ライフサイエンスコーパス: buccal

1 tes were not statistically different between buccal (11.3%) and blood (7.0%, p = 0.18) samples; howev

2 and peptides into systemic circulation from buccal administration remains a daunting challenge.

3 n engineered, clinically-relevant system for buccal administration.

4 typing characteristics were compared between buccal and blood samples collected in the population-bas

5 lost a mean of <1 mm alveolar height on the buccal and lingual aspects and <1.5 mm of total ridge wi

6 ut width loss was evenly distributed between buccal and lingual aspects when RP was performed.

7 ncluding change in ridge width and change in buccal and lingual ridge height.

8 aces and, among coronal surfaces, on smooth (buccal and lingual), occlusal, and proximal surfaces.

9 Moreover, the buccal and mesial regions of the cortical bone concentra

10 Epidemiologic information, serum, and buccal and oropharyngeal swabs were collected.

11 al bone were measured at the mesial, distal, buccal, and lingual regions around the implant for each

12 e find that the anterior proboscis ends in a buccal apparatus containing teeth, the eyes project late

13 ridge width reduction was experienced on the buccal aspect in sites without RP, but width loss was ev

14 CS, fenestration defects were created at the buccal aspect of the first mandibular molar of all anima

15 ral fenestration defects were created at the buccal aspect of the first mandibular molar.

16 olar sites allowed to heal without RP on the buccal aspect of the socket (RP: -1.12 +/- 1.60 mm versu

17 to show less vertical bone resorption on the buccal aspect than the flapless technique.

18 The first bone to implant contact at the buccal aspect was 4.85 +/- 3.12 mm in CAS and 2.15 +/- 3

19 ertical reduction was most pronounced on the buccal aspect, 0.7 to 1.0 mm.

20 ity of ridge width loss was localized to the buccal aspect.

21 (PD) and depth of osseous dehiscence at the buccal aspect.

22 a- and subgingival plaque samples from mesio-buccal aspects of premolars and molars exhibiting probin

23 GCF samples were obtained from the mesio-buccal aspects of two teeth.

24 identified as: 1) the sum of the maximum mid-buccal (B) and mesio-buccal (MB) measures, which reflect

25 n (FME) of six sites (disto-buccal [DB], mid-buccal [B], mesio-buccal [MB], disto-lingual [DL], mid-l

26 iscence defect (6 x 3 mm) was created on the buccal bone and immediate implants were placed in distal

27 phy images were used to measure the width of buccal bone at two points along the root surface and the

28 clinical findings to gingival recession and buccal bone conditions.

29 he distance from the implant shoulder to the buccal bone crest was 1.6 mm.

30 he distance from the implant shoulder to the buccal bone crest was measured on cross-sectional CBCT i

31 of gingival recession to predict underlying buccal bone deficiencies is unknown.

32 ndency for GC development in the presence of buccal bone dehiscence (P = 0.052) and thin gingival bio

33 ment of intraosseous defects associated with buccal bone dehiscence accessed by buccal SFA may suppor

34 jaw, craniofacial growth, gingival biotype, buccal bone dehiscence after extraction, space closure)

35 In half of the blocks, a buccal bone dehiscence of random extent ("depth") was cr

36 ontal intraosseous defects associated with a buccal bone dehiscence resulted in a limited post-surger

37 Individuals with at least 5 mm of buccal bone dehiscence were selected for a flapless surg

38 ly, CBCT analysis showed that with >/=50% of buccal bone destruction, rhBMP-2/ACS was able to regener

39 implants in CBCT images; in cases where the buccal bone is <=1 mm thick, detection of the buccal bon

40 d no effect on the detection accuracy of the buccal bone level at dental implants in CBCT scans, BBT

41 major impact on the correct diagnosis of the buccal bone level at dental titanium implants in CBCT im

42 computed tomography (CBCT) to determine the buccal bone level at titanium implants.

43 uccal bone is <=1 mm thick, detection of the buccal bone level is largely inaccurate.

44 he distance between implant shoulder and the buccal bone plate (BID) effect.

45 igher thickness and volume reduction at thin buccal bone plates.

46 Buccal bone remodeling is significantly more extensive a

47 uate a new technique for treating dehiscence buccal bone sites (Class II) with immediate implant and

48 Immediate implant placement at dehiscence buccal bone sites using flapless surgery combined with x

49 e positioned at a variable distance from the buccal bone surface; thus, resulting in three BBT groups

50 rgery may be necessary at ~ 30% of sites, if buccal bone thickness > 1.9 mm is intended.

