戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 man hand preference, are observed throughout bilateria.
2 ndependently in Ctenophora and in Cnidaria + Bilateria.
3 head larvae, facilitated larval evolution in Bilateria.
4 to proteins involved in cell interactions in Bilateria.
5 ng to Trochozoa, one of the main branches of Bilateria.
6 ry network evolved in the common ancestor of Bilateria.
7 the equivalent to the head-forming region of Bilateria.
8 at is essential for embryonic development in bilateria.
9 es across Protostomia, Deuterostomia and non-Bilateria.
10 ptides for >96% of genes that evolved before bilateria.
11  conservation or convergent evolution within Bilateria.
12 els and planarians being the ancestor of the Bilateria.
13 velopment, that facilitated the evolution of bilateria.
14 ion along the branch separating Cnidaria and Bilateria.
15 conservation of the Hox-CTCF link across the Bilateria.
16 ltipotency during the development of diverse bilateria.
17 of the dorsoventral (DV) axis throughout the Bilateria.
18 y present in the last common ancestor of the Bilateria.
19 system, as the sister group to all remaining Bilateria.
20 la that diverged before the emergence of the Bilateria.
21  evolutionary origin in a common ancestor of Bilateria.
22  as evidence of the early diversification of Bilateria.
23  might have been an ancestral feature of the Bilateria.
24 y present in the last common ancestor of all bilateria.
25 y in the common ancestor of the Cnidaria and Bilateria.
26 om other animals before the radiation of the Bilateria.
27 mals are members of the evolutionary lineage Bilateria.
28  to those of non-bilaterian animal phyla and Bilateria.
29 the likely sister group of the triploblastic Bilateria.
30 efore the evolutionary split of Cnidaria and Bilateria.
31 hordates), or as among the most primitive of Bilateria.
32 tion and endoderm development throughout the Bilateria.
33  arthropods, than in nonserially constructed Bilateria.
34 lls and are possibly the sister group to the Bilateria.
35 ecretion and degradation of neuropeptides in Bilateria.
36 mployed for homologizing body regions across bilateria.
37 one biology in life history processes across Bilateria.
38 e the simple sister group of the rest of the Bilateria.
39 ancorina within the Euarthropoda or even the Bilateria.
40 velopmental bases of left-right asymmetry in Bilateria.
41 , or prior to the divergence of Cnidaria and Bilateria.
42 gene interaction dates back to the origin of Bilateria.
43 breaking, may be an ancestral feature of the Bilateria [1 and 2].
44 ia) and that a through-gut originated within Bilateria [1-8].
45  patterning apparently predates the birth of Bilateria [4-7].
46 mplest animals and a distant relative of the Bilateria, also possesses miRNAs, both classes of piRNAs
47  both occurring before the split between the Bilateria and Cnidarians.
48 or of mechanosensory cell differentiation in Bilateria and cnidocyte differentiation in Cnidaria - co
49 ly have been identified as synapomorphies of Bilateria and Ctenophora, e.g., mesoderm, more likely ev
50 ylum Cnidaria represents a close outgroup to Bilateria and includes familiar animals including sea an
51                  This hypothesis states that Bilateria and Placozoa share a more recent common ancest
52 r of the anteroposterior axis throughout the Bilateria and specifies regeneration polarity in planari
53 t TRF2 evolved prior to the emergence of the bilateria and subsequent to the evolutionary split betwe
54 genetic program for cartilage development in Bilateria and suggest that activation of this ancient co
55 n patterning the dorsal-ventral body axis in Bilateria and the directive axis in anthozoan cnidarians
56 tidergic neuronal properties of Cnidaria and Bilateria and those of Ctenophora, the most basal neuron
57 ys were linked to cilia before the origin of bilateria and transient receptor potential (TRP) channel
58 ction of axis in Cnidaria, a sister group to Bilateria, and is important in bilaterian axis formation
59 ent, and enterocely are ancestral within the Bilateria, and spiral or idiosyncratic cleavages, mosaic
60 importance for endoderm specification across Bilateria, and this gene lies at an essential node of th
61 ve hypotheses for the phylogenetic origin of Bilateria are evaluated by using complete 18S rRNA gene
62           Photoreceptor cells in the eyes of Bilateria are often classified into microvillar cells wi
63  observations that bear on the origin of the Bilateria are reviewed and interpreted in light of our s
64 ments in Neuralia (Cnidaria, Ctenophora, and Bilateria) are composed of an opsin (a seven-transmembra
65           The bilaterally symmetric animals (Bilateria) are considered to comprise two monophyletic g
66 d/trunk distinction is a synapomorphy of the Bilateria as a whole, and that it reflects the body plan
67 ew of the RNA polymerase II core promoter in bilateria (bilaterally symmetric animals).
