コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
2 al dementia is clinically heterogeneous with bitemporal and inferior frontal lobe dysfunction contrib
4 tons 2800-4000 ms postlabeling in bifrontal, bitemporal, and biparietal regions within 7 days of mTBI
5 (aphasic, perceptual-motor, frontal lobe and bitemporal categories) encompass the majority of atypica
6 the electrode placement (right unilateral or bitemporal) determines the geometric shape of the electr
7 ive complications, hippocampal remnants, and bitemporal disease do not account for all failures; extr
10 hreshold) right unilateral ECT is similar to bitemporal ECT but may have fewer cognitive side effects
11 high-dose unilateral ECT is not inferior to bitemporal ECT for depression and may be preferable beca
12 patients given bifrontal ECT and those given bitemporal ECT in the number of treatments required to r
13 High-dose unilateral ECT was noninferior to bitemporal ECT regarding the 24-item HAM-D scores after
15 eekly moderate-dose (1.5x seizure threshold) bitemporal ECT with high-dose unilateral ECT in real-wor
16 ni-Mental State scores of the patients given bitemporal ECT worsened more after treatment than did th
18 bifrontal electrode placement with standard bitemporal electrode placement in the treatment of patie
20 retrospective cohort study of 15 adults with bitemporal epilepsy who had a device that provides chron
21 life, and a further affected child displayed bitemporal epileptogenic discharges on EEG without overt
22 cate that patients with infantile spasms and bitemporal glucose hypometabolism on PET comprise a rela
23 d to the emergency department with new-onset bitemporal headache, dizziness, and bilateral lower extr
24 nd 18 patients with a relative homonymous or bitemporal hemianopia were tested with both conventional
25 bination with subtle facial features such as bitemporal narrowing, broad nasal tip, thin upper lip, p
27 raction to determine whether patients fit a "bitemporal" or "prefrontal" model of sensory dysfunction
28 al electrode placement was as efficacious as bitemporal placement and resulted in less cognitive impa
29 ich the characteristic diagnostic feature is bitemporal scar-like lesions that resemble forceps marks