51 -nine of 84 virtual implants (70%) exhibited buccal bone thickness > 1.9 mm.

52 al recession was a significant predictor for buccal bone thickness <1 mm at the level of 4 mm apical

53 the effect of grafting the buccal mucosa on buccal bone thickness (BBT) has not been investigated, a

54 acrificed and jaw segments were assessed for buccal bone thickness (BBT), buccal bone volume (BBV), v

55 To evaluate whether buccal bone thickness (BBT), implant diameter, and abutm

56 A CBCT exam allowed to access the initial buccal bone thickness (BT).

57 The mean buccal bone thickness (P <0.05) and MBL (P <0.05) was co

58 e observational study sought to quantify the buccal bone thickness achieved adjacent to virtual denta

59 The mean post-GBR buccal bone thickness adjacent to virtual dental implant

60 Virtual implant buccal bone thickness also exhibited moderate correlatio

61 Buccal bone thickness changes were significant in GG sit

62 r regression analyses revealed that baseline buccal bone thickness is a strong predictor of alveolar

63 oduced significantly greater virtual implant buccal bone thickness than those without membrane fixati

64 CT images from 84 patients, and the adjacent buccal bone thickness was measured at each site.

65 There was no significant difference in the buccal bone thickness, MBL, and BIC among the groups in

66 Buccal bone thickness, soft tissue peri-implant paramete

67 oronal height of the gingiva were related to buccal bone thickness.

68 patient- and procedure-related variables on buccal bone thickness.

69 re assessed for buccal bone thickness (BBT), buccal bone volume (BBV), vertical bone height (VBH), an

70 at several factors like the thickness of the buccal bone wall and the size of the gap between the imp

71 Buccal bone wall height was measured by computed tomogra

72 ft blocks provided complete formation of the buccal bone wall up to the implant shoulder.

73 Mean buccal bone widths were significantly less, and the dist

74 recession and the condition of radiographic buccal bone, as well as the relative contribution of dem

75 ession were more likely to have thin (<1 mm) buccal bone.

76 l quantitative analysis in comparison to the buccal branch (BB) of the facial nerve using cadaver and

77 opted treatment modality, with the change in buccal (bREC) and interdental (iREC) gingival recession

78 muscle responsible for pulling food into the buccal cavity during swallowing is the I3 muscle, whose

79 both amino acids and insulin were ionised at buccal cavity pH and able to form stable ion pairs which

80 Excess liquid is then shunted out of the buccal cavity through ancillary channels made by surroun

81 specimen collected with eggs present in the buccal cavity, along with other specimens exhibiting pre

82 d the logarithm of RTL, adjusting for age at buccal cell collection, state of residence, applicator l

83 rature were inversely associated with RTL in buccal cell DNA among cancer-free pesticide applicators.

84 the disease-associated variation observed in buccal cell DNA is mirrored in adult brain tissue obtain

85 this end, we examined whether variability in buccal cell DNA methylation (DNAm) associated with neuro

86 ome-wide patterns of DNA methylation in twin buccal cell DNA using the Infinium HumanMethylation450 B

87 Methylation patterns were analysed in buccal cell DNA with the Illumina HumanMethylation 450K

88 of the eight patients showed an increase in buccal cell FXN levels, and fold induction was significa

89 zation (TEL-FISH) coupled with 3D imaging of buccal cell nuclei], providing high-resolution data amen

90 Bio-sampling was randomised to blood spot, buccal cell or no request.

91 We examined buccal cell TL in relation to lifetime use of 48 pestici

92 r lifetime pesticides use is associated with buccal cell TL.

93 amples using either blood (N=45, P=0.001) or buccal cells (N=255, P=0.004).

94 samples with low DNA yield, including blood, buccal cells and urine.

95 Buccal cells from patients, mutation carriers, and contr

96 re, we assess genome-wide DNA methylation in buccal cells of 309 SAM children using the 450 K microar

97 ersion and pyrosequencing assays on DNA from buccal cells provided by 377 participants of the Childre

98 Buccal cells were collected from 1999 to 2006.

99 In additional studies, buccal cells were grown in vitro and incubated with SB21

100 For whole blood and buccal cells, analysing FRDA patients and carriers toget

101 the recovery of DNA from human blood, semen, buccal cells, breastmilk, and earwax in addition to low-

102 head with a pair of simple eyes, a terminal buccal chamber containing a radial array of sclerotized

103 tudy is to evaluate the clinical response of buccal Class II furcation defects to open-flap debrideme

104 Seventy-two patients with mandibular buccal Class II furcation defects were randomized and ca

105 Ninety patients with mandibular buccal Class II furcation defects were randomly allocate

106 al parameters of healing of human mandibular buccal Class II furcation defects.