68 ation is thought to be an ancestral trait of Bilateria, but major questions remain as to the nature o
69 phora, and Cnidaria and are widespread among Bilateria, but our study is the first to show that Placo
70 ld, and twenty-one can be traced back to the Bilateria clade.
71 SU data agree in supporting the monophyly of Bilateria, Cnidaria, Ctenophora, and Metazoa.
72 eric structures were present in the Cnidaria-Bilateria common ancestor over 600 million years ago.
73 e been identified in all three groups of the Bilateria (deuterostomes, ecdysozoans, and lophotrochozo
74 yfishes) is the sister group to well-studied Bilateria (e.g. flies and vertebrates), and has two mech
75 een reported in the other two main clades of Bilateria: Ecdysozoa (including flies and nematodes) and
76 Radiata or Ctenophora, nor is it likely that Bilateria gave rise to Cnidaria or Ctenophora.
77 gulators of feeding-related processes in the Bilateria has been conserved in the unusual and unique c
78 explain (i) the formation of Hox clusters in Bilateria, (ii) the diversity of bilaterian body plans,
79 aran, Eumetazoa in the middle Ediacaran, and Bilateria in the upper Ediacaran, with many crown-phyla
80 uding some short motifs, is conserved across Bilateria, indicating the importance of maintaining this
81                  The evolutionary success of Bilateria is credited partly to the origin of bilateral
82 -specific microRNA arm switching as found in Bilateria is detected.
83 and combined data reject the hypothesis that Bilateria is more closely related to Ctenophora than it
84                                              Bilateria is not likely to be the sister group of Radiat
85 coelomorpha may be sister to the rest of the Bilateria (Nephrozoa).
86 omorpha is the sister group to all remaining Bilateria (= Nephrozoa, namely protostomes and deuterost
87 hs (=Xenacoelomorpha) as sister to all other Bilateria (=Nephrozoa), or placed Xenacoelomorpha inside
88 odermal muscle originated at the base of the Bilateria not only for contraction, but also as the sour
89 al Wirin gene in the last common ancestor of Bilateria, numerous gene duplications produced the heter
90 ge that originated either at the base of the bilateria or of the deuterostome clade, we report the li
91 y of the same molecular components as in the Bilateria, particularly in pathways associated with oxid
92 l role in the radiation of the triploblastic Bilateria, permitting the evolution of larger and more c
93 tarlet sea anemone), a close relative to the Bilateria, possesses an extensive repertoire of miRNA ge
94 e origin of bilaterally symmetrical animals (Bilateria) prior to their obvious and explosive appearan
95                  The evolutionary origins of Bilateria remain enigmatic.
96 ls of the phylum Cnidaria are not within the Bilateria, some representatives, such as the sea anemone
97 dinal origination among serially constructed Bilateria, such as arthropods, than in nonserially const
98 ugh their placement as sister to the rest of Bilateria supports relatively simple morphology in the a
99 d to form an archetypal signaling pathway in bilateria that was expanded extensively during early ver
100                 We show that, in contrast to Bilateria, the Hox and NK clusters of investigated cnida
101  can be traced to the common ancestor of the Bilateria (Urbilateria).
102  ancestor to the last common ancestor of the Bilateria ("Urbilaterian") and present an integrative hy
103 gulatory circuit is a central feature of the Bilateria, used broadly for the establishment, maintenan
104  the 2b-tail, found in the SERCA pump of all Bilateria, whereas LE is only present in Nematoda and ve
105 gene duplication in a common ancestor of the Bilateria, with only one type being retained in chordate

 
Page Top