ライフサイエンスコーパス: button

1 story entitled 'The Curious Case of Benjamin Button'.

2 for the standardized manufacture of 'double-buttons'.

3 ing from 67,000 to 128,000 cells per corneal button).

4 ingle limbs (i.e., a single finger pushing a button).

5 ts indicated stimulus identity by pressing a button.

6 sin-related proteins clustered at a terminal button.

7 remove the corneal epithelial cells from the button.

8 larging at the distal end to form a terminal button.

9 states, 1-stream and 2-stream, by pressing a button.

10 ithout disturbing the radiolabeled leukocyte button.

11 properly the supernatant from the leukocyte button.

12 USTALW) can be performed with the click of a button.

13 te publication-ready plots at the click of a button.

14 ck was thermally uncomfortable by pressing a button.

15 phatics at E16.5 were joined by zippers, not buttons.

16 s for further refinement via convenient push buttons.

17 e consistently detected in all three corneal buttons.

18 rophages were observed in one of the corneal buttons.

19 nd have them press "shoot" and "don't shoot" buttons.

20 ng due to retrieval suppression and pressing buttons.

21 ing the molecular identity and regulation of buttons.

22 ted with the touch of a finger to one of its buttons.

23 ers of hydrophobic residues forming "leucine buttons."

24 on) so that there were two radiopaque spring buttons 4 mm apart on the button loop attached to the oc

25 250 mum in thickness) and a small posterior button (5 to 6 mm in diameter).

26 Three corneal buttons (6-mm diameter) were obtained from each cornea o

27 By clicking the SCP button, a patient-tailored SCP was generated.

28 ded with rechargeable "cig-a-like" or larger button-activated e-cigarettes, to use ad-libitum in two

29 ide are controlled by individual buttons and buttons also control the visibility of different ribosom

30 hemical analyses were performed on a corneal button and corneal pannus from 2 EEC patients.

31 In the present study, White Button and Honey Brown (both Agaricus bisporus), Shiitak

32 l features: whether a girl pushes a boy or a button and whether we see it in real-time or in a single

33 fied nucleotide are controlled by individual buttons and buttons also control the visibility of diffe

34 rial quantification was performed on corneal buttons and GFP-expressing Staphylococcus aureus was use

35 onor corneas include pre-formed biosynthetic buttons and in situ-forming matrices that strive to achi

36 Corneal buttons and peripheral blood leukocytes were obtained at

37 selected industries (e.g., military uniform buttons and piano keys) and handicraft applications, lit

38 All 4 corneal buttons and the GAN fascicle remained positive for B-III

39 However, both buttons and zippers were composed of vascular endothelia

40 onizing 18 silicone gastrostomy devices (12 "buttons" and six tubes converted to skin level devices)

41 of removing the coronary arteries as limited buttons, and anastomosis of the pulmonary artery using o

42 tics decreased rapidly just before birth, as buttons appeared.

43 sting that combinations of elements within a button are required for pairing.

44 Additionally, buttons are enriched for insulator protein clusters.

45 In this model, buttons are nonuniformly distributed, such that alignmen

46 ts had zippers, not buttons, suggesting that buttons are specialized junctions rather than immature o

47 Buttons are thought to act as primary valves for fluid a

48 initiated voluntary acts, such as pressing a button, are preceded by a surface-negative electrical br

49 xed by a lower proportion of touches for the button associated with the social reward image.

50 For the motor task, subjects pressed a button at a comfortable pace, and activation was compare

51 they were visually cued to press one of four buttons at a time.

52 imilar expression patterns at the click of a button; back-end refactoring from an object oriented to

53 ational modeling to evaluate an alternative "button barcode" model, in which there is only one type o

54 button distributions, many highly effective button barcodes can be easily found, some of which achie

55 tive biophysical model to demonstrate that a button-based mechanism can lead to chromosome-wide pairi

56 Our results strongly support a button-based mechanism of somatic homolog pairing in Dro

57 Button batteries (BBs) are commonly found in many househ

58 d does not require starting, stopping, reset buttons, batteries, or maintenance; the timer simply sta

59 be powered and run several times by a small button battery suggesting that it could be integrated to

60 bjects performed bilateral finger tapping on button boxes with a 3-Hz audio cue and a reversing check

61 gically associating domain (TAD) function as buttons, but not all buttons contain TADs.

62 ratocytes were isolated from central corneal buttons by collagenase digestion for 16 hours, seeded on

63 ratocytes were isolated from central corneal buttons by digestion in 1 mg/mL of collagenase A in DMEM

64 hod enables a comprehensive, 20-minute, push-button cardiac MRI examination without ECG gating or bre

65 erformance from five different types of PCFC button cells without degradation after 1400 hours.