107 At the most mid-buccal computerized tomography slice of each tooth, othe

108 f ridge width and preserved or augmented the buccal contour.

109 -mouth examination (FME) of six sites (disto-buccal [DB], mid-buccal [B], mesio-buccal [MB], disto-li

110 constructive treatment of surgically created buccal, degree II furcation defects in mini-pigs.

111 cal approach to insert xenograft blocks into buccal dehiscence defects as well as the gap between imp

112 one used in flapless extraction sites with a buccal dehiscence is able to regenerate lost buccal plat

113 g extraction of a hopeless tooth with >/=50% buccal dehiscence were enrolled.

114 also significantly (P <0.05) less remaining buccal dehiscence, both clinically (6.81 versus 10.0 mm)

115 deep intraosseous defects associated with a buccal dehiscence.

116 e (CS) alone in extraction sites with >/=50% buccal dehiscence.

117 ation of a biodegradable polymeric patch for buccal delivery of insulin using chitosan as the mucoadh

118 occurrence, average and maximum lingual and buccal depth of space between tooth and bone, periosteal

119 occurrence, average and maximum lingual and buccal depth of space between tooth and bone, periosteal

120 an subjects living in Northern Italy donated buccal DNA and completed diurnal preference, sleep quali

121 namic model (DM) call rates were lower among buccal DNA samples (p < 0.0001).

122 n (%5mC) was analysed with pyrosequencing on buccal DNA.

123 ress in the in vitro and in vivo modeling of buccal drug delivery and provide a critical review of cu

124 Buccal drug delivery offers a potential non-invasive mea

125 The Pediatric-Buccal-Epigenetic (PedBE) clock was characterized in add

126 e of age specific to pediatric samples using buccal epithelial cell DNAm.

127 ripheral blood mononuclear cells (PMBCs) and buccal epithelial cells (BECs), the two most accessible

128 nificantly reduced E. coli adhesion to fresh buccal epithelial cells by up to 80% (p<0.001).

129 dothelial cells, and freshly collected human buccal epithelial cells in suspension.

130 Ex vivo, adhesion of E. coli to fresh human buccal epithelial cells was measured in the presence or

131 helps guide decisions on the suitability of buccal epithelial or peripheral mononuclear cells for th

132 asive method to obtain high-quality DNA from buccal epithelial-cells (BEC) of premature infants for g

133 ord blood at delivery, in fetal lung, and in buccal epithelium and blood during childhood.

134 es with materials such as connective tissue, buccal fat pads, and resorbable collagen membranes have

135 Buccal flap blood perfusion recovery and changes in bone

136 granules (PTG) in the treatment of Class II buccal furcation defects in mandibular molars in humans.

137 hirty-nine patients with mandibular Class II buccal furcation defects were randomized to beta-tricalc

138 of CT scan and clinical probing was found at buccal furcation sites in the mandible, with a kappa-coe

139 dible, with a kappa-coefficient of 0.52, and buccal furcation sites in the maxilla, kappa = 0.38.

140 ABA)-immunoreactive (GABA-ir) neurons in the buccal ganglia of six sea slug species (Mollusca, Gastro

141 pil in the Nudipleura were restricted to the buccal ganglia, commissures, and connectives.

142 Buccal genetic cheek swab, circulating serum dietary car

143 a distinct clinicopathological entity of the buccal gingiva of young patients which has been related

144 Weighted mean difference of mid-buccal gingival level (WDBGL), papilla index score (WDPI

145 Mid-buccal gingival level (WDBGL, 0.07 mm; 95% confidence in

146 Mid-buccal gingival level, interproximal gingival level, fac

147 ttempt to limit the post-surgery increase in buccal gingival recession (bREC), effect of a connective

148 ) assess the long-term outcomes of untreated buccal gingival recession (GR) defects and the associate

149 tients with bilateral Miller's Class I or II buccal gingival recessions >/=2.0 mm in canines or premo

150 Thirty-six patients with Miller Class I buccal GR associated with NCCLs completed the follow-up.

151 tive responses to ingestive inputs [Cerebral-Buccal Interneuron (CBI-2)].

