ライフサイエンスコーパス: biceps

1 of mesotenon, and 3/326(0.9%) cases of split biceps.

2 evoked potentials (MEPs) were measured from biceps.

3 s measured by motor evoked potentials in the biceps.

4 support the hypothesis that the recovery of biceps after cervical SCI results, at least in part, fro

5 iceps (C-25ms-Bi); click alone (C only); and biceps alone (Bi only).

6 aying of the articular aspect of the labrum, biceps anchor avulsion, inferiorly displaced bucket hand

7 s FSHD or control with 90% accuracy based on biceps and 80% accuracy based on deltoids.

8 more gradually distributed activation of the biceps and deltoid motoneuron pools.

9 ssed between affected and control samples of biceps and deltoid muscle tissues, respectively, with 29

10 genic cells and muscle biopsies derived from biceps and deltoid muscles of FSHD affected subjects and

11 valuation of deep tendons such as the distal biceps and peripheral nerves.

12 In contralateral biceps and quadriceps the responses had high thresholds

13 spinal conditioning of the stretch reflex of biceps and quadriceps was abnormal in both hemizygous ma

14 of the plantar H-reflex evoked by posterior biceps and semitendinosus (PBSt) group I afferents.

15 cluded transverse and longitudinal images of biceps and supraspinatus tendons and articular cartilage

16 Results, relative to biceps and trapezius for left and right arm, clearly dem

17 gh-density surface electromyography over the biceps and triceps brachii during isometric ramp contrac

18 and duration were not different between the biceps and triceps brachii in controls but prolonged in

19 d by cervicomedullary stimulation (CMEPs) on biceps and triceps brachii in males and females with and

20 We recorded HDsEMG from the biceps and triceps brachii of seven individuals with iSC

21 Surface EMG was recorded from biceps and triceps brachii, pectoralis major and deltoid

22 arch Council (MRC) muscle strength score for biceps and triceps in patients with a diagnosis of upper

23 changes in intracortical inhibition) in the biceps and triceps muscles in controls and individuals w

24 Acute tendon injuries (biceps and triceps ruptures) require early (< 4 weeks) s

25 Distal biceps and triceps tendon injuries may result in elbow d

26 r evoked potentials (iMEPs) from the paretic biceps (BIC) and first dorsal interosseous (FDI) muscle.

27 study, the best directions of SMUs in human biceps (both heads) and deltoid (anterior, medial, and p

28 ith and without voluntary contraction of the biceps brachi (BB).

29 r (Pmajor) and posterior deltoid (Pdeltoid); biceps brachii (Bi) and Tri brachii (Tri), and linking m

30 e recorded in the surface EMG of contracting biceps brachii (Bi), evoked by taps applied to the tendo

31 the stone would employ a two-muscle chain of biceps brachii and latissimus dorsi.

32 ar enthesis organs were seen at 2 sites, the biceps brachii and patellar tendon insertions.

33 ospinal tract and responses were recorded in biceps brachii and quadriceps femoris.

34 e and 1 min of light voluntary activity from biceps brachii bilaterally.

35 gh-density surface EMG was recorded from the biceps brachii during steady (10% MVF) and trapezoidal (

36 images of the dominant Vastus Lateralis and Biceps Brachii from 32 young (18-35 year old) and 34 old

37 The paretic biceps brachii had ~8,200 fewer serial sarcomeres and ~2

38 e acquired high-density EMG signals from the biceps brachii in 5 male transhumeral amputees who under

39 Serial recordings from biceps brachii indicated that motor units fired faster a

40 limb length, whereas the activity pattern of biceps brachii length afferents matched forelimb orienta

41 he effects on the oxidative status of liver, biceps brachii muscle and serum were also tested.

42 rected to the motor cortex representation of biceps brachii muscle during the adaptation phase of the

43 same recordings were also performed from the biceps brachii muscle of additional 5 able-bodied indivi

44 red with single- and paired-pulse TMS in the biceps brachii muscle proximal to INB.

45 hibition (ICI) and facilitation (ICF) to the biceps brachii muscle proximal to the level of deafferen

46 Spasticity of the biceps brachii muscle was assessed using the modified As

47 pulations of motor units identified from the biceps brachii muscle, and muscle fibre diameter.

