ライフサイエンスコーパス: blood donation

1 7 and PrEP use within the same time frame as blood donation.

2 ceived the co-component plasma from the same blood donation.

3 forearm brachial artery 5 and 42 days after blood donation.

4 lly serious, associated injuries after whole blood donation.

5 erse events that occur during or after whole-blood donation.

6 o controls by age, gender, race, and date of blood donation.

7 lthy subjects, such as those associated with blood donation.

8 bject following a loss of blood typical of a blood donation.

9 eceived a yellow fever vaccine 6 days before blood donation.

10 h tested negative for agents screened for in blood donations.

11 d comprehensive proteome analyses from small blood donations.

12 e needed to eliminate potentially infectious blood donations.

13 firmation of HCV infection and for screening blood donations.

14 e for an adverse event is at least 1 in 3400 blood donations.

15 man immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) in blood donations.

16 hen questioned directly at the time of their blood donations.

17 L; 95% CI, -3.6 to -2.3 ng/mL; P < .001) and blood donation (-1.1 ng/mL; 95% CI, -1.5 to -0.7 ng/mL;

18 In a second blood donation 12 days later, plasma HIV RNA increased 2

19 identified among approximately 34 million US blood donations, 2006-2009; incident infections were def

20 acid test results identified in seronegative blood donations, 26 (9 HBV, 15 HCV, and 2 HIV) were conf

21 d conservation strategies such as autologous blood donation, acute normovolemic hemodilution, or cell

22 s 316 cases of breast cancer diagnosed after blood donation and before June 1, 2003, who had two cont

23 e still exist many questions in the areas of blood donation and clinical use that are either unanswer

24 r whom at least 6 months had elapsed between blood donation and diagnosis of the case.

25 mines recent research on syncope after whole blood donation and efforts by blood centers to improve s

26 associated with a vasovagal reaction during blood donation and five others with heart rate and/or bl

27 s were selected, matching the case on age at blood donation and length of storage of serum specimens.

28 e majority of current research is focused on blood donation and patient blood management in sub-Sahar

29 naffected sisters after adjusting for age at blood donation and smoking status [odds ratio (OR), 1.3;

30 significant associations were found between blood donation and the risk of myocardial infarction in

31 significant associations were found between blood donation and the risk of type 2 diabetes.

32 erformed nucleic acid testing on 3.7 million blood donations and further evaluated those that were HB

33 be transmitted through various routes (e.g., blood donation) and cause hepatitis, liver cirrhosis and

34 nd food frequency questionnaires, peripheral blood donation, and colonoscopy, 115 pairs of CRA cases

35 tors included age at blood donation, date of blood donation, and race.

36 of measurement, prevalent infection, recent blood donation, and treatment with iron for anemia.

37 ibility for the collection and processing of blood donations, and government agencies perform regulat

38 e available, there is a policy to screen all blood donations, and there is an injection safety policy

39 e-iron intake from non-red meat sources, and blood donations are not related to the risk of type 2 di

40 Although at present blood donations are not screened, an agreed policy is ne

41 anti-SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence surveying of blood donations as a tool in monitoring the epidemic.

42 icated that, on a college campus, describing blood donations as a way to "prevent a death" rather tha

43 A multi-level approach to increasing blood donations at difficult times of the year can ensur

44 rmined by the size and racial composition of blood donations available for transfusion.

45 ports using the search terms "blood donor", "blood donation","blood safety", "blood bank", "transfusi

46 donation had a larger treatment effect than blood donation, but both were significantly more efficac

47 ates) were exposed to products from a single blood donation by an asymptomatic Babesia-infected donor

48 r period, inter-donation intervals for whole blood donation can be safely reduced to meet blood short

49 Disasters can create situations in which blood donations can save lives.

50 Plasma and blood donations caused greater reductions in serum PFAS

51 sed and operationally sensitive context of a blood donation center requires justification for disrupt

52 The study identifies blood donation centers and medical facilities, as well a

53 ns can be tested prior to being delivered in blood donation centers.