152 the cholinergic command-like neuron cerebral buccal interneuron 2.

153 istometric and microtomographic analyses (at buccal, interproximal, and furcation sites) demonstrated

154 tment groups were compared, the width of the buccal keratinized tissue in the E group showed an incre

155 e important role of Evc for establishing the buccal-lingual axis of the developing first molar is als

156 Likewise, buccal-lingual width of alveolar ridge as well as thickn

157 ted teeth (T1) and their contralateral, both buccal-lingually in the alveolar ridge (P = 0.007) and i

158 al, subvertical, frontal, magnocellular, and buccal lobes.

159 th of keratinized mucosa measured at the mid-buccal location per implant at baseline and 1-year visit

160 The mean CAL at the mid-buccal location per implant was 0.8 mm at baseline and 0

161 a gradual increase of the 5-HT level in the buccal mass during development.

162 behaving animals or in vitro in a suspended buccal mass preparation, we demonstrated that the freque

163 sum of the maximum mid-buccal (B) and mesio-buccal (MB) measures, which reflects the worst case of b

164 es (disto-buccal [DB], mid-buccal [B], mesio-buccal [MB], disto-lingual [DL], mid-lingual, and mesio-

165 A unique buccal microwear pattern that is found in Homo antecesso

166 of dietary abrasiveness as evidenced by the buccal microwear patterns on the teeth of the Sima del E

167 roplasmy transmission conducted on blood and buccal mtDNA of 39 healthy mother-child pairs of Europea

168 n blood (15%), urinary epithelium (75%), and buccal mucosa (58%).

169 om LL explants compared to explants from the buccal mucosa (BM), HP, and transition zone of the lower

170 to have tongue malignancy (82%) followed by buccal mucosa and gingivobuccal sulcus malignancy (18%).

171 The buccal mucosa appeared as an intermediate ecological nic

172 s, we have investigated the potential of the buccal mucosa as an alternative delivery route for ShK b

173 ion protein Cx43 were markedly diminished in buccal mucosa cells from arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy p

174 Buccal mucosa cells from arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy p

175 esmosomal protein desmoplakin was reduced in buccal mucosa cells from patients with mutations in DSP,

176 mosomal protein plakophilin-1 was reduced in buccal mucosa cells in patients with PKP2 mutations but

177 potential surrogate tissue, we characterized buccal mucosa cells.

178 This study demonstrated that the buccal mucosa is a promising administration route for th

179 plant mucosa, but the effect of grafting the buccal mucosa on buccal bone thickness (BBT) has not bee

180 of selegiline, which is absorbed through the buccal mucosa producing higher plasma levels of selegili

181 c verrucous papules on the lips, tongue, and buccal mucosa refractory to multiple excisions.

182 ryptic population of R. mucilaginosa in many buccal mucosa samples.

183 the m.14487T>C mutation in his blood, urine, buccal mucosa, and hair follicle DNA samples, while the

184 in plaque, others in keratinized gingiva or buccal mucosa, and some oligotypes were characteristic o

185 dents of three oral habitats: tongue dorsum, buccal mucosa, and supragingival plaque.

186 The simultaneous presence of lesions on the buccal mucosa, grade of lesion extension, and presence o

187 ups based on similar community compositions: buccal mucosa, keratinized gingiva, hard palate; saliva,

188 f fluorescent 5-Fam-ShK to untreated porcine buccal mucosa, there was no detectable peptide in the re

189 cancer, and simultaneous involvement of the buccal mucosa, tongue, and palate was more common in thi

190 ocytes, urinary epithelial cells (UECs), and buccal mucosa.

191 n the oral mucosa measured in the tongue and buccal mucosa.

192 Additionally, the change in mid-buccal mucosal level (MBML) and approximal marginal bone

193 ut at the same time better maintains the mid-buccal mucosal level.

194 and restorative interventions on implant mid-buccal mucosal level.

195 studies demonstrated significantly enhanced buccal mucosal retention of the peptide (measured by muc

196 le-exome sequencing of 5 tumors and a normal buccal mucosal sample from a patient with MHIBCC was per

197 ed by differences in SFV gag sequences, from buccal mucosal specimens overlapped with those from bloo

198 OSCC often affects upper and lower gingiva, buccal mucous membrane, the retromolar triangle and the

199 anchaea, we detected a few GABA-ir fibers in buccal nerves that innervate feeding muscles.

