コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ., a CD30-positive expression for the use of brentuximab vedotin).
2 consistent with the known safety profile of brentuximab vedotin.
3 e enrolled and received at least one dose of brentuximab vedotin.
4 e development of the antibody-drug-conjugate brentuximab vedotin.
5 andomly assigned to pembrolizumab and 153 to brentuximab vedotin.
6 en with ALK+ ALCL were enrolled and received brentuximab vedotin.
7 zumab and 16 (11%) of 152 patients receiving brentuximab vedotin.
8 17, a total of 12 patients with LyP received brentuximab vedotin.
9 ther anticancer therapy after treatment with brentuximab vedotin.
10 oth autologous stem-cell transplantation and brentuximab vedotin.
11 isease progressed on or after treatment with brentuximab vedotin.
12 ter autologous stem-cell transplantation and brentuximab vedotin.
13 78% after a relapse following the receipt of brentuximab vedotin.
14 ational design of combination therapies with brentuximab vedotin.
15 nivolumab group fixed nivolumab 3 mg/kg with brentuximab vedotin 1.2 mg/kg (cohort D) or 1.8 mg/kg (c
16 ivolumab 3 mg/kg and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg with brentuximab vedotin 1.2 mg/kg (cohort G) or 1.8 mg/kg (c
17 o 5 of each cycle orally, followed by either brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg and a placebo form of vinc
18 A total of 102 patients were treated with brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg by intravenous infusion ev
20 izumab 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks or brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg intravenously every 3 week
21 d web response system to receive intravenous brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg once every 3 weeks, for up
23 f six cohorts: in the ipilimumab group fixed brentuximab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg with ipilimumab 1 mg/kg (c
25 00% CD30 expression levels were treated with brentuximab vedotin (1.8 mg/kg) every 3 weeks for a maxi
26 re randomly assigned (1:1) to receive A+AVD (brentuximab vedotin, 1.2 mg/kg of bodyweight, doxorubici
29 In the present investigation, we evaluated brentuximab vedotin, a CD30-directed Ab-drug conjugate,
30 r study evaluated the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin, a CD30-directed antibody-drug conju
31 l study evaluated the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin, a CD30-directed antibody-drug conju
34 s lymphoma patients treated with single-dose brentuximab vedotin, a new anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody
35 ith R/R HL who obtained CR with single-agent brentuximab vedotin achieved long-term disease control a
36 es had been taken into account in developing brentuximab vedotin (Adcetris), an ADC that recently rec
37 l study evaluated the safety and activity of brentuximab vedotin administered sequentially with CHOP
42 tion of patients who were PET-negative after brentuximab vedotin alone or brentuximab vedotin followe
44 , open-label study evaluated the efficacy of brentuximab vedotin, an anti-CD30 antibody-drug conjugat
46 lled and randomly assigned to a group (66 to brentuximab vedotin and 65 to physician's choice), with
47 d phase 2 dose was deemed to be 1.8 mg/kg of brentuximab vedotin and 90 mg/m(2) of bendamustine, whic
49 ured in 41% of all patients (14 [56%] in the brentuximab vedotin and ABVD group and seven [27%] in th
50 ntuximab vedotin and AVD group), and, in the brentuximab vedotin and ABVD group only, pulmonary toxic
51 neutropenia (20 [80%] of 25 patients in the brentuximab vedotin and ABVD group vs 20 [77%] of 26 pat
52 were febrile neutropenia (four [16%] in the brentuximab vedotin and ABVD group vs two [8%] in the br
53 r, an unacceptable number of patients in the brentuximab vedotin and ABVD groups had pulmonary toxic
55 ABVD group vs 20 [77%] of 26 patients in the brentuximab vedotin and AVD group), anaemia (five [20%]
56 ab vedotin and ABVD group vs two [8%] in the brentuximab vedotin and AVD group), and, in the brentuxi
59 d that replacing vinblastine with nivolumab (brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab [AN] + doxorubicin and
61 aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of brentuximab vedotin and nivolumab in untreated older pat
63 homas have durable responses to single-agent brentuximab vedotin and show longer progression-free sur
64 trials are assessing novel agents, including brentuximab vedotin and the anti-CCR4 antibody, mogamuli
65 h is under way to extend the applications of brentuximab vedotin and to advance the field by developi
66 e two FDA-approved antibody-drug conjugates (Brentuximab vedotin and Trastuzumab emtansine) and the f
67 020, a total of 13 patients with SS received brentuximab vedotin and were analyzed as part of a retro
69 4 women; median age, 46 years) responded to brentuximab vedotin, and 7 exhibited a complete response
70 (cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, prednisone, brentuximab vedotin, and etoposide) followed by brentuxi
71 ta were consistent with the known profile of brentuximab vedotin, and included at least grade 3 event
72 ither relapsed after or failed to respond to brentuximab vedotin, and with an Eastern Cooperative Onc
73 ience of the German Hodgkin Study Group with brentuximab vedotin as single agent in 45 patients with
75 enter dose-escalation study, we administered brentuximab vedotin (at a dose of 0.1 to 3.6 mg per kilo
76 med to understand the activity and safety of brentuximab vedotin-AVD in people living with HIV diagno
79 omography (PET)-adapted salvage therapy with brentuximab vedotin (BV) and augmented ifosfamide, carbo
