ライフサイエンスコーパス: body part

1 manipulation and cutaneous stimulation of 14 body parts).

2 , establishing the healthy baseline for this body part.

3 y part into something that resembles another body part.

4 sms and/or aberrant postures of the affected body part.

5 rs, the trident is not located on an exposed body part.

6 omes not only a tool, but also an integrated body part.

7 injected bilaterally, and into more than one body part.

8 ession of afferent sensation from the moving body part.

9 y was not affected by viewing the stimulated body part.

10 striatal neurons that have switched to that body part.

11 as of cortex after amputation of an adjacent body part.

12 present the location of the arm or any other body part.

13 suggest a representation anchored to another body part.

14 cts, limiting their impact to one particular body part.

15 ells that can grow and develop into the lost body part.

16 by the ratio of sensory inputs to different body parts.

17 related to functional-semantic properties of body parts.

18 oportions, eclipsing in size the surrounding body parts.

19 ammatory papules and ulcers, located in >/=2 body parts.

20 hilst social anointing targets hard-to-reach body parts.

21 high, for instance when grooming vulnerable body parts.

22 vements, and movements coordinating multiple body parts.

23 ol of voluntary movement involving different body parts.

24 mechanosensory bristle neurons on different body parts.

25 istinct motor programs that clean individual body parts.

26 duals showed global differentiation of adult body parts.

27 ns are flatworms capable of regenerating all body parts.

28 regenerate limbs, brains, and other complex body parts.

29 duced somatosensation in the stroke-affected body parts.

30 s, in some animals, the regeneration of lost body parts.

31 ) or laterality judgment (left/right) of the body parts.

32 sue necessary for the replacement of missing body parts.

33 y asymmetric fragments to regenerate missing body parts.

34 kernels, which underlie development of major body parts.

35 rrespond to the representations of different body parts.

36 dify developmental pathways to sculpt animal body parts.

37 ted bilaterally responding preferentially to body parts.

38 f various vertebrate species and from insect body parts.

39 ng goal-directed movements of the observer's body parts.

40 ons that innervate homologous right and left body parts.

41 BA) has been implicated in the perception of body parts.

42 from one body part to one or more different body parts.

43 omotoneuronal excitability to the stimulated body parts.

44 it its intents to replacement or reactivated body parts.

45 regeneration (with organogenesis) of missing body parts.

46 the deprived hand region represents multiple body parts.

47 ces, with overlapping patterns for different body parts.

48 the brain encodes the relative positions of body parts.

49 ale allocates the received PA quickly to all body parts.

50 o touch or taps on the stump and neighboring body parts.

51 the perceived weight of specific individual body parts.

52 fold in adult head (brain) relative to other body parts.

53 y excessive, unintended motion of contiguous body parts.

54 music using a wide variety of movements and body parts.

55 ethod for predicting the positions of animal body parts.

56 as with different connectivity for different body parts.

57 by the real-time physical distances between body parts.

58 re pronounced species differences than other body parts.

59 n their natural abilities to regenerate lost body parts.

60 lity among vertebrates to regenerate complex body parts.

61 43 of 2639 (96.4%; 95% CI: 95.5%, 97.1%) for body part, 2292 of 2639 (86.9%; 95% CI: 85.3%, 88.5%) fo

62 d may instead process information from other body parts, a phenomenon termed remapping.

63 atory stimulation and voluntary movements of body parts above and below the lesion.

64 this Review, we consider the regeneration of body parts across a range of tissues and species to expl

65 rganization, sensory activity in a localized body part activates striatal neurons that have switched

66 motor strip, with words related to different body parts activating the corresponding body representat

67 uch as external cause, intent, location, and body part affected were reported for all injury outcomes

68 7 [95% CI, 1.71-2.75; P<.001]) and number of body parts affected with vitiligo (P</=.009) but not lat

69 pared the metric representations across five body parts affording different degrees of tactile sensit

70 rvous system that are able to regenerate any body part after traumatic injury.

71 Planarians regenerate all body parts after injury, including the central nervous s

72 hin anthropology and, second, what defines a body "part." After exploring these initial questions, th

73 erwise impossible to infer from the study of body parts alone.

74 phila wing imaginal disc gives rise to three body parts along the proximo-distal (P-D) axis: the wing

75 vity for motion, intact objects, bodies, and body parts, although only the peak voxel of each region

76 tly, based on their availability for a given body part and a given spatial dimension.

