ライフサイエンスコーパス: bioenergy

1 in the search for sustainable and renewable bioenergy.

2 ignocellulose processing for biorefining and bioenergy.

3 f soil and biodiversity can be harvested for bioenergy.

4 sts to provide biomass for wood products and bioenergy.

5 ty of harvesting conservation grasslands for bioenergy.

6 d the potential constraints on the supply of bioenergy.

7 medicine, biotechnology, bioremediation and bioenergy.

8 on was associated with a decline in cellular bioenergy.

9 c traits that are optimized for biofuels and bioenergy.

10 medicine, biotechnology, bioengineering, and bioenergy.

11 enome stability, chromosome segregation, and bioenergy.

12 er to produce food, feed, fiber, timber, and bioenergy.

13 crease, chiefly due to land requirements for bioenergy.

14 elopment of specialized plant feedstocks for bioenergy.

15 , biological devices, and energy storage and bioenergy.

16 Because of increasing demands for bioenergy, a considerable amount of land in the midweste

17 es that could be used to generate tomorrow's bioenergy and biochemical crops.

18 biogeochemical cycling, and applications in bioenergy and bioelectronics.

19 impacts on both SDGs and NCPs; these include bioenergy and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage,

20 uction still hinders their widespread use as bioenergy and biomaterial feedstocks.

21 , and other wood properties important to the bioenergy and biomaterial industries.

22 ral renewable resource for the production of bioenergy and biomaterials, and its enhanced use would a

23 come this limitation and facilitate scalable bioenergy and bioproduct generation.

24 nmentally significant industries such as the bioenergy and biorefining sectors.

25 iratorily versatile bacterium with promising bioenergy and bioremediation applications, Shewanella on

26 thus genus of perennial grasses is grown for bioenergy and biorenewable feedstocks.

27 bilities dedicated to advancing genomics for bioenergy and environmental applications.

28 o improve biomass conservation properties in bioenergy and forage crops.

29 sumption because of a decline in reliance on bioenergy and higher conversion efficiencies of primary

30 n increasingly important source of renewable bioenergy and industrial feedstocks.

31 m industrial biotechnology to innovations in bioenergy and medical intervention.

32 convert solar energy and carbon dioxide into bioenergy and oxygen more than two billion years ago.

33 mic food crop with a potential of becoming a bioenergy and pharmaceutical crop.

34 globally) for the production of pulp, paper, bioenergy, and other lignocellulosic products.

35 ion of these species in phytoremediation and bioenergy applications is discussed, underscoring their

36 ia, although important for biotechnology and bioenergy applications, remain incompletely understood.

37 lopment, and will be instrumental for future bioenergy applications.

38 sights into its physiology and potential for bioenergy applications.

39 tations include traits that may be useful in bioenergy applications.

40 d transportation that could be replaced with bioenergy are also provided.

41 sis in CLL lymphocytes by targeting cellular bioenergy as well as RNA transcription and translation o

42 he combined rate of formation of biomass and bioenergy (as ATP) was shown to be equivalent to the rat

43 Although bioenergy-biochar systems (BEBCS) can also deliver CDR,

44 They have emerging applications in bioenergy, bioproduction, and bioremediation.

45 applications to the ever-emerging fields of bioenergy, bioremediation, and biosensing.

46 crobial communities, to utilize microbes for bioenergy, bioremediation, etc.

47 ells employ bio entities at anode to produce bioenergy by catalysing organic substrates while some sy

48 te production, bioenergy facility build-out, bioenergy byproduct quality, and soil response.

49 but the wild claims of those who think that bioenergy can replace much of our dependence on foreign

50 lgae for the renewable production of several bioenergy carriers, including starches for alcohols, lip

51 bolic pathways for the synthesis of targeted bioenergy carriers.

52 ing the life cycle inventories of the entire bioenergy chain.

53 cent empirical findings show that cellulosic bioenergy concerns related to climate mitigation, biodiv

54 ents offers an option to reach high gasoline bioenergy content for E10-compatible cars.

