ライフサイエンスコーパス: biometry

1 ens thickness (LT) were measured using optic biometry.

2 d pre- and post-treatment using LenStar OLCR biometry.

3 nd reactions, choroidal thickness and ocular biometry.

4 to compare the TFR in SS-OCT and in PCI/LCOR biometry.

5 ta on gender and generational differences in biometry.

6 luding cycloplegic autorefraction and ocular biometry.

7 atients from North-East India, using optical biometry.

8 orneal curvature were assessed using optical biometry.

9 of both eye bulbs were determined by optical biometry.

10 ll patients underwent ocular examination and biometry.

11 for gestational age determination and fetal biometry.

12 vitreous length were obtained by ultrasound biometry.

13 nocular open-field autorefraction and ocular biometry.

14 maging and high-precision, noncontact ocular biometry.

15 to examine interocular differences in ocular biometry.

16 vidual differences in axial length by ocular biometry.

17 on was used for ethnic differences in ocular biometry.

18 eased by 43% within the 90 days after ocular biometry (1.0% vs. 0.7%; P < 0.0001).

19 1.0D in short and long eyes using ultrasound biometry after phacoemulsification.

20 hamber depth (ACD), and K), (2) Pentacam AXL biometry (AL, ACD, and Sim K), and (3) combined IOLM700

21 A subgroup of patients underwent biometry also with IOLMaster 500.

22 odds of sustaining a fall within 90 days of biometry among patients of high-testing physicians (test

23 odds of sustaining a fall within 90 days of biometry among patients of high-testing physicians (test

24 Using A-115 for ultrasound biometry and A-115.7 for optical biometry and SRK/T form

25 Using A-115 for ultrasound biometry and A-115.7 for optical biometry and SRK/T form

26 on was to determine refractive error, ocular biometry and age-related lens changes in a population of

27 Ocular biometry and an eye model were used to estimate the reti

28 uded full ophthalmic evaluation, IOP, ocular biometry and anterior segment optical coherence tomograp

29 d the mean and median number of days between biometry and cataract surgery, calculated the proportion

30 d the mean and median number of days between biometry and cataract surgery, calculated the proportion

31 Given differences in ocular biometry and environmental stimuli, population-specific

32 Combined analysis of fetal biometry and fetal growth velocity identified a subset o

33 outcome measures were the results of ocular biometry and gene analysis.

34 terior segment tomography, A-scan ultrasound biometry and handheld slit lamp biomicroscopy.

35 ociated with better outcomes included having biometry and having an eye department manager in the fac

36 s have spurred the continued improvements in biometry and intraocular lens calculations.

37 recent studies and advances in the field of biometry and intraocular lens power calculations.

38 ews recent advances in the field of clinical biometry and IOL power calculations.

39 djusting for ASOCT-measured anterior segment biometry and iris characteristics.

40 assessed using pre-surgical examinations and biometry and keratometry measurements performed with the

41 The repeatability and reproducibility of the biometry and keratometry measurements.

42 it was originally made in order to reconcile biometry and Mendelism and ever since has been used in p

43 e difference in axial length between optical biometry and MRI was 0.50 mm.

44 visual field testing, autorefraction, A-scan biometry and optic disc assessment.

45 ual function testing, autorefraction, A-scan biometry and optic disc assessment.

46 ce of formulas varies based on the source of biometry and optimization.

47 Patients underwent biometry and peripapillary and macular OCT imaging.

48 Biometry and refraction measurements were conducted preo

49 Preoperative AL was measured by ultrasound biometry and SRK/T formula was used for IOL calculation.

50 ultrasound biometry and A-115.7 for optical biometry and SRK/T formula, +/-1.00 D of SE, is able to

51 ultrasound biometry and A-115.7 for optical biometry and SRK/T formula, the emmetropia (+/-1.00 D) o

52 Cross-sectional survey of ocular biometry and visual function in healthy eyes across the

53 xial length was assessed with the ultrasound biometry and/or the Zeiss IOLMaster.

