戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ime (unimanual) or both arms simultaneously (bimanual).
2 , during, and after execution of a unimanual/bimanual action selection task in 30 (human) young adult
3 , during, and after execution of a unimanual/bimanual action selection task in 30 (human) young adult
4 uggest that hand preferences for coordinated bimanual actions are not influenced by situational facto
5 er than a traditional model that treated the bimanual actions as unitary with a single value.
6  role often played by the nondominant arm in bimanual actions reflects its specialization rather than
7  Hand preference was measured by coordinated bimanual actions, and concordance percentages were compa
8 sured using a task that elicited coordinated bimanual actions.
9 level right hand preferences for coordinated bimanual actions.
10 arily in the execution of previously learned bimanual activities.
11 a game "walking" a frog through a maze using bimanual, alternating finger-tapping movements to provid
12 articipants to grasp with both hands because bimanual and left-hand grasping share intermediate-level
13 ependent phase transition is observed during bimanual anti-phase (asymmetric) tasks in healthy young
14                     Participants performed a bimanual anti-phase finger tapping task wearing gloves w
15 human participants of either sex performed a bimanual anticipatory response inhibition paradigm with
16 lves during movement planning by combining a bimanual arm crossing movement with a temporal order jud
17 terior parietal area 5 in macaque monkeys on bimanual behavior performed with and without visual guid
18 ination of performance over a wider range of bimanual challenges.
19                                              Bimanual co-ordination of skilled finger movements is a
20 iment subjects were asked to perform Luria's bimanual co-ordination task which involves either in-pha
21  control before stopping was manifest in the bimanual condition as changes in corticomotor excitabili
22  agent using one hand (left or right), or in bimanual conditions where each agent performed the task
23 ity was related to better performance in the bimanual conditions, despite some age-related difference
24 d performance declines in the more difficult bimanual conditions, less optimal brain white matter (WM
25 n of side (left, right) and hand (unimanual, bimanual) configurations.
26 ned how learning transfers between these two bimanual contexts by applying force fields to the arms.
27 r 20 ms; P < .001) and maintaining a focused bimanual control of the operative field (mean difference
28  demonstrate the feasibility of high-quality bimanual control of two cursors via neural network (NN)
29                            We found that, in bimanual control, the elderly showed no preference for t
30 sal relationship between unimanual noise and bimanual control, we considered elderly people, whose un
31 d noise, and found a corresponding change in bimanual control.
32                         Our findings confirm bimanual convergence at the earliest stage of cortical s
33                                  Deficits in bimanual coordination in ACC are present across differen
34 ata confirm previous findings of deficits in bimanual coordination in callosal absence, but using sig
35 onal anatomical role of the basal ganglia in bimanual coordination is unknown.
36                     Participants practiced a bimanual coordination task across four days.
37 tex (M1) during the preparation of a complex bimanual coordination task in human.
38 were present in the cerebellar vermis during bimanual coordination tasks, with greater activation in
39 sum (ACC) was studied using the computerized Bimanual Coordination Test (cBCT).
40 tained attention tests and in visuomotor and bimanual coordination tests.
41 cant improvements in gross manual dexterity, bimanual coordination, and the functional activities per
42    Our results demonstrate that synchronized bimanual coordination, mirroring a state of healthy vari
43 n trials involving angled paths that require bimanual coordination, the ACC group performed significa
44 and contralateral M1 that may play a role in bimanual coordination.
45 trongly influences the temporal precision of bimanual coordination.
46  left and right limbs, perhaps in service of bimanual coordination.
47 visuomotor skills, proprioceptive sense, and bimanual coordination.
48 red interhemispheric communication speed and bimanual coordination.
49 f the basal ganglia in the neural control of bimanual coordination.
50  their residual (handless) arm for typically bimanual daily tasks also showed more symmetrical functi
51 increasing task complexity from unimanual to bimanual-equal and then to bimanual-unequal movements re
52 g levels of bimanual interaction: unimanual, bimanual-equal, and bimanual-unequal.
