ライフサイエンスコーパス: biocontrol

1 burial, delayed sowing, variety mixtures and biocontrols).

2 cular studies, and evolutionary biology; and biocontrol.

3 d indicate some genes that may be related to biocontrol.

4 ar ways to further increase future safety of biocontrol.

5 an important agent in locust and grasshopper biocontrol.

6 F. verticillioides, showing its potential in biocontrol.

7 ased efficiency and precision in postharvest biocontrol.

8 ications in gene therapy, cancer therapy and biocontrol.

9 er an effective and safe lead for flavivirus biocontrol.

10 x quinquefasciatus and have potential use in biocontrol.

11 arasitoids, and how their adaptations impact biocontrol.

12 microbial interaction and its potential for biocontrol.

13 anic compounds (VOCs) play a crucial role in biocontrol.

14 DNA viruses, many of which have been used in biocontrol.

15 f insect-infecting viruses with key roles in biocontrol.

16 the complex ecological processes involved in biocontrol.

17 ing efforts are directed toward using EFN in biocontrol.

18 icrobes to colonize plants and contribute to biocontrol.

19 ion reduction strategies that employ genetic biocontrol, a broad suite of technologies that alter the

20 ng this infection model, we demonstrated the biocontrol ability of a wild-type B. subtilis strain 605

21 solate led to impaired root colonization and biocontrol ability.

22 everal genes potentially contributing to its biocontrol activities.

23 lant growth-promoting traits (10 to 64%) and biocontrol activity (74% to 82%) against plant pathogens

24 Pseudozyma flocculosa in the context of its biocontrol activity against Blumeria graminis f.sp. hord

25 sis 118, a soil isolate that exhibits potent biocontrol activity against Fusarium wilt of banana.

26 strains of fluorescent Pseudomonas spp. with biocontrol activity against soilborne fungal plant patho

27 ic richness and the potential loss of fungal biocontrol activity highlights an important mechanism to

28 e contribution of beta-1,3-glucanases to the biocontrol activity of L. enzymogenes may be due to comp

29 The biocontrol activity of PGPR depends on their ability to

30 nant bacterial AHL biosensors and to restore biocontrol activity to an HHL-deficient P. aureofaciens

31 taibol antibiotics and their contribution to biocontrol activity.

32 he fungal species can trigger or depress the biocontrol activity.

33 derstand the dynamics of foliar pathogen and biocontrol agent (BCA) populations in order to predict t

34 tation can be prevented by the nonpathogenic biocontrol agent A. radiobacter K84, which prevents dise

35 subtilis is widely used in agriculture as a biocontrol agent able to protect plants from a variety o

36 e bunds provides food and shelter to enhance biocontrol agent activity and reduce pest numbers, while

37 parasite Coniothyrium minitans, an important biocontrol agent against crop diseases caused by Sclerot

38 B. subtilis M1 was ineffective as a biocontrol agent against P. syringae infectivity in Arab

39 of bioactive COS and fungal protoplasts, as biocontrol agent against pathogenic fungi and insects, t

40 pounds, facilitating its ability to act as a biocontrol agent against phytopathogenic bacteria.

41 s support that phage AhFM11 can be used as a biocontrol agent against vAh as an alternative to antibi

42 ocin 84 is a LeuRS inhibitor produced by the biocontrol agent Agrobacterium radiobacter K84 that targ

43 Interestingly, the biocontrol agent appears to have acquired genes encoding

44 include spores of the industrially relevant biocontrol agent Aspergillus flavus Af36 from crude PS-d

45 on of tomato to evaluate the efficacy of the biocontrol agent Bacillus cereus against the seed pathog

46 ovel compound (HSAF) produced by a bacterial biocontrol agent disrupts polarized growth and leads to

47 notypes in invasive plants, influencing weed biocontrol agent establishment and effectiveness, and sh

48 ity of LAPs and may be used in the future as biocontrol agent for agricultural needs.