200 identification of most motor neurons in the buccal network of Aplysia at low, nontoxic Mn(2+) concen

201 -type defects were surgically created on the buccal of the mandibular premolars (PI and PII).

202 d a colonoscopy from 1998 to 2007, donated a buccal or blood sample, and completed a structured quest

203 n of a lesion was presence of sinus tract at buccal or facial abscess of apical portion of implant, a

204 well-demarcated leukoplakias, either on the buccal or lingual gingival margin, or circumferentially

205 iched, taxonomically assigned species are of buccal origin, suggesting an invasion of the gut from th

206 eceived the same socket graft procedure plus buccal overlay cancellous xenograft (overlay group).

207 a socket graft to the same treatment plus a buccal overlay graft, both with a polylactide membrane,

208 traction-induced bone loss (BL) was noted on buccal, palatal, and interproximal height (P <0.05) and

209 of this study is to evaluate the effects of buccal-palatal bone width on the presence of the interpr

210 safe and effective permeation enhancers for buccal peptide delivery.

211 <= 1 mm exhibited a significantly increased buccal peri-implant tissue thickness change than patient

212 l implant collar and the bony surface on the buccal plate (I-BP).

213 12 weeks postoperatively for dimensional and buccal plate analyses.

214 oach; 4) bone grafts to fill the gap between buccal plate and fixture; 5) connective tissue grafts; a

215 the distance between implant surface and the buccal plate is <4 mm, the combination of internal and e

216 Gingival recession and a thin or absent buccal plate occur frequently at maxillary anterior teet

217 of implant placement, either because of thin buccal plate or failure of implant stability.

218 antly (P <0.05) better in regard to clinical buccal plate regeneration (4.75 versus 1.85 mm), clinica

219 h measurements, vertical height changes, and buccal plate regeneration.

220 e vehicle-treated animals, resulting in less buccal plate resorption and a wider alveolar ridge by da

221 tal bone width (P = 0.002) with preoperative buccal plate thickness (BPT) was observed.

222 A secondary objective is to compare mean buccal plate thickness between thick and thin biotypes a

223 When the probe was visible, mean buccal plate thickness tended to be smaller by 0.212 mm

224 For the secondary objective, mean buccal plate thickness was compared between sites in whi

225 Buccal plate thickness was measured (n = 66 teeth) by co

226 rameters: healing time, patient age, gender, buccal plate thickness, or radiographic changes in ridge

227 te characteristics, e.g., tissue biotype and buccal plate thickness.

228 was able to regenerate a portion of the lost buccal plate, maintain theoretical ridge dimensions, and

229 buccal dehiscence is able to regenerate lost buccal plate, maintain theoretical ridge dimensions, and

230 ion alveolar bone loss, mostly affecting the buccal plate, occurs despite regenerative procedures.

231 d a tendency to be associated with a thinner buccal plate.

232 One type of interneuron, the Pleuro-Buccal (PlB), is an extrinsic modulatory neuron of the f

233 dontists were asked to push tooth #16 into a buccal position to in a typodont model with different mo

234 were made possible by the use of the hamster buccal pouch and mouse models.

235 The CAGE/insulin patches placed in the rat buccal pouch in vivo lowered blood glucose levels in a d

236 tion reference manual toothbrush (MT) on mid-buccal preexisting GR (PreGR) during 12 months.

237 udy demonstrates the possibility of treating buccal recessions with gingival unit grafts as an altern

238 ere was a higher stress concentration on the buccal region in comparison to all other regions under o

239 rences between the groups for mean change in buccal ridge height, lingual ridge height, and ridge wid

240 echnology to deliver injectables through the buccal route.

241 us, transdermal, oral, inhalation, nasal and buccal routes.

242 Given residential address and buccal sample collection date, we estimated 7-day, 1-mon

243 ll, our findings support the potential for a buccal sample-based TB assay.

244 Exons 4, 5 and 8 in DNA from blood or buccal samples (130 autosomal recessive and simplex RP p

245 the 661 methylated genes from two studies of buccal samples (N = 1,002).

246 was extracted from the model foods and human buccal samples by GIDAGEN Multi-fast DNA isolation kit.