48 asound were recorded simultaneously over the biceps brachii muscle.

49 magnetic stimulation (TMS) in small hand and biceps brachii muscles before, during and after INB of t

50 array was used to record surface EMG of the biceps brachii muscles from both impaired and non-impair

51 M-wave recordings for bilateral biceps brachii muscles were also made.

52 Deltoid and biceps brachii muscles were different in participants wi

53 ly meaningful architecture parameters in the biceps brachii of both limbs of individuals with chronic

54 etected during isometric contractions of the biceps brachii revealed a significant association betwee

55 Concentric biceps brachii sEMG amplitude was similar between condit

56 he rotator interval and the long head of the biceps brachii tendon are anatomically closely associate

57 instability patterns of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon are difficult.

58 ted with instability of the long head of the biceps brachii tendon.

59 mous, monosynaptic Group Ia projections from biceps brachii to both the antagonist triceps brachii an

60 Small taps were delivered to the tendon of biceps brachii using an electromechanical tapper.

61 es in the brachioradialis; amplitude for the biceps brachii was relatively similar between conditions

62 fraction and (1)H(2)O T2 in the deltoid and biceps brachii were measured from single-voxel (1)H MR s

63 scharge characteristics of 53 motor units in biceps brachii were recorded after being recruited durin

64 muscle biopsies of the vastus lateralis and biceps brachii were used to assess central and periphera

65 The surface EMG was recorded from biceps brachii when two different types of sinusoidally

66 erent input were observed in the homonymous (biceps brachii) and antagonist (triceps brachii) motor n

67 The deltoid, biceps brachii, and triceps brachii were affected to the

68 electromyography (sEMG) was obtained for the biceps brachii, brachioradialis and anterior deltoid on

69 ar, femoral, and common peroneal nerves) for biceps brachii, first dorsal interosseous, quadriceps fe

70 tor pollicis brevis, abductor digiti minimi, biceps brachii, tibialis anterior, extensor dig. brevis,

71 post-stroke patients with spasticity of the biceps brachii, we found involuntary microscopic contrac

72 nsferred to reinnervate the long head of the biceps brachii.

73 dence for increased reticulospinal inputs to biceps but not triceps brachii and loss of corticospinal

74 artReact and CMEP facilitation was larger in biceps but similar to controls in triceps, suggesting en

75 r MEPs and maximal voluntary contractions in biceps but smaller responses in triceps compared with co

76 ed in the finger and wrist extensors and the biceps, but no response or inhibitory responses were obs

77 before click (Bi-10ms-C); click 25 ms before biceps (C-25ms-Bi); click alone (C only); and biceps alo

78 tion of RVR was seen during 15 s involuntary biceps contractions (engages only muscle reflexes) and L

79 but it hampered certain strength increases (biceps curl).

80 xteen subjects performed 36 elbow flexions ("biceps curls") at one of two submaximal workloads that e

81 ressure (Pdi) in six healthy subjects during biceps curls, bench press, power lift, and sit-ups.

82 xidation were simultaneously detected in the Biceps femoris (BF) and Semimembranosus (SM) muscles.

83 re evaluated in the Semimembranosus (SM) and Biceps femoris (BF) muscles of pork legs for composition

84 luate its potential for discrimination among biceps femoris and semimembranosus muscle from two hams,

85 salt content, and instrumental color in the biceps femoris and semimembranosus muscles during the el

86 The results obtained in Biceps femoris and Semimembranosus muscles showed that 5

87 chium and semimembranosus (SM) and conjoined biceps femoris and semitendinosus (BF-ST) tendons and ev

88 cant change after the sprint task was in the biceps femoris long head (BFlh) with an increase of 10%

89 uscle activities of the rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris long head (BL), tibialis anterior (TA), a

90 Of all the muscles examined, the VL and biceps femoris long head were the most responsive to dis

91 ere significantly increased (P < .05) in the biceps femoris muscle 2 days after running.

92 xidative phenomena in Spanish dry-cured ham (Biceps femoris muscle) was evaluated at different ripeni

93 We found, in biceps femoris muscle, decreased Akt(Ser473), FOXO1(Ser2

94 branosus, Semitendinosus, Rectus femoris and Biceps femoris muscles of the hams was computed and expr

95 The rectus femoris and biceps femoris muscles showed no clear reflex activity w

96 cators in Semitendinosus, Rectus femoris and Biceps femoris muscles.

