コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 er, blockade of ISR activation prevented the behavioral abnormalities as well as increased cortical n
3 patients into antibiotic-treated mice caused behavioral abnormalities such as psychomotor hyperactivi
4 ortex (PFC) or the hippocampus would produce behavioral abnormalities that could be attributed to ast
9 uencing (MoSeq) is an ethologically inspired behavioral analysis method that identifies modular compo
15 of neurons has been observed during various behavioral and cognitive processes, but the underlying c
18 we tested the impact of PFC-targeted tDCS on behavioral and electrophysiological markers of proactive
21 icrobiome causally impact the development of behavioral and neuropathological endophenotypes of disea
23 ecific expression of Tmc2b-mEGFP rescues the behavioral and physiological deficits in tmc triple muta
24 olestus, exhibit epidemiologically important behavioral and physiological differences, but the whole-
26 en intact retinal locations is less than the behavioral and physiological upper disparity limit at th
30 ds of interacting biological, socioeconomic, behavioral, and institutional factors, vector-borne dise
31 nce threat while blunting cardiovascular and behavioral anticipatory arousal to high-value food rewar
32 is firmly established as a key regulator of behavioral arousal, sleep, and wakefulness and has been
33 We used a neuroethologic approach, including behavioral assays and multineuronal recording techniques
35 ere tested using a comprehensive sequence of behavioral assays, as well as measures of health and dev
37 onality of invertebrate traces [8], and even behavioral asymmetry in fossil non-human primates [9, 10
38 cific groups of people who share patterns of behavioral change might increase the impact of behaviora
39 signaling in immune cells can contribute to behavioral changes associated with brain infection, offe
43 We predicted the effect of treatment and behavioral changes on HCV incidence among HIV-positive G
44 t experience with illnesses, and the type of behavioral changes voluntarily implemented by each parti
45 dy S. pneumoniae cell-cell communication and behavioral changes, as well as attenuate S. pneumoniae i
47 to estimate the parameters underlying these behavioral characteristics, with quantitative data encod
49 ities, body parts, and time points to inform behavioral choice, but the relevant sensory comparisons
51 ovides awareness for the potential long-term behavioral consequences associated with juvenile ketamin
52 s) for enhanced MRI, their neurochemical and behavioral consequences, if any, remain poorly understoo
53 activity-driven neuronal synaptic events and behavioral consequences, we chemogenetically activated a
56 and noradrenaline likely indicate changes in behavioral control that underlie adaptations to the cave
57 inhibitory synapse, in the NAc that modifies behavioral coping mechanisms and stress resiliency in mi
60 fter seven-day oral metronidazole treatment: behavioral counseling only (control), or counseling plus
61 Having an intermediate or ideal level of behavioral CVH in both midlife and late life (versus poo
63 stage of syphilis (primary vs secondary) and behavioral data collected by computer-assisted self-inte
64 levels ([Formula: see text] = 0.40) based on behavioral data collected from 624 volunteers over 30 co
65 MoSeq can meaningfully organize large-scale behavioral data, illustrate the power of a fundamentally
67 ging availability of neural, anatomical, and behavioral data, we believe that now is the time to crea
73 recise forelimb placement emerged as a novel behavioral deficit unpredicted by our previous study of
77 biota transplantation from MIA mice produced behavioral deficits in antibiotic-treated mock mice.
78 Deletion of CypD also prevented KET-induced behavioral deficits in cognitive flexibility, social int
79 2 in Mecp2-null neurons rescues synaptic and behavioral deficits in Mecp2 conditional knockout mice,
80 xin domoic acid (DomA) produces long-lasting behavioral deficits in rodent and primate models; howeve
81 linical studies have reported improvement of behavioral deficits in the Ts65Dn mouse model of Down sy
83 BAC versus NT mice and neuropathological and behavioral deficits similar to those shown by Liu et al.
84 everses both abnormal gamma oscillations and behavioral deficits with high correlation by pharmacolog
86 d for E. coli to exacerbate alphaSyn-induced behavioral deficits, including intestinal and motor impa
88 ts show that cortical state is controlled by behavioral demands and arousal by asymmetrically modulat
90 ere also predictive, particularly scores for behavioral disinhibition and major depressive disorder.
