ライフサイエンスコーパス: bodily pain

1 nt (Physical Functioning, Role Physical, and Bodily Pain).

2 creased sleep disturbance, and had worsening bodily pain.

3 Men and women differed in the dimension bodily pain.

4 on all HRQOL subscales with the exception of bodily pain.

5 ns--Physical Functioning, Role Physical, and Bodily Pain.

6 l function and vitality as well as decreased bodily pain.

7 eficial for physical function, vitality, and bodily pain.

8 % CI, -0.69 to 1.37), and SF-36 subscales of bodily pain (1.25; 95% CI, -4.46 to 4.96), and physical

9 cant improvement in SF36 scores occurred for Bodily Pain (23.2 to 55.4, P =.0008), Physical Function

10 At 3 months, "bodily pain" (3 points, P=0.04) and "role physical" (8 p

11 (73 +/- 21 versus 77 +/- 20; p = 0.016), and bodily pain (63 +/- 27 versus 72 +/- 24; p < 0.001).

12 the elderly group regarding the dimensions "bodily pain" (7 points; P=0.001), "role physical" (18 po

13 6% (95% CI, 55.3%-59.9%) of participants for bodily pain, 76.5% (95% CI, 74.6%-78.5%) for physical fu

14 18.8 v -11.5 and -7.5 points, respectively), bodily pain (-9.0 v -2.7 and -2.7 points), social functi

15 e treatment effects at 2 years were 18.1 for bodily pain (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5 to 21.7)

16 sleep disturbance, physical functioning, and bodily pain after one year (the mean benefit in terms of

17 al and mental well-being, with the subscales bodily pain and mental health being of interest in this

18 -Item Short Form Health Survey subscales for bodily pain and mental health between the groups at any

19 dividuals reported an improved perception of bodily pain and physical activity.

20 atients experienced dramatic improvements in bodily pain and physical function after joint replacemen

21 Bodily pain and physical function improved after joint r

22 The primary outcomes were measures of bodily pain and physical function on the Medical Outcome

23 social support was associated with improved bodily pain and physical function outcomes.

24 comes Study 36-item Short-Form Health Survey bodily pain and physical function scales and the modifie

25 tem Short-Form General Health Survey (SF-36) bodily pain and physical function scores (100-point scal

26 Bodily pain and physical function were assessed preopera

27 Preoperative bodily pain and physical function, demographic character

28 ere significant correlates of improvement in bodily pain and physical function.

29 DM patients seeing a specialist had more bodily pain and poorer physical functioning than those s

30 decreased to 48.6% (95% CI, 46.0%-51.1%) for bodily pain and to 70.2% (95% CI, 67.8%-72.5%) for physi

31 is (MS) with up to 92% of patients reporting bodily pain, and 85% reporting pain severe enough to cau

32 itations, social functioning, mental health, bodily pain, and energy/vitality.

33 ical functioning, physical role functioning, bodily pain, and general health perceptions (0 [severe l

34 itations caused by physical health problems, bodily pain, and general health perceptions.

35 SF-36 domains of physical role functioning, bodily pain, and general health perceptions.

36 n SF-36 physical functioning, role physical, bodily pain, and physical summary scales, as well as FIQ

37 ng; role limitations due to physical health; bodily pain; and general health.

38 The SF-36 bodily pain area under the curve up to 18 months did not

39 RQOL including reduced anginal frequency and bodily pain as well as improved disease perception (all

40 s with preoperative-to-postoperative CIIs in bodily pain decreased from 50% (95% CI, 48%-53%) to 43%

41 physical ability (-8.6 points; p = 0.01) and bodily pain/discomfort (+8.2 points; p < 0.05).

42 The bodily pain domain score of physical components score at

43 of postoperative complications, whereas the bodily pain domain was associated with a lower risk of p

44 Scores for SF-36 (bodily pain domain) and EQ-5D were also significantly be

45 er 18 months using the short form 36 (SF-36) bodily pain domain, with higher scores (range 0-100) ind

46 patients had lower Role-Physical (ES=-0.07), Bodily Pain (ES=-0.08), and Vitality (ES=-0.11) scores,

47 ity to maintain their roles (role-physical), bodily pain, general health, and vitality (energy) on th

48 , role limitations due to physical problems, bodily pain, general health, and vitality.

49 dels to compare HRQOL (physical functioning, bodily pain, general health, physical and emotional role

50 SF-36 scores for bodily pain, general health, physical functioning, vital

51 d a significantly lower HRQOL in the domains bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functionin

52 going laparoscopic nephrectomy reported less bodily pain in the first 6 weeks postdonation, and this

53 Self-reported anxiety, depression, and bodily pain levels were significantly higher in the Mild

54 ice of treatment reported significantly more bodily pain, lower mental health scores, and less genera

55 provement in the primary outcome measures of bodily pain (mean change: surgery, 40.9 vs nonoperative

56 se differences narrowed somewhat at 2 years: bodily pain (mean change: surgery, 42.6 vs nonoperative

57 of emotional role function, social function, bodily pain, mental health, vitality, and general health

58 sical function, vitality, general health and bodily pain (p 0.045).

59 Greater disability (P = 0.0002), more bodily pain (P = 0.0002), increased fatigue (P = 0.0112)

60 ND 36-Item Health Status Survey, Short Form: bodily pain (P=.03), physical functioning (P=.008), role

61 F-36 scales: physical functioning (P=0.038); bodily pain (P=0.047), general health (P=0.014), and the

62 month after surgery, despite improvements in bodily pain, physical function deteriorated.

63 hysical function and vitality, and increased bodily pain regardless of baseline weight.

64 the differential processing of facial versus bodily pain remains unknown.

65 bserved for SF-36 domains physical function, bodily pain, role-physical, general health, vitality, so

66 The mean SF-36 norm based bodily pain score was 49.4 (standard deviation 11.7) in

67 from injection to surgical treatment, SF-36 bodily pain score, and score on the 11-item disabilities

68 Mean changes in bodily pain scores did not differ significantly between

69 nts consistently had lower Role-Physical and Bodily Pain scores than the norm, suggesting impact on d

70 al health, social functioning, vitality, and bodily pain scores.

71 tioning, concentration and memory, vitality, bodily pain, sleep, and sexual functioning.

72 limitations due to physical health problems, bodily pain, social functioning, or overall physical fun

73 d point was pain at 3 weeks, measured as the bodily pain subscale of Short Form-36 (SF-36).

74 two groups, but stent patients reported less bodily pain than PTCA patients (p = 0.03).

75 D patients in both generic and ESRD domains (bodily pain, travel, diet restrictions, and dialysis acc

76 between groups apart from the SF36 domain of Bodily Pain, where C2 saw an improvement of 12.8 [95% co

77 fect favoring surgery on the SF-36 scale for bodily pain, with a mean difference in change from basel