コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 proved to fit in the managemet of refractory calculi.
2 ed retrospectively for the presence of renal calculi.
3 and is an optional treatment for many renal calculi.
4 rden was evaluated in patients with multiple calculi.
5 f patients with small, asymptomatic calyceal calculi.
6 % for ureteral calculi, and 67-84% for renal calculi.
7 ved as options for the treatment of ureteral calculi.
8 is the development of urinary tract cystine calculi.
9 ion in the assessment of upper urinary tract calculi.
10 arkable reports on renal (and other urinary) calculi.
11 ation included a careful search for ureteral calculi.
12 icated, moderately sized upper urinary tract calculi.
13 biliary findings were ductal dilatation and calculi.
14 in differentiating phleboliths from ureteral calculi.
15 bstruction, and obstruction due to bile duct calculi.
16 ificity of 77% for the detection of ureteral calculi.
17 s were reviewed for proof of the presence of calculi.
18 mes and all three linear dimensions of renal calculi.
19 issed 1 calculus in 3 patients with multiple calculi.
20 tion in patients suspected of having urinary calculi.
21 degradable form, inhibiting the formation of calculi.
22 s in fragmentation and removal of refractory calculi.
23 of ureteroscopy for the management of renal calculi.
24 linded to the location and presence of renal calculi.
25 ients along with refractory residual biliary calculi.
26 the presence, number, location, and size of calculi.
27 stone types, that is, melamine and indinavir calculi.
28 one-free rates in the management of staghorn calculi.
29 imal treatment modality for lower pole renal calculi.
30 ining to the treatment of renal and ureteral calculi.
31 uncture for the management of staghorn renal calculi.
32 ne its place in the treatment of upper tract calculi.
33 or the treatment of renal and upper ureteric calculi.
34 thic urethritis, and the passage of ureteral calculi.
35 modality available for the visualization of calculi.
36 planning, including the size and location of calculi.
37 cacious therapy with low morbidity for renal calculi.
38 udy performed with patients who had ureteral calculi.
39 re pertinent to endoscopic surgery for renal calculi.
40 hoice for the majority of renal and ureteral calculi.
41 US is of limited value for detecting renal calculi.
42 thotripsy (Dornier HM-3) for distal ureteral calculi.
43 entially related to the study included renal calculi (16 participants in the vitamin D3 + calcium gro
44 most commonly studied pathology was urinary calculi (28%), renal lesion/tumor (23%), and hepatic les
45 rim sign was present in 105 of 136 ureteral calculi (77%) and in 20 of 259 phleboliths (8%) and yiel
50 patients, who suffered from residual biliary calculi after hepatectomy and underwnet POC from August
51 und in 33 (66%) patients; 25 (50%) had renal calculi and 19 (38%) had an obstructing ureteral calculu
54 ntification of 39% of patients with multiple calculi and demonstrated all calculi in 17% of these pat
56 er, P=.041) and attenuation (P=.0005) of the calculi and image noise (P=.0031) were significantly ass
60 oses and was independently evaluated for all calculi and separately for calculi greater than 3 mm in
61 the protein composition of prostatic CA and calculi and suggests that acute inflammation has a role
63 ing modalities employed for the diagnosis of calculi and the caveats of different clinical situations
65 ive congenital anomalies, five urinary tract calculi, and 18 calyceal and/or papillary, 30 renal pelv
67 or flexible ureterorenoscopy for upper tract calculi, and discuss the techniques and strategies that
69 Defects, Congenital, Vascular, Calcification/Calculi, Aorta, Pulmonary Arteries, CT Angiography, Echo
71 ations for ureteroscopic management of renal calculi are expanding, and this technique is quickly bei
74 l Networks, Carotid Arteries, Calcifications/Calculi, Arteriosclerosis, Segmentation, Vision Applicat
77 ive rate of twinkling artifact for confirmed calculi at CT was 49% (73 of 148 twinkling foci), while
81 tive than pneumatic lithotripsy for ureteral calculi, but no more effective than shock-wave lithotrip
83 rge (>2.9 mm) and high-attenuation (>387 HU) calculi can be detected with good reliability; smaller a
88 y significant difference between the size of calculi detected by MRI and true size of calculi retriev
91 minal CT is the imaging standard for urinary calculi detection; however, studies comparing photon-cou
92 o metabolic consequences were noted, urinary calculi did not form, mucus production was normal, and r
93 xaminations for presence or absence of renal calculi, differential diagnoses, and associated abnormal
94 detectability, number, size, and location of calculi (distance of obstruction from the ostium and mas
95 ound between the 2 readers regarding size of calculi, distance of calculi from the ostium, and distan
96 me a widely used modality for treating renal calculi due to its noninvasive nature and ease of applic
98 disease; 136 of these patients had ureteral calculi, excluding the ureterovesical or ureteropelvic j
100 bladder tumors arise through urinary bladder calculi formation but is insufficient to hypothesize a m
102 aders regarding size of calculi, distance of calculi from the ostium, and distance from the masseter
103 evaluated for all calculi and separately for calculi greater than 3 mm in diameter by using the McNem
105 rger than 2.9 mm, maximum attenuation of the calculi greater than 387 HU, and image noise less than 2
106 ia, prostate cancer, renal masses, and renal calculi have resulted in enhanced understanding of cavit
117 afe and efficient method of treating urinary calculi in children, which was once thought too injuriou
118 of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy for calculi in congenitally abnormal kidneys is now giving w
119 history of passing 2 small (about 5 mm each) calculi in his urine after the occurrence of hematuria,
121 hotripsy is effective for ureteral and renal calculi in morbidly obese patients who are not suitable
122 efficacious for the management of intrarenal calculi in multiple-patient populations and is also cost
124 cause of the importance of identifying small calculi in the gland or salivary duct as the cause of th
125 on US and CT images, and the US detection of calculi in the left and right kidneys was compared.