54 r complication database from 7,000,000 whole-blood donations classified reported donor complications

55 residual archived samples from 7389 routine blood donations collected by the American Red Cross from

56 the B19V prevalence among a large cohort of blood donations collected in Germany during 2015-2018.

57 ontinuation of systematic leukoreduction for blood donations collected in individuals born before the

58 The final date of blood donation collection was May 31, 2021.

59 There were 3126 donors with at least one blood donation confirmed HCV-seropositive, for a crude p

60 ls directly predicting iron biomarkers after blood donation could help to manage donation-associated

61 machine-learning models using retrospective blood donation data.

62 Matching factors included age at blood donation, date of blood donation, and race.

63 r, prospective data relating iron intake and blood donations (determinants of body iron stores) to di

64 ticipants, 33 541 also provided a history of blood donation during the past 30 y in 1992.

65 48) demonstrated that 360 degrees -video VR blood donation environments elicit a similar profile of

66 uscripts), and stigmas surrounding voluntary blood donations, especially in LMICs.

67 Limits on the frequency of whole blood donation exist primarily to safeguard donor health

68 should inform patients of the need to defer blood donation for at least 2 weeks after receiving a ye

69 graphics and seroreactivity after testing of blood donations for severe acute respiratory syndrome co

70 an Red Cross regions collected 145,678 whole blood donations from 16- and 17-year-olds, 113,307 from

71 2021, 17 blood collection organizations with blood donations from all 50 US states; Washington, DC; a

72 This cross-sectional study examines monthly blood donations from individuals aged 16 years and older

73 igibility policies, practical barriers limit blood donations from individuals with hemochromatosis.

74 We have collected one-unit blood donations from study participants receiving the mo

75 presence of human erythrovirus DNA in 2,440 blood donations from the United Kingdom and sub-Saharan

76 volunteer donors with a history of extensive blood donation (>100 lifetime donations) to investigate

77 nfarction for men in the highest category of blood donations (>/=30) compared with never donors was 1

78 me for basophil activation measurement after blood donation has been extended considerably (whole blo

79 Although quite safe, blood donation has some attendant risk, and syncopal rea

80 edictions in the context of repeat voluntary blood donation (high-cost helping of a non-reciprocating

81 invasive breast cancer cases diagnosed after blood donation in 1989-1990, 417 of whom donated a secon

82 Preoperative autologous blood donation in our population is associated with decr

83 epeated cross-sectional study used data from blood donations in 50 states and Washington, DC, from Ju

84 nd epidemiological data on HTLV screening of blood donations in England between 2002 and 2021, implem

85 We examined iron intake and blood donations in relation to the incidence of type 2 d

86 r sex, age, donation center, number of whole blood donations in the past 2 years, and first 10 princi

87 ein localization, while requiring only small blood donations in the range of a few milliliters.

88 Based on a sample of blood donations in the US from July 2020 through May 202

89 We discuss the history of the global blood donation index and highlight some factors that sho

90 tect adult donors from measurable effects of blood donation-induced iron deficiency on cognition.

91 The effects of blood donation-induced iron deficiency on red cell trans

92 d antigens has been effective in identifying blood donations infected with the classic transfusion-tr

93 exually transmitted diseases) or flattering (blood donations) information, and across decisions rangi

94 Although blood donation is allowed every 8 weeks in the United St

95 rral of men who have sex with men (MSM) from blood donation is highly debated.

96 Generally, blood donation is limited because of poor health infrast

97 Haploidentical and umbilical cord blood donations may be valid transplant options for pati

98 in concentrations were age, body mass index, blood donation, menopausal status, and HFE genotype.

99 rline the importance of maintaining reliable blood donation networks in areas of high malaria transmi

100 ut no significant change was observed in the blood donation or observation groups.

101 (PFHxS) levels after 12 months of plasma or blood donations or after observation only.