97 ned the PL class contents and composition in biceps femoris of Iberian pigs according to the rearing

98 iceptive reflex withdrawal recorded from the biceps femoris of the stimulated leg.

99 Two hundred biceps femoris porcine muscle samples from Spanish dry-c

100 trodes were implanted into vastus lateralis, biceps femoris posterior, lateral gastrocnemius and tibi

101 mitochondrial density and activity in ovine biceps femoris skeletal muscle during the perinatal peri

102 Zn-protoporphyrin further increased in the biceps femoris until 9 months of processing but remained

103 The pigs' biceps femoris was treated locally in two separate targe

104 .02; soleus) to 0.17 (95% CI, -1.76 to 2.10; biceps femoris) in the delandistrogene moxeparvovec grou

105 aging traceability of steaks of Angus beef (Biceps femoris) individually vacuum-packaged, as well as

106 or, medial gastrocnemius, rectus femoris and biceps femoris).

107 lateral gastrocnemius, vastus lateralis and biceps femoris).

108 eus medius, gluteus maximus, semitendinosus, biceps femoris, and gastrocnemius muscles in the double-

109 imized, which comprises embedding samples of Biceps femoris, cryo-sectioning, glass slide mounting, a

110 nd compare the peptides present in slices of Biceps femoris, Istrian dry-cured ham muscles, from the

111 tivation of erector spinae, gluteus maximus, biceps femoris, soleus and intrinsic foot (toe flexor) m

112 lation elicited responses bilaterally in the biceps femoris, vastus lateralis, rectus femoris, medial

113 cessing, and sous vide (SV) on goat and lamb biceps femoris, where samples were cooked to the same te

114 protoporphyrin were also investigated in the biceps femoris.

115 e to triceps in neurological conditions, but biceps has a larger cortical representation and might be

116 0-10 numerical rating scale in an isometric biceps hold-task and was used as a secondary measure of

117 ntrol spindle feedback from a single muscle (biceps/iliofibularis).

118 s in 87 limbs, and triceps was stronger than biceps in 258 limbs, with no difference seen in the rema

119 rength is relatively preserved compared with biceps in ALS.

120 ea was larger in the triceps compared to the biceps in both groups and further increased in SCI parti

121 ed svEMG area in the triceps compared to the biceps in controls and SCI participants, with this measu

122 he glenohumeral joint clearly delineates the biceps-labral complex and glenohumeral ligaments, extern

123 The biceps-labral complex was best visualized on oblique cor

124 Anatomical variants of the long head of the biceps (LHB) and diseases of the rotator interval struct

125 s around the origins of the long head of the biceps (LHB) are reported to occur with a frequency of 1

126 endon tissue from patients with long head of biceps (LHB) tendinopathy were determined according to t

127 efore neurotization, the motor branch to the biceps' long head was transected at the motor entry poin

128 The LLSR was significantly enhanced in the biceps muscle (on average by 49%) after the Bi-10ms-C pa

129 Protocol II compared the recovery of the biceps muscle and forearm flexors when using all 5, 2 (C

130 c challenge, as well as greater decrement in biceps muscle force.

131 ulus pairing, responses in the contralateral biceps muscle to TMS alone were measured.

132 uts that drive M1 output was measured in the biceps muscle using a modified twitch interpolation tech

133 trical stimuli around motor threshold to the biceps muscle via surface electrodes.

134 cols, in which clicks and stimulation of the biceps muscle were paired at either low or high rate, or

135 s present (in either the cleidobrachialis or biceps muscle) was not significantly different from the

136 had a comparable functional recovery in the biceps muscle.

137 dose of MK-801 given intravenously or in the biceps muscle.

138 a clinical trial (NCT05083806) to image the biceps muscles of 10 late-onset PD (LOPD) patients and 1

139 e in the weight ratios of the quadriceps and biceps muscles to the whole body.