49 B. cepacia is currently being developed as a biocontrol agent for large-scale agricultural release, w

50 us (Hymenoptera: Scelionidae), a prospective biocontrol agent for Leptoglossus zonatus (Heteroptera:

51 rans has long been recognized as a potential biocontrol agent for root knot nematodes, but the fastid

52 y feeding on the reproductive performance of biocontrol agent H. pennsylvanicus suggests that perform

53 a polycyclic tetramate macrolactam from the biocontrol agent Lysobacter enzymogenes.

54 a granulovirus (CpGV) is widely applied as a biocontrol agent of codling moth.

55 s particularly important in agriculture as a biocontrol agent of plant diseases.

56 ydis yet is not a phytopathogen but rather a biocontrol agent of powdery mildews; this relationship m

57 ed by Bacillus subtilis in its behavior as a biocontrol agent on plants.

58 oencapsulation and controlled release of the biocontrol agent Pantoea agglomerans strain E325 (E325),

59 we assessed the nematicidal activity of the biocontrol agent Pochonia chlamydosporia against M. java

60 ic basis in the host for interactions with a biocontrol agent suggests new opportunities to exploit n

61 We demonstrate that this biocontrol agent targets A. tumefaciens leucyl-tRNA synt

62 opathogenic nematodes (EPNs) are a potential biocontrol agent that could be effectively used to contr

63 ria-nematode complex has been exploited as a biocontrol agent that is active against several insect p

64 th, plant growth, and applications as a crop biocontrol agent to suppress the threats of nematode pes

65 ht to characterize a functional clock in the biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride to assess its im

66 among a broad range of fungi, including the biocontrol agent Trichoderma atroviride, the plant patho

67 capsulated bacteriophage cocktail as a smart biocontrol agent was evaluated in this study to be used

68 x, and could be potentially developed into a biocontrol agent with minimal off-target effects.

69 Tritrophic interactions involving a biocontrol agent, a pathogen and a plant have been analy

70 of the successful use of a microencapsulated biocontrol agent, E325, against E. amylovora, and could

71 uable insight into the use of M. alpina as a biocontrol agent, emphasizing the ecologically significa

72 icroorganism widely used in agriculture as a biocontrol agent, negatively affects the development and

73 n is critical for ensuring its efficacy as a biocontrol agent.

74 r host range and was considered to be a good biocontrol agent.

75 rd Psa, illustrating potential as a targeted biocontrol agent.

76 y and the potential of PpR24 as an effective biocontrol agent.

77 its host-killing capacity and potential as a biocontrol agent.

78 ed predominantly from the perspective of the biocontrol agent.

79 Microbial biocontrol agents (BCAs) are increasingly being commerci

80 is article the alternative use of enzymes as biocontrol agents against fungal infections in post-harv

81 results will inform the use of Wolbachia as biocontrol agents against mosquito-borne viruses and dir

82 ion in the effectiveness of Bacillus spp. as biocontrol agents against phytopathogens.

83 our structure will inform rational design of biocontrol agents against plant pathogens that cause dis

84 era: Encyrtidae), two candidate neoclassical biocontrol agents against the Puerto Rican cactus pest m

85 nce, lytic phages are considered alternative biocontrol agents against these bacterial superbugs.

86 important due to the use of these viruses as biocontrol agents and for protecting ecologically or eco

87 ous environmental bacteria emerging as novel biocontrol agents and new sources of anti-infectives.

88 y relevant signals, including root exudates, biocontrol agents and phytohormones.

89 nisms, which allows them to serve as crucial biocontrol agents and virulence factors during infection

90 , such as Trichoderma harzianum, that act as biocontrol agents by antagonizing M. roreri.

91 strategies aimed at enhancing the impact of biocontrol agents by reducing the immunocompetence of th

92 Second, biocontrol agents can successfully reduce long-term host

93 but largely unexplored reason for many weed biocontrol agents failing to establish or being ineffect

94 This supports the potential role of fish as biocontrol agents for cercariae with similar dispersion

95 ring technique that aims to increase natural biocontrol agents for crop protection.

96 erstanding parasite-host interactions and as biocontrol agents for insect pests.