54 Due to utilization of ultrasound biometry and/or Zeiss IOLMaster, axial length correction

55 ations included tonometry, ultrasound A-scan biometry, and anterior segment optical coherence tomogra

56 ete examination including gonioscopy, A-scan biometry, and anterior segment optical coherence tomogra

57 patient selection, accurate keratometry and biometry, and appropriate intraocular lens power formula

58 Refraction, biometry, and corneal curvature were measured, before, a

59 At both ages 9 and 14 years, ocular biometry, and cycloplegic autorefraction were assessed.

60 Participants underwent gonioscopy, A-scan biometry, and imaging by anterior segment optical cohere

61 phthalmologist using ultrasound, fundoscopy, biometry, and intraoperative assessments.

62 Subjects underwent a full eye examination, biometry, and spectral-domain optical coherence tomograp

63 e noted for growth, feed utilisation or fish biometry, and the fatty acid composition of fish fillets

64 ; the axial length was measured by immersion biometry, and the standard A-constant was used.

65 mined, who underwent retinal imaging, ocular biometry assessment, and clinical ascertainment of ocula

66 ad research ultrasonography, including fetal biometry at 28 and 36 weeks' gestational age.

67 Pre- and postoperative biometry, autorefraction, and ocular comorbidities or co

68 articipants, which included advanced optical biometry, autorefractometry, visual acuity testing, and

69 diction errors across 3 methods: (1) IOLM700 biometry (axial length (AL), anterior chamber depth (ACD

70 ere statistically superior to standard fetal biometry-based GA estimates derived from images captured

71 icity was consistently associated with fetal biometry: Black, Hispanic, and Asian women had fetuses w

72 length from MRI in studies that do not have biometry but use retinal imaging to study neurodegenerat

73 RI is not a replacement for the precision of biometry, but in the absence of biometry it could provid

74 All 3 models outperformed standard biometry by a more substantial margin on fetuses that we

75 ntraocular lens insertion using the provided biometry calculations, however post-operatively the pati

76 n infants may be difficult, and preoperative biometry can be used to estimate CL power.

77 Inaccurate biometry can lead to the wrong intraocular lens implanta

78 At E19, biometry, cardiovascular function, stereological, and mo

79 After their eyes were measured by ultrasound biometry, chicks wore either a +10-D lens over one eye f

80 siology, genetics, biochemistry, statistics, biometry, cosmology, and philosophy, although he himself

81 The study involved the analysis of biometry data collected from ten international centers a

82 (M-LVC) according to axial length (AL) using biometry data exported from swept-source optical coheren

83 m normal eyes of children <10 years old with biometry data from eyes undergoing cataract surgery.

84 hort study combining prospectively collected biometry data from normal eyes of children <10 years old

85 To report the biometry data of pediatric cataractous eyes (randomly se

86 eye in unilateral cases) and to compare the biometry data of the unilateral cataractous eye with the

87 s (P < 0.001) while intraocular pressure and biometry data were similar.

88 Anonymized SS-OCT biometry datasets acquired between 2018 and 2020 and con

89 toperative refraction using a single optical biometry device.

90 s and limitations of the currently available biometry devices allows prevention of high variability a

91 (2) What biometry devices are available, do the measurements they

92 All biometry devices delivered highly reproducible measureme

93 Biometry devices with swept-source optical coherence tom

94 n optical coherence tomography, ocular axial biometry, dual Scheimpflug photography and integrated Pl

95 portant and need to be considered along with biometry effects when interpreting OCT-A indices.

96 rea measures, based on individualized ocular biometry, eliminated the magnification effect.

97 imals underwent Doppler ultrasound and fetal biometry followed by MRI at gestational days 85 (G85) an

98 linical studies on IOL power calculation and biometry for 2020.

99 e for automated multi-layer segmentation and biometry for 3D T2w reconstructed images of the pregnant

100 clavation, A-constant, ultrasound or optical biometry, formula employed and refractive outcomes.

101 Optical biometry has shown to be superior to ultrasound biometry

102 The SS-OCT biometry has the potential to provide clinically useful

103 of the tumor was found to influence optical biometry in 15 of 22 patients; the remaining patients sh

104 e association of maternal smoking with fetal biometry in different stages of pregnancy.

105 d for monitoring refractive error and ocular biometry in myopia management.