102 OR, 25.0; 95% CI, 17.5-35.8), and first-time blood donation (OR, 3.6; 95% CI, 2.8-4.7).

103 neral population for preoperative autologous blood donation (PABD), it is a procedure that continues

104 There are 15 million whole-blood donations per year in the United States, and one t

105 a provide evidence that current criteria for blood donation preserve red cell transfusion quality for

106 c acid amplification testing of minipools of blood donations prevented hundreds of cases of West Nile

107 ited States and other high-income countries, blood donation primarily relies on anonymous, voluntary

108 , a 68-year-old woman considering autologous blood donation prior to knee replacement surgery, the co

109 Typically, a whole blood donation rate of ten donations per 1000 population

110 Although the disparity in blood donation rates between low-income and middle-incom

111 In the United States, blood donation rates of African-Americans are 25-50% of

112 fectious disease risk factors at the time of blood donation represent a potential threat to the safet

113 ons and when resources are depleted, on-site blood donations require the rapid and accurate detection

114 We tested 97,950 blood donation samples for IgG antibodies from March 202

115 The assay detected all positive blood donation samples identified by the Roche WNV NAT.

116 samples included routine diagnostic samples, blood donation samples, samples from patients with confi

117 -reaction (PCR) assays for B. microti DNA on blood-donation samples obtained in Connecticut, Massachu

118 Of 89,153 blood-donation samples tested, 335 (0.38%) were confirme

119 ing virus rebound in HIV cure studies and in blood donation screening, where high test sensitivity is

120 PBS) and B. microti PCR within two months of blood donation screening.

121 Blood-donation screening for antibodies to and DNA from

122 potential harm and societal impact, directed blood donations should be limited to rare, medically nec

123 We randomly selected blood donation specimens collected during December 2019-

124 Allowing such preferences risks politicizing blood donation, spreading misinformation, and straining

125 ral, genetic, and metabolic underpinnings to blood donation, storage, and (to a lesser extent) transf

126 vioral-risk screening tool, donated, and the blood donation tested positive for HIV.

127 fection status as determined by the original blood donation testing algorithm.

128 ted individual donation testing to interdict blood donations that are positive for the West Nile viru

129 tly assessed the effectiveness of a call for blood donations that was presented as either death-preve

130 From Oct 8, 2012, to Sept 30, 2013, 225,000 blood donations that were collected in southeast England

131 792 syphilis-negative samples collected from blood donations, the Elecsys Syphilis assay had specific

132 We report the prevalence of HEV RNA in blood donations, the transmission of the virus through a

133 Using SCANDAT3-S, a comprehensive nationwide blood donation-transfusion database, we modeled outcomes

134 ptoms occurring during the 2 weeks following blood donation using a standardized questionnaire.

135 having occurred during the 2 weeks following blood donation, using a standardized questionnaire.

136 eome of platelets highly purified from fresh blood donations, using elaborate protocols to ensure neg

137 The lifetime history of blood donation was assessed with a questionnaire in 1992

138 A first standard blood donation was followed by the gold-standard measure

139 r plasma ferritin levels in a subsample, the blood donation was not associated with risk of myocardia

140 Data on HTLV testing of blood donations was reviewed; it was initially conducted

141 Although the number of lifetime blood donations was strongly associated with lower plasm

142 centers (for a total of 2,318,356 allogeneic blood donations), we calculated the incidence rates of s

143 tched on age, menopausal status, and date of blood donation were included in a case-control study nes

144 , and by the middle of 2003, essentially all blood donations were being tested for West Nile virus RN

145 Blood donations were collected and screened for HIV acco

146 Approximately 0.5%-1% of blood donations were DENV RNA positive in epidemic distr

147 20-year study period, a total of 30 679 741 blood donations were screened for HTLV in England.

148 However, directed blood donation-where people donate for a specific recipi

149 We prospectively studied blood donations, which effectively reduce body iron stor

150 do not support the need to routinely screen blood donations with a sensitive B19V DNA nucleic acid a