130 Here we show that the formation of dental calculi involves bacteria in local mature biofilms conve
132 dition, the endoscopic treatment of ureteral calculi is efficacious and definitive, albeit more invas
133 nal stone disease and the incidence of these calculi is increasing, suggesting environmental and diet
135 to be efficacious in identifying all urinary calculi, is not useful in imaging stones that are compos
136 conventional technique for residual biliary calculi, its efficacy still needs to be improved to fit
138 so found for urinary tract infections, renal calculi, lower urinary calculi, and other lower urinary
140 d reliability; smaller and lower attenuation calculi might be erased from images, especially with inc
142 ings were appendicitis (n=13), urinary tract calculi (n=6), small-bowel obstruction (n=2), cholelithi
143 : Coronary Arteries, Cardiac, Calcifications/Calculi, Neural NetworksSee also the commentary by Gupta
145 with US was 7.1 mm +/- 1.2 (95% CI); 73% of calculi not visualized at US were less than 3.0 mm in si
147 r the detection of specific individual renal calculi observed at CT was 55% (95% confidence interval:
148 nhanced CT of a phantom containing 188 renal calculi of varying size and chemical composition (brushi
149 The sensitivity regarding the detection of calculi on VNE images compared with true nonenhanced (TN
152 -quality images for the diagnosis of urinary calculi; radiation exposure was reduced by 44% with a hi
153 of the mainstays of treatment of upper tract calculi, rather than as a technique for the exclusive us
154 ere no differences between the two groups in calculi recurrence at half-a year, or one year follow-up
156 11 cases: infrared spectrometry analysis of calculi revealed that ATV made up a median of 89% (range
157 o were unaware of the location and number of calculi, reviewed the CT images and recorded where stone
158 vers noted the location, size, and number of calculi; secondary signs of obstruction; and other clini
162 sful technique for the treatment of ureteral calculi (success rates >90%) and is an optional treatmen
165 n the spontaneous passage of distal ureteral calculi, thereby reducing the need for surgical interven
166 ns were compared with the known positions of calculi to generate true-positive and false-positive rat
167 g perfusion, neoplasm, bowel diseases, renal calculi, tumor response to treatment, and metal implants
168 The mean age by gender of the patients with calculi was 54 years for men and 38 years for women.
169 ld male mice, the incidence of early urinary calculi was 67% in Cav1-/- mice compared to 19% in Cav1+
178 alline calcium oxalate and calcium phosphate calculi were found throughout the entire spectrum, and d
179 seven stones were detected on TNE images; 46 calculi were identified on VNE images (sensitivity, 52.9
182 50 patients with history suggestive of renal calculi were subjected to DECT using 100 kVp and Sn150 k
183 or imaging findings in 19 patients, in whom calculi were visible on 16 of 18 CT scans, 15 of 19 sono
185 ent (ED) with moderate to high likelihood of calculi who would require urologic intervention within 9
187 reatment of proximal ureteral and intrarenal calculi with the development of new endoscopes, more eff
188 aphy (DECT) in the characterization of renal calculi, with ex vivo renal stone evaluation using Fouri
190 the rim sign had a mean size of 4.3 mm, and calculi without a rim sign had a mean size of 6.3 mm (P
191 mGy enabled effective evaluation of urinary calculi without substantially affecting diagnostic confi
192 n the treatment of small, asymptomatic renal calculi, yet we know very little about the natural histo