戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 sphincterotomy as effective in extraction of bile duct stones.
2 imum dilation time for the removal of common bile duct stones.
3 creatography is commonly performed to remove bile duct stones.
4 n accuracy of 94% in the diagnosis of common bile duct stones.
5 e conventional surgical management of common bile duct stones.
6 can optimize the outcomes of managing common bile duct stones.
7 ystic ducts, and large, numerous or impacted bile duct stones.
8 d balloon dilation for the removal of common bile duct stones.
9 tomy is the established treatment for common bile duct stones.
10          The SPLC group contained 1 retained bile duct stone, 1-port site hernia, and 1 postoperative
11 copic (10) approach, or endoscopy for common bile duct stones (2).
12  CT scans were evaluated for the presence of bile duct stones, ampullary stones, the gallbladder and
13 ic sphincterotomy is commonly used to remove bile-duct stones and to treat other problems.
14                                       Common bile duct stones are a very frequent problem in the west
15 nd presence of acute cholecystitis or common bile duct stones are associated with difficult cholecyst
16                                       Common bile duct stones are unusual in children, occurring in 2
17                                              Bile duct stones are usually treated with surgical bilia
18 e conventional surgical management of common bile duct stones (CBDS).
19 am; even prior images had evidence of common bile duct stones (CBDS).
20              The optimal strategy for common bile duct stones (CBDSs) encountered during cholecystect
21  techniques for the noninvasive diagnosis of bile duct stones continue to be developed and tested.
22 orithm for the treatment of difficult common bile duct stones (DCBDS).
23 age resulted in the identification of common bile duct stones during preoperative ERCP in 92.3% (36/3
24 large balloon dilation (EST-EPLBD) for large bile duct stone extraction with an extent of cutting < 1
25 ients underwent ERCP and clearance of common bile duct stones; group 2 patients underwent MRC; group
26                         The removal of large bile duct stones (&gt; 15 mm) by conventional endoscopic sp
27 ts (HR, 2.52; 95% CI, 1.05-6.04), and common bile duct stones (HR, 11.83; 95% CI, 1.54-91).
28        Unenhanced helical CT depicted common bile duct stones in 15 of 17 patients found to have ston
29 been used increasingly for the management of bile duct stones in relatively young and healthy patient
30 Both radiologists agreed on the diagnosis of bile duct stones in six of seven cases (kappa = 0.90).
31 graphy in the evaluation of suspected common bile duct stones is discussed.
32 s common use, endoscopic clearance of common bile duct stones is not always trivial especially in cas
33  (>=18 years) with native papilla and common bile duct stones (&lt;=1.5 cm in size and <2 cm in diameter
34  3), nonspecific biliary dilatation (n = 3), bile duct stones (n = 2), and biliary-colonic fistula (n
35                           Unsuspected common bile duct stones occurred in six patients (1.4%).
36 e, biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis, common bile duct stones or cholecystitis).
37 ber and without a visible underlying cause), bile duct stones, or biliary fistulas.
38 e, biliary pancreatitis, cholangitis, common bile duct stones, or cholecystitis.
39 ilated bile duct is the only risk factor for bile duct stone recurrence in patients undergoing limite
40 lated bile duct was the only risk factor for bile duct stone recurrence in the limited EST-EPLBD grou
41 adial expansion balloons according to common bile duct stone size.
42 ngiographic findings and management of large bile duct stones, technological advances in the devices
43 trated on the management of difficult common bile duct stones using electrohydraulic lithotripsy, chr
44  2017, 3721 consecutive patients with common bile duct stones were recruited, 1718 of whom were exclu
45        We enrolled 185 patients with >=15 mm bile duct stones who received EST, EPLBD and limited EST
46 s patients with a high probability of common bile duct stone, who were surgical candidates but could
47  in acute cholecystitis patients with common bile duct stone whose cholecystectomy was deferred for 3
48 nd lowest when the indication was removal of bile-duct stones within 30 days of laparoscopic cholecys