ライフサイエンスコーパス: calculus

1 4 mm) but not the more prevalent condition (calculus).

2 and dental disease (gingivitis, plaque, and calculus).

3 tly improve radiographic detection of dental calculus.

4 ules of inference akin to those of a logical calculus.

5 n probing, visual gingival inflammation, and calculus.

6 ets > or = 4 mm) and at least two sites with calculus.

7 sity and CAL among women without subgingival calculus.

8 cope resulted in significantly less residual calculus.

9 ral, more cells attached to cementum than to calculus.

10 eriments were performed, both on subgingival calculus.

11 pregnant patient suspect of having a urinary calculus.

12 uli and 19 (38%) had an obstructing ureteral calculus.

13 e inferior sphere was coated with plaque and calculus.

14 , > or = 3 mm gingival recession, and dental calculus.

15 al plaque, gingival bleeding on probing, and calculus.

16 ghty-two patients each had a single ureteral calculus.

17 n a dentist infrequently and had subgingival calculus.

18 on of the disease, and extensive subgingival calculus.

19 per canine teeth scaled to remove plaque and calculus.

20 percentage of sites with only supragingival calculus.

21 gival calculus with or without supragingival calculus.

22 m diode laser was able to detect subgingival calculus.

23 on to be a useful tool to detect subgingival calculus.

24 mage enhancements in the detection of dental calculus.

25 to navigate a more complicated public health calculus.

26 gingival bleeding index, and the presence of calculus.

27 require basic college-level probability and calculus.

28 4.0 mm; P <0.01), and more sites with dental calculus (18.2 versus 6.4; P <0.001) than controls.

29 of the root surfaces in group 1 had residual calculus, 38.0% in group 2, and 61.0% in group 3.

30 This paper introduces the Beacon Calculus, a process algebra designed to simplify the tas

31 erse and implicit function theorems in scale calculus-a generalization of multivariable calculus to i

32 xhibiting bleeding on probing, or plaque and calculus accumulation between HIV- and HIV+ subjects.

33 t level, bleeding on probing, and plaque and calculus accumulation.

34 n the teeth to locate supra- and subgingival calculus after extraction.

35 that showed no attachment to the subgingival calculus also had no cells attached to the adjacent ceme

36 e 2 diabetes had more supra- and subgingival calculus, an increased extent and severity of periodonta

37 ctors and effect modification by subgingival calculus and age.

38 Sites with subgingival calculus and bleeding on probing demonstrated more LCAL

39 icant effect on cLCAL/cPD, while subgingival calculus and bleeding on probing were negatively associa

40 ed with a high level of supragingival dental calculus and cigarette smoking.

41 ngival calculus and the extent of teeth with calculus and gingival bleeding.

42 med in order to assess dental plaque, dental calculus and gingival inflammation.

43 % of interproximal root surface covered with calculus and increasing size of deposits were associated

44 = 339) and young adults (n = 720) and dental calculus and periodontal probing depth among young adult

45 Each calculus and phlebolith along the course of the ureter w

46 Thus, elementary calculus and phylogenetics can be integrated into a pert

47 xis, which includes removal of supragingival calculus and plaque, has been shown to arrest the progre

48 n on sociodemographics, periodontal therapy, calculus and plaque, number of remaining teeth, smoking,

49 a we assessed indicators of diet from DNA in calculus and suggest exercising caution when making asse

50 inal helical CT showed findings positive for calculus and suggestive of obstruction.

51 urea metabolism may promote the formation of calculus and that ammonia release from urea could exacer

52 of all root surfaces had detectable residual calculus and that the mean percentage of residual calcul

53 This material has not been verified as calculus and the ability of a chelating agent to remove

54 relationship between the presence of dental calculus and the extent of gingival bleeding and attachm

55 th age, as did the prevalence of subgingival calculus and the extent of teeth with calculus and gingi

56 x vivo study is to verify if the material is calculus and to determine if calculus is removed with a

57 te, characterization of ancient oral (dental calculus) and gut (coprolite) microbiota has been primar

58 mens of Neanderthal calcified dental plaque (calculus) and the characterization of regional differenc

59 es; periodontal status (bleeding on probing, calculus, and attachment loss); and OHRQoL/oral health i

60 y higher levels of bleeding on probing, root calculus, and dental plaque than adolescents without sub

61 illed Surfaces Index, gingival inflammation, calculus, and destructive periodontal disease measures.

