ライフサイエンスコーパス: biogeochemical

1 lability across space, revealing hotspots of biogeochemical activity for further evaluation.

2 hases provide information on changes of past biogeochemical activity in a dynamic sub-seafloor biosph

3 Current methods for biochemical and biogeochemical analysis of the deep-sea hydrothermal ven

4 t sediment niches, which we characterised by biogeochemical analysis, around the burrow of a herbivor

5 timates of nitrogen fixation from an inverse biogeochemical and a prognostic ocean model.

6 nding and modeling hydrological, ecological, biogeochemical and atmospheric processes.

7 As life spread, biogeochemical and climate changes cyclically increased

8 o influences iron (Fe) solubility, affecting biogeochemical and ecological processes.

9 nues for the investigation of many important biogeochemical and physical processes in structured soil

10 ystems require improved understanding of the biogeochemical and physical-chemical mechanisms regulati

11 proach integrating aDNA with archaeological, biogeochemical, and historical data to investigate six i

12 Here we propose a novel biogeochemical approach to track the biological origin o

13 Elemental analysis of biogeochemical archives is an established technique used

14 (Chl-a) observations, in conjunction with a Biogeochemical-Argo dataset, to assess the capability of

15 We found that the soil biogeochemical background corresponding to P inherited f

16 nd-based enhanced rock weathering (ERW) is a biogeochemical carbon dioxide removal (CDR) strategy aim

17 Amazonian waters are classified into three biogeochemical categories by dissolved nutrient content,

18 r these results show that there are specific biogeochemical changes at coral-turf algal interfaces th

19 ween catchments and lakes but at the cost of biogeochemical changes that release stored contaminants.

20 n environmental change triggered significant biogeochemical changes, and cascaded organic matter, nut

21 al distribution of bio-cementation, solution biogeochemical changes, and precipitate microstructure.

22 sition are mainly attributed to physical and biogeochemical characteristics, suggesting that these co

23 important and oftentimes unaccounted organic biogeochemical component.

24 Iron oxides are important structural and biogeochemical components of soils that can be strongly

25 ems, persisting and migrating for decades if biogeochemical conditions are stable.

26 ed a high level of heterogeneity in sediment biogeochemical conditions, and diverse niches harboured

27 methylating organisms is highly dependent on biogeochemical conditions, which subsequently influences

28 sient Neoproterozoic weathering events whose biogeochemical consequences were sustained by a set of p

29 vironmental contexts to better predict their biogeochemical consequences.

30 ions of N demand to evaluate demographic and biogeochemical controls on biomass dynamics in legume-ri

31 rning and geochemical modeling to reveal the biogeochemical controls on regional groundwater uranium

32 matter (OM) is thought to have been a major biogeochemical cycle in the early ferruginous oceans whi

33 of the critical knowledge gaps in the marine biogeochemical cycle of mercury (Hg).

34 Here, we review the global biogeochemical cycle of N and its anthropogenic perturba

35 qually or more important in the global ocean biogeochemical cycle of N.Despite their ubiquitous natur

36 es substantial support for an active arsenic biogeochemical cycle on the anoxic Archean Earth.

37 MTB may significantly impact the iron biogeochemical cycle, especially in the ocean where diss

38 senic (As) plays an important role in the As biogeochemical cycle, particularly in rice paddy soils w

39 isotope fractionation as a tracer of the Hg biogeochemical cycle.

40 to investigate the evolution of the arsenic biogeochemical cycle.

41 isms that play a major role in food webs and biogeochemical cycles (1) .

42 onate (DMSP) is a pivotal compound in marine biogeochemical cycles and a key chemical currency in mic

43 yanobacteria are an integral part of Earth's biogeochemical cycles and a promising resource for the s

44 e late Paleozoic influenced not only surface biogeochemical cycles and animal diversification but als

45 Antarctic krill play an important role in biogeochemical cycles and can potentially generate high-

46 ology and evolution of plants, and to global biogeochemical cycles and climate change predictions, ha

47 a non-negligible driver of future changes in biogeochemical cycles and climate feedbacks on Earth.

