ライフサイエンスコーパス: bone marrow edema

1 nt readers for tenosynovitis, synovitis, and bone marrow edema.

2 eted virtual noncalcium images for traumatic bone marrow edema.

3 l noncalcium images were evaluated to detect bone marrow edema.

4 s to be osteoarthritis, stress fracture, and bone marrow edema.

5 epth and cross-sectional area of subchondral bone marrow edema.

6 n in 3 of the control subjects (18%), but no bone marrow edema.

7 ortical bone perforation, sequestration, and bone marrow edema.

8 sitions such as tophaceous gout deposits and bone marrow edema.

9 group, 23 of 40; control group, 60 of 100), bone marrow edema (39 of 40 vs 87 of 100), effusion (20

10 ts, foci of wall susceptibility, osteolysis, bone marrow edema, abductor muscle or tendon abnormality

11 The lessening of bone marrow edema after anti-TNF therapy provides furthe

12 f 17 wrists) in the detection of wrists with bone marrow edema and a sensitivity of 69% (95% CI: 55%,

13 The presence of bone marrow edema and abductor tendon tears but not the

14 accuracy of dual-energy CT in helping detect bone marrow edema and fracture in participants with wris

15 The presence of bone marrow edema and fracture was rated per bone.

16 The presence of soft-tissue edema, bone marrow edema, and bone spur formation at the attach

17 RI showed that 96% had synovitis and 46% had bone marrow edema, and US showed that 73% had gray-scale

18 Bone marrow edema appears after a few weeks from occurre

19 synovium, and, less commonly, pisotriquetral bone marrow edema are MR imaging findings that may help

20 Calcaneus bone marrow edema at the insertion site was observed in

21 CT) shows promising performance in detecting bone marrow edema (BME) associated with vertebral body f

22 While bone marrow edema (BME) detected by magnetic resonance i

23 body, posterior element, and spinous process bone marrow edema (BME) lesions, were scored in a blinde

24 nnot undergo MRI, dual-energy CT (DECT) with bone marrow edema (BME) maps are used as an approach for

25 cation and severity of defects of cartilage, bone marrow edema (BME), osteophytes, subchondral cysts,

26 group, the treatment goal was absence of MRI bone marrow edema combined with clinical remission, defi

27 Bone marrow edema correlates with inflammation severity,

28 ions of these in clinical practice-urate and bone marrow edema detection, metal artifact reduction, a

29 ce of subtle morphologic changes in bone and bone marrow edema, dual-energy CT (DECT) could be an alt

30 ers, respectively, for inflammatory changes (bone marrow edema, enthesitis) and structural changes (e

31 of 14 bones): cartilage defects, bone cysts, bone marrow edema, fractures, joint debris, joint effusi

32 After ESWT, the extant of bone marrow edema had increased in one heel and had newl

33 capsule distention, and (e) the location of bone marrow edema, if any.

34 (VNCa) technique for detection of traumatic bone marrow edema in patients with vertebral compression

35 moral condyle and lateral tibial plateau and bone marrow edema in the lateral femoral condyle.

36 l outcome and severity of cartilage loss and bone marrow edema in the medial femoral condyle and medi

37 with greater severity of cartilage loss and bone marrow edema in the same compartment as the menisca

38 noncalcium technique may enable depiction of bone marrow edema in thoracolumbar vertebral compression

39 agnostic performance for assessing traumatic bone marrow edema in vertebral compression fractures.