62 The presence of gingival inflammation, calculus, and infectious dental diseases did not signifi

63 probing (BOP), visible plaque, supragingival calculus, and mean tooth loss.

64 al recession, gingival bleeding, subgingival calculus, and more teeth with total calculus than female

65 l procedures includes the removal of plaque, calculus, and perhaps contaminated cementum and dentin.

66 eding on probing, visible plaque index, root calculus, and probing depth, smoking by pack-years, peri

67 by changes in gingival inflammation, plaque, calculus, and stain, while changes in clinical attachmen

68 sites with gingival bleeding and subgingival calculus, and the lowest percentage of sites with only s

69 on have gingival bleeding; 97.1 million have calculus; and 58.3 million have subgingival calculus; an

70 ported no need for cleaning who did not have calculus; and NPV(Gum): proportion who self-reported no

71 self-reported the need for cleaning who had calculus; and PPV(Gum): proportion who self-reported the

72 calculus; and 58.3 million have subgingival calculus; and the corresponding percentages are 22.5%, 5

73 difficulties of the conventional variational-calculus approach prevents the numerical calculation inv

74 ith moderate to severe calculus had areas of calculus ( approximately 5 x 5 mm) delineated with small

75 periodontal defects, small areas resembling calculus are detected remaining on root surfaces followi

76 Small areas of calculus are reduced or eliminated with a chelating agen

77 Each calculus area was treated under 2.5x magnification to th

78 There was 2.14% (P < 0.001) more residual calculus at control versus test sites.

79 l, there was 1.16% (P = 0.097) less residual calculus at test versus control sites.

80 perinephric edema at CT and a nonobstructing calculus at urography, 21 had limited edema at CT and lo

81 stically significant differences in residual calculus between groups at deeper probing depths or at s

82 ogy and elemental composition of subgingival calculus between Indo-Pakistani and Caucasian patient gr

83 cit model specification, including the kappa-calculus, BioNetGen, the Allosteric Network Compiler, an

84 ight mandibular quadrants were evaluated for calculus, bleeding on probing (BOP) and loss of gingival

85 9 to 0.75 combining proportion of teeth with calculus, bleeding, or pocket with income; number of los

86 e use of US for detecting the full extent of calculus burden was evaluated in patients with multiple

87 Current male smokers had more teeth with calculus, but the differences in plaque, tooth mobility,

88 Historic calcified dental plaque (dental calculus) can provide a unique perspective into the heal

89 nal hemorrhage, renal failure, urinary tract calculus, chronic ulcer of skin, and back problems.

90 Plaque (PI), calculus (CI), gingival (GI), and bleeding on probing (B

91 lculus removal is associated with up to >90% calculus clearance rates.

92 resulted in a greater reduction of residual calculus compared to SRP alone in multirooted teeth.

93 ing (SRP) resulted in a decrease in residual calculus compared to SRP alone.

94 eding upon probing, or extent of subgingival calculus comparing subjects assigned to protocol therapy

95 median of 89% (range, 10%-100%) of the total calculus composition.

96 There is evidence that supragingival calculus contains unmineralized channels and lacunae.

97 , and rebalancing the underlying risk/reward calculus could help keep companies engaged in making CNS

98 ries, together with high incidence of dental calculus, could be attributed to elevated oral mucosal p

99 The amount of cell attachment to calculus-covered root surfaces was quantitatively compar

100 le, were derived with adjustment for plaque, calculus, crown coverage, age, income, education, marita

101 und within cavities/lacunae in supragingival calculus cryosections.

102 Subgingival calculus demonstrated differences in morphology between

103 The surface area of calculus deposit was determined as a percentage of the t

104 1% methylene blue, the largest interproximal calculus deposit was scored, and photographs of each int

105 e free gingiva and the attached gingiva, the calculus deposition over tooth surfaces, and the subging

106 of calculus on the root surface and size of calculus deposits increased, sensitivity of detection al

107 ute hand scaling to remove easily accessible calculus deposits.

108 laser may be used as an additional tool for calculus detection in non-surgical periodontal therapy.