48 he rise of pelagic calcifiers - have changed biogeochemical cycles and ecosystem dynamics.

49 tions structure microbial communities, drive biogeochemical cycles and enhance genetic diversity in n

50 phytoplankton, essential organisms in global biogeochemical cycles and food-web dynamics.

51 ies and drive processes as diverse as global biogeochemical cycles and human health.

52 nce oceanic phytoplankton dynamics, and thus biogeochemical cycles and marine food webs.

53 l resource exchange is fundamental to global biogeochemical cycles and plant and animal nutrition.

54 key roles in the oceans by regulating global biogeochemical cycles and production in marine food webs

55 ng respiration quotient will impact multiple biogeochemical cycles and that future warming can lead t

56 into the water column potentially influence biogeochemical cycles and the pelagic food web structure

57 arly Proterozoic Eons could have reorganized biogeochemical cycles between land and sea impacting atm

58 ch of it occurring as polysaccharides, fuels biogeochemical cycles driven by interacting autotrophic

59 minimum zones (OMZs) play a pivotal role in biogeochemical cycles due to extensive microbial activit

60 roader understanding of deep sea ecology and biogeochemical cycles in hydrothermal vent ecosystems.

61 pulation dynamics, genetic heterogeneity and biogeochemical cycles in marine ecosystems.

62 mpact microbial activities involving several biogeochemical cycles in nature.

63 alters decomposition-a critical component of biogeochemical cycles in the biosphere.

64 uence of internal feedbacks in the long-term biogeochemical cycles of carbon, oxygen, and phosphorus,

65 Ecosystem-bedrock interactions power the biogeochemical cycles of Earth's shallow crust, supporti

66 ebs will increase, with potential impacts on biogeochemical cycles of iodine in coastal ecosystems.

67 The major biogeochemical cycles of marine ecosystems are driven by

68 fide (DMS) plays an important role in global biogeochemical cycles of the sulphur element between lan

69 ice fuel high-latitude ecosystems and drive biogeochemical cycles through the fixation and export of

70 etween microbes and nanoparticles impact the biogeochemical cycles via accelerating various reaction

71 important ecosystem engineers that influence biogeochemical cycles via burrowing.

72 mpacts ranging from host evolution to global biogeochemical cycles(1,2).

73 Viruses are key players in ocean biogeochemical cycles(6,7), yet little is known about ho

74 xygenated the deep oceans, ushered in modern biogeochemical cycles, and led to the diversification of

75 tems are highly biodiverse, influence global biogeochemical cycles, and provide valued services.

76 and provide insight into shelf geochemistry, biogeochemical cycles, and the deep biosphere.

77 their ubiquitous nature and significance in biogeochemical cycles, cyanobacterium-phytoplankton symb

78 le of IRES should be accounted for in global biogeochemical cycles, especially because prevalence of

79 ity of biomass and control most of the major biogeochemical cycles, including those that regulate Ear

80 Fungi are key components in global biogeochemical cycles, play important roles in manufactu

81 re important ecosystems in modulating global biogeochemical cycles, yet their biological communities

82 ucture and function, ecosystem services, and biogeochemical cycles.

83 productivity, downstream water quality, and biogeochemical cycles.

84 microbial activities are central to Earth's biogeochemical cycles.

85 is critical to understanding future oceanic biogeochemical cycles.

86 eing recognized as important contributors to biogeochemical cycles.

87 s in fractionation values reflect changes in biogeochemical cycles.

88 l processes including climate regulation and biogeochemical cycles.

89 ces for plant community composition and land biogeochemical cycles.

90 licating them as important drivers of global biogeochemical cycles.

91 eatland ecosystems and thereby impact global biogeochemical cycles.

92 s that make major contributions to important biogeochemical cycles.

93 al evidence for the modernisation of Earth's biogeochemical cycles.

94 ng their role in marine food webs and global biogeochemical cycles.

95 e changes have implications for foodwebs and biogeochemical cycles.

96 , and uniquely large perturbations to global biogeochemical cycles.

97 processes, sustainable resources and global biogeochemical cycles.

98 lterations of the Arctic marine food web and biogeochemical cycles.

