戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 red to a time point early after the bivalent booster immunization.
2 rden in the nares at 6 weeks after the final booster immunization.
3  cells for augmented IgG responses following booster immunization.
4 ugmented PS-specific IgG responses following booster immunization.
5 d) were taken before and 28 days after PCV13 booster immunization.
6  CD8(+) T cell anamnestic response following booster immunization.
7 tivector antibodies did not interfere with a booster immunization.
8 obulin diversity, and cannot be corrected by booster immunization.
9  for the improved survival that results from booster immunization.
10 mediate the enhanced protection conferred by booster immunization.
11 virulent wild-type Lm without the need for a booster immunization.
12  above that seen in colonized controls after booster immunization.
13 ated to immunizing dose, and was enhanced by booster immunization.
14 n (KLH) before subcutaneous immunization and booster immunization.
15 accharide (PS)-specific IgG titers following booster immunization.
16 week 18 (P < 0.001), i.e., 3 weeks after the booster immunization.
17 er, 2 of 5 animals were given an intradermal booster immunization.
18 system to mount a more potent response after booster immunization.
19 ines is critical for informing the timing of booster immunization.
20 y and make informed decisions about COVID-19 booster immunization.
21  lymph nodes for at least 12 weeks after the booster immunization.
22 ing antibodies were generated after a single booster immunization.
23  antibodies expected to dampen the effect of booster immunizations.
24 iming followed by recombinant fowl pox virus booster immunizations.
25 se appeared to be augmented following dermal booster immunizations.
26 remains high, variant emergence has prompted booster immunizations.
27                                            A booster immunization 12 weeks after the prime immunizati
28 modified vaccinia virus Ankara (MVA) ME-TRAP booster immunization 8 weeks later (n = 26).
29 ypic marker CD127 and the effectiveness of a booster immunization administered early after the initia
30  low antibody titers to DEN2 and DEN3, but a booster immunization after 4 months increased the neutra
31           Our data thus suggest that mucosal booster immunizations after mRNA priming is a promising
32 ildren and changed post-primary through post-booster immunizations against multiple antigen types, in
33 alized LeTx in vitro 78 days after the final booster immunization and protected the mice from in vivo
34 reached 1:10,000 immediately after the final booster immunization and then decayed to 1:150 at 6 mont
35       Animals were sacrificed 1 wk after the booster immunization, and PPs, mesenteric lymph nodes, a
36  various B cell populations, the response to booster immunization, and the generation of plasma cells
37 mmunization with G14D-CCV and at 3 d after a booster immunization as compared with control fish only
38                                            A booster immunization at week 17 after the initial immuni
39 ustained for at least 7 months following the booster immunization, at which time the secretory IgA an
40       Mechanistically, an intranasal omicron booster immunization bypassed deleterious immune imprint
41                 This study demonstrates that booster immunizations can critically improve the humoral
42 ne regimen used in RV144 have indicated that booster immunizations can increase serum anti-Env antibo
43 moted entry into the brain, but a subsequent booster immunization caused a dramatic accumulation of T
44                                   Intranasal booster immunization circumvented the shortcomings of in
45  amplification of Ag-specific CD8 T cells by booster immunization, despite an undetectable primary re
46                          A subsequent single booster immunization did not further enhance the antibod
47         We tested the hypothesis that rabies booster immunization elicits rapid anamnestic responses.
48 d within 7 days after a single intramuscular booster immunization, even when administered 10-24 years
49 rgp160 or placebo over 6 months, followed by booster immunizations every 2 months.
50 n the human population necessitating regular booster immunization for its long-term control.
51        These findings support the use of ACP booster immunizations for adolescents and adults, to pro
52 nstant (k(dis)) and the antibody response to booster immunization has not been studied.
