 n images, their demands on visual processing are quite different.
28 ude of the binding constant for each complex are quite different.
29 on from pH 7.3 to pH 3.0 for loops CD and EF are quite different.
30 anions and the corresponding neutral species are quite different.
31  ventricular volume between the two patients are quite different.
32 ion machinery, their kinetics of degradation are quite different.
33 on expression during chemoautotrophic growth are quite different.
34 he atomic compositions of the two substances are quite different.
35            The properties of CaMKII labeling are quite different.
36 nslation of prokaryotic and eukaryotic genes are quite different.
37 ffects of KChIP4a and KChIP1-3 on Kv4 gating are quite different.
38 arly identical, their hemichannel properties are quite different.
39 s, the in vivo functions of the two proteins are quite different.
40 ngal, and viral keratitis, as the treatments are quite different.
41 nship between them, their modes of secretion are quite different.
42          The selectivities on the two phases are quite different.
43 ar, their apoptotic and oncogenic properties are quite different.
44 a of AFGP8 and AFGP1-5 in the amide I region are quite different.
45  of natural selection and breeding structure are quite different.
46 tween those two classes of bis-intercalators are quite different.
47 al, their equilibrium momentum distributions are quite different.
48 olic and sensory effects of these two sugars are quite different.
49 ce because therapeutic options and prognosis are quite different.
50 process is achieved and hence the mechanisms are quite different.
51 atus and final visual outcome in the 2 types are quite different.
52 , the catalytic phenotypes of these isozymes are quite different.
53 fic mechanisms involved in metal recognition are quite different.
54  the class II alleles and genotypes involved are quite different.
55 e neighborhood ratio between A + T and G + C was quite different.
56                  The response of coi1 plants was quite different.
57 milar illnesses, the treatment they received was quite different.
58 n-dependent manner; however, the time course was quite different.
59 s, the chemical composition of these samples was quite different.
60 the freshwater budget at the poles must have been quite different.
61 the experimental water exchange results have been quite different.
62 owever, some of the trigonal tricationic ILs were quite different.
63 tion kinetics in response to interferon-beta were quite different.
64 ts of these proteins on actin polymerization were quite different.
65 ce identity, their responses to Gd@C82(OH)22 were quite different.
66 se, despite the genetic and biological basis being quite different.
67                         While the two assays are quite different, a zero-inflated negative binomial (
68 owever, the surface features of the proteins are quite different, accounting for their different role
69 thy (BSE) infection, the polymorphism effect is quite different although the ARR allotype remains the
70  cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A2 and iron-which can be quite different among inbred strains-are critical in
71 he rate parameters for the various processes is quite different among the branching models.
72              At position -5, the selectivity was quite different among the various isozymes; PKC alph
73 alues of the pKs, 10.5 and 8.5 respectively, are quite different and Mn(2+)SOD's pK affects the coord
74  a bulk nematic phase, the kinematic details are quite different and provide a possible mechanism for
75 e occupied by TcdB bound to the two peptides are quite different and provide valuable insight for the
76 the binding of arachidonate to PGHS-1 and -2 are quite different and that residues within the hydroph
77 key stability determinants for each Cro fold are quite different and that the P22 Cro sequence strong
78 rimary structures of the major coat proteins are quite different and the virions assemble at very dif
79 ay the two repressors cooperatively assemble is quite different and explains in part the differences
80 residues presented by each partner, however, are quite different, and some initial findings concernin
81 t in both molecules, the mechanisms involved are quite different, and this difference resulted in dif
82 ible for phenotypic differences, the picture is quite different, and about 80% of proteins are differ
83 ies that developed in these two environments were quite different, and some indicators (soil salinity
84 imary structures of the two protein subunits are quite different; and the nucleotide/protein subunit
85  considered to be very similar, may actually be quite different at the molecular level.
86           The ranking of uncertainty sources was quite different at the sector level, with the choice
87 signalling molecules and regulatory proteins are quite different between Gram-positives and Gram-nega
88 hanical systems involved in this propagation are quite different between the DHQSs from the two speci
89 ning to host-pathogen numerical dynamics can be quite different between pathogens with frequency-depe
90 ory areas caused by associative learning can be quite different between specialized and nonspecialize
91 onsynonymous, and noncoding sites appears to be quite different between the species, making direct co
92 ured by resonant inelastic x-ray scattering, is quite different between the two structures, evidencin
93 ial growth stage, the polyphenol composition was quite different between the cultivars.