55 of heat, electricity, and transport and 173 bioenergy conversion routes.

56 ficiencies and environmental performances of bioenergy conversions are derived using biochemical proc

57 -29% by 2050, but providing large amounts of bioenergy could increase global HANPP to 44%.

58 t of endophyte inoculations may be useful in bioenergy crop breeding and engineering programs.

59 vices is dependent not only on the choice of bioenergy crop but also on its location relative to othe

60 donax has attracted interest as a potential bioenergy crop due to a high apparent productivity.

61 diting, transgene expression regulation, and bioenergy crop engineering, with a focus on traits relat

62 the origin of the highly productive triploid bioenergy crop M.

63 red into several other plants, including the bioenergy crop Panicum virgatum (switchgrass).

64 ajor objective toward developing sustainable bioenergy crop plants.

65 Here, using activation tagging in the prime bioenergy crop poplar, we have identified a mutant that

66 hanges in forests, soil carbon dynamics, and bioenergy crop production on degraded/abandoned agricult

67 hen evaluating potential regional impacts of bioenergy crop production.

68 her the effects of N fertilization vary with bioenergy crop species also remains unclear.

69 ch] is a critical food, forage, and emerging bioenergy crop that is notably drought-tolerant.

70 nt and increase in biomass are important for bioenergy crop to lower processing costs for biomass fer

71 um bicolor), an important grain, forage, and bioenergy crop, at multiple developmental time points fr

72 switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), a perennial bioenergy crop, because later flowering allows for an ex

73 on of glycosyl hydrolases in a high yielding bioenergy crop, holds considerable promise for improving

74 4 grass with the potential to become a major bioenergy crop.

75 of alfalfa (Medicago sativa) as a dedicated bioenergy crop.

76 switchgrass (Panicum virgatum), a dedicated bioenergy crop.

77 n studying gene regulation in this important bioenergy crop.

78 need to focus on specific enzyme in certain bioenergy cropland soil when N fertilization effect is e

79 ablished spatial structures of SOC and TN in bioenergy croplands, which little varied with fertilizat

80 Bioenergy cropping systems can substantially contribute

81 ure is driving biodiversity loss, and future bioenergy cropping systems have the potential to amelior

82 To explore the impact of different bioenergy cropping systems on soil microorganisms, the c

83 led that feedstock yields of seven potential bioenergy cropping systems varied substantially within s

84 lations applied to an empirical dataset from bioenergy cropping systems, we show that the ESM method

85 whereas habitat loss from afforestation and bioenergy cropping typically outweighs the climate mitig

86 suggests that expanded production of annual bioenergy crops (e.g., corn and soybeans) on marginal la

87 replacement of annual with diverse perennial bioenergy crops (e.g., mixed grasses and forbs) is expec

88 pothetical conversion of annual to perennial bioenergy crops across the central United States impart

89 of genetic variants in native populations of bioenergy crops and direct manipulation of biosynthesis

90 sources for the delignification of dedicated bioenergy crops and other sources of lignocellulosic bio

91 Different bioenergy crops are expected to vary in their effects on

92 foliar carbon/nitrogen ratio (C/N) in these bioenergy crops at harvest is significantly higher than

93 preserved near their present-day extent, and bioenergy crops emerge as an effective mitigation option

94 The high biomass productivity of bioenergy crops in a longer growing season linked tightl

95 (NETs), is the production and combustion of bioenergy crops in conjunction with carbon capture and s

96 While cultivation of isoprene-emitting bioenergy crops may be appropriate at some scales and in

97 The expanding production of bioenergy crops may impact regional air quality through

98 d Survey to forecast the impact of potential bioenergy crops on avian species richness and the number

99 Producing bioenergy crops on marginal lands--farmland suboptimal f

100 Here we show that perennial bioenergy crops provide an alternative to annual grains

101 ates could be converted to second generation bioenergy crops such as miscanthus and switchgrass.

