戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 n a semisterile environment (cellulose fiber bedding).
2 erved after clinical contact and changing of bedding.
3 al discontinuities, such as the thickness of bedding.
4 was mixed and added back as a portion of new bedding.
5 eekly bathing and laundering of clothing and bedding.
6  to test vaginal secretory responses to male bedding.
7 ture after exposure to male, but not female, bedding.
8 hase distributions aligned with depositional bedding.
9 lt avian antigens from commonly used feather bedding.
10 wed equivalent preferences for female-soiled bedding.
11 d to a variety of odorants added to the cage bedding.
12 th and were often found scattered within the bedding.
13 d to be due to virus exposure while changing bedding.
14 floors, 35.3 (5th-95th percentile, 5.0-260); bedding, 18.7 (2.0-142); family room floors, 63.9 (11.5-
15 mmon husbandry practices, including food and bedding alterations, as well as facility and cage change
16                 Modeling the joint effect of bedding and bedroom floor endotoxin on recent asthma sym
17 ust was vacuum sampled to generate composite bedding and bedroom floor samples.
18                                    Dust from bedding and bedroom floor was analyzed for endotoxin con
19 tures of environmental specimens (e.g., from bedding and clothing) were obtained.
20 a pair of primary antennas mounted under the bedding and connected to a wireless reader and a multipl
21 luate the use of house dust mite-impermeable bedding and its impact on severe asthma exacerbations in
22 ply of Aquatabs and soap, hygiene promotion, bedding and latrine disinfection activities, ring covera
23 ed in rats by providing the dam with limited bedding and nesting (LBN) materials, which mimics the ef
24                     Here we used the limited bedding and nesting (LBN) model of adversity to evaluate
25 down of 5HT(1A) autoreceptors to the limited bedding and nesting model of ELA from postnatal day (P)3
26  either a control or ELA (induced by limited bedding and nesting) environment, from postnatal days (P
27  driving large scale velocity variations are bedding and paleostresses, while mineralogical compositi
28 Planum Boreum basal unit scarps reveal cross-bedding and show evidence for recent mass wasting, flow,
29 tions for infant sleep, smoke exposure, soft bedding and sleep surfaces, and overheating.
30 colonize calves by contact with contaminated bedding and without antibiotic selection pressure.
31 kin, milking machine unit liners, hands, and bedding) and countries.
32 s three product types (furnishings, apparel, bedding) and five labeling groups representing different
33 wn pillows (protective relative to synthetic bedding), and (regardless of specific sensitization) dus
34 were housed in groups with fresh, paddy husk bedding, and no infections or wound breakdown were obser
35 sized that introducing copper into clothing, bedding, and other articles would provide them with bioc
36 re eGFP-labelled E. coli were present in the bedding ( approximately 2 log g(-1)) resulting in amplif
37                  House dust mite impermeable bedding as an isolated intervention is unlikely to offer
38 rom birth and cat and dog allergen levels in bedding at age 1 year.
39                            Following limited bedding at postnatal days 2-9, adult (postnatal day 70)
40 maps to demonstrate the presence of rhythmic bedding at several outcrops in the Arabia Terra region.
41 nfants include prone and side sleeping, soft bedding, bed sharing, inappropriate sleep surfaces (incl
42                           Alternatively, the bedding can be covered with glass marbles and the number
43 ur air samples collected before and during a bedding change in one patient's room were positive (Ct 3
44  including from air samples collected during bedding change.
45 from air samples collected before and during bedding changes in five rooms were analysed using quanti
46 transmission mode: contact (n = 4), vehicle (bedding, clothing, other fabric, and medical equipment;
47  lithofacies from geological factors such as bedding, composition, and poroperm characteristics, as w
48 grammes involving the use of HDM impermeable bedding covers (n = 4), acaricides (n = 2), high-efficie
49 torial design, acaricide and HDM impermeable bedding covers in isolation and combination (n = 1).
50 tral role in the formation of microcracks or bedding delaminations which ultimately dominate mass tra
51              When women who used an electric bedding device for more than 6 months per year (and ther
52  aimed to examine whether use of an electric bedding device increased breast cancer risk in African-A
53 ncer risk associated with use of an electric bedding device increased with the number of years of use
54                          The use of electric bedding devices may increase breast cancer risk in Afric
55 ing groundwater flow exploits joint sets and bedding dip direction.