53 erative direction with skilfully coordinated bimanual experience.
54 rate that the central nervous system changes bimanual feedback control and adaptation optimally accor
55          Subjects performed a visually paced bimanual finger-tapping task.
56 cy and variability within a trial provided a bimanual force control outcome.
57 ction of bad variability as well as improved bimanual force control performances within a trial based
58                                    To assess bimanual force control performances within a trial, we u
59 orce levels on bilateral motor synergies and bimanual force control performances.
60 ual gain greater than 8 pixels/N facilitates bimanual force control.
61 nnectivity was significantly correlated with bimanual function, but not unimanual function or somatos
62  gesture-concurrent head movements (i.e. for bimanual gestures), (3) when vision is blocked, gestures
63 urred when switching from a (1) unimanual to bimanual grasp regardless of object center of mass, and
64                    Specifically, we employ a bimanual grasp-lift-replace protocol with younger and ol
65 subsequently cued to execute an unimanual or bimanual grasp.
66 ensatory torque differ between unimanual and bimanual grasping.
67 rticipants to perform lifts in unimanual and bimanual grasps and analyzed results before and after tr
68                            After synchronous bimanual hand movements in which the viewed and felt mov
69        Twelve healthy participants performed bimanual index finger abduction force control tasks at 2
70                                            A bimanual infusion technique was used to introduce and po
71                                     Hand-Arm Bimanual Intensive Therapy Including Lower Extremities (
72 d, a tool that incorporates state-of-the-art bimanual interaction and drop shadows to enable rapid co
73 ur motor task incorporated varying levels of bimanual interaction: unimanual, bimanual-equal, and bim
74 iming between stimuli to evoke the strongest bimanual interactions, topographical distribution of eff
75 asure their temporal generalization in three bimanual interference tasks.
76 tterns that required rhythmical unimanual or bimanual (iso-directional/anti-directional) movements.
77 ourteen healthy young participants performed bimanual isometric force control tasks by extending thei
78 mmunication that are specifically related to bimanual learning and may be relayed through the corpus
79 in interhemispheric coupling associated with bimanual learning.
80 l reduction in activity magnitude during the bimanual loads for both limbs (25%).
81                     Across the unimanual and bimanual loads, neurons largely maintained their preferr
82 6) were responsive to both the unimanual and bimanual loads.
83 ignificant amount of the variance during the bimanual loads.
84  and advanced fluidics allow the safe use of bimanual microincision techniques for lens extraction.
85               Clinical results achieved with bimanual microincisional cataract surgery and new microi
86 o highlight the major issues associated with bimanual microincisional cataract surgery and to review
87                                              Bimanual microincisional cataract surgery has been perfo
88                                              Bimanual microincisional cataract surgery is a promising
89 the wrist was passively moving alone, during bimanual mirror symmetric passive synchronous movement,
90 electrically stimulated noninvasively during bimanual mirrored finger movements.
91 This result suggests that active segments in bimanual motion sequences are linked across limbs.
92      Our results highlight that, even during bimanual motor actions, M1 largely retains its represent
93 ral limb is maintained between unimanual and bimanual motor actions, whereas the activity related to
94 dergoes a small change between unimanual and bimanual motor actions.
95     The nature and extent of deficiencies in bimanual motor coordination in individuals with agenesis
96 an be adapted to different force fields in a bimanual motor sequence when the information about the p
97  function in the aging brain, in relation to bimanual movement control.
98              We examined the coordination of bimanual movement kinematics in a female patient recover
99 ortical inhibition (SICI) induced by passive bimanual movement was assessed in dominant and non-domin
100 nctionality for people with paralysis (e.g., bimanual movement).
101 the first of two stimuli, presented during a bimanual movement, had occurred, and then indicated its
102                                For a complex bimanual movement, studies using functional magnetic res
103 e PRR input, reflects the pattern of planned bimanual movement.
