ライフサイエンスコーパス: biotic

1 Combined, our results highlight the coupled biotic-abiotic nature of oxidative mechanisms, with Mn-m

2 itical roles in numerous elemental cycles in biotic/abiotic loops as the key redox center.

3 evelop and indistinct from symptoms of other biotic/abiotic stressors.

4 nterpreted as indicating that geochemical or biotic activities could persist on Mars today(1).

5 volutionary interactions can result in rapid biotic adaptation, but most studies have focused only on

6 that species did not show an increase in net biotic adaptation:ancestral, polyculture- and monocultur

7 structural overshoot, stand development, and biotic agent host selection and outbreaks in mortality p

8 ators, the FES should consider nonpollinator biotic agents and floral physiological costs, broadening

9 n isolating the genome-wide effect of single biotic agents of selection have limited our ability to i

10 isks to forest stability from fire, drought, biotic agents, and other disturbances.

11 Our results show that both biotic and abiotic (pH) treatments had a persistent infl

12 gy reserves to mount a metabolic response to biotic and abiotic challenges.

13 Soil biotic and abiotic characteristics of plantations differ

14 Rapidly changing biotic and abiotic conditions can alter host community a

15 cal patterns in flower colouration relate to biotic and abiotic conditions.

16 fense and acclimation responses to different biotic and abiotic conditions.

17 igating spatial trade-offs between competing biotic and abiotic constraints.

18 But, in many animals, biotic and abiotic cues, like temperature and bacterial

19 on dynamics, but accounting for its numerous biotic and abiotic drivers is a significant challenge.

20 Consequently, the biotic and abiotic drivers of arboreal arthropod abundan

21 communities are excellent models to explore biotic and abiotic drivers of diversity because they are

22 such data has hampered the disentangling of biotic and abiotic effects.

23 ulations respond similarly to changes in the biotic and abiotic environment.

24 Recent work reveals a strong influence of biotic and abiotic environmental factors (including the

25 The many biotic and abiotic factors influencing FTE behaviour mak

26 ithin a geographic location due to differing biotic and abiotic factors influencing ring growth since

27 ing the flow of carbon through soil, yet how biotic and abiotic factors interact to drive it remains

28 chemistry of fossil melanosomes is biased by biotic and abiotic factors is, however, unknown.

29 ect survival and also mediate the effects of biotic and abiotic factors later in life.

30 Different levels of these biotic and abiotic factors resulted in significant varia

31 witch to a different class, depending on the biotic and abiotic factors within which species are obse

32 interactions of developmental processes with biotic and abiotic factors, and we used it here to inves

33 uld consider these in combination with other biotic and abiotic factors.

34 d parasite growth, are influenced by various biotic and abiotic factors.

35 ns, and blurring the conceptual line between biotic and abiotic filters.

36 caution when assessing global-change-related biotic and abiotic implications, including land-atmosphe

37 mmunities arises from a complex interplay of biotic and abiotic interactions, and is a major determin

38 Dryland vegetation is influenced by biotic and abiotic land surface template (LST) condition

39 tand the availability of carbon compounds to biotic and abiotic oxidation and to compare fundamental

40 ial communities, but highlight that multiple biotic and abiotic pathways must be considered to scale

41 Water acts as the solvent for natural biotic and abiotic processes and in many technological c

42 HNPs are generated by biotic and abiotic processes and range in complexity fro

43 Mn oxides, provided new insights for natural biotic and abiotic redox reactions, and explained the do

44 ected areas is crucial in rehabilitating the biotic and abiotic soil environment, while also improvin

45 6 putatively adaptive loci related mainly to biotic and abiotic stress resistance.

46 on its targets, controls the balance between biotic and abiotic stress responses and is a master regu

47 and oomycete pathogen effectors that induce biotic and abiotic stress responses in the plant, as a f

48 Reactive oxygen species are key players in biotic and abiotic stress responses, but there is no con

49 The functional network revealed mechanism of biotic and abiotic stress tolerance, energy conservation

50 luence plant performance and may also impact biotic and abiotic stress tolerance.