80 ot study assessed the safety and efficacy of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and AVD (adriamycin, vinblastin
81 al cohorts, patients received four cycles of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and doxorubicin, vinblastine, a
84 on of targeted immunotherapies specifically, brentuximab vedotin (BV) and programmed death-1 (PD-1)-b
85 The CD30-targeted, antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the immunomodulator lenalid
86 y over the past decade after the approval of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and the programmed death-1 (PD-
87 ) lymphomas have improved with the advent of brentuximab vedotin (BV) and, in Hodgkin lymphoma, anti-
89 esponse-adapted approach with nivolumab plus brentuximab vedotin (BV) followed by BV plus bendamustin
90 treatment with the anti-CD30 toxin conjugate brentuximab vedotin (BV) have been associated with remis
92 fficacy of the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) brentuximab vedotin (BV) in relapsed/refractory peripher
94 2, nonrandomized, open-label study evaluated brentuximab vedotin (BV) monotherapy (results previously
96 med death-1 immune checkpoint inhibitor, and brentuximab vedotin (BV), an anti-CD30 antibody-drug con
98 nventional chemotherapy to receive frontline brentuximab vedotin (BV; 1.8 mg/kg) with dacarbazine (DT
99 nts received doses of 0.6, 0.9, or 1.2 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin by intravenous infusion every 2 week
100 ory Committee for an accelerated approval of brentuximab vedotin by the Food and Drug Administration.
101 ficant proportion of patients who respond to brentuximab vedotin can achieve prolonged disease contro
102 or lines of therapy (range, 2-23), including brentuximab vedotin, checkpoint inhibitors, and autologo
103 s seem to be similar to previously presented brentuximab vedotin chemotherapy salvage combinations de
104 ractory Hodgkin lymphoma who were treated on brentuximab vedotin clinical trials to evaluate the effi
106 ablish the safety and activity of dose-dense brentuximab vedotin combined with ifosfamide, carboplati
107 lerated dose and dose limiting toxicities of brentuximab vedotin combined with ipilimumab (ipilimumab
108 a, the CD30-directed antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin combined with multiagent chemotherap
110 who responded to the treatment could receive brentuximab vedotin consolidation for up to ten addition
111 ntuximab vedotin, and etoposide) followed by brentuximab vedotin consolidation in patients with CD30-
112 with or without autologous HSCT) followed by brentuximab vedotin consolidation was safe and active.
113 tiated to compare the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and
121 the safety and efficacy of front-line A+AVD (brentuximab vedotin, doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacar
122 le ongoing clinical trials are investigating brentuximab vedotin efficacy in other CD30-positive hema
124 aphy (PET)-guided therapy with 4-6 cycles of brentuximab vedotin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide, doxoru
127 PET-adapted sequential salvage therapy with brentuximab vedotin followed by augICE resulted in a hig
129 activity of PET-adapted salvage therapy with brentuximab vedotin, followed by augmented ifosfamide, c
130 el, single-center, phase 2 clinical trial of brentuximab vedotin for CD30+ cutaneous T-cell lymphomas
133 ical activity of the recently approved ADCs, brentuximab vedotin for Hodgkin lymphoma and ado-trastuz
134 TE-204 study evaluating pembrolizumab versus brentuximab vedotin for relapsed or refractory classical
135 ese results support the potential utility of brentuximab vedotin for selected patients with HL relaps
137 rface antigens have been approved, including brentuximab vedotin, for the treatment of CD30-positive
138 12, we randomly assigned 329 patients to the brentuximab vedotin group (n=165) or the placebo group (
139 y was seen in 44 (67%) of 66 patients in the brentuximab vedotin group (n=21 grade 2, n=6 grade 3) an
140 e reported in 27 (41%) of 66 patients in the brentuximab vedotin group and 29 (47%) of 62 patients in
141 ears was 99.3% (95% CI, 97.3 to 99.8) in the brentuximab vedotin group and 98.5% (95% CI, 96.0 to 99.
142 apy did not differ substantially between the brentuximab vedotin group and the standard-care group (5
143 onths (95% CI 30.4-42.9) for patients in the brentuximab vedotin group compared with 24.1 months (11.
144 is, 28 (17%) of 167 patients had died in the brentuximab vedotin group compared with 25 (16%) of 160
145 as significantly improved in patients in the brentuximab vedotin group compared with those in the pla
146 The most frequent adverse events in the brentuximab vedotin group were peripheral sensory neurop
147 etoposide, prednisone, and cyclophosphamide (brentuximab vedotin group) or the standard pediatric reg
148 mab group vs one [1%] of 152 patients in the brentuximab vedotin group), neutropenia (three [2%] vs 1
149 nfidence interval [CI], 88.4 to 94.7) in the brentuximab vedotin group, as compared with 82.5% (95% C
150 investigator to be treatment-related in the brentuximab vedotin group; no on-treatment deaths were r
156 t: pralatrexate, romidepsin, belinostat, and brentuximab vedotin have been approved for relapsed and
157 embrolizumab versus 8.3 months (5.7-8.8) for brentuximab vedotin (hazard ratio 0.65 [95% CI 0.48-0.88
160 (to confirm the recommended phase 2 dose of brentuximab vedotin in CHEP-BV) and the complete respons
161 ng preclinical indications for evaluation of brentuximab vedotin in clinical studies of PEL patients.