97 Trichoderma spp. are effective biocontrol agents for several soil-borne plant pathogens

98 use of "biologicals" as bio-fertilizers and biocontrol agents for sustainable agricultural practices

99 heir quorum-quenching abilities as potential biocontrol agents in aquaculture systems to combat the c

100 hat the AMP1-like viruses may act as natural biocontrol agents influencing the population levels of B

101 re comprehensive analysis of the impact that biocontrol agents may have on ecological sustainability

102 ollinators [7-10] and larvae are significant biocontrol agents of aphid crop pests [11], and thus, it

103 the suitability of these fungal pathogens as biocontrol agents of invasive Hill rapberry.

104 et these are important contributions because biocontrol agents offer disease management alternatives

105 ine the community-wide effects of introduced biocontrol agents on Kauai Island, Hawaii, we constructe

106 es for developing baculoviruses as effective biocontrol agents or for targeting baculoviruses infecti

107 or the successful establishment of effective biocontrol agents over a wide area will be needed to sup

108 nts reached 28% in some species of moth, all biocontrol agents reared had been released before 1945.

109 The study also explored FNPs' potential as biocontrol agents showing no adverse effects on overall

110 productivity through growth promotion or as biocontrol agents to control pests and diseases.

111 There is very limited use of microbial biocontrol agents to control plant disease and no indica

112 As such, satellite RNAs could be used as biocontrol agents to reduce the level of disease in fiel

113 ecies, ranging from soil- and plant-dwelling biocontrol agents to the major human pathogen Pseudomona

114 that a multiple release strategy for the two biocontrol agents would produce better control than a si

115 To properly weaponize mycoviruses as biocontrol agents, a better understanding of their basic

116 cine and agriculture, such as probiotics and biocontrol agents, as well as for ecological questions s

117 These are the improvement of weed-specific biocontrol agents, enhancement of crop competition or al

118 ssayable function, including facilitation of biocontrol agents, suppression of pathogens, degradation

119 seudomonas species are well-known antifungal biocontrol agents, whereas Lysobacter are far less studi

120 and so improve commercial efficacy of these biocontrol agents.

121 ssibilities for improving the performance of biocontrol agents.

122 action and for their possible adaptation as biocontrol agents.

123 l for developing efficient Trichoderma-based biocontrol agents.

124 ctors which influence the role of insects as biocontrol agents.

125 d be further explored for their potential as biocontrol agents.

126 nd DBL might be developed as naturally-based biocontrol agents.

127 ter prepare us to use defensive symbionts as biocontrol agents.

128 pplications to improve the EPN's efficacy as biocontrol agents.

129 g of the strategies exploited by nematicidal biocontrol agents.

130 hytes or endophyte-derived constituents into biocontrol agents.

131 f which may have the potential to be used as biocontrol agents.

132 The biocontrol Agrobacterium radiobacter K84 secretes the Tr

133 Genetic biocontrol aims to suppress or modify populations of spe

134 r heterologous protein production, or on new biocontrol and bioremediation technologies based on Aspe

135 ive soil bacterium potentially important for biocontrol and bioremediation, in soil.

136 teriophage-based products for the detection, biocontrol and biosanitation of foodborne pathogens.

137 New biocontrol and chemical products continue to improve con

138 of this review, the evolution of postharvest biocontrol and its current status are briefly discussed.

139 dawn for phage-based (chemical-free) precise biocontrol and microbiome editing is on the horizon to e

140 inematodal compounds have been isolated from biocontrol and other fungi.

141 prokaryotic viruses and their potential for biocontrol and phage therapy applications.

142 at the ooc gene cluster is widespread within biocontrol and phytopathogenic strains of the enterobact

143 ich a role in host-interaction, -regulation, biocontrol, and more, could be posited.

144 the fields of individualized phage therapy, biocontrol, and rapid diagnostics.

145 ing necrotrophic pathogens are vulnerable to biocontrol, antagonists can be applied directly to the t

146 This yeast therefore has great potential for biocontrol applications against fungal diseases; particu

147 with Wolbachia pipientis (wMel strain) is a biocontrol approach against Ae. aegypti-transmitted arbo

148 ideas to optimally exploit plant traits for biocontrol approaches against C. medinalis, a major rice

149 as has been documented for some chemical and biocontrol approaches.