51 inducible expression patterns in response to biotic and abiotic stress.

52 th potential benefits for crop resistance to biotic and abiotic stress.

53 compost system can be manipulated to impose biotic and abiotic stresses for testing how microbial in

54 Agronomic characteristics and tolerance to biotic and abiotic stresses in hexaploid wheat can be dr

55 ucial regulator of defense responses against biotic and abiotic stresses in plants.

56 so subjected these accessions to an array of biotic and abiotic stresses including heat, ER stress-in

57 Perception of biotic and abiotic stresses often leads to stomatal clos

58 RS allows for confirmatory diagnostic of biotic and abiotic stresses on plants.

59 es are constantly exposed to a wide range of biotic and abiotic stresses which they must defend thems

60 ediate programmed cell death in development, biotic and abiotic stresses, damage-induced immune respo

61 variety of environmental factors, including biotic and abiotic stresses.

62 d development, hormone response, response to biotic and abiotic stresses.

63 conserved signalling cascade in response to biotic and abiotic stresses.

64 volved in plant responses to a wide range of biotic and abiotic stresses.

65 rotein important for plant responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses.

66 the cost of decreased fitness under combined biotic and abiotic stresses.

67 fense on the outer surface of plants against biotic and abiotic stresses.

68 ne bivalve, highly invasive and resilient to biotic and abiotic stressors causing recurrent massive m

69 ough BHABs were associated with a variety of biotic and abiotic substrates, the results of this study

70 cteria is a precursor to the colonization of biotic and abiotic surfaces, and an important cause of d

71 termed adhesins that enable binding to both biotic and abiotic surfaces.

72 providing novel targets for improving plant biotic and abiotic tolerance and rubber production.

73 lternatives were selected as case chemicals; biotic and abiotic transformation reactions were conside

74 were studied for their adaptations to local biotic and climatic conditions, but more recently, the s

75 The Mexican drylands possess enormous biotic and cultural wealth, representing 65% of the nati

76 an worlds were markedly distinct, and places biotic and environmental change within a longer-term nar

77 Rn) gas has the potential to disentangle the biotic and physical processes that regulate gas transfer

78 gest that local success is driven largely by biotic and stochastic factors and raise the possibility

79 Invasive plants experience more genetic, biotic, and abiotic variation across space and over time

80 itudes of the population impacts of abiotic, biotic, and anthropogenic drivers differ, accounting for

81 Similar impact magnitudes for abiotic/biotic/anthropogenic drivers hold for plants of differen

82 Further analyses of such biotic archives will enable researchers to quantify the

83 s to overcome their sessile habit and combat biotic as well as abiotic stresses.

84 <25 million years ago and, consequently, its biotic assemblage is relatively young and derived from b

85 identifying and protecting the uniqueness of biotic assemblages.

86 lity vulnerability, but hydraulic failure or biotic attack may dominate the process during the end st

87 re, we provide direct evidence that external biotic C sinks can limit plant C allocation to an AM fun

88 n(Cl)) associated with the major abiotic and biotic CH(3)Cl sinks in the environment, namely, CH(3)Cl

89 Lastly, theoretical trends in biotic change can be associated with observed spatial va

90 nalysis to test for any relationship between biotic changes and climatic warming since the industrial

91 s response to ongoing and future abiotic and biotic changes in the 21st century.

92 nts has the potential to record climatic and biotic changes in the pelagic community with the same sp

93 responses to ongoing and future abiotic and biotic changes.

94 e the T-OAE and associated environmental and biotic changes.

95 rstanding the global-scale environmental and biotic collapses that mark the Cretaceous-Paleogene exti

96 rming temperatures, can substantially modify biotic communities and their trait compositions, with fu

97 erating, with impacts ranging from mixing of biotic communities to individual behavioral responses.