94 course of labeled Tn exchange at pCa 9 and 4 were quite different between cTn and sTn.
95     An edge effect is often observed and can be quite different both qualitatively and quantitatively
96       Although the NAPs in the two complexes are quite different, both groups of NAPs activate the en
97 t monomer-polymer transitions of the mutants are quite different, confirming that the linear polymeri
98 cation procedures of the two proteins, which were quite different, could have contributed to such con
99 composition characteristics of compounds can be quite different depending on whether it is the bulk d
100 able to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons may be quite different depending on which other agents are p
101 resentation of mutations in a given gene can be quite different, depending upon the location and type
102  Although the 1976 and 2003 drought extremes were quite different, Douglas fir maintained consistentl
103 -vis absorption spectra of these two isomers are quite different even though their local chromophore
104 gly, the models and interpretation for PEDOT are quite different: film dynamics are determined by fre
105 ts demonstrate that thermodynamic parameters are quite different for paralogous but are quite similar
106 also similar for the two 3,6 derivatives but are quite different for the 2,7 NH and NMe carbazole dic
107                      The solution structures are quite different for the [AP]dG.dA 11-mer duplex cont
108        In contrast, such SKIE on k(cat)/K(m) are quite different for the C221A/C222A variant (0.62) t
109 e driven coercivity changes with temperature are quite different for top and bottom CoFeB layers.
110    The changes in ion permeability, however, are quite different for Trp --> Phe and Trp --> 1-methyl
111 owever, the wave morphology of the ictal EEG is quite different for electrodes placed in different an
112          However, the loss of binding energy was quite different for vestibule residues considered to
113                         FA-FABP interactions were quite different for I-FABP and A-FABP proteins.
114               The changes observed, however, were quite different for the two pterin substrates.
115 es of Est-6 make up two allele families that are quite different from each other, while there is rela
116 mal, and the activities of each in the brain are quite different from each other.
117                                However, they are quite different from L25541 in both the 5' UTR and t
118 ation properties of the three polar solvents are quite different from one another and from polar solv
119 tion patterns of MG1 and MG2 in whole saliva are quite different from one another.
120 cal bonding, and overall molecular structure are quite different from peptides and proteins.
121 id for reciprocal and nonreciprocal objects, are quite different from previous relations.
122                                These results are quite different from recent reports that ADAM-2/alph
123 tions with the NW arenaviruses JUNV and MACV are quite different from responses to infections with th
124 ar distributions of the low energy electrons are quite different from that of simpler targets like Ne
125 ng Li-Li separations in the cycled structure are quite different from the as-prepared material, as re
126  topologies, but the posterior probabilities are quite different from the bootstrap proportions.
127       The actual forces describing exclusion are quite different from the commonly assumed steric cro
128                           These consequences are quite different from the more localized effects that
129 exponents that depend on that rate, and that are quite different from the naive prediction based on t
130 t materials can present novel phenomena that are quite different from the physical properties observe
131 ic mechanisms behind negative signal changes are quite different from those behind positive signal ch
132 elicits a T cell response with features that are quite different from those elicited by the wild-type
133  However, the infrared bands for huPrP23-144 are quite different from those for a synthetic peptide P
134 ed myristate and structure of Ca2+-free Ncs1 are quite different from those in other NCS proteins.
135  effects of other iNKR on dNK responsiveness are quite different from those in pbNK.
136  between actin and many binding partners and are quite different from those in the Arp2/3 complex.
137 es to its proximal and distal promoters that are quite different from those in the chicken.
138 trated that binding behaviors in rodent MCRs are quite different from those in the classical frog ski
139 moters involves mechanisms and proteins that are quite different from those in the pap operon.