106 sted odds ratio of falling within 90 days of biometry in patients of high-testing physicians versus l

107 effectiveness of universal ultrasonic fetal biometry in predicting the delivery of a macrosomic infa

108 In response, using swept-source optical biometry in prepresbyopic and presbyopic eyes, we invest

109 LCOR vs. SS-OCT) optical methods for optical biometry in the same cohort of patients were included.

110 effectiveness of universal ultrasonic fetal biometry in the third trimester as a screening test for

111 metry has shown to be superior to ultrasound biometry in vitrectomized eyes but still not achieving a

112 Ocular biometry including axial length (AL), anterior chamber d

113 Ocular biometry including diameters of the eye, vitreous chambe

114 Biometry indicated storage of 1.6 +/- 0.4 megagrams of c

115 e refraction, slit-lamp examination, optical biometry, intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell c

116 n plus (Ver.10.13)) and swept source optical biometry (IOL Master 700 v1.7) was performed on all part

117 ric measurements were obtained using optical biometry (IOLMaster 700), and postoperative refraction w

118 pt-source optical coherence tomography-based biometry (IOLMaster 700; Carl Zeiss Meditec AG).

119 Preoperative assessments included biometry (IOLMaster 700; Carl Zeiss Meditec).

120 eveloped low-coherence reflectometry optical biometry is comparable to older ultrasonic biometric and

121 RECENT FINDINGS: Immersion A-scan biometry is superior in measuring the axial length of ch

122 ovel instrument combining autorefraction and biometry, is designed for monitoring refractive error an

123 precision of biometry, but in the absence of biometry it could provide sufficient accuracy to act as

124 miologic and genetic study that included eye biometry, keratometry, and autorefraction.

125 Eyes were excluded for invalid biometry, lack of refractive data at the specified posto

126 Challenges include biometry limitations and a high incidence of zonulopathy

127 amber angle anatomy in perspective of ocular biometry may be the key element to intraocular pressure

128 or compared with the clinical standard fetal biometry (mean [SD] difference, -1.51 [3.96] days; 95% C

129 statistical difference between every optical biometry measure between genders.

130 A meta-analysis to compare ocular biometry measured by optical low-coherence reflectometry

131 Preoperative biometry measured on the day of cataract surgery was use

132 etinal spectral-domain OCT system and ocular biometry measured.

133 s recent studies highlight difficulties with biometry measurement and IOL calculations in the entire

134 A total of 88 participants had at least one biometry measurement available.

135 Derivation of GA from manual fetal biometry measurements (ie, head, abdomen, and femur) is

136 cation was predicted based on refraction and biometry measurements and compared with empirical change

137 igh 325 kHz A-scan rate not only facilitates biometry measurements by minimizing acquisition time and

138 lar and systemic diseases, unfit for optical biometry measurements due to dense cataract, nystagmus a

139 ITK and Carestream) and compared results to biometry measurements from a specialized ophthalmic inst

140 As a rule, biometry measurements taken by different devices should

141 readily accessible method to use only SS-OCT biometry measurements to detect eyes with a high probabi

142 postflight cycloplegic refraction and ocular biometry measurements were obtained from 56 eyes among 2

143 Preoperative biometry measurements were obtained from IOLMaster 700 (

144 Biometry measurements were obtained using a swept-source

145 his prospective study, 2 consecutive optical biometry measurements, before and after pupil dilation,

146 a chart review/analysis of immersion A-scan biometry measurements, excluding traumatic cataract or l

147 phics, clinical examination findings, ocular biometry measurements, treatment received, and pre- and

148 went cycloplegic refractive error and ocular biometry measurements.

149 MES and SINDI subjects also completed ocular biometry measurements.

150 custom MATLAB programs that included ocular biometry measures (IOL Master).

151 A meta-analysis of the TFR of different biometry methods highlighted that SS-OCT biometry result

152 Mendelism but evolution, natural selection, biometry, mutation, and cytology.

153 A-scan biometry (Nidek Echoscan Ultrasound US-800; Nidek Co., T

154 The central corneal thickness (CCT) and biometry of all subjects were recorded.

155 Biometry of the anterior segment may offer the opportuni

156 Following servicing of the machine, repeat biometry of the patient calculated the axial length cons

157 redentialed sonographers performing standard biometry on high-specification machines.

