戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ponent during the final choice (indicated by button press).
2 on was reported by pressing or withholding a button press).
3 ore registering their motion decision with a button press.
4 ed subjects to discriminate their emotion by button press.
5 re instructed to respond to the stimuli by a button press.
6 ge, and subjects responded to the target via button press.
7 gnaled the time of recognition (T(R)) with a button press.
8 ning a subset of them as targets requiring a button press.
9 n association between presented images and a button press.
10 receiving cooling (TT(cool) ) and cumulative button presses.
11 itivity to body sensations and more frequent button presses.
12 experimental setups limit behavior to simple button presses.
13 ice's actions are implemented via strings of button-presses.
14 ting-state and for simple movements, such as button pressing.
15 articipants learned two 12-item sequences of button presses (A and B).
16  are able to report the sound as a target by button press after approximately 300-500 ms.
17 mp) component that peaked 200 msec after the button press and reversed polarity near the central sulc
18 he objective contingency between the rate of button pressing and the amount of money they earned.
19 for both overt behavioral reports (immediate button presses) and silent counting of the perceptual ev
20 a stimulus, indicated their prediction via a button press, and then received feedback.
21 d their owners, we investigate whether dogs' button presses are (i) non-accidental, (ii) non-random,
22                     Using a large dataset of button presses by family dogs and their owners, we inves
23 articipants learned that right and left hand button-presses each produced a specific audio-visual sti
24 involving very simple motor responses (e.g., button press), errors concern inappropriate action-selec
25 in which they could choose between making 20 button presses for $1 or 100 button presses for higher a
26 tween making 20 button presses for $1 or 100 button presses for higher amounts (varying from $3 to $7
27       We find no evidence for rhythmicity in button presses for visual tasks using the same stimuli,
28 nd spontaneous trial-to-trial variability in button press force.
29    When tasks were uncued, we replicated the button-press forgetting effect; but when cued, pressing
30                                    Moreover, button-press forgetting partially reflects output-interf
31 ditory (button press-tone) and motor-visual (button press-Gabor patch) events.
32   In a subsequent test phase, left and right button-press generated either the same audio-visual stim
33 and they did so with either a speeded manual button press (humans) or a speeded saccadic eye movement
34  covertly attended location, quicker speeded button presses immediately followed a larger positive (P
35                                         Each button press initiated 30 s of -20 degrees C fluid perfu
36 experiment consisting of periods of rest and button presses, leading to local field potential recordi
37 ot stimuli and respond either with a speeded button press (N = 24), or vocally, after a randomized de
38 rticipants were instructed to respond with a button press only to presented stimuli for a particular
39 sponses were invariant to motor output (i.e. button press or not), and to different ways of defining
40 nsory component, we varied movements (active button press or passive depression of button) at adaptat
41 earance of a peripheral target with either a button press or saccade.
42 aried in coherence and responded with either button presses or saccadic eye movements.
43 n, Sunrise." They continuously reported, via button press/release, whether the Gabor patch, or the su
44                 However, the nature of pets' button presses remains an open question: are presses del
45 erception of contingency existed between the button press response and the outcome.
46 ollowing an anticipatory cue, or following a button press response.
47 sented singly and each requiring a different button press response.
48                       VRT was recorded via a button-press response to the sudden appearance of a stim
49 ty of the hallucinations produced, utilising button presses, retrospective drawing, interviews, and q
50 s input (visual, auditory), response output (button press, speech), stimulus category (words, picture
51            Training consisted of a two-phase button press task.
52  behaving monkey during a simple, sequential button pressing task.
53                    Split-brain patients made button presses that were less synchronous than either no
54 ring the counting Stroop, subjects report by button-press the number of words (one to four) appearing
55        During this task, subjects report, by button press, the number of words (1-4) that appear on a
56 ry tasks, where participants indicate, using button presses, the timing of encoding and recall of cue
57 peak in the mean response time locked to the button press to be principally composed of triphasic, pr
58 g VEP assessments, subjects responded with a button press to infrequent (10%) target stimuli.
59 r temporal recalibration for motor-auditory (button press-tone) and motor-visual (button press-Gabor
60                    The fraction of premature button presses varied among the four conditions, possibl
61                                            A button press was required in response to soft speech sou
62                                 The order of button presses was determined by a complex sequence that
63 s, P < 0.01), while the number of cumulative button presses was greater from 40-60 min in HS for HIGH
64 n, during the task, responses (left or right button presses) were either directly instructed (forced
65 ream of visual stimuli and to respond with a button press when a particular target appeared.
66 bjects, the rules were reversed to require a button press whenever an object, but not a circle, appea
67 n each trial, with the patient indicating by button press whether he saw an object on the left, the r
68 which subjects indicated with a differential button press whether the probe was contained in the stud
69 nd multisensory (audiovisual) stimuli with a button press, while electrocorticography was recorded ov
70          Considering that these actions were button presses with trivial motor demands, the idiosyncr
71 eding but only partially phase-locked to the button press, with larger complexes preceding quicker mo