102 kg(-1), both similar to dedicated herbaceous bioenergy crops such as switchgrass.

103 ion from managed landscapes, particularly of bioenergy crops that have low nitrogen requirements.

104 enerating coproducts is to directly engineer bioenergy crops to accumulate bioproducts in planta that

105 apture the eco-physiological acclimations of bioenergy crops under climate change, and (ii) predict h

106 Advances in engineering of bioenergy crops were driven over the past years by adapt

107 Inoculation of bioenergy crops with plant growth-promoting endophytes h

108 he rational manipulation of lignin in future bioenergy crops, augmenting the previous successful appr

109 en proposed as a means to improve forage and bioenergy crops, but frequently results in stunted growt

110 t species, including many C3 and C4 food and bioenergy crops, implies its presence is adaptive under

111 ed to supply food to the global market, grow bioenergy crops, or for conservation.

112 its of a biofuel industry based on perennial bioenergy crops, rather than corn ethanol and soy biodie

113 ght-resistance varieties is a major goal for bioenergy crops, such as poplar (Populus), which will be

114 oted to the cultivation of second-generation bioenergy crops, such as switchgrass and miscanthus.

115 ies to genetically design plants, especially bioenergy crops, with a high WUE and better photosynthet

116 g this pathway into existing food, feed, and bioenergy crops.

117 e food crop and a model grass for studies of bioenergy crops.

118 ion of what types of plants may be useful as bioenergy crops.

119 mass of fermentable cell wall components in bioenergy crops.

120 rgatum L.) are being evaluated as cellulosic bioenergy crops.

121 overall growth and development of edible and bioenergy crops.

122 s aimed at increasing the value derived from bioenergy crops.

123 utor to SOC accrual in diversified perennial bioenergy crops.

124 sting new gene targets to improve forage and bioenergy crops.

125 ing lignin modification in sorghum and other bioenergy crops.

126 ersion of existing maize cropping to support bioenergy demand.

127 To meet emerging bioenergy demands, significant areas of the large-scale

128 farming for sustained food security and agro-bioenergy development.

129 rtificial photosynthetic systems to underpin bioenergy development.

130 quantity of biomass in a biochar system to a bioenergy district heating system which replaces natural

131 ologies (METs) are one of the emerging green bioenergy domains that are utilizing microorganisms for

132 of the same sustainably procured biomass for bioenergy, except when fertile soils are amended while c

133 cterize changes in organic waste production, bioenergy facility build-out, bioenergy byproduct qualit

134 er, the full distribution of potential woody bioenergy feedstock after tree die-off has not been eval

135 utionary biology, breeding, conservation and bioenergy feedstock development.

136 The bioenergy feedstock grass Miscanthus x giganteus is exce

137 Switchgrass is a leading dedicated bioenergy feedstock in the United States because it is a

138 lue-added products, and for development as a bioenergy feedstock.

139 mum constraints for potential cost-effective bioenergy feedstock.

140 hese perennial grasses, instead of maize, as bioenergy feedstocks can improve soil ecosystem nitrogen

141 but climate impacts for producing different bioenergy feedstocks have not been directly compared exp

142 microorganisms have significant potential as bioenergy feedstocks, but the sustainability of large-sc

143 the ecological costs and benefits of growing bioenergy feedstocks--primarily annual grain crops--on m

144 s for increasing the production of crops and bioenergy feedstocks.

145 elimination of incentives for land-demanding bioenergy feedstocks.

146 ant for plant fitness and the engineering of bioenergy feedstocks.

147 me of which are being developed as dedicated bioenergy feedstocks.

148 iohydrogen, lipids, and carbohydrates, three bioenergy foci.

149 , and woody plants) with different end uses: bioenergy, food, other bio-products, and short rotation

150 eration, which provides cells with efficient bioenergy for G2/M transition and shortens overall cell-

151 r, due to limited supply and competition for bioenergy from other energy sectors.