98 y help refine projections of how species and biotic communities will respond to future change.

99 cal changes impacted those animals and their biotic communities, and what changes occurred at the Ple

100 ghtened the vulnerability of human and other biotic communities.

101 Both biotic community and abiotic conditions are important in

102 allenge is to understand how the surrounding biotic community modifies evolutionary trajectories as s

103 n of Hg behavior and toxicity in abiotic and biotic compartments.

104 Biotic competition may control the distribution of popul

105 rsity-dependent diversification, assume that biotic competition restricts resource use, and thus limi

106 rganics could provide powerful evidence of a biotic component.

107 lectron flux to enable communication between biotic components and abiotic electrodes.

108 s reflects the evolutionary history of their biotic components, and their dynamics are strongly drive

109 to a new steady state possessing a distinct biotic composition and reduced species richness, biomass

110 ronmental (e.g. environmental stability) and biotic conditions (e.g. level of competition).

111 s, social and spatial structure, abiotic and biotic conditions and pathogen infections.

112 Our results highlight how local biotic conditions modify abiotic selection, in some case

113 variation in parasite pressure, abiotic and biotic conditions, and anthropogenic factors can all sha

114 nd biodiversity change emphasize the complex biotic consequences of land-use change.

115 o elucidate the drivers, both geomorphic and biotic, controlling the establishment, persistence, and

116 ng mechanisms of selective extinction during biotic crises.

117 he end-Permian extinction (EPE), the largest biotic crisis of the Phanerozoic, have not resolved the

118 obacco miR159-GAMYB pathway functions in the biotic defense response, which becomes activated upon mi

119 nds of plastic debris by linking abiotic and biotic degradation behavior in seawater with physical pr

120 enerate complex patterns of both climate and biotic distributions across landscapes.

121 understanding of Amazon rivers as drivers of biotic diversification.

122 one of the earliest explanations for Amazon biotic diversification.

123 or two shelf transects, with an inventory of biotic diversity and distribution from the Nama Group, N

124 f historic events that determine patterns of biotic diversity and may help predict biotic response to

125 Intracontinental biotic divisions across the vast Palaearctic region are

126 , and this variation was attributable to the biotic driver, rather than abiotic drivers.

127 independently control potential abiotic and biotic drivers of the F(soil)-T hysteresis.

128 lative to biotic drivers, but sensitivity to biotic drivers was still substantial.

129 We show how environmental abiotic and biotic drivers, as well as human cultural and socioecono

130 SD of change in abiotic drivers relative to biotic drivers, but sensitivity to biotic drivers was st

131 natural disturbance (not climate), and among biotic drivers, interactions with neighboring plants had

132 in seawater chemistry will have catastrophic biotic effects due to ocean acidification hindering biog

133 ons in stomatal movement only in response to biotic elicitors and support a model in which TARK1 regu

134 stomatal movement responses to bacteria and biotic elicitors.

135 and spontaneous changes in their physical or biotic environment.

136 allel natural selection across a gradient of biotic environments.

137 ermian-Triassic boundary suggest coupling of biotic extinction and increased volcanic activity.

138 acted and likely played a less acute role in biotic extinctions than previously suggested.

139 re, we combine distinct community inocula (a biotic factor) with different temperature and moisture c

140 that longer-term physiological responses or biotic factors (e.g., competition) may better explain th

141 tion: (a) parasite pressure, (b) abiotic and biotic factors and (c) anthropogenic changes.

142 Many (57 of 70) studies indicate that biotic factors can ameliorate harsh climatic conditions

143 pothesis, iRLT hypothesizes that abiotic and biotic factors can interact to impact both limits of a s

144 Abiotic and biotic factors cause plant wounding and trigger complex

145 ained constant over time while the effect of biotic factors decreased.

146 M) mineralization; and (b) the importance of biotic factors for temperature sensitivity (Q(10) ) of S

147 s requires information about how abiotic and biotic factors limit their distributions.