77 ferent modalities are used to image the same body part and AI is used to generate detailed inferences

78 ians are capable of regenerating any missing body part and present an attractive system for molecular

79 actile localisation, involving confusions of body parts and body sides.

80 different homunculi is similar for different body parts and hemispheres.

81 ion between faces and nonface objects (i.e., body parts and inanimate objects), and (2) the regionall

82 rate aging mostly utilized the whole body or body parts and limited age-points, and failed to address

83 elative to unfamiliar faces, animals, tools, body parts and maps.

84 cally on how multisensory representations of body parts and of the 'peripersonal' space immediately a

85 ide new markers that address the homology of body parts and provide clues as to how body plans have e

86 age underwater face challenges because their body parts and senses are adapted for land--for example,

87 nsorimotor pathways connecting the exercised body parts and the brain.

88 sts of a graphical interface for labeling of body parts and training the network.

89 atosensory responses to both face (congruent body part) and finger (control site) tactile stimulation

90 ic expression across populations, castes and body parts, and contrasting allelic expression biases wi

91 or cut with a bloody object, pierced ears or body parts, and immunoglobulin injection must be interpr

92 ctivated by natural categories (e.g., faces, body parts, and places), artificial categories (numerals

93 th preferences for categories such as faces, body parts, and places.

94 bly they depend on the patterns of growth of body parts, and simple analyses have shown that exponent

95 spontaneous movements employing a variety of body parts, and suggest why parrots share this response

96 formation from different sensory modalities, body parts, and time points to inform behavioral choice,

97 clear selectivity to static images of human body parts, and upper limbs in particular, with respect

98 ttempts at individuated movements of a given body part are accompanied by excessive, unintended motio

99 nships between anatomical entities and human body parts are crucial for building medical text mining

100 s, we argue that the perceived dimensions of body parts are estimated by integrating visual and somat

101 proposed, it is still unknown how different body parts are intermixed and interrelated in human moto

102 on the resulting allometric relationships of body parts are not well understood.

103 motor systems is somatotopy, where specific body parts are represented separately and adjacently to

104 control body size and the relative sizes of body parts are today best understood in insects.

105 t the replacement of the appropriate missing body parts are unknown.

106 cortex (M1), voluntary movements of affected body parts are weak and slow.

107 Orderly scaling relationships among body parts are widespread in the animal world, but there

108 ction often centered on explaining how novel body parts arose.

109 lex organism that possessed some of the same body parts as modern bilaterians.

110 ons showed strong selectivity for individual body parts at different orientations.

111 A preferential fetal blood flow to the upper body parts at the expense of the intra-abdominal organs

112 f preferential fetal blood flow to the upper body parts at the expense of the intra-abdominal organs.

113 a discussion of demarcation of an invisible body part, before concluding that images of phantom limb

114 rs, tactile processing but not auditory, and body-part bisection tasks but not line bisection tasks.

115 to the painful side for visual processing of body parts but not letters, tactile processing but not a

116 only during the perception of other people's body parts, but also during goal-directed movements of t

117 emales were differentially expressed in both body parts, but in opposite directions, consistent with

118 h show great interdependence: the sight of a body part can reduce tactile target detection times [1],

119 ggests that the sense of the position of our body parts can be surreptitiously deceived, for instance

120 The unusual configuration of body parts can cause illusions.

121 ts that the primate brain constructs various body-part-centred representations of space, based on the

122 ands, feet, arms, and legs), (2) noneffector body parts (chests and waists), and (3) face parts (uppe

123 ifferent functions associated with the three body part clusters, reflecting the unique processing and

124 e test how three motor variables (body side, body part, cognitive strategy) are coded in the human an

125 The Rrp44 C-terminal body part containing an RNase II-type active site is anc

126 the different types of information different body parts convey.

127 etrieval of limbs, faces, and possibly other body parts demands algorithms for the sequence of steps

128 ng images to reveal an absent though sensate body part, depictions of phantom limbs are discussed fro

129 Although body parts differ in size, the ways in which selector ge

130 ther automatic imitation is sensitive to the body part dimension of action.

131 omatically estimate locations of an animal's body parts directly from images or videos.

