戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 songbird (zebra finch) and a parrot species (budgerigar).
2 , which abolishes yellow pigmentation in the budgerigar.
3  used real optical mapping data for rice and budgerigar.
4 s and 80% of locally misassembled contigs in budgerigar.
5 low-matched carotid artery of the Australian budgerigar.
6 production in a small Australian parrot, the budgerigar.
7 e much more extensively studied domesticated budgerigar.
8 may be important vocal control nuclei in the budgerigar.
9  numerous older sleep studies, including for budgerigars.
10  their echoes, have been recently studied in budgerigars.
11 auditory processing of conspecific sounds in budgerigars.
12 n of mature, patterned food-begging calls in budgerigars.
13 esting a possible auditory specialization in budgerigars.
14 t reveals patterns in the acoustic output of budgerigars, a vocal learning parrot species, that match
15 al Henle 407, chick kidney, chick ovary, and budgerigar abdominal tumor cells.
16                        SFOAE-based tuning in budgerigars accurately predicted cochlear frequency tuni
17 ture observed in mammals, songbirds, and now budgerigars, alongside recent work in reptiles and basal
18                                              Budgerigars also show a spatial masking release of 9 dB
19 al organization of vocal control pathways in budgerigars and songbirds.
20                                              Budgerigars and zebra finches were tested, using operant
21 onic signals were measured in zebra finches, budgerigars, and humans.
22        The distributions of ChAT and AChE in budgerigars appeared similar to that in oscine songbirds
23 to vocal control and auditory nuclei because budgerigars are a psittacine species in which both males
24                                              Budgerigars are parrots that have been extensively bred
25 eads we saw reads address 63% of gaps in our budgerigar assembly, of which 32% were closed and 63% im
26 y be a general property of this cell type in budgerigars because a similar gender difference was foun
27 sed as an acute type despite the 15-years of budgerigars breeding.
28                             In contrast, the budgerigars categorized both novel combinations of famil
29                     By 4 weeks postfledging, budgerigar contact call repertoires often contained more
30 obscura, an assembly of the Assemblathon 2.0 budgerigar dataset, and a preliminary assembly of the So
31 critical ratio functions for the wild-caught budgerigars decreased at frequencies of 1.0 kHz-2.86 kHz
32                                Surprisingly, budgerigars did not get more rewards than would be predi
33              Despite these similarities, the budgerigar dorsal striatopallidum (lobus parolfactorius,
34 to other avian thermoregulatory behaviors in budgerigars (e.g., panting, wing venting).
35                                              Budgerigars exhibited consolidated sleep, a pattern also
36 t calls of both wild-caught and domesticated budgerigars falls almost exclusively in the frequency of
37                                     Instead, budgerigars followed a learning strategy based on reward
38  SFOAE-based and cochlear-afferent tuning in budgerigars, for comparison to previously reported behav
39 und that all vocal control nuclei within the budgerigar forebrain exhibit prominent mENK-like immunor
40  examined the course of vocal development in budgerigars from hatching to about 4 weeks postfledging
41 lolly pine, Francisella tularensis, rice and budgerigar genomes.
42  thresholds were similar across all species, budgerigars had slightly higher overall levels of discri
43                                              Budgerigars have a complex vocal repertoire, some of whi
44                                           In budgerigars, HVo is connected to both the anterior foreb
45    We measured cognitive performance of male budgerigars in four tasks: problem solving, detour reach
46  her detailed clinical history, she had kept budgerigars indoors for 15 years.