140 reveals that the base changes induced by ENU are quite different from those induced by EMS; specifica
141                                  The results are quite different from those obtained using 3-dimensio
142 s building blocks of human intelligence that are quite different from those of artificial intelligenc
143       All cephalochordate GFP-encoding genes are quite different from those of copepods and cnidarian
144  oxygen affinity and very low cooperativity, are quite different from those of deoxy-Hb A, even in th
145 ins 1 and 3 in our E. coli EF-Tu-GDP complex are quite different from those of EF-Tu with bound GTP f
146 ic structures, but their structural features are quite different from those of genes of both SBEI and
147 and structural parameters of the apCAM bonds are quite different from those of NCAM.
148 dues lining on the active site of TaNAPRTase are quite different from those of QAPRTase, although the
149 cessful coreference resolution in this genre are quite different from those of the general domain, an
150   The 2D spectral patterns of the tripeptide are quite different from those of the longer peptides.
151 quilibrium conditions of receptor activation are quite different from those often used to study GABAA
152 al geometry and an oxidation state (+3) that are quite different from those seen in bulk ceria or for
153     The initial retinal responses to defocus are quite different from those when the eye growth patte
154 eal viruses.IMPORTANCE Many archaeal viruses are quite different from viruses infecting bacteria and
155 mical structure of the antagonist, which can be quite different from agonists.
156           Cyclobutadienyl radical appears to be quite different from benzocyclobutadienyl radical (1r
157  and Rouse-Zimm models shows the material to be quite different from other thiophene-based conducting
158 e genetic basis of ordinal traits appears to be quite different from regular quantitative traits.
159             Though MS has always appeared to be quite different from spectroscopy to analytical chemi
160 ssue-specificity of an isolated enhancer may be quite different from that in the context of its own g
161     As the disease in a new host species may be quite different from that in the original or natural
162 hese cases, clinical signs and pathology can be quite different from the infantile form, raising the
163                     Since any given line can be quite different from the outbred control, it is likel
164 egment of the population that is sampled may be quite different from the population variability that
165 hough bacterial sigma factors are thought to be quite different from the specificity factors employed
166  mechanisms of overcoming immune control may be quite different from those at the primary site.
167  protein, transducin (Gt), and found them to be quite different from those that might be expected fro
168 catalysts induce high enantioselectivity may be quite different from those used by catalysts that rel
169 e height of the last ice age appears to have been quite different from today.
170 ed as unique, with speciation and adaptation being quite different from immigration and ecological as
171 eosomes by the ATP-dependent remodeler INO80 is quite different from another remodeler (SWI/SNF) that
172 ary song has 'sine song' characteristics and is quite different from any song produced by New World s
173 on of functional domains within the sequence is quite different from apoA-I and apoE.
174 rotein function from available sequence data is quite different from assigning an EC classification f
175 s were not detected in MHC-II KO mice, which is quite different from CD4 T cell-deficient mice that i
176 s not generally realized that interfacial PT is quite different from conventional PT in bulk water.
177 nocyte cadherins in these individuals, which is quite different from healthy individuals from the Uni
178 t to E3BP of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, which is quite different from its homologous transacetylase in
179              Such high alpha-helical content is quite different from known antimicrobial proteins.
180 nce dependence of polyol inclusion, however, is quite different from nonpolar alcohol exclusion, sugg
181    Characterization of OmpG revealed that it is quite different from other porins.
182                                This behavior is quite different from other two-dimensional systems.
183    The protein adopts a novel structure that is quite different from predicted models and features a
184 ontal lineC double bond was generated, which is quite different from previously reported 1,3-DCs of a
185  16, the relative organization of the region is quite different from that in humans.
186 tary in adult Teleosts (class: Osteichthyes) is quite different from that in other chordates and is a
187 ues, but their function in the first setting is quite different from that in the latter.
188 eous reaction of SP-B(1-25) at the interface is quite different from that in the solution phase.
189     The ApolPBP pH-induced structural change is quite different from that observed for alcohol bindin
190 truction reveals a receptor interaction that is quite different from that observed for EV7.
191                               This phenotype is quite different from that observed in polycythemia ve
192                                  Recognition is quite different from that observed in the c-di-GMP-I
193  same kernel, the surface structure of Au103 is quite different from that of Au102, indicating the ma
194  of release of the PMCA4b CaM-binding domain is quite different from that of binding.