132 the native representations of some of these body parts do not neighbor the deprived hand region.

133 rconnected than the representation of distal body parts (e.g., digit 1, D1).

134 information (e.g., action, social) different body parts (e.g., limbs, faces) convey.

135 Products marketed for use on a specific body part (eg, face, hands, eyelids) were excluded.

136 n brain to represent an artificial limb as a body part (embodiment) has been inspiring engineers, cli

137 istent with recent studies, neurons encoding body parts exhibited mixed selectivity.

138 The ability to regenerate missing body parts exists throughout the animal kingdom.

139 During organismal growth, body parts expand proportionally with one another and wi

140 es on the representation of the deafferented body parts (feet, but not hands) and (ii) regardless of

141 d somatotopic areas of the face and multiple body parts forming a higher-level homunculus in the supe

142 formation, enabling prediction of the moving body part from inside and outside its somatotopic locati

143 pictures of whole persons, chairs, and eight body parts (hands, arms, legs, feet, chests, waists, upp

144 ence that: taking ownership of an artificial body part has consequences for the real body part; that

145 cern about the proprietary rights over human body parts has had a dramatic recent impact in some Euro

146 The native brain regions of these body parts have varying levels of overlap with the hand

147 The task involved choosing between using a body part (i.e. crows: beak; humans: hand) or a tool for

148 on in order to generate the desired cells or body parts; identification and appropriate manipulation

149 (tactile discrimination, proprioceptive and body part illusions and self/non-self differentiation).

150 Patients were analyzed according to body part imaged and scanning frequency.

151 Delayed consumption of high-quality body parts implies that the meat was shared with other m

152 might not be predictive for the actual plant body part in which a transcript exerts its function.

153 ow a fruit fly's brain tells it to groom its body parts in a stereotyped order might help us understa

154 The failure to replace damaged body parts in adult mammals results from a muted growth

155 therefore aid in the regeneration of damaged body parts in adult mammals.

156 e findings illustrate that interaction among body parts in development is part of the mechanism of si

157 imilar ways in the development of particular body parts in Drosophila and in chordates.

158 take into account the movements of multiple body parts in haptic perception, and they show that the

159 We suggest that the semantic organization of body parts in high-level visual cortex relates to the di

160 tinct mechanisms act to regenerate different body parts in Hydractinia.

161 eater numbers of differentiated segments and body parts in insects, compared with the simpler body pl

162 model best captured the neural similarity of body parts in lateral and ventral OTC, which followed an

163 ategory-selective organization for faces and body parts in macaque temporal cortex.

164 Patterning of body parts in multicellular organisms relies on the inte

165 nts viewed color photographs depicting human body parts in painful or nonpainful situations and perfo

166 butions of agency and self-ownership for the body parts in question.

167 to activate the representations of different body parts in sensorimotor cortex.

168 to activate the representations of different body parts in sensorimotor cortex.

169 Genitals are unique body parts in that they show sexual dimorphism, major ch

170 is, we could predict movements of individual body parts in these homunculi, thus confirming that they

171 tes that it is a vertebrate; considering its body parts in this new light suggests it was an anatomic

172 sh have the remarkable ability to regenerate body parts including the heart and fins by a process ref

173 ry bristles and pegs distributed on multiple body parts including the proboscis, wing margins, legs,

174 capacity to regenerate their arms and other body parts, including central and peripheral nervous sys

175 ans possess the capacity to regenerate their body parts, including the limbs and the lens of the eye.

176 study population, physical injuries to other body parts, including the trunk, arms, or legs, were not

177 cause of injury, location on the track, and body part injured was evaluated.

178 ntation involves subdivision of a developing body part into multiple repetitive units during embryoge

179 sically defined as the transformation of one body part into something that resembles another body par

180 lity to coordinate movements across distinct body parts into a consistent, skilled action.

181 well fit by feature spaces that capture the body parts involved in an action and the action's target

182 rception of tactile localization on a static body part is strongly affected by the displacement betwe

183 patial comparisons of sensory inputs between body parts is essential for organizing grooming movement

184 The precise coordination of body parts is essential for survival and behavior of hig

185 e demonstrate that information from multiple body parts is processed in the hand regions of both the

186 rodele amphibians to regenerate a variety of body parts is providing insight into mechanisms of tissu

187 (3D) imaging of delicate, moving soft-tissue body parts is very difficult.