140 xed biopsies of control and FSHD deltoid and biceps muscles, snap-frozen at resting length, were cryo

141 Significant improvement was seen in the biceps of patients before (35.48 +/- 3.38 ms) and after

142 l) was significantly longer in the patients (biceps P = 0.01; triceps P = 0.004) compared to controls

143 fractions of the long and short components (biceps P = 0.03, triceps P = 0.04).

144 nt in the patients compared to the controls (biceps P = 0.063; triceps P = 0.190).

145 The amplitude of biceps phasic stretch reflex increased with muscle contr

146 In tests for stationarity the amplitude of biceps phasic stretch reflex varied <10% in the first si

147 ging, but with both methods the magnitude of biceps phasic stretch reflex varied linearly with tap fo

148 I afferents of tibialis posterior, posterior biceps-semitendinosus and gastrocnemius soleus were also

149 s soleus, flexor digitorum longus, posterior biceps-semitendinosus and popliteus (mainly within L7).

150 follows: 0.40 (weight at week 37, kg)+ 0.16 (biceps skinfold thickness at week 37, mm) + 0.15 (thigh

151 Biceps skinfold thickness had the highest predictive val

152 6 - (7.34 x sex) + (0.32 x weight) + (0.38 x biceps skinfold) (R2 = 0.84, P < 0.001, SEE = 4.85).

153 Diaphragm and biceps specimens obtained from brain-dead organ donors w

154 We tested the following four paradigms: biceps stimulus 10 ms before click (Bi-10ms-C); click 25

155 Biceps strength is usually preserved relative to triceps

156 ean rank=186.1) were higher than ipsilateral biceps strength scores (mean rank=134.2), Z=-10.1, p<0.0

157 ontrolling for chronologic age, was triceps, biceps, subscapular, suprailiac, and thigh (SEE = 2.87),

158 and thigh (SEE = 2.87), and for girls it was biceps, subscapular, suprailiac, thigh, and calf (SEE =

159 ned by DXA, and subcutaneous fat at triceps, biceps, subscapular, suprailiac, thigh, and calf sites w

160 or glenohumeral ligament (SGHL), presence of biceps tendinopathy, and rotator cuff tears adjacent to

161 bicipital groove in predicting long head of biceps tendon (LHBT) pathology.

162 ed were displacement of the long head of the biceps tendon (LHBT) relative to the subscapularis tendo

163 fragment, and extension of the tear into the biceps tendon fibers.

164 s, superior and anteroinferior labral tears, biceps tendon tears, cartilage defects, Hill-Sachs lesio

165 or labral tears; 68%, 90%, 82%, and 0.80 for biceps tendon tears; 42%, 93%, 81%, and 0.64 for cartila

166 movement was replaced by stimulation of one biceps tendon with a 50-Hz vibratory stimulus (a selecti

167 us, accompanied by medial dislocation of the biceps tendon with degeneration and tear.

168 glenohumeral joint, acromioclavicular joint, biceps tendon, scapulothoracic articulation, and sternoc

169 The bicipitoradial bursa enveloped the biceps tendon, with internal septation seen in two cases

170 ion of tears and grade of involvement of the biceps tendon.

171 subscapularis, and 65%-85% and 100% for the biceps tendon.

172 subscapularis, and 55%-65% and 100% for the biceps tendon.

173 iments using vibratory stimuli, vibration of biceps tendons in normal subjects elicited flexion of th

174 ic debridement of the subacromial space with biceps tenotomy (debridement only group) with the same p

175 number of differentially expressed genes in biceps to 188 and in deltoid to 7.

176 The biceps, triceps, suprailiac, subscapular, thigh, calf, a

177 cending aorta and proximal-extremity muscle (biceps/triceps) were used as reference regions.

178 rements (i.e., BMI, waist/hip circumference, biceps/triceps/subscapular/suprailiac skinfold thickness

179 The coracoid lacks a biceps tubercle as in non-hadrosaurid hadrosauroids, sug

180 However, biceps vibration (1) scaled the amplitudes of two bursts

181 Biceps was stronger than triceps in 87 limbs, and tricep

182 The T(1rho) values in the biceps were significantly higher in patients before trea

183 Ipsilateral responses in biceps were smaller, with higher thresholds and delayed

184 analyzed using GeneChip Gene 1.0 ST arrays: biceps, which typically shows an early and severe diseas