148 was to determine the effects of abiotic and biotic factors on phenotypic plasticity of the diaspore-

149 nt bioregulators (PBRs), which are important biotic factors, are known to play a vital role not only

150 Whether biotic factors, such as insect herbivores that represent

151 y attributed to a combination of abiotic and biotic factors, with a cooling-driven extinction (negati

152 ange between plants and AM fungi and suggest biotic factors-individually and in combination with abio

153 strength and the direction of the abiotic or biotic factors.

154 Therefore, we hypothesized that it may be biotic factors.

155 ioning, (ii) abiotic facilitation, and (iii) biotic feedbacks.

156 ined by a series of hierarchical abiotic and biotic filters which select for or against species based

157 For implanted devices, both abiotic and biotic fuel cells can utilize the dissolved glucose in t

158 mental change may thus depend on small-scale biotic heterogeneity.

159 e interior-edge gradient, pointing to severe biotic homogenisation at all strata.

160 ctional diversity may increase, simultaneous biotic homogenization across tundra communities is likel

161 These processes are likely to amplify biotic homogenization in future ecosystems(7) and may re

162 due to selective logging is contributing to biotic homogenization on islands.

163 Biotic homogenization, more typically associated with ot

164 While both stressors drive biotic homogenization, our results have important implic

165 iodiversity, and are subject to accelerating biotic homogenization, where specialist endemics are los

166 tly increased arthropod abundance and caused biotic homogenization.

167 These changes were accompanied by strong biotic homogenization; i.e. regions are more similar now

168 d on abiotic (i.e. temperature response) and biotic (i.e. host range) axes, that host interactions re

169 tic (i.e. month, site-month interaction) and biotic (i.e. tree-species-specific characteristics) driv

170 reatened by a multitude of environmental and biotic influences.

171 e metrics of species richness and indices of biotic integrity and has largely ignored how land use le

172 The Chesapeake Basin-wide Index of Biotic Integrity, a benthic macroinvertebrate multimetri

173 Conversely, abiotic factors can also mediate biotic interactions along low-latitude/altitude limits (

174 crobiome interactions, the important role of biotic interactions and microbial loop (compositional li

175 escribe their potential independent roles in biotic interactions and the practical challenges associa

176 Biotic interactions are central to both ecological and e

177 The hypothesis that biotic interactions are stronger at lower relative to hi

178 of the underlying biological processes, with biotic interactions as a particularly important process.

179 This study emphasizes that 'non-focal' biotic interactions between hosts and other organisms in

180 ns highlight how biogeographic processes and biotic interactions can shape continental diversity.

181 form high-latitude/altitude limits, whereas biotic interactions create lower limits.

182 nce, especially in diverse communities where biotic interactions greatly complicate responses to envi

183 data, and this explains why the strength of biotic interactions has empirically been treated in a si

184 cies' traits, or (iii) novel (non-coevolved) biotic interactions has never been quantified.

185 erest in using fossil data to understand how biotic interactions have shaped the evolution of life is

186 We test two central tenets of the biotic interactions hypothesis: that predation is (1) st

187 ence for an important and measurable role of biotic interactions in shaping the evolution of communit

188 ry-provides an opportunity to understand how biotic interactions influence range limits and how this

189 aker in more diverse biomes, consistent with biotic interactions initially favouring the accumulation

190 mperature, thus opposing the hypothesis that biotic interactions intensify towards the equator.

191 In communities, biotic interactions may either facilitate or constrain e

192 As predicted, biotic interactions most often occurred along lower limi

193 Ultimately, linking abiotic factors and biotic interactions on niche width will be critical for

194 iding critical information about the complex biotic interactions related to ecosystem change.

195 Understanding how climate-mediated biotic interactions shape thermal niche width is critica

196 s are often assigned greater importance than biotic interactions such as competition.

