戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ntly, and this epigenetic mechanism leads to biallelic inactivation.
2 g BAP1 in familial mesotheliomas, indicating biallelic inactivation.
3 ge repair (DDR) genes, of which 28 (42%) had biallelic inactivation.
4 ergo tumor-specific mutation consistent with biallelic inactivation.
5 pressure for, and functional consequences of biallelic inactivation across TSGs.
6  tumorigenic effects associated with somatic biallelic inactivation, although haploinsufficiency may
7 ost significantly mutated CMG is DNAAF1 with biallelic inactivation and loss of DNAAF1 expression sho
8                                   Additional biallelic inactivation and/or missense p53 mutation in t
9 were found in tumors from five patients, and biallelic inactivation as a result of a mutation and los
10 ith approximately 30% of patients displaying biallelic inactivation by mutations and/or deletions.
11            We demonstrate that selection for biallelic inactivation can be utilized to identify drive
12 loma driver genes and the critical nature of biallelic inactivation events affecting tumor suppressor
13   In many recurrent deletions, however, such biallelic inactivation has not been found.
14  gsLOH was common, indicating a high rate of biallelic inactivation in metastatic breast cancer.
15 he unmethylated form was present, confirming biallelic inactivation in methylated lines.
16           We show that the frequency of TP53 biallelic inactivation increases dramatically in early p
17 the genome-wide identification of genes with biallelic inactivation involving nonsense mutations and
18 5.1% overall), lineage-dependent patterns of biallelic inactivation led to tumors exhibiting mechanis
19 RCs and also confers the "second hit" in the biallelic inactivation mechanism for some proportion of
20 r ACVR2 mutation and expression to assess if biallelic inactivation occurs.
21 ssity for earlier genetic alterations before biallelic inactivation of a recessive tumor susceptibili
22 ising in Arf (+/-) mice consistently exhibit biallelic inactivation of Arf, but, unexpectedly, do not
23                               In contrast to biallelic inactivation of autosomal tumor-suppressor gen
24 esothelioma cells from Bap1(+/-) mice showed biallelic inactivation of Bap1, consistent with its prop
25                                              Biallelic inactivation of BRCA1 or BRCA2 is associated w
26            We investigated the prevalence of biallelic inactivation of BRCA2 in the presumed precurso
27                                     Although biallelic inactivation of BRG1 could not initiate tumor
28  that a loss of cell viability underlies why biallelic inactivation of BRG1 does not increase tumorig
29                                              Biallelic inactivation of cancer susceptibility gene BRC
30                                              Biallelic inactivation of CDKN2A emerged exclusively in
31 known TSGs are not homozygously deleted, and biallelic inactivation of CDKN2A may contribute to tumor
32                                              Biallelic inactivation of DPC4 has been reported in half
33 tumors arising in a double heterozygote show biallelic inactivation of either BRCA1 or BRCA2, but not
34 ly, TSC is said to occur through a classical biallelic inactivation of either TSC genes (TSC1, hamart
35 ha subtype(4) and characterized by universal biallelic inactivation of ELP1 owing to somatic loss of
36 wo patients with hybrid oncocytic tumors had biallelic inactivation of FLCN in a setting of Birt-Hogg
37 diator complex subunit 12 (MED12) mutations, biallelic inactivation of fumarate hydratase (FH), and c
38 161 deficiency and the primary mechanism for biallelic inactivation of GPR161 in affected MB(SHH) tum
39                          We demonstrate that biallelic inactivation of Lkb1 and Pten in the mouse lun
40                                              Biallelic inactivation of LKB1, a serine/threonine kinas
41   The "secondhit" pathway is responsible for biallelic inactivation of many tumor suppressors, where
42 cy in a subset of canine and feline UCs with biallelic inactivation of MSH2.