188 all RNAs can move to and function in distant body parts is well established.

189 by an uncontrollable shaking of the affected body part, is often professed to be the most common move

190 s a rhythmic and involuntary movement of any body part, is the most prevalent movement disorder, affe

191 eveloped to conduct image retrieval based on body part keywords and images.

192 to conduct comparative analysis based on the body part keywords and the associated images.

193 Animals have body parts made of similar cell types located at differe

194 n gene expression have been observed between body parts made of similar cell types, how regulatory in

195 ure - Matrix Generation pipeline to generate body part measurement matrices from a set of 188 spider

196 The tools produced two corresponding spider body part measurement matrices, and the matrix from the

197 ming its validity, 96.7% reported right-left body part mislabeling during examination or biopsy, and

198 ghly relevant afferents in three-dimensional body-part-models might facilitate isomorphic cortical co

199 t involvement in processing verbs describing body part movements.

200 for four different visual categories: faces, body parts, objects, and places.

201 lecular basis for segmentation of individual body parts occurring at later developmental stages.

202 bitants of Sulawesi fashioned ornaments from body parts of endemic animals, suggesting modern humans

203 As overall size varies, the sizes of body parts of many animals often appear to be related to

204 yellow laser) independently on any specified body parts of two freely moving Drosophila adults.

205 their morphology to be regulated by adjacent body parts or organs.

206 omote the transfer of microorganisms between body parts or surfaces to mucosa.

207 (OR = 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1-4.1), pierced ears or body parts (OR = 2.0; 95% CI: 1.1-3.7), and immunoglobul

208 to a portion of the SI cortex representing a body part other than the hand, suggesting that multisens

209 the somatotopic representations of different body parts overlap more than previously thought.

210 rity of multivoxel activity patterns for all body part pairs was established in whole person-selectiv

211 dieter obsesses about reduction of different body parts, permanent reduction of many structures seems

212 Individual body part pre/postdiscomfort difference was modeled, con

213 Experiment 2 used this body part priming effect to investigate the role of sens

214 nd vice versa, led to a greater reduction in body part priming than compatible training, in which sub

215 presentation of (i) the intact hand and (ii) body parts proximal to the deafferented hand (upper arm)

216 o a large extent, on the use of a particular body part rather than on innervation density.

217 Cleaning one body part reduces the sensory drive to its motor program

218 fferentiation, which allow complex organ and body part regeneration, are discussed and common molecul

219 r representations of monkey faces and monkey body parts relative to man-made objects using functional

220 and potentially the coordination of multiple body parts (relative-coordinate representations).

221 iate the debilitating shakiness of different body parts remain unclear.

222 When the averaged areas of a body-part representation were re-examined as a percentag

223 ficance statement: While the organization of body part representations in motor and somatosensory cor

224 do not fully account for the organization of body part representations in OTC.

225 ell characterized, the principles underlying body part representations in visual cortex have not yet

226 ear to be both matched and mismatched to the body part representations injected in the opposite hemis

227 l body, and that the general organization of body part representations mirrors that of the primary so

228 died the effects of rTMS delivered to nearby body part representations on the motor output from the u

229 the absence of excitability changes in other body part representations such as thorax or leg muscles.

230 tive position, distance, and overlap between body-part representations differ.

231 significant differences in averaged area of body-part representations for body/chest and head/neck w

232 demonstrates that the mere spatial layout of body-part representations may not exclusively dictate re

233 underlying somatotopy, such that neighboring body-part representations tend to activate the deprived

234 Planarians can regenerate any missing body part, requiring mechanisms for the production of or

235 y behaviors in one-handers involved multiple body parts (residual arm, lips, and feet).

236 are the organizational principles underlying body part responses in these regions?

237 ortical genital neurons showed unusual multi-body-part responses and sexually dimorphic receptive fie

238 presented separately and adjacently to other body parts, resulting in a body map.

239 ults highlight the importance of the touched body part's identity and canonical location but challeng

240 s related to sensorimotor activity of single body parts (SBP neurons).

241 variability due to major action components (body parts, scenes, movements, objects, sociality, trans

242 del of the body's metric properties, such as body part size and shape.

243 on induces substantial reorganization of the body part somatotopy in primary sensory cortex (S1 compl

244 e results revealed the existence of sex- and body part-specific mRNA and miRNA expression profiles.