40 epth and cross-sectional area of subchondral bone marrow edema increased with increasing grade of the

41 Bone marrow edema is a potent risk factor for structural

42 miquantitative Leeds Scoring System in which bone marrow edema is graded from 0 to 3 according to sev

43 ssociated MRI findings (meniscus, cartilage, bone marrow edema, joint effusion, ligaments, tendons) w

44 VIPR-SSFP helped detect 69.3% of bone marrow edema lesions identified at routine MR.

45 eral collateral ligament tears, and 85.3% of bone marrow edema lesions identified on images obtained

46 Bone marrow edema lesions on magnetic resonance imaging

47 were used to evaluate the relation of medial bone marrow edema lesions to medial progression and late

48 llateral ligament tears, meniscal tears, and bone marrow edema lesions within the knee joint at 3.0 T

49 cruciate ligament tears, meniscal tears, and bone marrow edema lesions, first by using routine MR and

50 at helping detect lateral meniscal tears and bone marrow edema lesions.

51 lesions, ligament tears, meniscal tears, and bone marrow edema lesions.

52 ficantly less subchondral bone attrition and bone marrow edema-like abnormalities in the knee as asse

53 mentous injury (eg, creation of quantitative bone marrow edema maps), which is not possible with stan

54 The newest studies reveal that bone marrow edema may be a more sensitive indicator of t

55 as a significantly greater degree of diffuse bone marrow edema (median of 6.5 tarsal bones versus 2 a

56 d a moderate specificity in the detection of bone marrow edema of the wrist.

57 We recorded bone marrow edema on STIR images from each vertebral bod

58 CT numbers for the diagnosis of bone marrow edema on the basis of MR imaging revealed ar

59 presence of cortical or periosteal changes, bone marrow edema, or a fracture line.

60 tegration (OR, 20.4; 95% CI: 9.7, 42.6), and bone marrow edema pattern (OR, 4.7; 95% CI: 2.8, 7.8).

61 on (<33%, 33%-66%, or >66%), and presence of bone marrow edema pattern were assessed.

62 alyzed by two readers for cartilage lesions, bone marrow edema pattern, and ligamentous and meniscal

63 Cartilage lesions, bone marrow edema pattern, and meniscal and ligamentous

64 showed full-thickness cartilage lesions and bone marrow edema pattern.

65 ue to OVCF lasting longer than 3 months with bone marrow edema present at MRI.

66 Bone marrow edema (present in six asymptomatic patients

67 Bone marrow edema presents with increased signal in T2-w

68 and lumbar spine that were scored for active bone marrow edema representative of acute inflammation,

69 ylosing spondylitis, present in MRI include: bone marrow edema, sclerosis, fat metaplasia, formation

70 eviewed for findings including hernia, pubic bone marrow edema, secondary cleft sign, and rectus abdo

71 magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of transient bone marrow edema syndrome (TBMES) and avascular osteone

72 is indicated by the presence of subchondral bone marrow edema, synovitis, bursitis, or enthesitis.

73 s a group of patients with more severe axial bone marrow edema that is likely related to the classic

74 Six of the SpA patients had bone marrow edema that was maximal at entheseal insertio

75 ess the post-ESWT changes in soft-tissue and bone marrow edema, the thickness of the proximal plantar

76 n to adjacent cartilage and underlying bone, bone marrow edema underneath graft, and contour of bone

77 re used to determine the association between bone marrow edema volume and IKDC score.

78 was no significant association between total bone marrow edema volume and preoperative or postoperati

79 Bone marrow edema volume was quantified by using segment

80 Subchondral bone marrow edema was also seen beneath four (1.4%) of 2

81 Calcaneal bone marrow edema was present in four volunteers (5.2%).

82 Subchondral bone marrow edema was seen beneath 105 (19%) of 554 arti

83 Although bone marrow edema was seen globally in similar frequenci

84 patients without synovitis), pisotriquetral bone marrow edema was seen only in patients with synovit

85 The reference standard for bone marrow edema was the combined reading of MRI scans.

86 MR-specific characteristics of bone marrow edema were depicted on almost all examinatio

87 high specificity, the detection of vertebral bone marrow edema with dual-energy CT (DECT) associated

88 correlate MR imaging findings of subchondral bone marrow edema with the arthroscopic grade of articul

89 the size, depth, and location of subchondral bone marrow edema without knowledge of the arthroscopic