150 These results support the use of Wolbachia biocontrol as a multivalent strategy against Ae. aegypti

151 Conversely, the antifungal activity of the biocontrol bacterium Pseudomonas aureofaciens 30-84 is d

152 underpins the development of strategies for biocontrol-based pest management.

153 at 30.5 degrees N, we tested the role of the biocontrol beetle Agasicles hygrophila in mediating warm

154 affects impacts of a multivoltine introduced biocontrol beetle on the non-target native plant Alterna

155 To determine the role of surfactin in biocontrol by B. subtilis, we tested a mutant strain, M1

156 influence the effectiveness of augmentative biocontrol by modulating interactions between the introd

157 , reduced pathogenicity and slightly reduced biocontrol capacities.

158 fluorescens 2P24, a PGPR well known for its biocontrol capacity.

159 dscapes, and the economic impacts of reduced biocontrol caused by increased corn production in 4 U.S.

160 ghly diverse group of insects widely used in biocontrol, depends on a variety of life history strateg

161 introduction opens up new possibilities for biocontrol design and our understanding of symbiosis evo

162 DAPG plays an important role in the biocontrol disease suppressing activity of Pseudomonas s

163 with the rhizosphere of plants where it has biocontrol effects on other microorganisms.

164 uses and suggested that to exert significant biocontrol effects, viruses must be able to induce hypov

165 To provide biocontrol effects, viruses must be able to induce hypov

166 Biocontrol efficacy could be improved by co-inoculation

167 s of B. subtilis that exhibit high levels of biocontrol efficacy from natural environments and to inv

168 We studied biocontrol efficacy of different phage combinations on R

169 btained six strains that exhibited above 50% biocontrol efficacy on tomato plants against the plant p

170 omonas fluorescens strains have demonstrated biocontrol efficacy, concerns remain regarding their eco

171 Thus to increase biocontrol efficacy, it is necessary to frequently apply

172 biofilm architecture in B. subtilis, reduced biocontrol efficacy.

173 y selected wMel variants for Wolbachia-based biocontrol efforts, which protect millions of individual

174 ent of anti-infectives and the prevention of biocontrol emasculation.

175 inhibition, which was supported by in planta biocontrol experiments.

176 l apertures and attenuated its efficacy as a biocontrol following co-inoculation with S. typhimurium.

177 represents an exciting potential new form of biocontrol for arboviral diseases, including dengue.

178 parasitic plants are being investigated as a biocontrol for invasive weeds, they may be more effectiv

179 ortance of scenario testing when considering biocontrol for pest management.

180 ation that removals by trapping, angling and biocontrol from lakes of the globally invasive crayfish

181 Cs) found in devastating plant pathogens and biocontrol fungi revealed an uncharacterized and conserv

182 aceum and contributes to understanding how a biocontrol fungus and its prey interact with each other.

183 PPN can be managed sustainably by the biocontrol fungus Pochonia chlamydosporia (Pc).

184 glucosidase was cloned from strain P1 of the biocontrol fungus Trichoderma atroviride (formerly T. ha

185 al yield outcomes between delayed sowing and biocontrols (greatest yields), and crop residue burial a

186 rder to predict the likelihood of successful biocontrol in relation to the mechanisms involved.

187 r the advancement of phytopathogen-dependent biocontrol, including the generation of optimized Tricho

188 o identify microorganisms with potential for biocontrol, increased testing under semicommercial and c

189 re resources to reproduction than native and biocontrol individuals, and their reproduction is spread

190 and with other control methods, integrating biocontrol into an overall system.

191 r traits, suggesting that the host effect on biocontrol is mediated by different mechanisms.

192 One mechanism of biocontrol is mycoparasitism, and T. virens produces ant

193 lates were detected in Sonora, Mexico, where biocontrol is not currently practiced.

194 g the basis for this phytopathogen-dependent biocontrol is still unknown.