53 tologous T cells followed by post-transplant booster immunizations improved the severe immunodeficien
54                                        After booster immunization in a rabbit, we find that the antig
55          However, although widespread use of booster immunizations in humans generates secondary and
56                             Thus, SARS-CoV-2 booster immunizations in humans induce robust germinal c
57                                   SARS-CoV-2 booster immunizations in humans primarily recruit pre-ex
58                                However, mRNA booster immunizations in vaccinated and convalescent ind
59       Activated MBCs were also induced by TT booster immunization, indicating that the expansion of t
60            Heterologous messenger RNA (mRNA) booster immunization induced higher serum neutralizing a
61                                    Two gp140 booster immunizations induced very high levels (~2 mg/ml
62 ondary expansion in response to a variety of booster immunizations, leading to elevated numbers of ef
63              These data suggest that regular booster immunizations may be required to sustain protect
64 al and cytokine signatures after primary and booster immunizations, MM induced enhanced expression of
65                          One primary and one booster immunization of 30 micrograms DNA per rabbit yie
66                                  In summary, booster immunization of adults with acellular pertussis
67 on and the IgG1/IgG2a ratio even following a booster immunization of KLH/CFA.
68              Also, in contrast with GBS-III, booster immunization of MenC-primed mice with isolated M
69 neous tumors, but only in combination with a booster immunization of the recipient post-BMT.
70                                              Booster immunizations of either a second dose of dendrit
71 e they suggest that increasing the number of booster immunizations or delivering additional viral ant
72                             Despite repeated booster immunizations, population-wide declines in the n
73                    Our results indicate that booster immunization results in a reduction in detectabl
74  immunizations but not when they are used as booster immunizations, suggesting that these APC-modulat
75              Despite receiving no additional booster immunizations, the protected rDNA/rRRV-SIVnfl va
76                                      After a booster immunization, these individuals generated a robu
77  to other H5 antigen vaccines, it required a booster immunization to prime protective immune response
78 TM expansion in the presence of TE, enabling booster immunizations to bypass TE-mediated negative fee
79 ed liposome preparations required one or two booster immunizations to develop a substantial anti-AgI/
80                                  This allows booster immunizations to rapidly expand CD8(+) central m
81                                        After booster immunization, vaccinated rabbits formed no new p
82 nd whether augmented IgG responses following booster immunization were also dependent on CD4(+) T cel
83 rition of memory CD8 T cells was reversed by booster immunization, which restored protection.
84 )ICOS(+) cTfh subset clonally expanded after booster immunization whose frequencies correlated with v
85 ons with an E1-deleted Ad vector followed by booster immunization with a poxvirus vector and they sur
86 , but these T cells failed to expand after a booster immunization with a replication-defective adenov
87          A subset of participants received a booster immunization with an A/Indonesia(H5N1) vaccine a
88 IgG2a secretion upon a subsequent intranasal booster immunization with an E1-deleted adenoviral recom
89 es to describe neutralization profiles after booster immunization with bivalent mRNA vaccines based o
90 ugmented PS-specific IgG response similar to booster immunization with intact MenC.
91 fied IgG recovered from mice 3 weeks after a booster immunization with live L3 was shown to transfer
92 immune responses were greatly enhanced after booster immunization with recombinant influenza viruses
93 antly with the DNA vaccine before intranasal booster immunization with the recombinant vaccine.
94  enhance PS-specific IgG responses following booster immunization with their encapsulated isogenic pa
95 V1V2 trimeric scaffold immunogen followed by booster immunizations with a combination of DNA and prot
96                                        Three booster immunizations with a heterologous subtype C trim
97                                              Booster immunizations with Ag 21 days after the initial
98 acking the N276 glycan, followed by multiple booster immunizations with glycan-repaired autologous an
99 r of chimpanzee origin allows for sequential booster immunizations with heterologous vaccine carriers
100 ike immune response to GLU after primary and booster immunizations with Salmonella expressing GLU.
101 Ad-SIV immunization, all groups received two booster immunizations with SIV gp140 and SIV Nef protein
102           Our results show that heterologous booster immunizations with the chimpanzee-derived Ad vec
103 nst heterologous R5 viruses after one or two booster immunizations with the mismatched oligomeric HIV
104 responses improves only marginally following booster immunizations with the Pfizer-BioNTech or Modern
105  IgA and IgG seroconversion at day 8 1 after booster immunization, with minor changes until day 23 5,
106 o pp65-2 cellular responses after the second booster immunization, with rapid responses observed with
107 ristics, including the ability to respond to booster immunization within days of initial priming.
108 tly, cross-primed CD8 T cells can respond to booster immunization within days of the initial immuniza

 
Page Top