66 ned by random pressing, and that certain two-button concept combinations appear more often than expec

67 omain (TAD) function as buttons, but not all buttons contain TADs.

68 led the rapid formation of micrometer-sized "buttons" containing oligomerized viral Gag protein.

69 cantly higher in Royal Trumpet than in White Button, Cremini, and Portobello, while no difference was

70 this presentation is to document results of buttoned device (BD) occlusion of patent ductus arterios

71 the feasibility, safety and effectiveness of buttoned device closure of PDAs.

72 of the multi-institutional U.S. trial of the buttoned device for transcatheter closure of atrial sept

73 y and effectiveness of the fourth generation buttoned device in dosing atrial septal defects (ASDs) a

74 hese data suggest that the fourth generation buttoned device is as effective as earlier generation de

75 In up to 5.5 years of follow-up, the buttoned device provided effective closure in 98% of pat

76 FO closure with the Clamshell, CardioSEAL or Buttoned Devices at two institutions.

77 .2%) with first, second and third generation buttoned devices, the device was modified (fourth genera

78 rdiac defects can be closed with umbrella or buttoned devices.

79 By simulating randomly generated nonuniform button distributions, many highly effective button barco

80 Fragments of buttons do not pair, suggesting that combinations of ele

81 ese findings indicate that simply pressing a button does not induce forgetting, on its own, without c

82 Studies have shown that a histidine button engineered into cTnI (cTnI A164H) specifically en

83 This pH-sensitive 'histidine button' engineered in TnI produces a titratable molecula

84 In this issue of Cell Host & Microbe, Button et al.

85 Here, Button et al. develop a phylogenetic network approach to

86 listened to a stream of sounds and pressed a button every time they heard a central target tone, whil

87 E::K-5) was used for transduction of corneal buttons ex vivo.

88 Participants were instructed to release a button following a green LED flash on the device.

89 bitrary rules such as 'for coffee, press red button' following their first-time instruction.

90 /no-go task requires participants to press a button for go stimuli, while inhibiting the response to

91 lly matched healthy control subjects pressed buttons for color of drug-related versus neutral words.

92 To learn when and how buttons form during development and whether they change

93 g development and inflammation and show that button formation can be promoted by glucocorticoid recep

94 Dexamethasone also promoted button formation during early postnatal development thro

95 Corneal buttons from BALB/c (syngeneic) or C57BL/6 (fully mismat

96 amage in CNTF-modulated explants and corneal buttons from explants was quantified by analysis of pano

97 Twelve normal corneal buttons from healthy donors were used as controls.

98 Fresh corneoscleral buttons from human donors (n = 19) and organ-cultured co

99 ated and simple "scripting at the click of a button" functionality that enables researchers to perfor

100 icroscopic examination of an excised corneal button, genomewide linkage analysis, fine mapping linkag

101 Corneal buttons harvested from C57BL/6 mice were used in three e

102 point eliminates the need for a back-mounted button in animals already receiving neural implants, the

103 al control adults participated and pressed a button in response to all female faces.

104 ges that can be reached by use of navigation buttons in a frame at the top of the screen.

105 d and preparation of the lamellar transplant buttons in a national cornea bank could improve the cost

106 In inflammation, zippers replaced buttons in airway lymphatics at 14 and 28 days after Myc

107 he posterior margin of the corneas and DSAEK buttons in all cases.

108 ge in disease, we examined the appearance of buttons in mouse embryos and their plasticity in sustain

109 ors (two subtypes) and one single pedicellar button (in L. pygmaea) are located on antennal pedicel.

110 The proportion of buttons increased from only 6% at E17.5 and 12% at E18.5

111 Here, we identify buttons interspersed across the fly genome that pair wit

112 mechanically deform in order to bring their buttons into mutual register.

113 ed by the microbiological community to a hot-button issue gaining staunch supporters (on particular p

114 were anchored on the sides by discontinuous button-like junctions (buttons) that differed from conve

115 lls of initial lymphatics have discontinuous button-like junctions (buttons), unlike continuous zippe

116 residue 685 and the concomitant formation of button-like junctions in initial lymphatics.

117 lymphatics transform from a zipper-like to a button-like pattern during collecting vessel development

118 radiopaque spring buttons 4 mm apart on the button loop attached to the occluder.

119 Incorporation of folding plug over the button loop in 10 additional patients produced immediate

120 Incorporation of folding plug over the button loop produces complete PDA occlusion at the time

121 Of the four mat types, the button mats contained the highest diversity of Cyanobact

122 nities referred to as black, beige, pink and button mats on the surfaces of the thrombolites.