162 stablish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of brentuximab vedotin in combination with ABVD and AVD.
164 abel, dose-escalation safety study comparing brentuximab vedotin in combination with standard (ABVD)
165 y reported excellent therapeutic efficacy of brentuximab vedotin in heavily pretreated CD30(+) malign
166 nt value of CD30 as a therapeutic target for brentuximab vedotin in ongoing successful clinical trial
167 l transplantation (HSCT), consolidation with brentuximab vedotin in patients with high-risk relapsed
168 ucted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed or refract
169 2 study evaluated the safety and efficacy of brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed or refract
170 dy results from the pivotal phase 2 trial of brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed/refractory
171 phase 2 trial of the antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin in patients with relapsed/refractory
173 are well aware of the incredible success of brentuximab vedotin in the treatment of patients with Ho
181 incristine 1.4 mg/m(2) and a placebo form of brentuximab vedotin intravenously (CHOP group) on day 1
182 one dose of either 1.2 mg/kg or 1.8 mg/kg of brentuximab vedotin intravenously on day 1 of a 21 day c
183 six planned cycles of CHEP-BV (ie, 1.8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin intravenously on day 1, cyclophospha
189 significant clinical efficacy, single-agent brentuximab vedotin is an approved treatment for relapse
196 The CD30-specific antibody-drug conjugate, brentuximab vedotin, is approved for the treatment of re
198 ut according to institutional standards, and brentuximab vedotin maintenance was allowed following HD
200 mic ALCL, provide evidence that single-agent brentuximab vedotin may be a potentially curative treatm
202 results demonstrate for the first time that brentuximab vedotin may serve as an effective therapy fo
205 nts who achieved a complete response (CR) to brentuximab vedotin (N = 34) had estimated OS and PFS ra
206 ients received weekly infusions of 1.2 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin on days 1, 8, and 15 for two 28 day
207 % CI 60-86) patients were PET-positive after brentuximab vedotin; one PET-positive patient withdrew c
209 sequence, to receive 16 cycles of 1.8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin or placebo intravenously every 3 wee
212 (7%) patients and diffuse rash at 1.2 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin plus 70 mg/m(2) of bendamustine in o
213 , including grade 4 neutropenia at 1.8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin plus 80 mg/m(2) of bendamustine in t
214 is ongoing and will formally assess whether brentuximab vedotin plus AVD might redefine therapy in t
217 ase 2, all patients were assigned to receive brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine at the recommended
218 and clinical activity of the combination of brentuximab vedotin plus bendamustine in heavily pretrea
221 isone (CHOEP) for CD30-negative diseases, or brentuximab vedotin plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin,
224 not meet the prespecified activity criteria, brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab is active in older pa
226 ts were male, 29 (49%) completed 8 cycles of brentuximab vedotin plus nivolumab, and 45 (76%) complet
230 s with persistent abnormalities on PET after brentuximab vedotin received augICE; however, all patien
231 were treated intravenously with 1.2 mg/kg of brentuximab vedotin (recommended phase 2 dose) with stan
235 in, the objective response rate was 59% with brentuximab vedotin retreatment after A+CHP and 50% with
237 pivotal phase 3 ALCANZA (A Phase 3 Trial of Brentuximab Vedotin (SGN-35) Versus Physician's Choice [
243 ients who relapsed and subsequently received brentuximab vedotin, the objective response rate was 59%
250 a model ADC (Ab095-PZ) and a commercial ADC (brentuximab vedotin) under the MS-compatible conditions.
252 4 months was 56.3% (36 of 64 patients) with brentuximab vedotin versus 12.5% (eight of 64) with phys
253 We aimed to assess efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin versus conventional therapy for prev
254 onse lasting at least 4 months was seen with brentuximab vedotin versus physician's choice of methotr
256 verse events were infrequent with nivolumab; brentuximab vedotin was associated with more treatment d
265 s in the therapeutic antibody-drug conjugate brentuximab vedotin, which displays a heterogeneous drug
267 12P1 determined the toxicity and efficacy of brentuximab vedotin with chemotherapy in children with n
268 Patients were randomly assigned to receive brentuximab vedotin with doxorubicin, vinblastine, and d
269 re assigned to receive five 21-day cycles of brentuximab vedotin with doxorubicin, vincristine, etopo
271 y activity for the two most active regimens, brentuximab vedotin with nivolumab and the triplet thera
272 d the safety and activity of combinations of brentuximab vedotin with nivolumab or ipilimumab, or bot
274 ts who achieved a complete remission (CR) on brentuximab vedotin, with estimated 3-year overall survi
275 t in progression-free survival compared with brentuximab vedotin, with safety consistent with previou