152 ising given mitochondria have major roles in bioenergy generation, signalling, detoxification, apopto

153 onsiderable progress in identifying relevant bioenergy genes and pathways in microalgae, and powerful

154 to evaluate the interplay between potential bioenergy grass (Miscanthus, Cave-in-Rock, and Alamo) pr

155 cusing on biomass derived from the perennial bioenergy grass Miscanthus.

156 Bioenergy grasses can maintain high productivity over ti

157 One advantage of bioenergy grasses is that they mitigate nitrogen leachin

158 hen grown without applying N fertilizer; and bioenergy grasses, especially Miscanthus, generally requ

159 productivity in several major food crops and bioenergy grasses, including maize (Zea mays), sugarcane

160 ed to other C3 species, and comparable to C4 bioenergy grasses.

161 se relative of several major feed, fuel, and bioenergy grasses.

162 However, current bioenergy growth patterns may, in the long term, only be

163 site for understanding and further improving bioenergy harvesting.

164 e impacts of future environmental change and bioenergy harvests on regional forest carbon storage hav

165 hough using cellulosic feedstocks to produce bioenergy has great potential to reduce GHG emissions, C

166 ystem which replaces natural gas combustion, bioenergy heating systems achieve 99-119% of the climate

167 enzymes (CAZymes) are extremely important to bioenergy, human gut microbiome, and plant pathogen rese

168 organic carbon was recovered in the form of bioenergy (i.e., methane).

169 omass pyrolysis) can provide carbon-negative bioenergy if the biochar is sequestered in soil, where i

170 the algal bioreactor), and the production of bioenergy in electricity and algal biomass through bioel

171 erent visions of land use and management for bioenergy in the U.S. are currently being used both for

172 stocks at scale is a crucial concern for the bioenergy industry.

173 important short rotation woody crop for the bioenergy industry.

174 ake Actinobacteria a promising group for the bioenergy industry.

175 costs is of critical importance to a growing bioenergy industry.

176 The Joint BioEnergy Institute Inventory of Composable Elements (JB

177 are critical for effective incorporation of bioenergy into the national energy portfolio.

178 Bioenergy is efficiently produced in the mitochondria by

179 Bioenergy is often considered an important component, al

180 ighting novel ecosystem impacts of alternate bioenergy landscapes, our results suggest that niche bre

181 ss in competing technologies, land intensive bioenergy makes the most sense as a transitional element

182 Biomass production for bioenergy may change soil microbes and influence ecosyst

183 In addition, dissipation of cellular bioenergy may impose a lethal effect on these quiescent

184 eases in harvesting woody biomass--e.g., for bioenergy--may open forest canopies and accelerate therm

185 that administration of resveratrol modulates bioenergy metabolism, substrate utilization, oxidative s

186 e (TPS) gene family of the panicoid food and bioenergy model crop foxtail millet (Setaria italica).

187 nosine triphosphate (GTP), are signaling and bioenergy molecules to mediate a range of cellular pathw

188 cial traits in crop plants to meet society's bioenergy needs.

189 ng biochar production entails a reduction in bioenergy obtainable per unit biomass feedstock.

190 water treatment plants (WWTPs) to produce of bioenergy offers many potential synergies.

191 But land-intensive bioenergy often entails substantial carbon emissions fro

192 iological processing strategies that produce bioenergy or biochemicals while treating industrial and

193 isms for industrial use (e.g., production of bioenergy or biofuels).

194 ng materials synthesis, nuclear engineering, bioenergy, or waste treatment and it occurs in nature.

195 ns producing bulk and fine chemicals, and in bioenergy, particularly considering increased methane av

196 These results suggest that alternative bioenergy pathways have large differences in how efficie

197 offering twice the carbon sequestration and bioenergy per unit biomass, BEBCS may allow earlier depl

198 on of starch-rich cereals and cellulose-rich bioenergy plants must grow substantially while minimizin

199 Our study suggests that bioenergy policy that supports coordinated land use can

200 in the conterminous U.S.-to estimate primary bioenergy potential (PBP).