123 Eight human eye bank corneal buttons (mean age, 73.6 years) were included.

124 g CBs, our studies suggest that the distinct buttoning mechanism we propose for DV closure is elabora

125 102) using our previously described ischemic button model.

126 The "button" model of pairing proposes that specific regions

127 gicola is a pathogen of the commercial white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) and is the causal ag

128 strate for mushroom cultivation by the white button mushroom (Agaricus bisporus) fruit body was inves

129 over 200 y and worldwide cultivation of the "button mushroom" forms a multibillion dollar industry.

130 White button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporous) are a potential br

131 0, 100, and 1000 uM retarded cap browning of button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) by 78.35, 31.40, 30

132 rst time, identified and quantified in white button mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) following treatment

133 Button mushrooms are widely produced edible basidiomycet

134 Pseudomonas tolaasii severely damages white button mushrooms by secretion of the pore-forming toxin

135 dried mushrooms, the level of vitamin D2 in button mushrooms was found to be 6.90 mug/g dw, which is

136 idated and applied to commercially available button mushrooms.

137 rs (n = 19) and organ-cultured corneoscleral buttons (n = 10) obtained after Descemet's membrane endo

138 transverse shear properties of 6 mm diameter buttons of matched human cadaver cornea pairs.

139 the coronary arteries are removed as limited buttons of sinus tissue, leaving the transected edge of

140 Full-thickness buttons of the central macula and the periphery of human

141 , the corneas were prepared to split corneal buttons on day 0 and cultivated for 15 days.

142 sample and reagents is activated by pressing buttons on the cartridge and sustained by exploiting cap

143 e range, temperature control and simple push-button operation.

144 Responses were given as simple button or key presses, which are quick to make and easy

145 , as 391 (23.7%) isolates lacked the typical button or mucoid colony appearance of S. pneumoniae.

146 tactile stimuli and action choices (press a button or not).

147 Wholemount corneal buttons or cells from enzyme-digested corneas were analy

148 If subtle growth (i.e., granular, small button, or "starry" growth) was considered positive, err

149 Thus, buttons pair homologous chromosomes to facilitate cell-t

150 oints along the A-P axis of the embryo in a "buttoning" pattern, divergent from the zippering mechani

151 contain a shared sequence motif, the "pause button" (PB): KCGRWCG.

152 c yellow-fluorescent protein zFP538 from the button polyp Zoanthus sp. and a green-emitting mutant (K

153 nly one type of recognition site or adhesion button, present in many copies in the genome, each of wh

154 and they did so with either a speeded manual button press (humans) or a speeded saccadic eye movement

155 are able to report the sound as a target by button press after approximately 300-500 ms.

156 mp) component that peaked 200 msec after the button press and reversed polarity near the central sulc

157 nd spontaneous trial-to-trial variability in button press force.

158 Each button press initiated 30 s of -20 degrees C fluid perfu

159 rticipants were instructed to respond with a button press only to presented stimuli for a particular

160 sponses were invariant to motor output (i.e. button press or not), and to different ways of defining

161 earance of a peripheral target with either a button press or saccade.

162 erception of contingency existed between the button press response and the outcome.

163 ollowing an anticipatory cue, or following a button press response.

164 sented singly and each requiring a different button press response.

165 Training consisted of a two-phase button press task.

166 peak in the mean response time locked to the button press to be principally composed of triphasic, pr

167 g VEP assessments, subjects responded with a button press to infrequent (10%) target stimuli.

168 A button press was required in response to soft speech sou

169 ream of visual stimuli and to respond with a button press when a particular target appeared.

170 bjects, the rules were reversed to require a button press whenever an object, but not a circle, appea

171 n each trial, with the patient indicating by button press whether he saw an object on the left, the r

172 which subjects indicated with a differential button press whether the probe was contained in the stud

173 involving very simple motor responses (e.g., button press), errors concern inappropriate action-selec

174 on was reported by pressing or withholding a button press).

175 ponent during the final choice (indicated by button press).

176 a stimulus, indicated their prediction via a button press, and then received feedback.

177 s input (visual, auditory), response output (button press, speech), stimulus category (words, picture

178 During this task, subjects report, by button press, the number of words (1-4) that appear on a

179 nd multisensory (audiovisual) stimuli with a button press, while electrocorticography was recorded ov

180 eding but only partially phase-locked to the button press, with larger complexes preceding quicker mo

181 ditory (button press-tone) and motor-visual (button press-Gabor patch) events.