247 subset of placentas, cord blood samples, and buccal samples collected during the NCT00632476 trial fo

248 e quality of final genotyping resulting from buccal samples is somewhat lower, but compares favorably

249 Overall sensitivity for buccal samples was 51% (95% Confidence Interval [CI] 42-

250 s from 28 studies originating from blood and buccal samples.

251 ting 74 intraosseous defects accessed with a buccal SFA and treated with different modalities were se

252 epth reduction, adjunctive use of a CTG to a buccal SFA in the regenerative treatment of periodontal

253 ated with buccal bone dehiscence accessed by buccal SFA may support the stability of the gingival pro

254 ed trial is to assess the effectiveness of a buccal SFA used for the surgical debridement of deep int

255 s with an intraosseous defect treated with a buccal SFA with (SFA+CTG group; n = 15) or without (SFA

256 After buccal SFA, greater post-surgery increase in bREC must b

257 ly noted around the alveolar bone of molars (buccal side) and incisors.

258 tive tissue graft (CTG) when combined with a buccal single flap approach (SFA) in the regenerative tr

259 SUP was more frequently found at buccal sites (51%) and proved less prevalent at mesio-li

260 ndary outcomes were changes of GR at all mid-buccal sites (with or without PreGR), changes in percent

261 surement approaches for distal, lingual, and buccal sites but not mesial.

262 re recorded around implants and the adjacent buccal sites.

263 deliver immunizations to the sublingual and buccal (SL/B) tissue of rhesus macaques.

264 elomere length in genomic DNA extracted from buccal smears from 63 patients with BD, 74 first-degree

265 tify factors associated with the presence of buccal soft tissue dehiscences (BSTD).

266 of six articles reporting on the outcomes of buccal soft tissue phenotype modification around implant

267 articipants will have nasopharyngeal, blood, buccal, stool, and urine samples collected, plus complet

268 Fenestration defects were created at the buccal surface of the distal root of the mandibular firs

269 middle (M), and occlusal (O) regions of the buccal surface of the tooth to determine the linear devi

270 The plaque scores on buccal surfaces of the DTSG showed an additional slight

271 n clinical venipuncture whole blood (WB) and buccal swab (BS) specimens submitted to a field bioconta

272 y delivers the CMV IgG serostatus from dried buccal swab samples for >80% of the participants.

273 We analyzed three buccal swab samples from 123 adults with culture-confirm

274 determine the CMV IgG serostatus from dried buccal swab samples.

275 Buccal swab sampling constitutes an attractive non-invas

276 tutional DNA isolated from peripheral blood, buccal swab, or uninvolved optic nerve.

277 e burden, were associated with detection via buccal swab.

278 rmed simultaneously on DNA obtained from the buccal swabs and blood from the same patient.

279 PrP(Sc) was present in buccal swabs from a large proportion of sheep with PRNP

280 quences of transcriptionally active SFV from buccal swabs obtained from the same animals.

281 Buccal swabs showed high diagnostic sensitivity in case

282 The level of SFV RNA in buccal swabs varied greatly between macaques, with incre

283 At each visit, infant buccal swabs were collected for TL measurement, and moth

284 f breast skin tissue, breast skin swabs, and buccal swabs.

285 for incorrectly or less efficiently sampled buccal swabs.

286 can be collected and detected by using oral (buccal) swabs.

287 al routes: oral tablets, sublingual tablets, buccal tablets, sublingual spray, transdermal ointment,

288 insulin transport across the ex vivo porcine buccal tissue (~26% of loaded insulin) which was also co

289 Similarly, buccal tissue thickness has increased in the E group 0.4

290 sessing the levels of n-3 PUFAs in blood and buccal tissues of children and adolescents with ADHD.

291 n oral mucosa, especially for sublingual and buccal tissues.

292 y, the response consistently disappears in a buccal to lingual direction.

293 l for treatment approaches in patients where buccal tooth movement (expansion) is planned in the ante

294 ed using a split-mouth design, with half the buccal tooth surfaces coated with serum and the other ha

295 sterior dentition and expression of a "crown buccal vertical groove complex", all of which are uncomm

296 ccess to the defect was provided by a single buccal vertical incision with an interdental tunneling f

297 ng, group A showed a slight decrease in mean buccal volume, whereas group B had an increase in volume

298 Buccal wall height at T1 was not significantly different

299 lly in the alveolar ridge (P = 0.007) and in buccal wall thickness (P = 0.003).

300 th of alveolar ridge as well as thickness of buccal wall was compared with the contralateral tooth.