245 directions, consistent with the existence of body part-specific resource allocation switching.

246 When inspecting body-part-specific functional connectivity, we found dif

247 When inspecting body-part-specific functional connectivity, we found dif

248 motor system more than truthful actions in a body-part-specific manner, suggesting that motor resonan

249 nd is connected to multiple brain areas in a body-part-specific manner.

250 brain activity related to movements of other body parts such as the hands.

251 uggesting the main tissues or cells in these body parts, such as brain, neurons and muscles, which ha

252 Disarticulated body parts, such as the anterior appendages and oral cir

253 words ("small" and i, "full" and p or b) and body part terms ("tongue" and l, "nose" and n).

254 resent the hand per se, but rather any other body part that shares the functionality of the missing h

255 Individual anointing targets hard-to-see body parts that are harder to groom, whilst social anoin

256 e form of muscle synergies between different body parts that compose these larger, complex behaviors.

257 y behaviors may involve utilization of other body parts that do not cortically neighbor the hand terr

258 e regeneration of primordial germ cells from body parts that lack gonads.

259 cial body part has consequences for the real body part; that the awareness of our physical self and t

260 We also built a new ontology, Tree of Human Body Parts (THBP), from core anatomical parts by referri

261 d participants to estimate the weight of two body parts, their hand or their head, both in normal ter

262 For both body parts, there was an increase in perceived weight du

263 Perceiving the location of body parts through proprioception requires that informat

264 temporal change in sensory input to a given body part to measure cleaning effectiveness.

265 SBP neurons switched responsiveness from one body part to one or more different body parts.

266 y transitioned from selectivity based on the body part to selectivity based on the action type.

267 edation, including the ability to autotomize body parts to elude capture.

268 ich 16 human subjects (eight women) moved 20 body parts to investigate the possible body part topogra

269 tial connectivity patterns for the different body parts to the primary and secondary motor areas and

270 tial connectivity patterns for the different body parts to the primary and secondary motor areas, par

271 o multisensorially determined perceptions of body parts, to action execution, and even to attribution

272 d isometric muscle contractions in different body parts (tongue protrusion, fist-clenching or foot do

273 ed 20 body parts to investigate the possible body part topography of the precuneus.

274 Size regulation of body parts typically requires no external control and is

275 anized for the reaching task per se, for any body part used as an effector?

276 lowed an organization in three clusters: (1) body parts used as action effectors (hands, feet, arms,

277 Because the same body parts used for compensatory purposes are those show

278 r in people born with one hand, for multiple body parts used to overcome disability.

279 Representations of those body parts used to substitute hand function all mapped o

280 ns are flatworms capable of regenerating all body parts using a population of stem cells called neobl

281 ibians and teleost fish regenerate amputated body parts via a process called epimorphic regeneration.

282 creen and told to imagine that the displayed body part was part of a standing mirror image of themsel

283 porating the bilateral/axial movements of 20 body parts, we report detailed mototopic imaging maps in

284 ntral area resulting from stimulation of all body parts were considered, this region appeared to cont

285 sk) in two different postures (participants' body parts were hidden from view).

286 These body parts were likely dismembered, entering the resin d

287 istributions of neurons related to different body parts were not altered.

288 More body parts were represented per unit volume.

289 We found that most body parts were underestimated in their dimensions.

290 ity resulted in largely orthogonal coding of body parts, which "functionally segregate" the effector

291 new experimental procedures on virtual human body parts, which are generated and visualised three-dim

292 ensory illusions and ownership of artificial body parts, which has important implications for patient

293 depend exclusively on the hand as a specific body part whose movement they guide, or are they organiz

294 It is commonly thought that only body parts whose information is processed in regions nei

295 ed heat loss mediated by hiding the head-the body part with the highest heat dissipation-under the fe

296 imensions of action are the movement and the body part with which the movement is effected.

297 The prospect of replacing damaged body parts with artificial implants is being transformed

298 ic deletion of thalamic neurons representing body parts with axons excluded from S1.

299 al responses to motion, objects, bodies, and body parts with whole-brain group-average analyses and w

300 visual processing of hands as highly salient body parts, with distortions engaging neural resources t

301 ion, the relative independence of moving one body part without others is lost; attempts at individuat