182 r temporal recalibration for motor-auditory (button press-tone) and motor-visual (button press-Gabor

183 gnaled the time of recognition (T(R)) with a button press.

184 ning a subset of them as targets requiring a button press.

185 n association between presented images and a button press.

186 ore registering their motion decision with a button press.

187 ed subjects to discriminate their emotion by button press.

188 re instructed to respond to the stimuli by a button press.

189 ge, and subjects responded to the target via button press.

190 Moreover, button-press forgetting partially reflects output-interf

191 In a subsequent test phase, left and right button-press generated either the same audio-visual stim

192 VRT was recorded via a button-press response to the sudden appearance of a stim

193 ring the counting Stroop, subjects report by button-press the number of words (one to four) appearing

194 articipants learned two 12-item sequences of button presses (A and B).

195 in which they could choose between making 20 button presses for $1 or 100 button presses for higher a

196 tween making 20 button presses for $1 or 100 button presses for higher amounts (varying from $3 to $7

197 covertly attended location, quicker speeded button presses immediately followed a larger positive (P

198 aried in coherence and responded with either button presses or saccadic eye movements.

199 However, the nature of pets' button presses remains an open question: are presses del

200 Split-brain patients made button presses that were less synchronous than either no

201 The order of button presses was determined by a complex sequence that

202 s, P < 0.01), while the number of cumulative button presses was greater from 40-60 min in HS for HIGH

203 Considering that these actions were button presses with trivial motor demands, the idiosyncr

204 for both overt behavioral reports (immediate button presses) and silent counting of the perceptual ev

205 n, during the task, responses (left or right button presses) were either directly instructed (forced

206 experiment consisting of periods of rest and button presses, leading to local field potential recordi

207 ty of the hallucinations produced, utilising button presses, retrospective drawing, interviews, and q

208 ry tasks, where participants indicate, using button presses, the timing of encoding and recall of cue

209 itivity to body sensations and more frequent button presses.

210 receiving cooling (TT(cool) ) and cumulative button presses.

211 articipants learned that right and left hand button-presses each produced a specific audio-visual sti

212 ice's actions are implemented via strings of button-presses.

213 he objective contingency between the rate of button pressing and the amount of money they earned.

214 behaving monkey during a simple, sequential button pressing task.

215 t the hypothesis that introduction of double button reduces unbuttoning rate without reducing effecti

216 participations were instructed to abort the button release on these trials.

217 The corneal buttons retrieved during keratoplasty were processed for

218 Ex vivo studies with excised corneal buttons revealed that uninfected IL-6(-/-) corneas injec

219 Panoramic images of explants and corneal buttons revealed that VIP treatment reduced CE damage to

220 g tips of lymphatic sprouts had zippers, not buttons, suggesting that buttons are specialized junctio

221 ar switch, most readily described as a "push-button" switch, whereby two discrete and fully occupied

222 and r = -0.45 for Sharp's score), the timed button test (r = -0.62 for NDJ, and r = -0.57 for Sharp'

223 ; grip strength; walking velocity; and timed button test.

224 ; grip strength; walking velocity; the timed-button test; pain; and joint tenderness, swelling, and d

225 is patterned to create touch pads of arrayed buttons that are sensitive to contact with both bare and

226 d with AIC devices comprising soundboards of buttons that can be pressed to produce prerecorded human

227 ides by discontinuous button-like junctions (buttons) that differed from conventional, continuous, zi

228 ing three main ultrastructures: the terminal button, the electrodense core, and the wheel complex.

229 Click the Cancel button to access the source code without authenticating.

230 ortant features of H4K16: 1) it is the first button to anchor the H4 tail on the adjacent nucleosome;

231 The subject pressed a button to answer a ring tone, and then covertly answered

232 ther half of the blocks) in order to press a button to any deviant sound at that location.

233 ease over time, they decided when to press a button to bank their winnings, knowing that if they did

234 netic resonance imaging while they pressed a button to earn money as the response-reward relationship

235 ts played a game where they tried to press a button to earn points in a challenge with a brain-comput

236 t a time at fixation, and subjects pressed a button to every target.

237 Participants were required to press a button to indicate whether a briefly presented tone was

238 tation of each face pair, subjects pressed a button to indicate whether a subsequent asterisk appeare

239 ions (180 degrees ) while subjects pressed a button to occasional targets at one attended location.