47               Divergent behavioral tuning in budgerigars is unlikely attributable to the periphery an
48 lular nucleus of the lobus parolfactorius in budgerigars, like the area X in songbirds, contained man
49 entral nucleus of the lateral neostriatum in budgerigars, like the higher vocal center (HVC) in songb
50 ralaminar area of the frontal neostriatum in budgerigars, like the RA and the magnicellular nucleus o
51          The caudomedial pallium of the male budgerigar may have functional subdivisions that coopera
52 H) was mapped out in cells and fibers of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) brain.
53                                          The budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) is a parakeet speci
54 he telencephalic vocal control system in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) that has been hypot
55 rale (HVo), were mapped out in a parrot, the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus) to determine the re
56                             The brain of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus), a small parrot tha
57 ngs in the vocal production circuitry of the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus), a small parrot tha
58 in the brain of a vocal learning parrot, the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus), was examined using
59 kHz, similar to that previously found in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).
60 investigated in a vocal learning parrot, the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).
61 he vocal control nuclei of a psittacine, the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus).
62 ioral tone-in-noise (TIN) sensitivity in the budgerigar (Melopsittacus undulatus; of either sex), an
63 ate PM in binary-choice tasks theoretically, budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulates) actually apply a r
64  and contact calls of wild-caught Australian budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and compared these
65                                         When budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) are briefly held,
66                          The warble songs of budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) are composed of a
67                                         Male budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) are open-ended lea
68 periments revealed that yawning increased in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) as ambient tempera
69 1 days posthatch were assessed in 5 nestling budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) to determine if au
70              The flight trajectories of nine Budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) were reconstructed
71                                   Adult male budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) were stimulated to
72                           We implanted adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) with electroenceph
73  dimorphism in vocal control nuclei of adult budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus), a parrot species
74 d in zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata) and budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
75  paradigm to elicit learned contact calls in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus).
76  behavioral tone-in-noise (TIN) detection in budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus, either sex), a par
77  green cone opsins in two avian species, the budgerigar, Melopsittacus undulatus, and the mallard duc
78                  The apparent counterpart in budgerigars of the mammalian nucleus basalis of Meynert
79 ed multiple copies of endogenous HBVs in the budgerigar (order Psittaciformes), designated eBHBV.
80 cally normal vocalizations, isolation of the budgerigar PFP caused a degradation of call acoustic str
81        We show that song in four independent budgerigar populations is comprised of consonant- and vo
82                    Two binaural phenomena in budgerigars related to the detection of tones in noise w
83 rior lifelong vocal learning ability in male budgerigars rests largely on larger volumes of vocal con
84                                          The budgerigar septal region is theorized to be homologous a
85                                              Budgerigars show 8 dB of free-field binaural masking rel
86                                        Thus, Budgerigars show a high propensity to stick to their ind
87 ysical tuning curves, and critical ratios in budgerigars show that behavioral tuning sharpness increa
88 in older bird studies-dramatically disrupted budgerigar sleep structure, explaining the prior results
89 d that lighting conditions used in the prior budgerigar study-and commonly used in older bird studies
90 reflect neural specializations unique to the budgerigar that contribute to the extraordinary flexibil
91                                              Budgerigar TIN detection thresholds were similar to huma
92  We investigated neuronal activation in male budgerigars using the expression of the protein products
93 ed in other regions which may be involved in budgerigar vocal behavior, including the basal forebrain
94 es between the morphology of ELI elements in budgerigar vocal control nuclei and that described previ
95 had been previously described as part of the budgerigar vocal control pathway.
96 rough the basal forebrain also exists in the budgerigar vocal system that is similar to the anterior
97 gs, humans assigned the acoustic elements in budgerigar warble from several birds to eight broad, ove
98 , we found that tone-in-noise sensitivity in budgerigars was often greatest in midbrain neurons not t
99            In a repeated measures design, 16 budgerigars were exposed to 4 separate 10-min periods of
100                   However, zebra finches and budgerigars were extraordinarily sensitive to the mistun
101    By a site environmental investigation, 40 budgerigars were kept in a single breeding room and ther
102 rant conditioning and a psychophysical task, budgerigars were tested on large sets of these elements
103      We have investigated the paths taken by Budgerigars while flying in a tunnel.

 
Page Top