91 was found to have increased genetic risk for behavioral disinhibition, major depressive disorder, dep
97 erence test, we reveal marked differences in behavioral dynamics between the strains, suggesting stro
101 armacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD) and behavioral effects of a novel ghrelin receptor inverse a
104 ants such as d-amphetamine (AMPH) often have behavioral effects that appear paradoxical within the fr
105 neuron transplantation can exert therapeutic behavioral effects without necessarily restoring wild-ty
107 ormation in this process, layer (L) 6, using behavioral, electrophysiological and imaging methods in
109 ure at birth will reveal structural basis of behavioral emergence in typical development and identify
110 dies have proved inconsistent across several behavioral endpoints thought to be dependent on dentate
116 n is the gold standard for understanding the behavioral expression of anxiety and its neural circuitr
117 sed the effects of NE activity in the CeA on behavioral expression using receptor-specific pharmacolo
118 re used to assess demographic, clinical, and behavioral factors for PWID with HIV diagnosed during 20
121 The stability allowed reliable decoding of behavioral features for the entire timespan, while fixed
122 male participants) investigated clinical and behavioral features of individuals ascertained for the p
127 tic basis of inter-individual differences in behavioral flexibility using the model nematode C. elega
128 Striatal circuits must be modulated for behavioral flexibility, the ability to adapt to environm
130 a that ascribes to PFo an important role for behavioral flexibility.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT We can fle
131 the dimensions of emotional, cognitive, and behavioral functioning that underlie ADHD and other exis
132 We propose that the ventral circuit defines behavioral goals, and the dorsal circuit orchestrates be
133 practices that did not implement or sustain behavioral health integration, potentially limiting gene
134 eview research into two potential sources of behavioral heterogeneity: individual differences in deci
137 imary somatosensory cortex of young mice and behavioral hyperactivity in the mice at one minute after
138 KO rats showed gamma power abnormalities and behavioral hyperactivity that were consistent with obser
139 ral hyperactivity and isoflurane only caused behavioral hyperactivity with borderline significance.
140 le standard, but also portends consequential behavioral implications: People prefer to allocate stric
141 tiple levels including molecular, brain, and behavioral indicates that these epigenetic biomarkers ma
144 aditional measures of behavioral risk (i.e., behavioral inhibition) to provide more robust classifica
147 , participants with DM1 were randomized to a behavioral intervention (n = 14) or continued regular ca
148 hyperexcitability, learning is impaired and behavioral intervention provides no benefit to remyelina
150 statistically significant difference between behavioral interventions and controls in smoking cessati
152 d pharmacodynamic parameters, structural and behavioral interventions that target women are required
153 havioral change might increase the impact of behavioral interventions to prevent transmission of sexu
156 he impact of neonatal anesthesia exposure on behavioral learning in adolescent subjects, and a variet
160 ersistence, generating a characteristic cell behavioral manifold that is preserved under a perturbati
161 cium imaging, optogenetic perturbations, and behavioral manipulations, we studied outcome signals in
162 ons result from the poor reliability of many behavioral measures and the distinct response processes
166 nclude by outlining potential biological and behavioral mechanisms through which psychosocial stress
172 Tracking Using Retroreflector Embedding), a behavioral monitoring system that combines motion captur
174 isms-which are known to influence neural and behavioral motivational processes-might underlie some of
176 ion-theory-based model accurately replicated behavioral outcomes and indicated that the deficits in t
177 line was a significant predictor of multiple behavioral outcomes following exposure to chronic stress
178 containing EGCG improved some cognitive and behavioral outcomes in DS mouse models and in humans wit
181 target (i.e., prior to target selection) to behavioral outcomes, despite such preparatory changes be
186 Here, we devised an ethologically inspired behavioral paradigm to directly test the hypothesis that
187 lop two human-inspired, discrimination-based behavioral paradigms for studying selective visuospatial
188 that relies on neurobiology to identify core behavioral pathology of late-life depression and targets
189 , PS, or combined Pb and PS in F1 offspring: behavioral performance [fixed-interval (FI) schedule of
191 ages to contain only LSF or HSF and measured behavioral performance and corticospinal excitability (C
192 temporally precise SC inhibition influenced behavioral performance during a visually guided orientat
193 nge of perceptual, cognitive, emotional, and behavioral phenomena, this conceptual ambiguity and hete
194 tive Ahnak KO mice display a depression-like behavioral phenotype similar to that of constitutive p11
195 atal CB microstructure and childhood preterm behavioral phenotype symptoms (n = 56 parent report, n =
196 t prefrontal cortex (PFC), contributing to a behavioral phenotype that mimics multiple symptoms assoc
199 s) exhibit robust, consistent differences in behavioral phenotypes between individuals within a sex.
