コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 It is truly a great time to be a glial biologist.
2 are some reflections on my journey as a cell biologist.
3 zation schemes available to a broad range of biologists.
4 ure climate change is a challenging task for biologists.
5 neural network models and deep learning for biologists.
6 friendly, and validated in a way relevant to biologists.
7 The origin of animals has always fascinated biologists.
8 ncologists, physician scientists, and cancer biologists.
9 ormaticians, computer scientists and systems biologists.
10 at have limited their utility to comparative biologists.
11 rocesses that limit lifespan have challenged biologists.
12 grated, programmed, and operated by cellular biologists.
13 dioecious plants of interest to evolutionary biologists.
14 of development' organized by The Company of Biologists.
15 ation and analysis resource for experimental biologists.
16 007, this field remained in the hands of RNA biologists.
17 which has been challenging for evolutionary biologists.
18 t day ecological patterns has long intrigued biologists.
19 imic is a major challenge posed by synthetic biologists.
20 ate reuse of scRNA-seq data by computational biologists.
21 tely become a prominent target for synthetic biologists.
22 need for bioinformaticians and computational biologists.
23 e transcripts faster and more convenient for biologists.
24 t interest to crop breeders and evolutionary biologists.
25 nment is an indispensable tool for molecular biologists.
26 biogeographers, ecologists, and evolutionary biologists.
27 s a difficult object to study for structural biologists.
28 Thus, their adoption is very limited amongst biologists.
29 n, a finding that has long puzzled molecular biologists.
30 ed quantitative analysis among developmental biologists.
31 unnatural forms of DNA created by synthetic biologists.
32 anding enigma for molecular and evolutionary biologists.
33 ns has long been of interest to evolutionary biologists.
34 high summits remain relatively unexplored by biologists.
35 The limits of evolution have long fascinated biologists.
36 llenging and time-consuming for most wet-lab biologists.
37 en clinicians, geneticists and developmental biologists.
38 tters or those from outside the field, e.g., biologists.
39 th 'signal-response' curves measured by cell biologists.
40 indicates that our visual approach can help biologists: 1) visualize probabilities of stable states,
42 rther advance the utility of this system for biologists across disciplines, we generated a transcript
45 ting since as a stem cell researcher, cancer biologist and an MD, I have a unique perspective on thes
46 ility of pertinent research publications for biologist and medical practitioners remains a challenge.
47 ed recently, that would prove of interest to biologist and therapist to get real time informatics nee
48 a protocol that can be implemented by plant biologists and adapted to produce functionalized single-
50 n invaluable online resource, assisting both biologists and bioinformaticians to conduct experiments
51 ysis will provide an insightful resource for biologists and bioinformaticians who are interested in u
53 ed for biomedical researchers, computational biologists and bioinformaticians-we survey emerging comp
54 l Ontology has brought together experimental biologists and biomedical ontologists to discuss solutio
57 al discipline), but also fully integrate the biologists and clinicians with these computer scientists
59 ndrome features an interesting challenge for biologists and clinicians, as the disorder lies at the i
61 res no special equipment, allowing synthetic biologists and general users to evolve improved biomolec
62 anisation were first discovered by molecular biologists and how they relate to the patterns revealed
63 g captivated the imagination of evolutionary biologists and inspired the durable metaphor of the coev
64 rk propagation by putting it in the hands of biologists and linking it to the many other types of net
66 big data problem that precludes many cancer biologists and oncologists from gleaning knowledge from
67 of interdisciplinary collaborations between biologists and physical scientists may not only advance
68 therefore of paramount importance, such that biologists and synthetic chemists avoid pursuing phantom
69 nt virome will be of broad interest to plant biologists and virologists alike and will stimulate ever
71 ps using pair analytics with a computational biologist, and evaluating those alternatives with hour-l
72 fundamentally important resource for muscle biologists, and help to lay the foundation for entirely
73 e efforts of biochemists, cell and molecular biologists, and hematologists have provided an appreciat
74 biologists, developmental biologists, tumor biologists, and oncologists attempting to understand how
75 what might lie ahead for medicinal chemists, biologists, and physicians as they try to improve analog
76 80% in the past two decades and conservation biologists are actively seeking to understand and revers
77 ces 686 SUMMARY: Ecologists and evolutionary biologists are concerned with explaining the diversity a
81 ical studies and, as a result, developmental biologists are once again exploring the chemical and ene
83 on analysis functions needed by experimental biologists are still not adequately addressed by these t
84 350 years, these two organs have fascinated biologists as a model of organ structure and function.