195 However, the efficacy of phage biocontrol is variable and poorly understood in natural

196 milar to those caused by the introduction of biocontrol isolates were detected in Sonora, Mexico, whe

197 ave emerged from the predator diversity-pest biocontrol literature, suggesting that there may be gene

198 both within agricultural landscapes and the biocontrol marketplace.

199 d conclude by highlighting the importance of biocontrol measures and public acceptance.

200 potential exploitation in the development of biocontrol measures.

201 Four biocontrol mechanisms (competition, antibiosis, mycopara

202 physiological and genetic enhancement of the biocontrol mechanisms, manipulation of formulations, and

203 al factors on the expression and activity of biocontrol mechanisms.

204 characterized by higher abundances of known biocontrol microorganisms including actinobacteria (Arth

205 field-testing of wMel introgression for the biocontrol of Ae. aegypti-born arboviruses.

206 culovirus) that could be tested for using in biocontrol of agricultural pest mites.

207 y in two specific scenarios: firstly, in the biocontrol of beneficial and pathogenic fungi in increas

208 e of attenuating satellite RNAs as a form of biocontrol of CMV.

209 dea that they could be an effective tool for biocontrol of fungal pathogens.

210 ations for understanding the development and biocontrol of locust plagues.

211 ent state of CRISPR technologies for genetic biocontrol of pests and highlights the progress and ongo

212 des such as capsular polysaccharides and the biocontrol of phytopathogenic fungi were enhanced at 28

213 e phytobacteria, including those involved in biocontrol of plant diseases, significantly inhibit atta

214 Despite much research on biocontrol of plant diseases, success in field crops has

215 el approaches for biomass deconstruction and biocontrol of plant diseases.

216 tion of organic and inorganic pollutants and biocontrol of plant pathogens.

217 The use of entomopathogenic fungi for biocontrol of plant pests is recently receiving an incre

218 of increasing environmental variability, the biocontrol of Ralstonia solanacearum, one of the most de

219 y for their potential applications for phage biocontrol of the disease in striped catfish.

220 h objectives are evaluation of sciomyzids as biocontrols of disease-carrying or agriculturally import

221 lier than native populations, but later than biocontrol ones.

222 volutionary population processes in both the biocontrol organisms and in the wasps.

223 ns such as intracavity bio/chemical sensing, biocontrolled photonic devices, and biophysics.

224 dentify new genetic determinants involved in biocontrol, plant-growth promotion and rhizosphere compe

225 Integrated management where biocontrol plays an important role has been suggested in

226 We show that biocontrol populations have evolved a classic fast life

227 Group I, including CHV1, had great biocontrol potential and could protect trees by efficien

228 nitrate (e.g. from fertilizers) may enhance biocontrol potential in some circumstances.

229 an infect nearly all animal hosts, but their biocontrol potential of insect pests is routinely overlo

230 t viruses for their hypovirulence induction, biocontrol potential, and transmission properties betwee

231 A viruses for their hypovirulence induction, biocontrol potential, and transmission properties betwee

232 els of hypovirulence but showed much smaller biocontrol potential, likely because of inefficient viru

233 lence and spread efficiently but showed poor biocontrol potential.

234 the longstanding use of ecological theory by biocontrol practitioners should be expanded to incorpora

235 which causes the loss of traits crucial for biocontrol, presents a large obstacle in producing comme

236 vel industrial uses as well as probiotic and biocontrol processes.

237 The pioneering biocontrol products BioSave and Aspire were registered b

238 The limitations of these biocontrol products can be addressed by enhancing biocon

239 During the past ten years, over 80 biocontrol products have been marketed worldwide.

240 Although the number of biocontrol products is increasing, these products still

241 Aflatoxin contamination is reduced with biocontrol products that enable atoxigenic isolates from

242 ufficient for commercial-scale production of biocontrol products.

243 nts a large obstacle in producing commercial biocontrol products.

244 iscuss ways in which risk effects may impact biocontrol programs and suggest avenues for further inte

245 istical difficulties, establishment rates in biocontrol programs are equal or exceed those of abovegr

246 Biocontrol programs are underway using Aedes aegypti mos

247 inating a potential consequence of classical biocontrol programs involving insect herbivores and pois

248 performance, and therefore, the efficacy of biocontrol programs.

