コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 adolescents were ascertained from Minnesota birth records.
2 trols were selected without tracing from the birth records.
3 UK, between 1922 and 1926, and had complete birth records.
4 with respect to characteristics noted in the birth records.
5 tional diabetes), identified from nationwide birth records.
6 tional diabetes), identified from nationwide birth records.
7 l and perinatal variables were obtained from birth records.
8 s assessed by mothers, fathers, and hospital birth records.
9 th the same year of birth were obtained from birth records.
10 nal age at birth, identified from nationwide birth records.
11 regnancy duration identified from nationwide birth records.
12 noses from the California Cancer Registry to birth records.
13 ngth of gestation recorded in the California birth records.
14 ss-matching national cancer-registration and births records.
15 ith a prior induced abortion recorded on the birth record, 14.0% of the 43 cases and 14.9% of the 47
17 within 4 ounces (113.4 g) of that listed in birth records, 28% reported it inaccurately, and 47% did
20 The authors used 1995-2003 New York City birth records and a spatial measure of ethnic density to
21 thing patients aged 14 to 59 years with live birth records and admission to the postpartum unit or th
24 t (TD) (n = 350) were randomly selected from birth records and frequency matched on age, sex, and bro
25 ng children identified by using computerized birth records and located successfully, the other from a
26 an administrative linked database, including birth records and Medicaid claims, linked to program par
28 nal or Torres Strait Islander on one or more birth records) and 99 672 (92.6%) children were not Indi
29 ctional study using linked all-payer claims, birth records, and income data for Medicaid-paid births
31 c medical records, pharmacy databases, state birth records, and prospectively collected breastfeeding
33 of 502 male youth, identified from Minnesota birth records as members of twin pairs, had their P3 amp
37 d to individuals without cancer in the state birth records by birth year and sex with a comparator:su
40 7,750 normal controls) and Washington State birth record data for 1984-1994, the authors examined th
41 etrospective, cross-sectional study analyzed birth record data from all 50 states and the District of
42 g data from the New Bedford Cohort (NBC) and birth record data to predict prenatal exposures for all
43 linked to their corresponding Massachusetts birth record data, to build predictive models for cord s
44 irths that were registered in the California birth records during 2007 to 2015 and were linked to CP
46 ncer Registry and were matched to electronic birth records for 1985-2001 from New York State, excludi
51 f Pregnancy and Childhood (ALSPAC) for 7,678 birth records for women who gave birth in the County of
53 inked maternal and infant characteristics in birth records from 1987 to 2008 to hospital discharge da
54 : This cohort study of singleton births used birth records from 1993 to 2017 from the 50 most populou
58 T and autism diagnosis, we linked California birth records from 2000 through 2016 with contemporaneou
59 rospective cohort study using administrative birth records from 2012 to 2015 (N = 23,487) and satelli
62 United States (US) drawing upon 18.4 million birth records from census and nationally representative
63 nternational cohort study, we used data from birth records from Finland (1987-2016), Norway (1980-201
64 onal Maternity and Perinatal Audit, based on birth records from maternity information systems used by
65 irth outcomes were measured using individual birth records from the New York Bureau of Vital Statisti
68 e, population-based cohort study used linked birth records, hospital admission records, and dispensin
69 individuals aged 12 to 55 years with a live birth record identified by delivery-related codes from J
74 ated adverse birth outcomes in infants whose birth records indicated maternal residence in villages c
78 30 women after 1 January 2005 were linked to birth records (n = 1,630) to identify the outcomes of pr
79 d sibling-comparison design using California birth records (n = 2,015,104) with information on matern
80 irths and preterm deliveries identified from birth records (n = 2,709), the authors illustrate a nove
81 nces study design to analyze claims data and birth records obtained from the Colorado All Payer Claim
82 erview data and information collected on the birth record of the last child to whom they gave birth (
84 disparities using intergenerationally linked birth records of 379,794 California-born primiparous mot
85 ncident HDP using intergenerationally linked birth records of 45,204 Black California-born primiparou
87 t members were identified through California birth records of children born in California from Januar
90 rchived prenatal serum samples, prenatal and birth records, placental examinations, and follow-up for
93 r registry in Ontario, Canada, was linked to birth records to identify separate population-based coho
94 Surveillance Programme-Pre School), linking birth records to postnatal hospitalisation and universal
95 enrolled birth certificate controls), using birth records to recruit controls appears to provide a r
96 ansgenerational birth file by linking infant birth records to the birth records of their parents.
100 tion, and obstetrical complications noted in birth records were independently assessed in 18 patients
103 luded as they did not have an age or date of birth recorded, which resulted in 48 670 (99.3%) partici