56  exposure to diverse farm animals, feed, and bedding during the prenatal period and in early infancy
57 tressor, such as prone/side sleeping or soft bedding, during a critical developmental period.
58 sted against a sterile solution of their own bedding dust and against a solution containing the same
59 onships were strongest for bedroom floor and bedding dust and were observed in adults only.
60 ttle work to investigate the effect of other bedding dust components on HDM sensitisation.
61                          An individual's own bedding dust does not appear to contain factors that enh
62 the diluted house dust mite solution and the bedding dust in spite of their high levels of endotoxin.
63                                              Bedding dust is a mixture of many components, of which t
64  was to determine the effect of endotoxin in bedding dust on the allergic response in HDM-sensitised
65 e negative in 22/29 of subjects using either bedding dust solutions or comparable diluted house dust
66 ether, these findings highlight that limited bedding ELS (1) produces an early emerging, female-speci
67 exposures to a social stimulus (e.g., soiled bedding) ensure a subject discriminates between the habi
68 loping left and right amygdala after limited bedding exposure, a phenomenon that could shape long-ter
69            Conversely, whereas soiled female bedding failed to induce IEG-IR in VNO neurons of estrad
70 nd decreased amplitudes compared with normal bedding females, concomitant with reduced NMDAR GluN1 su
71 fe by providing the mother with insufficient bedding for nest building and were odor-0.5 mA shock con
72  from postnatal day 8-12, where insufficient bedding for nest building induces maternal maltreatment
73 ere the mother is provided with insufficient bedding for nest building; and a more controlled paradig
74 lithic bed mostly overlies both trough cross-bedding ([Formula: see text] = 0.706) and parallel lamin
75 males were placed in an aquarium with soiled bedding from live traps as the odor source.
76 ixed genotypes were housed together and used bedding from the cages was mixed and added back as a por
77 s in dust and air and on household surfaces, bedding, furnishings, hand wipes, and saliva.
78 ial textile for healthcare fabrics (hospital bedding, gowns, lab coats, etc.).
79 ry structures (e.g. ripple lamination, cross-bedding) have received a great deal of attention in sedi
80 rasites in faecal samples, Der p 1 levels in bedding, hepatitis A antibodies, serum cholinesterase (a
81                                      Limited bedding impaired peripherally-measured basal corticoster
82 nits after milking of infected cows and from bedding in the outbreak pen.
83                                      Limited bedding increased nursing time and slightly increased fr
84              Isolated use of HDM impermeable bedding is unlikely to prove effective.
85 mice exposed to a single adversity - limited bedding (LB) - versus mice exposed to multiple adversiti
86  adverse environmental conditions of limited bedding (LB) during postnatal life would alter rhythmici
87                            Using the limited bedding (LB) paradigm as a rodent model of ELA, we found
88 e compared with those induced by the limited bedding (LB) procedure, a model that produces altered ma
89  mouse model of resource insecurity, limited bedding (LB), we tested the effects of LB on the develop
90 uld be replicated with T-shirts worn by men, bedding material from gonadally intact and unfamiliar ma
91                        Several isolates from bedding material that had the phenotypic appearance of K
92 lets and potential emission sources, such as bedding material.
93 roiler litter (BL), a mixture of excreta and bedding material.
94 arate locations within one cage, and carried bedding materials (cellulose pellets) from their nesting
95 ssociated with drowsiness, such as gathering bedding materials, constructing nests, and lying down, w
96                    From P4 to P11, a limited bedding model that leads to fragmented maternal care, wa
97  of estradiol-treated females to soiled male bedding, more VNO neurons in the basal than the apical l
98 ity can be modeled in rats using the limited bedding/nesting model (LBN), in which dams and pups are
99 sing and after stress induced by the limited bedding/nesting paradigm in mice.
100 iction of nesting material (neonatal limited bedding [NLB]) for 1 week.