99 pin major aquatic food webs and drive global biogeochemical cycles.

100 tanding of current and future ecosystems and biogeochemical cycles.

101 bon, nitrogen, sulfur, arsenic, and selenium biogeochemical cycles.

102 obially mediated processes that drive global biogeochemical cycles.

103 robic alkane metabolisms and their impact on biogeochemical cycles.

104 s of host diversity, population dynamics and biogeochemical cycling and contribute to the daily flux

105 Viruses play a key role in biogeochemical cycling and host mortality, metabolism, p

106 fungi, which are critical for plant fitness, biogeochemical cycling and other processes.

107 r each, we discuss the role of microbiota in biogeochemical cycling and outline ecological and hydrol

108 production, and impact our understanding of biogeochemical cycling at and above the DCM.

109 nsional network burrows implies that benthic biogeochemical cycling could have been maintained at pre

110 s, which can further constrain foraminiferal biogeochemical cycling in biogeochemical models.

111 rganic matter production and impact nitrogen biogeochemical cycling in modern oceans.

112 tural and anthropogenic factors have altered biogeochemical cycling in the lake over the last 2,000 y

113 and, therefore, gives new insights into the biogeochemical cycling of arsenic in paddy ecosystems.

114 the current regime of terrestrial-to-aquatic biogeochemical cycling of C.

115 ught are a major gap in understanding global biogeochemical cycling of carbon (C) and nitrogen (N).

116 hts the importance of organic ligands in the biogeochemical cycling of chromium and has significant i

117 ep in many processes that are central to the biogeochemical cycling of elements and to pollutant dyna

118 been shown to be an important factor in the biogeochemical cycling of iron in AMD-impacted waters, b

119 and waste stabilization by accelerating the biogeochemical cycling of iron.

120 The soil microbiome governs biogeochemical cycling of macronutrients, micronutrients

121 ation processes are of key importance in the biogeochemical cycling of metals and other elements by m

122 , ferrihydrite is an important player in the biogeochemical cycling of nutrients and trace elements i

123 secondary oxalate formation, relevant to the biogeochemical cycling of phosphate minerals, and furthe

124 significant role these compounds play in the biogeochemical cycling of trace and nutrient elements.

125 damental link between ecosystem recovery and biogeochemical cycling over timescales that are longer t

126 al communities play a major role in disease, biogeochemical cycling, agriculture, and bioremediation.

127 They also make major contributions to global biogeochemical cycling, and ameliorate atmospheric accum

128 tem properties, including forage production, biogeochemical cycling, and biodiversity.

129 owever, for this Fe to influence upper-ocean biogeochemical cycling, efficient off-shelf transport me

130 in the ocean and play active roles in global biogeochemical cycling, especially the sulfur cycle.

131 habitat for microorganisms and a hotspot for biogeochemical cycling, including the toxic trace metall

132 lake physical processes and some aspects of biogeochemical cycling, our mechanistic understanding of

133 ycles, that led to permanent state change in biogeochemical cycling, primary production, and biologic

134 As the engine of biogeochemical cycling, soil microorganisms exert a crit

135 the base of ocean food webs and drive ocean biogeochemical cycling.

136 standing of how EM fungi mediate forest soil biogeochemical cycling.

137 rrhizal impacts on ecosystem functioning and biogeochemical cycling.

138 terms of biota, ecological interactions and biogeochemical cycling.

139 ework of Si availability and diatom-mediated biogeochemical cycling.

140 local oxygenic photosynthesis on Pacific AMZ biogeochemical cycling.

141 remediation products and understanding of Se biogeochemical cycling.

142 soil microorganisms play a critical role in biogeochemical cycling.

143 umn experiment were performed to investigate biogeochemical differences between bio-cementation media

144 ing niche specialization and contributing to biogeochemical diversification across this region.

145 A distinct biogeochemical divide was observed, with Fe deficient su

146 s) and suspended sediments were analysed for biogeochemical elements as potential tracers.

147 etabolisms that support life, and complete a biogeochemical energy cycle for manganese(5,6) that may

148 ools and their bioavailability under imposed biogeochemical environments in a watershed is limited la

149 kers for reconstructing Earth's climatic and biogeochemical evolution.