197 e temperature-dependent fluxes of energy and biotic interactions that sustain all forms of life at al

198 nd co-occurrence studies to explicitly model biotic interactions using data on fossil and modern biod

199 Yet, empirical tests of this "biotic interactions" hypothesis remain limited and often

200 Dispersal limitation, biotic interactions, and environmental filters interact

201 rom correlations between abiotic factors and biotic interactions, as a lack of data to evaluate the h

202 mental variables, spatial scale, strength of biotic interactions, intensity of habitat disturbance, d

203 An increased supply of nutrients and biotic interactions, such as grazing pressure, likely tr

204 olved biotic partners and in the outcomes of biotic interactions.

205 vers of phytochemical variation that mediate biotic interactions.

206 hology, anatomy, chemistry, biomechanics and biotic interactions.

207 a balance between substrate availability and biotic interactions.

208 ts, yet little is known about its effects on biotic interactions.

209 d mutational analyses while avoiding complex biotic interactions.

210 of the evolutionary dynamics resulting from biotic interactions.

211 ghts about the evolutionary ecology of plant biotic interactions.

212 e Argentine Pampas during the Great American Biotic Interchange (GABI).

213 ing hypotheses about the role of abiotic and biotic mechanisms for structuring range boundaries of an

214 hip with soil moisture; further insight into biotic mechanisms underlying N(2) O emission response to

215 er-predicted, prebiotic syntheses of several biotic molecules as well as a multistep, self-regenerati

216 aring compounds requires abiotic or possibly biotic N-fixation and ammonia storage, suggesting that e

217 f disturbance and provide an exemplar of how biotic networks and coral reefs may be impacted by anthr

218 he realized niche, and that both abiotic and biotic niches show limited phylogenetic constraint.

219 of defense response genes in the absence of biotic or abiotic stress.

220 and heterogeneity of urban landscapes drives biotic outcomes in these areas, and such spatial pattern

221 the degree to which species share co-evolved biotic partners and in the outcomes of biotic interactio

222 c (nutrient deprivation, metal toxicity) and biotic (pathogens, herbivores) stress factors.

223 uch is now known about effectors that target biotic pathways, particularly those that interfere with

224 Colonization on both biotic (patients) and abiotic (health care objects) surf

225 ed by abiotic microclimatic modification and biotic physiological functioning.

226 n general, there are three ways to make such biotic predictions.

227 ze and distinguish between major abiotic and biotic processes contributing to the CH(3)Cl sink in the

228 interactions: the temperature dependence of biotic processes from enzymes to evolution; the waveleng

229 ces highlights a perplexing question: how do biotic processes occur and alter the fates of oil micro-

230 cesses usually act identical on enantiomers, biotic processes, such as biodegradation often result in

231 Temperature governs most biotic processes, yet we know little about how warming a

232 are discussed with reference to abiotic and biotic processes.

233 ains, in turn influencing soil fertility and biotic productivity downstream.

234 While much work has been done to understand biotic recovery in both the body and trace fossil record

235 ulating ecosystem productivity and promoting biotic recovery in the Early Triassic.

236 has the potential to allow for some level of biotic resistance against the effects of M. rubra on pla

237 es colonization is more strongly affected by biotic resistance from residents than 3 degrees C of cli

238 The biotic resistance hypothesis predicts that diverse nativ

239 Here, we present a novel analysis of the biotic resistance hypothesis using 24 456 observations o

240 Our results strongly support the biotic resistance hypothesis, thus reconciling differenc

241 as rapidly revived a key ecosystem function (biotic resistance to a notorious woody invader), undersc

242 pes and ecoregions, although the strength of biotic resistance varied across different ecological, an

243 by changes in abiotic conditions or reduced biotic resistance will affect community functional compo

244 between experimental studies, which support biotic resistance, and observational studies, which find

245 dimension describes an abiotic condition or biotic resource required by a species.

246 rns of biotic diversity and may help predict biotic response to future change.