101 y, by cohousing our laboratory mice with the bedding of pet store rats, we identified cross-species t
102 Has) were cohabitated with or exposed to the bedding of SHas orally infected with Sc237 prions.
103 ralization being promoted as veins and along beddings of the deformed Mesoproterozoic carbonatites vi
104 ntestinal microbiota of mice housed on clean bedding or in contact with soil was analyzed by using 16
105 ota composition between mice housed on clean bedding or in contact with soil, with a higher proportio
106  22-28 male and female offspring from normal bedding or LB mothers.
107 racheal tube (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.38, 2.19), bedding (OR, 1.43; 95% CI, 1.20, 1.70), and bathing (OR,
108  in a bacterium-laden environment (corn dust bedding) or in a semisterile environment (cellulose fibe
109 ays of switches in common laboratory food or bedding, or following an isolated cage change in mice ac
110  the measuring direction with respect to the bedding orientation.
111 aturalistic rodent model of ELS, the limited bedding paradigm (LB) between postnatal days 1-10, we pr
112 ave been reproduced using the rodent limited bedding paradigm of early adversity.
113  pressure dependence is due to imperceptible bedding parallel delamination cracks in the oil bearing
114 at is completely random whereas trough cross-bedding, parallel laminated bed, cumulative sandstone fa
115                          Catagenesis created bedding-parallel microfractures, which subsequently acte
116        nov., based primarily on monospecific bedding plane assemblages from the Lower-Middle Devonian
117                              Some intriguing bedding plane features that were observed in the Mesopro
118  in viscoelastic rock slope with a nonlinear bedding plane is analyzed, and the propagation equation
119                     Data also shows that the bedding plane orientations have a substantial impact on
120                      To assess the impact of bedding plane properties on their stability under mining
121 even skeletons closely preserved on a single bedding plane received the bulk of previous attention.
122 ted model was then used to study how varying bedding plane strength and the cohesion-to-tensile stren
123                                   Increasing bedding plane strength enhanced the overall stability of
124                                     Reducing bedding plane strength led to more shear-tensile cracks
125 ability of the roof, reducing damage to both bedding planes and individual layers.
126  particularly for fossil tracks recovered at bedding planes below the originally exposed surface.
127 re small (< 2 mm) and precipitated either on bedding planes or reworked within micro cross-lamination
128 plitting the substrate volume along "virtual bedding planes" exposed prints that more closely resembl
129 toughness from 25 C up to 300 C at different bedding planes.
130                 Petunia hybrida is a popular bedding plant that has a long history as a genetic model
131  a pressure-sensitive pad under the infants' bedding recorded body movements and respiratory patterns
132 ed for > 10-fold greater contribution to the bedding reservoir compared with shedding of resistant ba
133        The stress at the structural plane of bedding rock slope will change under dynamic load, which
134 ing the same concentration of Der p 1 as the bedding solution for comparison.
135                 When reared in the corn dust bedding, SP-A null pups had significant mortality (P < 0
136 deformation was more sensitive to changes in bedding strength, especially when the bedding was weak.
137 ippage mechanism of a rock slope featuring a bedding structural plane subjected to the effects of str
138  the laboratory, mice dig vigorously in deep bedding such as wood chips.
139                      Excavation of Ediacaran bedding surfaces of the Rawnsley Quartzite in South Aust
140                              Analysis of two bedding surfaces preserving large numbers of Parvancorin
141 arly mobilization, and possibly less noxious bedding surfaces.
142 t the layers retain signs of floccule ripple bedding that would be detectable in the rock record.
143                    Of these predictors, only bedding type is easily manipulated to mitigate fighting.
144 tem (the combination of cage ventilation and bedding type), genetic background, time of year, cage lo
145 erence, 12.4% [95% CI, 9.3%-15.1%]), no soft bedding use (79.4% vs 67.6%; adjusted risk difference, 1
146 ion (room sharing without bed sharing), soft bedding use (none), and pacifier use (any); data were co
147 ropriate infants' sleeping position, type of bedding used, and sleeping arrangements strongly suggest
148 irus spread, provided that infectious animal bedding was absent from the cages.
149 ges in bedding strength, especially when the bedding was weak.

 
Page Top