195 t the evolutionary pattern of these families is quite different from that of concerted evolution but
196 nct ECM distribution pattern of Ang-1, which is quite different from that of fibronectin, laminin, an
197  of release of iron from the N-terminal lobe is quite different from that of its C-terminal counterpa
198  model system, we show that its conformation is quite different from that of its direct zymogen precu
199        The structure of these extreme events is quite different from that of moderately large events
200 hows its own form of space weathering, which is quite different from that of other airless bodies vis
201    Specifically, residue 773(S) in PI3Kalpha is quite different from that of PI3Kbeta (D), gamma (A),
202  state that the structure of the primate DCN is quite different from that of rodents, with primates l
203 gy landscape from the implicit solvent model is quite different from that of the explicit solvent mod
204 scripts that use an unusual codon usage that is quite different from that of the host cell.
205 igodendrocytes indicates that their function is quite different from that of the MBPs to which they a
206 erall environment of the CD21/35(-/-) spleen is quite different from that of the wild-type animal per
207   The arrangement of these domains, however, is quite different from that seen in polymerases that us
208                                         This is quite different from the beta-carbonic anhydrases of
209                                This location is quite different from the catalytic domain location of
210                          This action of TCDD is quite different from the classic action of TCDD to in
211 ltage-dependent gating of these two channels is quite different from the classical mechanical-lever m
212                                This sequence is quite different from the consensus Dun1 phosphorylati
213 ssage Toledo strain of human cytomegalovirus is quite different from the corresponding region in the
214 , and our findings reveal that the structure is quite different from the generic picture of cream str
215                    Such homogeneous behavior is quite different from the heterogeneity seen in previo
216  the tract of cingulum simultaneously, which is quite different from the idea of tractography.
217                       The fish immune system is quite different from the mammalian system because the
218  subunit form a dinucleotide platform, which is quite different from the motif seen in solution.
219          Interestingly, the tree shrew model is quite different from the mouse model of HSV infection
220 expressed and although its promoter sequence is quite different from the Nt59 and LAT59 promoters, th
221                                    This view is quite different from the one-step mechanism, which ha
222  molecule relative to the poliovirus surface is quite different from the orientation of intercellular
223 lf-bending behavior like a somersault, which is quite different from the previously reported behavior
224 nge of biological and structural studies, it is quite different from the relatively crowded condition
225                                         This is quite different from the somatostatin agonist analogu
226                  This solvent-induced effect is quite different from the traditional picture of balan
227  to the host cell receptors in a manner that is quite different from the way the natural ligands bind
228 at hybridization for surface immobilized DNA is quite different from the well-studied solution-phase
229 iques are not all the same: Behavior copying is quite different from theory passing.
230                              This phenomenon is quite different from these reported in previous works
231 strands flanked by five alpha-helices, which is quite different from those of other known two-compone
232  of the single-headed construct of myosin Vc is quite different from those of other vertebrate myosin
233 Although the split/recombine sampling scheme is quite different from those used in analysis of catego
234 n is arranged into a novel polymer form that is quite different from typical microtubules.
235 ing of PGSK fluorescence by Fe2+ in vesicles was quite different from that for PGSK and Fe2+ in solut
236 emonstrated that each of these three mutants was quite different from the others.
237 zzling in that the observed reactive pattern was quite different from those seen with TM6 and 12.
238                               Toxin profiles were quite different from both qualitative and quantitat
239 (DBP) concentration profiles in heated water were quite different from the DBP concentrations in the
240                  The chemisorbed NAB spectra were quite different from the free NAB spectra, and were
241 represented in the samples collected in 2010 were quite different from those collected in 2008 and 20
242  evolved to be adaptive in environments that were quite different from those faced in modern industri
243 effects of heroin self-administration itself were quite different from what has been seen during coca
244                          This crossing angle is quite different (>50 degrees ) from that typically fo
245 ion occurs in all three cases, the reactions are quite different in detail.
246 af initiation, vascularization, and polarity are quite different in lycophytes and seed plants, consi
247 y against opportunistic infections, but they are quite different in structure from previously studied
248 actions between the large N-terminal domains are quite different in the filament from that observed i
249 ind that the influences of nearest neighbors are quite different in the two datasets.
