ライフサイエンスコーパス: brochure

1 r change techniques, or a mailed educational brochure.

2 aid, were less adherent despite being sent a brochure.

3 nformed consent documents and a supplemental brochure.

4 assigned to TP received a mailed educational brochure.

5 style modification counseling session with a brochure.

6 , are found in the literature and industrial brochures.

7 cted item (52%), and "Instruction by using a brochure"(27.3%) was more commonly selected for tacrolim

8 Results are also summarized in a brochure about breadfruit history and diversity in St.

9 o develop and validate a printed information brochure about chronic critical illness aimed at improvi

10 Usual care included an admission brochure about hospital-based free food options and nons

11 igned to TCN received the mailed educational brochure, an initial phone-based psychoeducational sessi

12 An educational brochure and a questionnaire on attitudes toward depresc

13 Training aids for patients included a DVD, brochure and poster.

14 compared with provision of an informational brochure and routine family meetings conducted by ICU te

15 intervention, only 20.6% of parents saw the brochure and video and only 5.7% were exposed to the ent

16 ased survey enrolled via printed promotional brochures and social media platforms.

17 sion aid consisting of an educational video, brochure, and chart marker increased ordering and perfor

18 The contents of the video, discussion, and brochure are help-seeking for the intervention group and

19 After review, family members described the brochure as clear and readable and recommended that the

20 participants chose a color-coded educational brochure (based on stages of change) to indicate their d

21 clear and readable and recommended that the brochure be delivered to family members by clinicians fo

22 d between exposure to the SoS letter and SoS brochure compared to exposure to the SoS letter only.

23 (effect size [ES], 0.61; P < 0.001), reading brochures (ES, 0.45; P < 0.001), browsing the internet (

24 urses as well as a supplementary information brochure for ICU patients' families.

25 ation intervention with a mailed educational brochure for improving colonoscopy screening among at-ri

26 ter from the Secretary of State (SoS); (b) a brochure from the SoS or (c) both.

27 Conference brochures from 9 national ophthalmology conferences from

28 itator-led group discussions, and electronic brochures in December 2021 and January 2022, with the fi

29 or research participants, placement of study brochures in hypertension clinics at Johns Hopkins Unive

30 oup) versus usual care plus an informational brochure (intervention group).

31 pecialists and provision of an informational brochure (intervention) compared with provision of an in

32 ients who were mailed a question prompt list brochure (intervention, 38 [35%]; usual care, 34 [33%];

33 An inexpensive mailed brochure is an effective way to increase patient adheren

34 er provider/trainee, navigation, RIC posters/brochures, laboratory test timing, flexible scheduling,

35 ovider/trainee, peer navigation, RIC posters/brochures, laboratory test timing, flexible scheduling,

36 Receipt of the brochure led to greater dose reductions for participants

37 They prefer brochures, magazines, and short counseling sessions duri

38 Brochures, magazines, and short counseling sessions were

39 andomized to a control group that received a brochure (n = 235) or a 35-minute brief intervention del

40 re (n = 305), those viewing an NBS movie and brochure (n = 300), and those viewing both the NBS and D

41 hose viewing both the NBS and DBS movies and brochures (n = 296).

42 magazines, advertisements, maps, postcards, brochures, napkins, and garments from 26 countries in fi

43 ecommendations in recent patient information brochures of both VISX (Santa Clara, California) and Alc

44 Controls received a generic brochure on automobile safety, and no chart marker was a

45 kcal), and a control group given a standard brochure on healthy eating and assigned to follow their

46 ssigned to the C group (n = 56) were given a brochure on healthy eating.

47 vered by a care manager vs giving patients a brochure on management of behavioral health.

48 The control group also received educational brochures on controlling high BP.

49 e group) or to a session providing access to brochures on sexual assault, as was common university pr

50 r registration rate than exposure to the SoS brochure only.

51 r registration rate than exposure to the SoS brochure only.

52 ther a video-based intervention (n = 469) or brochures only (n = 461; overall response rate, 37.1%) a

53 clinic doctor (n = 77, 11.9%), an in-clinic brochure or flyer (n = 51, 7.9%), a community flyer (n =

54 gn (OR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.41, 0.61) and study brochures (OR = 0.70, 95% CI: 0.54, 0.90).

55 nally sampled pretest-posttest evaluation of brochures, posters, and messages that conveyed the impor

56 The standard care comparison group was given brochures recommending aerobic exercise.

57 that exposure to both the SoS letter and SoS brochure resulted in a greater registration rate than ex

58 (a codesigned direct-to-consumer educational brochure sent by mail) or usual care (comparator group).

59 d in all surgical units, patient opioid/pain brochures setting expectations, and educational seminars

60 Patients received a question prompt list brochure that contained questions they could ask a surge

61 ntervention arm received a customized mailed brochure that included a reminder to schedule a screenin

62 of these domains was incorporated in a draft brochure that included graphics and a glossary of terms.

63 eveloped and validated a printed information brochure that may improve family comprehension of chroni

64 After reading the brochure, their prognostic estimates became more consist

65 e of a national culture drawn from a tourist brochure." Thomas Kuhn, Structure Of Scientific Revoluti

66 n intervention based on mailing a customized brochure to patients who were referred for a screening c

67 mportant to develop standardized information brochures to educate patients on risk factors and indica

68 Parents read a brochure, viewed an 8-minute video about infant crying a

69 The brochure was mailed within 10 days of referral for scree

70 Cognitive testing of the brochure was performed through interviews of ten represe

71 Decision aids-brochures, web applications, and videos-are a major focu

72 Organizational strategies (brochures, webpages, tip sheets, and implementation tool

73 ance, and emotional sensitivity of the draft brochure were tested in a series of evaluations by cohor

74 Patients received a question prompt list brochure with 11 questions that they might ask their sur