43                                              Biallelic inactivation of PALB2 and MLH1 was observed in
44 lial carcinoma, we generated mice containing biallelic inactivation of Pten in the urogenital epithel
45             In tumor tissue tested with NGS, biallelic inactivation of RB1 was identified in 28 tumor
46                  Eleven tumor tissues showed biallelic inactivation of RIZ.
47                                        Thus, biallelic inactivation of SMAD4 occurs in both the epith
48                         One case of apparent biallelic inactivation of Smad4 was found in our study o
49                                              Biallelic inactivation of SMARCB1, encoding a member of
50 s, each containing multiple individuals with biallelic inactivation of SVBP caused by truncating vari
51                    In one of the two tumors, biallelic inactivation of the APC gene was found.
52                                              Biallelic inactivation of the Apc tumor suppressor gene
53                   These results suggest that biallelic inactivation of the BRCA2 gene is a relatively
54 aggressive pediatric cancer characterized by biallelic inactivation of the core BAF complex subunit S
55 CC) is an aggressive cancer characterized by biallelic inactivation of the gene encoding the Krebs cy
56 C) is an inherited cancer syndrome linked to biallelic inactivation of the gene encoding the tricarbo
57     When reintroduced in cell lines carrying biallelic inactivation of the gene, A20 induced apoptosi
58 s cause loss of ACVR2 expression, indicating biallelic inactivation of the gene.
59                     RTs are characterized by biallelic inactivation of the INI1 tumor suppressor gene
60 the mTORC1 activator genes, Rheb or MTOR, or biallelic inactivation of the mTORC1 repressor genes, De
61 bility that gliomagenesis requires more than biallelic inactivation of the NF1 tumor suppressor gene
62 g may result in the functional equivalent of biallelic inactivation of the NF1 tumor suppressor.
63                                              Biallelic inactivation of the NF2 gene occurs in the maj
64 is an inherited autosomal disorder caused by biallelic inactivation of the NF2 tumor suppressor gene.
65 n malignancies, but the demonstrated rate of biallelic inactivation of the PTEN gene by mutation or h
66 of the developing retina that initiates with biallelic inactivation of the RB1 gene.
67 defined by germline Ras disease and acquired biallelic inactivation of the respective genes in hemato
68 ma is a pediatric retinal tumor initiated by biallelic inactivation of the retinoblastoma gene (RB1).
69                            Specifically, the biallelic inactivation of the SWI/SNF subunit SMARCB1 re
70                                 In ccRCC the biallelic inactivation of the VHL gene leads to stabiliz
71  for more than 80% of cases, are typified by biallelic inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tu
72 f kidney cancer and frequently are linked to biallelic inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) tu
73                                              Biallelic inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor su
74                                              Biallelic inactivation of the von Hippel-Lindau tumor su
75 r in sporadic colorectal cancers (CRCs), but biallelic inactivation of this site has not been frequen
76 tic DICER1 variant (p.Asp1709Glu) as well as biallelic inactivation of TP53 (p.Val173Leu, VAF 91%) an
77         Here we model occult preneoplasia by biallelic inactivation of TP53, a common early event in
78 number of copy number aberration changes and biallelic inactivation of tumor suppressor genes was inc
79 es that are much more similar to tumors with biallelic inactivation of VHL.
80                                 In addition, biallelic inactivations of BRG1 were observed in four ot
81                              Monoallelic and biallelic inactivation represent disease stages occurrin
82                                         This biallelic inactivation resulted in loss of expression of
83                However, the low frequency of biallelic inactivation suggests that either PTEN/MMAC1 i
84 ty, clinical presentation and tumour-matched biallelic inactivation, top-ranked candidates include PR
85 tage, including drivers (DUOX2, EZH2, TP53), biallelic inactivation (TP53), noncoding mutations in bo
86                         Overall, evidence of biallelic inactivation was found in 74.2% of patients wi
87        Loss of the WT Nf2 allele, leading to biallelic inactivation, was observed in all nine asbesto
88     Tumorigenesis is typically attributed to biallelic inactivation, yet evidence suggests haploinsuf
89 RCA1/2, respectively, selective pressure for biallelic inactivation, zygosity-dependent phenotype pen