150 Reactions mediated by PCM can impact the biogeochemical fate of pollutants and lead to useful str

151 s they allow for the assessment of long-term biogeochemical feedbacks enabling a full range of questi

152 Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks to the climate are strongly mod

153 t, ecosystem functioning and climate through biogeochemical feedbacks, but their response to contempo

154 ematically show that under these conditions, biogeochemical fluxes are largely predictable based on t

155 -driven glacial/interglacial oscillations in biogeochemical fluxes at and near the ocean margins, wit

156 ring by eddies exerts significant control on biogeochemical fluxes in the open ocean, and eddies may

157 Microbial metabolism drives biogeochemical fluxes in virtually every ecosystem.

158 ght), and thus have implications for earth's biogeochemical fluxes of C and N, perhaps costing 4-7% o

159 highlight the prominent ecological role and biogeochemical function of laminarin in oceanic carbon e

160 tabolism in these regions, and therefore the biogeochemical function of SUP05, depends largely on the

161 t is likely to play an essential role in the biogeochemical functioning of forest ecosystems, in part

162 els(1-3) and caused severe disruption of the biogeochemical functions of the ocean, and especially di

163 els, but the effect of these trajectories on biogeochemical gradients and organisation of canopy trai

164 that defines pathways for matter fluxes and biogeochemical heterogeneity that governs reaction patte

165 underlying mechanisms that make PPR wetlands biogeochemical hotspots, which ultimately leads to their

166 Here, we assess the abundance, activity, and biogeochemical impact of cable bacteria at 12 Baltic Sea

167 discuss recent advances in understanding the biogeochemical impact of viruses, focusing on how metabo

168 ation are significant for both evolution and biogeochemical impact of viruses.

169 limate change, yet little is known about the biogeochemical impacts of meltwaters on downstream fresh

170 ytoplankton-associated bacteria with unknown biogeochemical implications.

171 diatoms is a biochemical process with global biogeochemical implications.

172 mpeting pathways with considerably different biogeochemical implications: demethylation channels sulf

173 hetic microorganisms of great ecological and biogeochemical importance, forming vast blooms in aquati

174 ath for refining the quantification of their biogeochemical importance.

175 ing (BONCAT) - for studying the activity and biogeochemical influence of marine viruses.

176 il to account for the complex ecological and biogeochemical interactions that govern reefs.

177 t of microaerophilic Fe(II) oxidation on the biogeochemical iron cycle in a variety of environmental

178 %) compared to intact wetlands, indicating a biogeochemical legacy of drainage.

179 Here we use physical and biogeochemical measurements of hundreds of living and de

180 l knowledge gaps exist in characterizing the biogeochemical mechanisms that transform microbe-mineral

181 l chelating agents that strongly control the biogeochemical metal cycles such as Fe in the environmen

182 cture analysis of X-ray tomography data with biogeochemical microscopic data of various modalities an

183 nthesizing DO observations with hydrodynamic-biogeochemical model simulations and meteorological time

184 We build a new biogeochemical model that couples the global Hg and C cy

185 We used the DayCent biogeochemical model to examine the effect of adaptation

186 We use a biogeochemical model to show that this increase in the t

187 By using a regional ocean-biogeochemical model, complemented with satellite and in

188 nd simulations obtained from a process-based biogeochemical model, here we detect changes in ecosyste

189 tical forecasting with information from a 3D biogeochemical model.

190 Biogeochemical modeling facilitates the mechanistic unde

191 using methods such as atmospheric inversion, biogeochemical modeling, and field inventories have prod

192 Combining observational evidence with biogeochemical modeling, we show that both sedimentary a

193 nd long-inactive based on reaction-transport biogeochemical modelling of porewater sulfate profiles.