201 ngly, realistically constrained estimates of bioenergy potential are critical for effective incorpora

202 and plant tissue nitrogen (N) as metrics of bioenergy potential from mixed-species conservation gras

203 , was not known, and the factors that affect bioenergy potential from these systems have not been ide

204 We simulated the bioenergy potential of pure even-aged high-forest stands

205 Our measurements of bioenergy potential, and the factors that control it, ca

206 s models to determine factors that influence bioenergy potential.

207 into the feasibility of current estimates of bioenergy potential.

208 essment of water scarcity, food security, or bioenergy potential.

209 xpanding meat consumption, and proliferating bioenergy pressures, concerns have recently been raised

210 uctive GAC promote the overall efficiency of bioenergy processes.

211 Bioenergy produced per hectare reflected yields: miscant

212 climate change mitigation trade-off between bioenergy production and biochar carbon sequestration in

213 bacteraceae, members of which participate in bioenergy production and in environmental bioremediation

214 hievable scale is tied to expected growth in bioenergy production and land available for application.

215 sustainability's sake, the establishment of bioenergy production can no longer overlook the interact

216 To improve bioenergy production from photosynthetic microorganisms

217 * The major obstacle for bioenergy production from switchgrass biomass is the low

218 Potential bioenergy production from these abandoned lands using a

219 endeavor of optimizing the sustainability of bioenergy production in Denmark, this consequential life

220 s approach can help to analyze the impact of bioenergy production on ecosystem dynamics and services

221 ce to a broad variety of disease states, the bioenergy production phenotype has been widely character

222 rely on decarbonizing vehicle transport with bioenergy production plus carbon capture and storage (BE

223 t estimates of additional land available for bioenergy production range from 320 to 1411 million ha.

224 In this paper, a bioenergy production system based on heathland biomass i

225 cell growth, with applications ranging from bioenergy production to human health.

226 ios regarding the types of land suitable for bioenergy production using coarse-resolution inputs of s

227 oal of guiding research towards intensifying bioenergy production using established principles of com

228 ing high-rate, high-yield N2O production for bioenergy production with combined N and P removal from

229 molecular mechanisms that mediate microbial bioenergy production, and optimizing existing microbial

230 resting for light-harvesting applications in bioenergy production, in optogenetics applications in ne

231 al applications, such as waste treatment and bioenergy production, using engineered phototrophic micr

232 ghum bicolor; SbPAL1), a strategic plant for bioenergy production, were deduced from crystal structur

233 hum (Sorghum bicolor), a strategic plant for bioenergy production, were deduced from crystal structur

234 o generate the maps of land availability for bioenergy production.

235 ion to biofuels can improve the economics of bioenergy production.

236 s tropical grass in temperate zone grain and bioenergy production.

237 d have multi-purpose uses; grains, sugar and bioenergy production.

238 argest global trends in land use-the rise in bioenergy production.

239 or environmental remediation applications or bioenergy production.

240 ass crop grown for grain, forage, sugar, and bioenergy production.

241 ocatalytic processes and their potential for bioenergy production.

242 s to increase annual U.S. biofuel (secondary bioenergy) production by more than 3-fold, from 40 to 13

243 Bioenergy productions in these regions can be largely co

244 e changes from an expanded global cellulosic bioenergy program on greenhouse gas emissions over the 2

245 nt tool for engineering plants with improved bioenergy properties.

246 bolic engineering of sugarcane feedstock for bioenergy purposes.

247 proposed as a promising solution to enhance bioenergy recovery and to transform a wastewater treatme

248 s stream can enable effective treatment with bioenergy recovery.

