ライフサイエンスコーパス: bipedalism

1 gly dexterous manipulation, concomitant with bipedalism.

2 tempo was within the genus' range of "solo" bipedalism.

3 tween two captive chimpanzees - synchronized bipedalism.

4 apabilities associated with an early form of bipedalism.

5 ally modified during the human transition to bipedalism.

6 erhaps resulting in a less efficient form of bipedalism.

7 es indicate a foot well adapted for striding bipedalism.

8 specialized foot that reflects our obligate bipedalism.

9 tions for understanding the origins of human bipedalism.

10 inin evolution, including the development of bipedalism.

11 e a new hypothesis for the origin of hominin bipedalism.

12 of the unique hominin locomotor adaptation, bipedalism.

13 cerning the mode of locomotion that preceded bipedalism.

14 gular bouts of both climbing and terrestrial bipedalism.

15 critical for understanding the evolution of bipedalism.

16 tatistically associated with both flight and bipedalism.

17 nna habitats were a catalyst for terrestrial bipedalism.

18 nning, and was critical for the evolution of bipedalism(1-6).

19 uge dimensions, massive skulls, and obligate bipedalism.(1)(,)(2) Another group that follows this pat

20 ith a proposed role in contributing to human bipedalism(4-6).

21 ormation, comparison of self to others), and bipedalism (a speculative developmental hypothesis about

22 Bipedalism, a defining feature of the human lineage, is

23 The suggestion that bipedalism allows thinning of the underloaded superolate

24 Evolutionary responses to selection for bipedalism and childbirth have shaped the human pelvis,

25 s as generating selection for traits such as bipedalism and dietary shifts.

26 nt with the disparate demands of terrestrial bipedalism and flight.

27 d cognitive abilities, complex vocal organs, bipedalism and opposable thumbs--most (if not all) are l

28 ions in the avian locomotor system: crouched bipedalism and powered flight.

29 The evolution of bipedalism and reduced reliance on arboreality in homini

30 ation has arisen because of the evolution of bipedalism and subsequently, in the last million years,

31 Moreover, the evolution of bipedalism and the loss of the forelimbs in weight suppo

32 feet provide insights into the evolution of bipedalism and, together with the rest of the skeleton,

33 ffers little information about the origin of bipedalism, and despite nearly a century of research on

34 ost frequently co-occur with humans, such as bipedalism, and retrieval of information that determines

35 wo different patterns of Pleistocene hominin bipedalism appearing on the same footprint surface.

36 Adaptations of the lower back to bipedalism are frequently discussed but infrequently dem

37 gical evidence suggests that adaptations for bipedalism arose in an arboreal context.

38 Whereas obligate bipedalism arose just once in the ancestor of extant jer

39 The human skeletal form underlies bipedalism, but the genetic basis of skeletal proportion

40 the earliest postcranial evidence of hominin bipedalism, but their functional and phylogenetic affini

41 knee adapted to the biomechanical demands of bipedalism by altering chondrocyte developmental program

42 width, hip adduction, and pelvic list during bipedalism by altering step widths and pelvic motions in

43 ns and whether a foot adapted to terrestrial bipedalism constrained regular access to trees.

44 st that there may have been several forms of bipedalism during the Plio-Pleistocene.

45 ies of humans, which were made possible when bipedalism emancipated the arms, enabled foragers to hun

46 centre-of-mass that suggests fully crouched bipedalism evolved after powered flight.

47 Understanding when and why these aspects of bipedalism evolved also requires an understanding of how

48 restriality, and provide evidence that human bipedalism evolved from a more arboreal ancestor occupyi

49 of debate, it remains unclear whether human bipedalism evolved from a terrestrial knuckle-walking an

50 omponent of the hominin adaptive niche, with bipedalism evolving in an arboreal context, likely drive

51 there is debate about when modern human-like bipedalism first appeared in hominins, all known South A

52 ure for traits and behaviors in Homo such as bipedalism, flexible diets, and complex social structure

53 The evolution to bipedalism forced humans to develop suitable strategies

54 However, the adaptive benefit of arboreal bipedalism has been unknown.

55 Bipedalism has traditionally been regarded as the fundam

56 ipedal walking in chimpanzees, indicate that bipedalism in early, ape-like hominins could indeed have

57 have been proposed to explain the origin of bipedalism in hominins and suspension in great apes (hom

58 It has been suggested that bipedalism in hominins evolved from an ancestor that was

59 Here, I argue that the development of bipedalism in humans might have contributed to a reduced

60 d might have contributed to the evolution of bipedalism in humans.

61 the oldest unequivocal evidence of obligate bipedalism in the human lineage(1-3).

62 skeletons show many derived adaptations for bipedalism, including an elongated lumbar region, both i

63 ith lumbar lordosis and other adaptations to bipedalism, including an increase in the width of interv

64 minin manipulative capabilities and obligate bipedalism initially proposed by Darwin.

65 Bipedalism is a defining feature of the human lineage.

66 Bipedalism is a defining trait of the hominin lineage, a

67 Bipedalism is a human-defining trait(1-3).

68 Striding bipedalism is a key derived behaviour of hominids that p

69 Bipedalism is a key human adaptation and a defining feat

70 ermed the Decoupling Hypothesis, posits that bipedalism is an adaptation that enables the shoulder to

71 Human bipedalism is commonly thought to have evolved from a qu

72 A key correlate of human bipedalism is the development of longitudinal and transv

73 Human bipedalism is thus less an innovation than an exploitati

74 hese characteristic frontal-plane aspects of bipedalism likely play a role in balance and energy mini

75 strength of primate hand preference and that bipedalism may have facilitated species-typical right-ha

76 mass reflect a shift from quadrupedalism to bipedalism occurred early in ontogeny in Mussaurus.

77 energy-saving adaptations such as economical bipedalism or sophisticated tool use that decrease subsi

78 However, bipedalism poses a unique challenge to pregnant females

79 genetic shifts in the human pelvis that made bipedalism possible.

80 nvestigate the long-standing hypothesis that bipedalism reduced the energy cost of walking compared w

81 aspects of the hominin ankle associated with bipedalism remain compatible with vertical climbing and

82 The evolution of upright bipedalism required coordinated modifications in spinal

83 ed to increased encephalization and obligate bipedalism, resulting in relative enlargement of the par

84 reased terrestriality selecting for habitual bipedalism, results indicate that trees remained an esse

85 n hominins show morphological adaptations to bipedalism, suggesting that this was their predominant m

86 ity to investigate the ecological drivers of bipedalism that cannot be addressed via the fossil recor

87 rch was a key step in the evolution of human bipedalism that predates the genus Homo by at least 1.5

88 ough birth canals that were reconfigured for bipedalism (the "obstetric dilemma"), (ii) high early po

89 As a consequence of bipedalism, the shape of the human pelvis has changed, l

90 s that the evolutionary precursor of hominin bipedalism was African ape-like terrestrial quadrupedali

91 A model is presented that suggests that bipedalism was attained through an intermediate stage of

92 Some argue that arboreal bipedalism was prohibitively risky for hominins whose in