104  and 3) or out-of-phase (conditions 2 and 4) bimanual movements (factor one), while looking towards t
105 determine if amplitude setting of upper limb bimanual movements and bipedal gait are similarly modula
106 ioral and neural demands of unimanual versus bimanual movements and highlight the important role of b
107 gamma activity differs between unimanual and bimanual movements and how these neural signatures evolv
108 A new study shows that ambiguous mistakes in bimanual movements are corrected by the non-dominant han
109                                     Rhythmic bimanual movements are highly constrained in the tempora
110 ntally affected than the young by asymmetric bimanual movements compared to symmetric ones, and both
111                                              Bimanual movements exhibited greater beta ERD, beta ERS,
112                          Yet the planning of bimanual movements has not been well-studied.
113 learning model that decomposed the values of bimanual movements into separate values for each effecto
114                The control and adaptation of bimanual movements is often considered to be a function
115  coordinate both simultaneous and sequential bimanual movements to manipulate objects.
116 gets (two-cursor condition) or used the same bimanual movements to move a cursor presented at the spa
117  participants performed simple unimanual and bimanual movements with right and left index fingers.
118  increased force ratios during unimanual and bimanual movements, compared with control subjects, indi
119                                          For bimanual movements, interhemispheric communication betwe
120                          In contrast, during bimanual movements, reaches executed by our patient usin
121 ces the movement time required to accomplish bimanual movements, suggesting enhanced bimanual perform
122 each side of a mirror and making synchronous bimanual movements, the mirror-reflected hand feels like
123 reat difficulty in performing sequential and bimanual movements.
124  and executing the corresponding coordinated bimanual movements.
125 rm that plays a significant role only during bimanual movements.
126 ctions that may underlie the coordination of bimanual movements.
127          Human participants performed a fast bimanual number comparison task on masked digits present
128 SII areas, and has behavioral importance for bimanual object manipulation and exploration.
129 omatosensory regions and their relevance for bimanual object manipulation and exploration.
130 ric passive synchronous movement, and during bimanual passive asynchronous movement.
131                                              Bimanual pelvic and rectovaginal examination, as well as
132                                              Bimanual pelvic examination was reported with similar fr
133 ancer screening consisted of mammography and bimanual pelvic examinations.
134 hysiological processes underlying successful bimanual performance and skill acquisition.
135 tructural and functional networks regulating bimanual performance decline in older adults, as well as
136 (IHIs) are assumed to be responsible for the bimanual performance deficits in older adults.
137 regulation of IHI, ultimately accounting for bimanual performance deficits.
138  IHI and comprehensive measures of dexterous bimanual performance in 72 individuals (36 musicians and
139 neurophysiological function resulted in poor bimanual performance in older adults.
140 een interhemispheric communication speed and bimanual performance in the two age groups.
141 ly the task-related changes in IHI predicted bimanual performance in young adults.
142                                    Dexterous bimanual performance was quantified by speed, accuracy,
143 ostructure, neurophysiological function, and bimanual performance were interrelated in older adults,
144 lish bimanual movements, suggesting enhanced bimanual performance.
145 in the aging brain that underlie declines in bimanual performance.
146 reduced, which also correlated with impaired bimanual performance.
147 ical study, the tissues were delivered using bimanual pull-through technique followed by air tamponad
148  chamber under continuous irrigation using a bimanual pull-through technique to facilitate spontaneou
149 thelium-in configuration and delivered using bimanual pull-through technique.
150 y, the graft can be easily delivered using a bimanual pull-through technique.
151 at energy cost in humans (N = 10) performing bimanual reaches cyclically.
152 e monkeys planned and executed unimanual and bimanual reaches.