202 n, with progressive degenerative ciliary and behavioral phenotypes; and they support a contributory r
205 alient stimuli are among the main drivers of behavioral plasticity, yet, how animals evolve and modul
212 nts with ALS was used to study cognitive and behavioral profiles, and 375 patients to study neuroimag
213 also describe the shortcomings of the purely behavioral protocol that purports to show recovery from
216 creased tolerance to loud sounds and reduced behavioral reaction time latencies to high-intensity sou
219 ntervailing resilience systems implicated in behavioral regulation, and may inform novel strategies f
220 n transforming sugar sensing by the gut into behavioral reinforcement via midbrain dopamine neuron re
223 establish p75NTR as a novel regulator gating behavioral response to food scarcity and time-of-day dep
225 acteristics for species discrimination, with behavioral responses and computational results indicatin
227 amina terminalis in regulating endocrine and behavioral responses that are involved in maintaining ca
231 tive network.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT Although behavioral responses to predatory threat are essential f
232 ensory cues are processed to elicit adaptive behavioral responses to threat and will help to identify
233 d gene clusters associated with the observed behavioral responses, mostly related to the stress axis.
238 bitory balance in the PFC and its control of behavioral responses.SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT A developmen
242 be incorporated with traditional measures of behavioral risk (i.e., behavioral inhibition) to provide
245 urveillance systems capture individual-level behavioral risk, they are not able to capture the social
246 ple sets of peptidergic neurons play similar behavioral roles in this fast-timescale behavior through
251 ioned fear in rodents and lacked cardiac and behavioral side effects, suggesting its potential for us
252 upside-down rotation) on body recognition, a behavioral signature of a specialized mechanism for body
253 and in another experiment, we reveal several behavioral signatures of this theoretical account, tying
256 These findings highlight the modulation of behavioral state as a powerful independent means through
257 ial for animal survival when environment and behavioral state change over short or long time spans.
258 These approaches allow us to identify the behavioral state-dependent functional connectivity of py
260 ical regulator of motivated and pathological behavioral states via its output to midbrain nuclei.
261 lus (SC) and regions associated with certain behavioral states, such as fear (Monavarfeshani et al.,
266 atients or using local anesthesia, we used a behavioral study with a programmable mechatronic device
268 Disease Control and Prevention National HIV Behavioral Surveillance (NHBS) from 5 US cities, self-re
271 lar description of behavior and suggest that behavioral syllables represent a new class of druggable
272 I) score during pregnancy with emotional and behavioral symptoms of offspring at 7 to 10 years of age
273 e assessed for the presence of cognitive and behavioral symptoms using a battery of neuropsychologic
278 e assessed waiting motor impulsivity using a behavioral task, as well as structural and functional un
281 ousands of neurons during the performance of behavioral tasks, raising the question of how recorded a
284 pha5-GABARs accelerates reversal learning, a behavioral test for cognitive flexibility dependent on r
288 prises education (cognitive) and counseling (behavioral) that require the involvement of a trained mu
291 examine the perceptual impact of AN loss on behavioral tone-in-noise (TIN) sensitivity in the budger
293 glutamate, is involved in centrally mediated behavioral, transcriptional, and neurochemical effects o
294 sparency acts as camouflage, we used in situ behavioral trials, visual modeling, and laboratory psych
295 nt individual differences in behavior [i.e., behavioral types (BTs)], are common across the animal ki
297 ion by choice, and random exploration, where behavioral variability drives exploration by chance.
300 was related to the strength of participants' behavioral VDAC effect and persisted into subsequent tar