249 thorough evaluation of costs and benefits of bioenergy-related land-use change must include potential

250 rocesses and pathways underlying biomass and bioenergy-related traits using a segregating Eucalyptus

251 Sustainable production of biomass for bioenergy relies on low-input crop production.

252 s a potential feedstock and model system for bioenergy research due to recent worldwide interest in d

253 eld studies conducted by large United States bioenergy research programs.

254 ht relate to functions that are important in bioenergy research.

255 In addition, land-intensive bioenergy scales only with the utilization of vast amoun

256 The BioEnergy Science Center (BESC) is undertaking large exp

257 application of lab-on-a-chip systems to the bioenergy sciences.

258 Moderate to upper bound growth in the bioenergy sector with annual byproduct disposal over 100

259 is increasing interest and investment in the bioenergy sector.

260 We conclude that NAD(+)-dependent bioenergy shifts link metabolism with the early and late

261 uin 1 (SIRT1) coordinates the epigenetic and bioenergy shifts.

262 Therefore, bioenergy should maximize land-use efficiency when addre

263 Stems of bioenergy sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.

264 Application of GA3 to bioenergy sorghum increased plant height, stem internode

265 Bioenergy sorghum is a highly productive drought toleran

266 Bioenergy sorghum is a low-input, drought-resilient, dee

267 Bioenergy sorghum's 4-5 m stems account for ~80% of the

268 ts potential as a commercial and sustainable bioenergy source, largely due to the challenge of maximi

269 ochemical cycles, bioremediation and several bioenergy strategies, but the mechanisms for the stimula

270 ve model predictions of root productivity in bioenergy switchgrass, but the edaphic factors we measur

271 opportunities for analyzing microbe-mediated bioenergy synthesis.

272 quantifying annual root production of three bioenergy systems (continuous corn, triticale/sorghum, s

273 ntly improves agricultural yields, with pure bioenergy systems being otherwise preferred.

274 roduction, and optimizing existing microbial bioenergy systems have been made.

275 It has potential utility in a range of bioenergy systems in vitro, but a major obstacle in its

276 This paper expands on the Geospatial Bioenergy Systems Model (GBSM) to evaluate the effect of

277 f biomass are the conversion efficiencies of bioenergy technologies and the kind and quantity of foss

278 ited for use as delivery vehicles for future bioenergy technologies.

279 Anaerobic digestion is the most successful bioenergy technology worldwide with, at its core, undefi

280 in MFCs and the prospects for this emerging bioenergy technology.

281 oxylan in human and animal nutrition and for bioenergy, the enzymes adding the arabinosyl substitutio

282 led can reap benefits in fields ranging from bioenergy to human medicine.

283 ine acts as a "molecular battery" conserving bioenergy to power T cell activities.

284 cifically engineered for improved biomass or bioenergy traits.

285 contribute to phenotypic variance of several bioenergy traits.

286 s: the carbon efficiency and payback time of bioenergy use in BECCS and the potential constraints on

287 benefits of substituting fossil energy with bioenergy were calculated for all approximately 1500 com

288 ) energy policy includes an expectation that bioenergy will be a substantial future energy source.

289 g an effective trajectory for land-intensive bioenergy will require an unusual mix of policies and in

290 Rapid growth in demand for lignocellulosic bioenergy will require major changes in supply chain inf

291 Bioenergy with carbon capture and sequestration (BECCS)

292 There is growing interest in bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) as a p

293 sting NGCC power plant to a biomethane-based bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS) system

294 n the energy sector would be delivered using bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECCS).

295 ing direct air capture, enhanced weathering, bioenergy with carbon capture and storage and afforestat

296 h SDGs and NCPs; these include bioenergy and bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, afforestation

297 har could be implemented in combination with bioenergy with carbon capture and storage.

298 line infrastructure, negative emissions from bioenergy with CCS for light-duty electric vehicles coul

299 efficient catalytic conversion of biomass to bioenergy would meet a large portion of energy requireme

300 diversity grasslands had increasingly higher bioenergy yields that were 238% greater than monoculture