250 e compression characteristics of the fibrils are quite different in the two media, revealing the pres
251 n development and tissue-specific expression are quite different in these organisms, most strikingly
252 etic term when the successive rate constants are quite different in value.
253 tion and purpose of NO production by NOS may be quite different in B. subtilis than in mammals.
254             Dynamics of this interaction may be quite different in contracting muscle than in vitro b
255 anagement approaches to tuberculosis need to be quite different in this country than in other regions
256 mptive evolutionary source of these proteins is quite different in contending models of mitochondrial
257 The detailed architecture of the heme pocket is quite different in ShuT and PhuT.
258       The aromatic heterocycle stacked dimer is quite different in structure from the polyamide-lexit
259 in the two receptors and across species, but is quite different in the integrin domains, explaining t
260 ral conformation of the hexapeptide analogue is quite different in the two sites.
261                The representation of pursuit is quite different in these two regions of the brain, bu
262 s, their coupling to the responding elements is quite different in various cell types.
263                                CelY and CelZ were quite different in substrate preference.
264 ges in tumors following treatment with virus were quite different in the presence versus the absence
265 e show that the dynamics of the epidemic can be quite different, in particular, short-term prediction
266 Importantly, fructose and glucose metabolism are quite different; in comparison with glucose, fructos
267 ame for the two isoenzymes, but the S states are quite different, indicating a much larger movement o
268 ptional regulatory elements in these viruses are quite different, indicating that tissue-specific onc
269  In contrast, binding of the globular domain was quite different: it binds much more weakly, with a K
270 nces and innate properties of ABri and Abeta are quite different, notably ABri contains two cysteine
271                                Phase 2(slow) is quite different, progressively slowing in concert wit
272    The pathogenesis of each of these viruses is quite different, providing an opportunity for compari
273 g effectors required in each of these models are quite different, quantitating the cellular ratio of
274 between chimpanzees and humans but the shape is quite different, rising more slowly for a longer frac
275 effect, at fw the pattern of differentiation is quite different such that the frequencies of single n
276  their relative location to the 2PG molecule is quite different, suggesting that they probably have d
277 channel activity but the activation kinetics were quite different, suggesting that, even if the chann
278 of characteristics exhibited by Tenuiviruses are quite different than those found for most plant viru
279         Although the eukaryotic RNase P RNAs are quite different than those of Bacteria in both seque
280 acteristics (fluorescence, CD) were found to be quite different than those of natural DNA, apparently
281  the intestinal mucosa, at least to fasting, is quite different than in humans.
282  This pattern of clearance of filtered fluid is quite different than is seen with the passive capilla
283                         This pattern of KIEs is quite different than observed for solvolysis of CMP-N
284 assays for individual camptothecin analogues were quite different than those determined for stabiliza
285 ain distributions of PreXMRV-1 and PreXMRV-2 are quite different, the former being found predominantl
286 elaboration of each of these organ types can be quite different, the same general organization of fou
287 -Voigt surface waves at the planar interface are quite different: the Dyakonov-Voigt surface wave wit
288 ng for its partner, however, the perspective is quite different: The functional task is challenged by
289 , the results with IL-2, a soluble cytokine, are quite different; thus, IL-2 function is markedly inh
290         The responses of sensory neurons can be quite different to repeated presentations of the same
291  properties of nanometre-scale materials can be quite different to those of bulk materials due to the
292    Although the spectra of the four peptides are quite different, tyrosine phosphorylation is found t
293 as improved latrines and water treatment can be quite different under conditions of high and low regi
294  The dependence of TOF on etaeff is shown to be quite different upon changing, for instance, the pKa
295 action rate of NO with cell-free Hb and RBCs is quite different, we hypothesize that different reacti
296 e of the C-terminal catalytic domain of TSP3 is quite different when compared to TSP1.
297 xample, the pH dependence of these processes was quite different, with reconstitution being most effi
298  Outcomes for patients with these phenotypes were quite different, with age-adjusted 1-year survival
299                      Germination progression was quite different within the three exhaustively aerate
300 s, functions, and developmental trajectories are quite different, yielding distinctly different tools

 
Page Top