249 regimes to improve Orius rearing for future biocontrol programs.

250 ntegral component of Wolbachia-introgression biocontrol programs.

251 Amycolatopsis BCA-696 is known for its biocontrol properties against charcoal rot and also for

252 a naturally beneficial bacterium with proven biocontrol properties but potential pathogenic risk.

253 e also identified that may contribute to the biocontrol properties of P. fluorescens Pf-5.

254 adequate protection but in combination with biocontrol provide additive or synergistic effects.

255 Analyses of biocontrol releases are critical to evaluating the envir

256 lar probes are powerful tools for monitoring biocontrol releases.

257 general mechanisms for pest control and that biocontrol research might inform disease management and

258 We also used an estimated biocontrol service index that showed a significant posit

259 of agricultural intensification and restore biocontrol service through proliferating the role of nat

260 tural enemies to soybean fields and reducing biocontrol services by 24%.

261 This loss of biocontrol services cost soybean producers in these stat

262 ield population processes and the associated biocontrol services is limited because emigration and im

263 gle pest in 1 crop suggest that the value of biocontrol services to the U.S. economy may be underesti

264 ronment, poses a health risk, and undermines biocontrol services.

265 o have non-target effects on pollinators and biocontrol services.

266 opportunities to study enemy-risk effects in biocontrol settings.

267 asitoid species, particularly candidates for biocontrol, share the same target in the same temporal w

268 X. fastidiosa biocontrol strain EB92-1 is infectious to grapevines but

269 exacerbated by coinoculation of roots with a biocontrol strain of Pseudomonas putida, but not with a

270 Expression of tri5 in the biocontrol strain Trichoderma harzianum CECT 2413 result

271 conditions, increased emphasis on combining biocontrol strains with each other and with other contro

272 estigated as candidates for use in Wolbachia biocontrol strategies in Anopheles aiming to reduce the

273 finding could contribute to develop disease biocontrol strategies in plants by activating its innate

274 irectly influences the efficacy of Wolbachia biocontrol strategies in transinfected mosquito systems.

275 Unlike insects, genetic biocontrol strategies including population-suppressing g

276 owever, for optimal use of this bacterium in biocontrol strategies, it is imperative to characterize

277 ector-borne disease transmission and genetic biocontrol strategies.

278 vector-borne disease transmission and novel biocontrol strategies.

279 diomycete yeasts, and pave the way for novel biocontrol strategies.

280 and biosafe profile suitable for sustainable biocontrol strategies.

281 interest to understand and optimize this new biocontrol strategy in particular, but also more general

282 om F. verticillioides and reveal a potential biocontrol strategy to reduce fumonisin contamination.

283 s of demographic stochasticity may influence biocontrol success in highly disturbed agricultural syst

284 e the need to understand factors influencing biocontrol success, few theoretical studies of host-para

285 gal BCA systems, does not address a specific biocontrol system.

286 actors in determining the final outcome of a biocontrol system.

287 Biocontrol systems also provide community ecologists wit

288 n of new concepts of postharvest disease and biocontrol systems based on studies of the microbiome of

289 The model considers biocontrol systems for foliar pathogens only and, althou

290 s to better describe, understand, and employ biocontrol systems under commercial conditions.

291 salis and provide clues to develop potential biocontrol techniques against this fruit fly.

292 ntrol products can be addressed by enhancing biocontrol through manipulation of the environment, usin

293 s a valuable addition to the malaria genetic biocontrol toolkit, enabling scalable SIT-like confinabl

294 involved in key pathways related to PGP and biocontrol traits such as siderophores, chitinase, and c

295 wn whether the effectiveness of augmentative biocontrol varies along gradients of landscape compositi

296 r performance in hypovirulence induction and biocontrol, while efficiently being transmitted in the i

297 pulation of formulations, and integration of biocontrol with other alternative methods that alone do

298 enibacillus polymyxa, a PGPR widely used for biocontrol worldwide, and a simple cultural change that