158 re cleaned regularly, and consider repeating biometry on separate days if repeat biometry still is no

159 gth (measured either by immersion ultrasound biometry or partial coherence interferometry), target re

160 ophthalmic evaluation including gonioscopy, biometry, pachymetry, and ultrasound biomicroscopy.

161 We found that ocular biometry parameters and anterior chamber parameters were

162 ead correlations between mRNA expression and biometry parameters including axial and astigmatic compo

163 s were used in various combinations: optical biometry, partial coherence interferometry, low-coherenc

164 Preoperative optical biometry, Pentacam topography, and postoperative outcome

165 uiring cataract surgery after SB should have biometry performed no earlier than 3 months post SB surg

166 Analysis of biometry performed on the same day identified other pati

167 Data including age, gender, optical biometry, postoperative refraction, implanted intraocula

168 The dataset included demographics, biometry power of the surgically implanted intraocular l

169 repeated measurements of autorefraction and biometry pre- and post-cycloplegia.

170 ng AL eyes, the mean absolute error from the biometry-predicted refraction was - 0.16 +/- 0.46 D, cor

171 Biometry prediction error was 1.11 diopters (D) for MFS

172 patient selection, accurate keratometry and biometry readings, as well as to the application of corr

173 OLCR-based biometry remains reliable in real-world practice.

174 source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) biometry repeatedly calculated the axial length as > 35.

175 ent biometry methods highlighted that SS-OCT biometry resulted in significantly decreased TFR compare

176 It is important to be sceptical of biometry results that do not match the refractive or cli

177 s women with universal third trimester fetal biometry roughly tripled detection of SGA infants.

178 position by a low-cost swept-source optical biometry (SSOB) system.

179 ed on the steepest corneal power measured by biometry (stage 1: <=48 diopters [D], stage 2: >48 D and

180 including applanation tonometry, gonioscopy, biometry, stereoscopic fundus examination, and automated

181 epeating biometry on separate days if repeat biometry still is not in keeping with the refractive or

182 now achieved by directing close attention to biometry technique, through the use of third generation

183 dy aims to use preoperative anterior segment biometry to predict future glaucoma among infants underg

184 ent, post-cycloplegic autorefraction, ocular biometry, tonometry, and spectral-domain optical coheren

185 Optical biometry using a thermally tunable VCSEL swept-source li

186 ariables from corneal tomography and optical biometry using Oculus Pentacam and IOL Master were asses

187 ss-sectional study of patients who underwent biometry using the Pentacam AXL Wave, IOLMaster 700, and

188 valent (SE) refraction and that predicted by biometry using the SRK-T formula was calculated.

189 Fetal biometry was assessed by ultrasound at each research vis

190 Magnetic resonance imaging-based biometry was considered more reliable in patients with U

191 on was then stimulated pharmacologically and biometry was measured continuously for 30 minutes.

192 NTERVENTION, OR TESTING: Preoperative SS-OCT biometry was obtained using the Anterion platform.

193 Biometry was obtained with the IOLMaster 500 (Carl Zeiss

194 Ultrasonic fetal biometry was performed at 20 weeks of gestation as per r

195 Ocular biometry was performed before and at the most recent vis

196 Optical biometry was performed by OLCR biometer (LenStar LS 900)

197 Biometry was performed on 20 healthy right eyes of volun

198 al acuity (VA), electroretinogram (ERG), and biometry were characterized in 4 genotypes, Loxl1(-/-),

199 December 31, 2015, with Lenstar 900 optical biometry were eligible.

200 differences in refractive status and ocular biometry were examined in a multiethnic sample of Britis

201 h keratoconus who had preoperative IOLMaster biometry were included.

202 refraction (without cycloplegia), and ocular biometry were measured in each eye.

203 Both preoperative and postoperative biometry were measured using either the IOLMaster 500 or

204 Refraction and ultrasound biometry were performed before and after the 3-day-long

205 nd credentialed sonographers performed fetal biometry with a high-specification machine (study standa

206 Optical biometry with the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG)

207 All subjects had biometry with the IOLMaster and disc/retinal nerve fiber

208 etween pregnancy-averaged SigmaDAP and fetal biometry z scores were determined through multiple linea