85 boration between disease specialists and RNA biologists as we envision a future in which neurodegener
87 formation about macromolecules, help systems biologists assemble global models of cells that encompas
89 le de novo assembly algorithms have hindered biologists attempting to swiftly assemble high-quality c
90 actor to benefit a recipient) once perplexed biologists because it seemed paradoxical in a Darwinian
91 rlooked by metabolic engineers and synthetic biologists because specific target genes have been elusi
92 e appearance of resources to help bench-side biologists become skilled at computational data analysis
93 has attracted the intense focus of top cell biologists, biochemists, and structural biologists, due
94 es, creating a new phase space for synthetic biologist, biotechnologist, and DNA nanotechnologists to
95 I am just starting my career as a cancer biologist, but I have always been a Black man in America
96 y of newly evolved genes has long fascinated biologists, but large-scale studies of their expression
97 care in animal evolution has long fascinated biologists, but tracing this complex of behavioural repe
98 ought CRNT approaches closer to experimental biologists by automating all the necessary steps in CRNT
99 and use of chemical probes, and suggest how biologists can and should be more discriminating in the
100 The resolution and dimensionality with which biologists can characterize cell types have expanded dra
101 and many human diseases, we as developmental biologists can contribute skills and expertise that are
102 mmunity faces, and discuss how developmental biologists can make unique and valuable contributions to
107 spp. are standard tools for plant molecular biologists, current laboratory strains have remained unc
111 now embraced by engineers, physicists, cell biologists, developmental biologists, tumor biologists,
113 cell biologists, biochemists, and structural biologists, due to its unique activation mechanisms and
114 uence-based protein annotation for molecular biologists, e.g., for identifying putative functional cl
115 The origin of flowers has puzzled plant biologists ever since Darwin referred to their sudden ap
118 philosopher of biology, an artist and a cell biologist - explore how best to represent the entire pro
123 d springs to life, has been a focus of plant biologist for many years, yet the early events following
126 ant abundance change is very advantageous to biologists for developing early disease diagnosis biomar
129 n unmet demand from structural and molecular biologists for software in the middle ground, which woul
130 With its increased popularity, experimental biologists frequently acquire large sequencing datasets
134 ms and specialized skills has inhibited many biologists from pursuing new microfluidic innovations.
137 protein-protein interactions (PPIs) can help biologists generate testable hypotheses about signaling.
138 An equivalent effort from plant molecular biologists has been lagging behind, but recent work in A
142 d with the synthetic tools in hand, chemical biologists have become key players in efforts toward und
147 Prize has drawn attention to these methods, biologists have begun adopting SRM to address a wide ran
150 this Review, we summarize the ingenious ways biologists have exploited natural mechanisms for protein
151 gh fitness costs of inbreeding, evolutionary biologists have found it challenging to understand the p
155 e with the data deluge are progressing, many biologists have lagged behind due to the fast pace of co
166 computational and modeling toolsets, systems biologists have turned their attention to tumor immunolo
170 BRM provides bioinformatics tools to assist biologists having minimal programming skills with analys
171 y have disappeared or to new locations where biologists hypothesize they have a good chance of surviv
173 tering, sorting, and grouping, which can aid biologists in developing hypothesis based on the input g
175 e describe the achievements by developmental biologists in identifying the genes responsible for dome
179 ably, some philosophers have now also joined biologists in their quest to make sense of the abundance
183 ences, and is an important tool for protease biologists interested in protease specificity for specif
189 obinson-Foulds (RF) metric is widely used by biologists, linguists and chemists to quantify similarit
190 can be discontinuous will not surprise many biologists - many genes are restricted in when and where
191 erse-authorship community used by population biologists, mathematicians, epidemiologists, and experts
192 ontents of potential interest for structural biologists, medicinal chemists, molecular modellers and
194 relevance of hiPSC-based studies, stem cell biologists must contemplate statistical and biological c
195 We provide information and resources to help biologists navigate through common pitfalls in SRM speci
196 y collaboration between dermatologists, skin biologists, neuroendocrinologists, and neuropharmacologi
199 ong been of interest to both cell and cancer biologists, partly because of its documented role in tum
203 he exploration of cancer genomics data, most biologists prefer simplified, curated pathway diagrams,
204 e field of biology is no exception; but most biologists receive little or no formal preparation for t
207 nd other model systems enhance fitness, many biologists remain skeptical given the extraordinary natu
210 relate to central objectives of regeneration biologists researching different tissues and species, fo