194 senting critical information for large-scale biogeochemical models and for the search for stable in s

195 esenting soil ecological processes in global biogeochemical models and will enable the prediction of

196 However, predictions based on different biogeochemical models are often more similar to each oth

197 us zooplanktons remain poorly represented in biogeochemical models because uncertainties about their

198 Coupled physical-biogeochemical models can inform on expected changes and

199 Simulations with ocean biogeochemical models confirm that climate variability d

200 tween fishery model runs driven by different biogeochemical models decrease dramatically when results

201 New soil biogeochemical models have been developed, but their eva

202 ations of soil nitrification and benefit the biogeochemical models in simulating global nitrogen cycl

203 m satellite products, and outputs from ocean biogeochemical models in the Southern Ocean.

204 To move forward, we argue that global biogeochemical models need a theoretically grounded fram

205 re effects on AO, suggesting that predictive biogeochemical models need to include such differential

206 mproved bioremediation strategies or advance biogeochemical models of electron transfer in anaerobic

207 Three-dimensional (3D) circulation-biogeochemical models of the coastal ocean simulate the

208 Biogeochemical models require modification to account fo

209 Biogeochemical models suggest that hydrothermal iron mig

210 Recent improvements in the fidelity of biogeochemical models translate into lower error rates i

211 Process-based biogeochemical models used for local to Pan-Arctic proje

212 e in, including microbial mechanisms in soil biogeochemical models used to forecast changes in global

213 chanistically implemented in next-generation biogeochemical models with size-structured representatio

214 s in drylands are higher than predictions by biogeochemical models, which are traditionally based on

215 rain foraminiferal biogeochemical cycling in biogeochemical models.

216 anding of microbial processes represented in biogeochemical models.

217 riation in soil community activity in global biogeochemical models.

218 ement cycling and microbial communities into biogeochemical models.

219 gap in knowledge on the role of iron and its biogeochemical multi-interactions in wastewater treatmen

220 A critical review of the complex biogeochemical networking of iron in CWs is therefore ne

221 ion to land surface exert adverse effects on biogeochemical nitrogen (N) cycling.

222 cal nitrogen fixation, a crucial step in the biogeochemical nitrogen cycle.

223 conditions with significant consequences for biogeochemical nitrogen cycling.

224 photosynthetically active radiation) and the biogeochemical number (combination of soil temperature,

225 tions but the effect of this tidally induced biogeochemical oscillation remains poorly understood, li

226 bioclimate envelope model forced by physical-biogeochemical output from eight ocean models to simulat

227 red, and there was no change in the analyzed biogeochemical parameters.

228 inputs sustain these emissions, the specific biogeochemical pathways and timescales involved in this

229 osystems; (2) to identify microorganisms and biogeochemical pathways associated with CH(4) production

230 adapted microbial communities, high rates of biogeochemical/physical weathering in ice sheets and sto

231 e show that newly developed ESM-based marine biogeochemical predictions can skillfully predict satell

232 ction), suggests a role for ESM-based marine biogeochemical predictions in dynamic marine resource ma

233 Microbial methanogenesis is a key biogeochemical process in the carbon cycle that is respo

234 marine organisms can have a central role in biogeochemical processes and are of great interest for u

235 Due to the complexity of biogeochemical processes and historically compartmentali

236 Considering that microbes underpin biogeochemical processes and nutrient recycling through

237 tion of marine aerosols coupled with complex biogeochemical processes at ocean surfaces.

238 In these environments, a range of biogeochemical processes can occur, including sulfate re

239 Biogeochemical processes control the amount and form of

240 nteractions between NCLDVs and eukaryotes in biogeochemical processes in the ocean.

241 ic networks, it is crucial to understand the biogeochemical processes involved in the formation of th

242 implicate compositional shifts in mediating biogeochemical processes of global significance.

243 s of redox-controlled iron turnover with the biogeochemical processes of other elements, e.g. carbon

244 s of redox-controlled iron turnover with the biogeochemical processes of other elements, for example,

245 g transport through fluvial systems, various biogeochemical processes selectively remove or transform

246 ve constraints on how different physical and biogeochemical processes shape dissolved iron distributi

247 bally widespread and have driven terrestrial biogeochemical processes since plant terrestrialization

248 A large body of research has focused on the biogeochemical processes that regulate these two factors

249 th uncertainties in broader contexts such as biogeochemical processes to drive future studies.

250 forest ecosystems and how this is coupled to biogeochemical processes via functional traits.