153  (CIMT) in which the intact is arrested, and Bimanual Reaching in which the movements of the intact a
154                                      Whereas bimanual reaching is more suitable for smaller lesion si
155    Thus, adaptive control of visually guided bimanual reaching movements is reversed between hands af
156    Right-handed human participants performed bimanual reaching movements while only one arm was subje
157 ight-handed chronic stroke survivors using a bimanual reaching task in which the hands jointly contro
158 ferences between young and older adults in a bimanual reaching task where the goal is to bring two ob
159                                      Using a bimanual self-touch paradigm, we demonstrate that people
160                            Training improved bimanual sequence performance (from 58.3+/-24.1 to 83.7+
161 nual finger-tapping sequences into one novel bimanual sequence, before and after a 30-min training pe
162 ing is that only active participation in the bimanual sequential task supports pronounced adaptation.
163                Nineteen subjects completed a bimanual simulated laparoscopic task both with and witho
164 ivation of human sensorimotor regions during bimanual skill acquisition.
165  the human motor system for learning complex bimanual skills.
166 ric interactions during early integration of bimanual somatosensory information in different somatose
167 cts found in human psychophysical studies of bimanual stimulation.
168 s (95.7%) by use of a previously established bimanual submerged preparation technique.
169 ical students, an AI-enhanced curriculum for bimanual surgical skills resulted in unintended changes
170 osal fibres may make unique contributions to bimanual synchronization, depending on whether responses
171 tosensory perceptual experiences specific to bimanual tactile object exploration derive, at least in
172 ry cortical regions and correlated them with bimanual tactile task performance.
173 SII source activity correlated directly with bimanual tactile task performance.
174  from 18 chimpanzees tested on a coordinated bimanual task before death.
175 ease group co-ordinated the two limbs in the bimanual task effectively and in a fashion similar to th
176 This research examined hand preference for a bimanual task in 45 tufted capuchin (Cebus apella) and 5
177                              We considered a bimanual task in which people chose how much force to pr
178 n and inhibition of a single response, and a bimanual task involving the selective stopping of one of
179 se group were differentially impaired on the bimanual task nor that movement deficits increased with
180             Participants practised a complex bimanual task over four days while receiving either of f
181 nodal tDCS had little effect on learning the bimanual task regardless of the stimulation sites and le
182           Hand preferences for a coordinated bimanual task were assessed in 109 chimpanzees (Pan trog
183           Hand preferences for a coordinated bimanual task were assessed in a sample of 31 captive go
184 asks, i.e. the standard unimanual task and a bimanual task which increased the control and coordinati
185 ples of responsibility assignment by using a bimanual task, in which the left and right hands jointly
186  left M1 or left DLPFC in learning a complex bimanual task.
187 d individuals as determined by a coordinated bimanual task.
188  with increasing accuracy demands and in the bimanual task; any such differences should be absent or
189 .64-3.20), Purdue Pegboard Test Assembly and Bimanual Tasks (beta(8-week) = 0.16/0.38, 95%CI = - 0.21
190 ease in the use of the more affected hand in bimanual tasks and in enhanced reported functional goal
191 ay show deficits in the acquisition of novel bimanual tasks but not necessarily in the execution of p
192 manual movements, but their roles in complex bimanual tasks remain largely unexplored.
193                       Compared with previous bimanual tasks, the cBCT is more specifically reliant on
194  These findings demonstrate that, similar to bimanual tasks, the coordination dynamics associated wit
195         The current understanding is that in bimanual tasks, this process is flexible such that error
196 Hz) did not differ between the unimanual and bimanual tasks.
197 al end with a 25 G vitreous scissors using a bimanual technique.
198 ngth) with a 25 G vitreous scissors, using a bimanual technique.
199 regardless of object center of mass, and (2) bimanual to unimanual grasp when the center of mass was
200 Fifty healthy human adults were trained on a bimanual tracking task for 5 days (Day 1 to Day 5) when
201            After training, interhemispheric (bimanual) TRCoh decreased again, thereby approaching lev
202 ings noted for chimpanzees which performed a bimanual tube task in a previous study.
203 from unimanual to bimanual-equal and then to bimanual-unequal movements resulted in slower and less a
204  interaction: unimanual, bimanual-equal, and bimanual-unequal.
205   However, the subspace captured more of the bimanual variance related to the contralateral limb (97%

 
Page Top