247 estions: (a) How reliable are predictions of biotic responses to changing conditions based on single

248 te biological models are critical to predict biotic responses to climate change and human-caused dist

249 s are providing transformative insights into biotic responses to environmental change, but have seen

250 ological changes is important for predicting biotic responses to global change.

251 entially clarifying evolutionary changes and biotic responses to paleoenvironments.

252 tions have constrained our ability to assign biotic responses to the different types of climate chang

253 A wealth of studies have assessed biotic responses to urbanization in North America and Eu

254 otherwise regulate development, abiotic, and biotic responses.

255 terol congeners were measured in all abiotic/biotic samples, revealing coprostanol, a proxy for human

256 er and type of genetic regions responding to biotic selection [6-9].

257 Biotic selective pressures dominate explanations for the

258 by both abiotic (environmental porosity) and biotic (signaling) factors.

259 velopmental programs directed by abiotic and biotic signals.

260 tence of macro-structures in the turnover of biotic similarity at continental scale that are congruen

261 its classified broadly into four categories: biotic stress (cassava mosaic disease and cassava green

262 d that GCN5 participates in the responses to biotic stress by repressing salicylic acid (SA) accumula

263 ormone jasmonate (JA) promotes resistance to biotic stress by stimulating the degradation of JASMONAT

264 Abiotic and biotic stress conditions provide new contexts for the st

265 ple, regulate plant responses to abiotic and biotic stress conditions.

266 some way to explaining their central role in biotic stress resilience.

267 transcript abundance of genes involved in (a)biotic stress response, gibberellic acid (GA) biosynthes

268 atabolic process, ion transport, abiotic and biotic stress responses besides transcriptional and tran

269 dditional role for two Fe-S cluster genes in biotic stress responses in plants.

270 > A, respectively, both of which function in biotic stress tolerance.

271 ce of the identified SHs was explored during biotic stress with Fusarium verticillioides infection.

272 As climate change is predicted to compound biotic stress with larger and more voracious arthropod p

273 Upon detecting abiotic or biotic stress, plants generally reduce their growth, ena

274 In response to biotic stress, plants produce suites of highly modified

275 s SlFAD2-1 and SlFAD2-2 are downregulated by biotic stress, the majority of divergent FAD2 genes in t

276 In young leaves subjected to biotic stress, we found up-regulation of 266 of the NLRs

277 any organisms, by analyzing 15 species under biotic stress.

278 ant development for research in the field of biotic stress.

279 which get triggered during the occurrence of biotic stress.

280 ry fatty acid metabolism and to responses to biotic stress.

281 that provides protection against abiotic and biotic stresses and prevents organ fusion during develop

282 accumulation in plants can mitigate various biotic stresses through enhanced plant resistance agains

283 Abiotic and biotic stresses widely reduce light harvesting complex (

284 nt and extreme weather events, pressure from biotic stresses will become increasingly compounded by h

285 flexibility to both perceive and respond to biotic stresses.

286 lants highly susceptible to both abiotic and biotic stresses.

287 ction as regulators of plant responses to (a)biotic stresses.

288 with different planting dates and abiotic or biotic stresses.

289 ion and defense during different abiotic and biotic stresses.

290 st in an environment of changing abiotic and biotic stresses.

291 raction of contaminants, climate change, and biotic stressors shapes the structure and functions of n

292 for their resistance to various abiotic and biotic stressors.

293 f contaminants interacting with climatic and biotic stressors.

294 ported and previously unidentified routes to biotic targets, as well as plausible syntheses of abioti

295 al colonization scenarios realized via three biotic treatments - addition of mature heathland-derived

296 ion of weathered fractions under abiotic and biotic treatments provide quantitative evidence for the

297 However, the pace and scale of biotic turnover in response to both the Younger Dryas co

298 The fossil record shows successive biotic turnovers such that a dominant group is replaced

299 the complex suite of interacting abiotic and biotic variables present in ecosystems, animal populatio

300 DNAN degradation (abiotic and biotic) was faster than degradation of RDX, suggesting t