212 ometry (MS) is an essential part of the cell biologist's proteomics toolkit, allowing analyses at mol
214 niques have become important elements of the biologist's toolkit to gain mechanistic insights into ce
216 ed in late September 2016 for The Company of Biologists' second 'From Stem Cells to Human Development
219 adiations on oceanic islands have fascinated biologists since Darwin's exploration of the Galapagos a
223 ces and the human history of taxonomists and biologists struggling with species concepts in this fasc
224 ding interest to developmental and stem cell biologists studying embryonic morphogenesis and adult ti
225 This approach addresses an important gap for biologists studying non-traditional model organisms and
226 intensivists, neonatologists, and complement biologists, summarizes the current knowledge of these po
231 genetic alterations dominate the way cancer biologists think about oncogenesis, growing evidence sug
232 s largely dominated by UK and North American biologists to a much more international one (with the PG
234 mbining these approaches allows evolutionary biologists to better study the interplay between genotyp
236 ing omics-scale data as well as in assisting biologists to build hypotheses for designing experiments
237 ffective and efficient tool for experimental biologists to comprehensively analyze and interpret OMIC
239 Our goal is to motivate and empower all biologists to consider FRET for the powerful research to
240 b-based application developed to allow plant biologists to construct dynamic mathematical models of m
241 rgo delivery(1), and have inspired synthetic biologists to create novel protein assemblies via the pr
242 workshop with the support of The Company of Biologists to debate the current state of knowledge rega
244 e imaging contrast and enable clinicians and biologists to differentiate between various cell organel
245 ighlight the opportunities for developmental biologists to engage with human geneticists and genetic
246 tworks (GCNs) are powerful tools that enable biologists to examine associations between genes during
247 Identifying emerging phenomena may help biologists to examine potential relationships among phen
249 ring is a common technique used by molecular biologists to group homologous sequences and study evolu
250 on-ready visualizations of results, allowing biologists to identify sites of embedded rNMPs, study th
251 ient web-based server is available for plant biologists to identify the experimentally verified targe
253 s extended PSI-MI format will enable systems biologists to model large-scale signalling networks more
254 iverse animals, it is time for developmental biologists to move away from this reductive approach.
255 sues with cellular resolution, thus enabling biologists to objectively determine drug binding kinetic
257 corporation, debCAM software tool will allow biologists to perform a more comprehensive and unbiased
258 ion and registration techniques have enabled biologists to place large amounts of volume data from fl
259 that allows medical professionals and bench biologists to prioritize and visualize genetic variants
260 focus on the opportunities now available to biologists to study the developmental genetics, cell bio
262 iptomes at the single-cell level have helped biologists to understand the heterogeneity of cell popul
263 e been sustained efforts on the part of cell biologists to understand the mechanisms by which cells r
267 zed by evolutionary developmental (evo-devo) biologists, tools for quantitative evaluation of morphol
268 , physicists, cell biologists, developmental biologists, tumor biologists, and oncologists attempting
271 chastic gene regulatory networks can further biologists' understanding of phenotypic behavior associa
273 ngle the discrepancies in how physicists and biologists use the term 'precision' to facilitate intera
274 lation is one of the central strategies that biologists use to investigate the molecular underpinning
275 d out by any trained biochemist or molecular biologist using commercially available reagents and typi
277 electrical and civil engineering, synthetic biologists utilize abstraction, decoupling and standardi
280 changing the way ecologists and evolutionary biologists view the importance of microorganisms in ecos
281 s Spotlight, we argue that, as developmental biologists, we are in a prime position to contribute to
284 it will enable both the community of systems biologists who study genome-wide ribosome profiling data
285 jectory at extreme old ages is important for biologists who test their theories of aging with demogra
287 a collection of examples that demonstrate to biologists why visualization should be an integral compo
288 innovations that an aspiring structural cell biologist will consider when planning to ask bold questi
291 data mining is challenging for experimental biologists with limited training in curating, integratin
293 with unprecedented detail, but also confront biologists with the challenge of selecting the best-suit
295 wielded at the molecular level is presenting biologists with unique opportunities to unravel the comp
296 iovascular medicine specialists and vascular biologists work closely with oncologists in the care of
298 ion tool for biodiversity informaticians and biologists working with large numbers of scientific name
299 t summarizes conclusions from The Company of Biologists Workshop 'Understanding Human Birth Defects i
300 long fascinated ecologists and evolutionary biologists, yet our understanding of the factors that ca