240 ation experiment, participants could press a button to receive intravenous alcohol using the Computer

241 support in favor of inteins acting as pause buttons to arrest protein function until needed; then, a

242 latively close proximity of these L2 density buttons to one another raised the possibility of homotyp

243 unidimensional strategy: pressing one of two buttons to rotate a visual grating that stimulates a mod

244 ome-shaped tumors in 79% of patients, collar-button tumors in 17% of patients, irregular tumor in 1 p

245 The corneal buttons underwent histopathologic and immunofluorescence

246 cs have discontinuous button-like junctions (buttons), unlike continuous zipper-like junctions (zippe

247 procedure or cut from a whole corneal graft button unsuitable for keratoplasty.

248 Complex manual tasks-everything from buttoning up a shirt to playing the piano-fundamentally

249 nd then form intermediate closure points to "button-up" the folds.

250 Affected larvae display buttoned-up, the ETH-null phenotype characterized by dou

251 havioral sequence, and exhibit the phenotype buttoned-up, which is characterized by incomplete ecdysi

252 ld consciously based his character, Benjamin Button, upon individuals with HGPS.

253 was performed on ex vivo human corneoscleral buttons using a depth-sensing needle, based on optical c

254 Although vascular access buttons (VABs) offer significant advantages, their wides

255 eter mechanical scrape injury was made, each button was cultured for 24, 48, or 72 hours in serum-fre

256 In a PKP, the corneal button was initially secured with 8 or 16 sutures and th

257 ("the coffee is ready about 3 min after the button was pressed").

258 The white cell button was then resuspended in 4 ml of platelet-poor pla

259 e anterior stromal surface of bovine corneal buttons was measured after the epithelium was scraped aw

260 ying there's a chance that when we push that button, we destroy the world?" The physicist says, "The

261 red by a conserved salt-bridge, the "charged button." We also modeled structures for three other C. e

262 puter (iPad), where two differently coloured buttons were associated with a social and a nonsocial re

263 Corneal buttons were collected from patients with keratoconus, h

264 Corneal buttons were collected from patients with keratoconus, n

265 -versus-volume curves of all corneal-scleral buttons were concave-up asymptotes, demonstrating elasti

266 EC-DM) complexes from normal and FED corneal buttons were dissected from the epithelium/stroma.

267 Thirty corneal buttons were examined, 18 of which were from patients af

268 A total of 1748 corneoscleral buttons were harvested from 10,265 deceased persons (17%

269 Corneal buttons were harvested from C57BL/6 mice and decellulari

270 The dissected corneoscleral buttons were immersed in OCT media and frozen in liquid

271 To study cell migration, buttons were nested within acellular uncompressed outer

272 FECD corneal buttons were obtained from transplantations and normal h

273 Electron microscopy showed that these buttons were packed with budding viral crescents.

274 Corneal buttons were placed in culture and immunocytochemistry a

275 Thirteen bisected Fuchs' corneal buttons were processed at the time of corneal transplant

276 The corneal buttons were processed for light, transmission, and scan

277 eudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) corneal buttons were removed during transplantation, and normal

278 Passenger leukocyte numbers in the buttons were significantly reduced by all three treatmen

279 Buttons were single and double labeled using phalloidin

280 Organ cultured human corneoscleral buttons were studied.

281 The corneal buttons were then evaluated by hematoxylin-eosin stainin

282 Six-millimeter-diameter buttons were then incubated in media supplemented with 1

283 The corneal buttons were transplanted after overnight incubation in

284 Two-millimeter-diameter guinea pig corneal buttons were transplanted into 1.5-mm-diameter graft bed

285 antic category as the first two, and another button when it belonged to a different category.

286 Participants were asked to press a button when the third picture of a triplet belonged to t

287 ate a central target and to press a response button when they saw a stimulus that was randomly presen

288 Subjects pressed a button whenever a rare target appeared.

289 were required to count mentally or to push a button whenever a target appeared.

290 ing an auditory discrimination task (press a button whenever an auditory pattern changes).

291 t or right finger stimulation and to press a button whenever they perceived a target pulse embedded i

292 (AX-CPT), which required subjects to press a button whenever they saw a letter A followed by a letter

293 hout initial lymphatics via openings between buttons, which open and close without disrupting junctio

294 h HLA-DM and may function as a pH-sensitive "button," which is closed at pH 7.0 but opens below pH 6.

295 ovements in a virtual environment to touch a button whose shape varied randomly from trial to trial-b

296 or pseudowords (experiment 2) by pressing a button with their right or left hand, while transitionin

297 perceiving a change in velocity by pushing a button with their thumb.

298 ion time task, subjects pressed each of four buttons with a different finger of the right hand in res

299 05-in Nitinol wires in the shape of two flat buttons with a short connecting waist with a diameter co

300 dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) by treating the buttons with anti-CD45 mAb plus complement.

301 quence of pushing five spatially distributed buttons without visual guidance.