251 tween host-virus interactions and changes in biogeochemical processes will provide tools to interpret

252 fundamentally coupled to microbially-linked biogeochemical processes within ecosystems.

253 e of the important role of e-pili in diverse biogeochemical processes, anaerobic digestion and electr

254 ng their effects on greenhouse gas emission, biogeochemical processes, and biodiversity of tropical e

255 Despite being key contributors to biogeochemical processes, archaea are frequently outnumb

256 d participates in a number of important soil biogeochemical processes, creates endosymbiosis with ben

257 erranean Sea and could contribute to several biogeochemical processes.

258 transformation, and degradation to deep-sea biogeochemical processes.

259 the sediment, potentially affecting sediment biogeochemical processes.

260 les of influence in agriculture, health, and biogeochemical processes.

261 urbing soils and vegetation, which can alter biogeochemical processes.

262 soils and sediments participate in numerous biogeochemical processes.

263 role in global water resources, climate, and biogeochemical processes; however, no global snow drough

264 ctions between M. liliana and MPB and affect biogeochemical processing in coastal marine sediments.

265 Biogeochemical processing of dissolved organic matter (D

266 ctability for other marine-resource-relevant biogeochemical properties (e.g., oxygen, primary product

267 r data indicate that climatic, physical, and biogeochemical properties and processes collectively reg

268 We explore how key ecosystem's biogeochemical properties have shifted over time as a co

269 res, water masses with distinct physical and biogeochemical properties.

270 ansition zone with intermediate physical and biogeochemical properties; however, bacterial communitie

271 ates, ice-rafted debris, and microfossil and biogeochemical proxies, show repeated abrupt collapses a

272 a lack of efficient methods to quantify this biogeochemical reaction pathway.

273 of the changes in U speciation during these biogeochemical reactions are poorly constrained.

274 rring the spatial organization of sequential biogeochemical reactions in an aquifer in France.

275 Biogeochemical reactions occur unevenly in space and tim

276 ions are ubiquitous and can facilitate major biogeochemical reactions that drive dynamic Earth proces

277 nd substrate for microorganisms that control biogeochemical reactions.

278 We found that biogeochemical responses varied across an elevation grad

279 autotrophically with iron, indicating a new biogeochemical role for this ubiquitous microorganism.

280 y management should consider the influential biogeochemical role of both adult and larval Antarctic k

281 igantic blooms play important ecological and biogeochemical roles in oceans.

282 n of traits that underlie the ecological and biogeochemical roles of phytoplankton.

283 owever, have not been reported, and possible biogeochemical roles of these mats in the past remain la

284 ta coexisting with seep fauna, and porewater biogeochemical signatures indicative of hydrothermal cir

285 he applications of this framework with a new biogeochemical simulation model that traces the fate of

286 Here, eddy-resolving physical/biogeochemical simulations of a seasonally-forced, open-

287 nterpretation of paleo-proxy data as well as biogeochemical simulations, we show that a sea level fal

288 te during a period where the system was near biogeochemical steady state (years 2007-2009, [Formula:

289 reduction (DSR)-an important reaction in the biogeochemical sulfur cycle-has been dated to the Palaeo

290 year, making it a significant aspect of the biogeochemical sulfur cycle.

291 gulate the transport of heat, freshwater and biogeochemical tracers, with strong implications for Ear

292 emissions in restored wetlands constitute a biogeochemical trade-off with contemporary carbon uptake

293 for these bacteria in the mineralization and biogeochemical transformation of sinking particulate org

294 for the transient behaviour of transport and biogeochemical transformation processes.

295 balance, ecological functioning, and coupled biogeochemical transformations of carbon and metals.

296 e interplay between hydrologic transport and biogeochemical transformations.

297 , and role in the concomitant biological and biogeochemical upheavals.

298 diate state of deoxygenation may represent a biogeochemical vulnerability with potential implications

299 ovides novel insights into the influences of biogeochemical water type and ecosystem productivity on

300 ferrous iron [Fe(II)]-oxidizing bacteria in biogeochemical weathering of subsurface Fe(II)-silicate