109 l field theories is combined with the formal calculus developed in Frenkel, Lepowsky, and Meurman's w

110 ontal surgery, age, gender, smoking, plaque, calculus, diabetes, and antidepressant medication were n

111 a case of a vesicourachal diverticulum with calculus diagnosed by multidetector computed tomography

112 Calculus diameter ranged from 0.14 to 1.32 cm (mean, 0.3

113 Currently, the volume of calculus disease can be better quantified and somewhat q

114 gh the incidence of kidneys lost to staghorn calculus disease has decreased considerably, stone disea

115 the maximally attenuating voxel within each calculus during measurement.

116 We construct counterexamples to classical calculus facts such as the inverse and implicit function

117 0 Caucasian teeth had sufficient subgingival calculus for analysis.

118 lly significant differences between residual calculus for test and control teeth at shallower probing

119 ide on this process, the mechanism of dental calculus formation and prevention, and the mechanism of

120 betes was associated with significantly more calculus formation and tooth loss and an increased exten

121 inflammation, (c) caries status, (d) dental calculus formation, (e) oral mucosal pH, and (f) salivar

122 the role of oral ureolysis in dental caries, calculus formation, and periodontal diseases.

123 eptible to bacterial plaque accumulation and calculus formation, and thus at risk of developing peri-

124 ctor promoting crystal adhesion and favoring calculus formation.

125 lculus remains on root surfaces judged to be calculus free using surgical loupes for visualization.

126 sing teeth, full crown coverage, presence of calculus, frequency of dental visits, and dental examine

127 nd a specificity of 92% for distinguishing a calculus from a phlebolith.

128 We then apply this method to human dental calculus from Greenland's medieval Norse colonies, and r

129 ctoglobulin (BLG), preserved in human dental calculus from the Bronze Age (ca. 3000 BCE) to the prese

130 Dental calculus, gingival bleeding, and gingival recession are

131 nstrated more LCAL and PD, and supragingival calculus had an apparently protective effect.

132 xtracted human teeth with moderate to severe calculus had areas of calculus ( approximately 5 x 5 mm)

133 trast to the outcomes LCAL/PD, supragingival calculus had no significant protective effect on cLCAL/c

134 Supragingival calculus harvested from patients with moderate to severe

135 d the ability of a chelating agent to remove calculus has not been proven.

136 gular intervals to detect complications like calculus, hydronephrosis, etc.

137 evalence of gingival inflammation and dental calculus in adolescents with early-onset periodontitis a

138 s property, in which case numerical operator calculus in higher dimensions becomes feasible.

139 equires an appreciation of growers' decision calculus in managing disease problems and, more broadly,

140 h more efficient than HAND or US in removing calculus in moderate-deep probing depths on single-roote

141 InGaAsP diode laser in detecting subgingival calculus in patients with periodontal disease compared w

142 a function of the low amount of root surface calculus in the experimental sample.

143 val recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus in United States adults, using data collected i

144 Detection threshold size for each type of calculus increased up to 1.17-fold at lower kilovolt set

145 tion of malrotation of the renal pelvis with calculus increases the risk of hematuria and/or hydronep

146 Mean calculus index (CI) scores were lower for the PB at 3 (P

147 laque index (PI); 3) gingival index (GI); 4) calculus index (CI); 5) caries index (DMFS); and 6) pres

148 All the teeth were scored by the calculus index of the periodontal disease index.

149 depth, attachment loss, bleeding on probing, calculus index, and furcation involvement were evaluated

150 cators included the gingival bleeding index, calculus index, and periodontal disease status (defined

151 gival index, probing depth, attachment loss, calculus index, plaque index, and microbial colonization

152 With the exception of the calculus indices and the incidence of cervical restorati

153 of treatment needs (CPITN) probe, debris and calculus indices were recorded per participant.

154 ment was measured by percentage of remaining calculus, instrument efficiency, modified instrument eff

155 Scale calculus is a corner stone of polyfold theory, which was

156 ave so far focused on ancient humans, dental calculus is known to form in a wide range of animals, po

157 the material is calculus and to determine if calculus is removed with a chelating agent.

158 alized, severe periodontitis with plaque and calculus-laden pockets.

159 ever, no significant improvement in residual calculus levels was noted with greater experience.

160 y greater for older patients whereas BOP and calculus levels were relatively constant across age cate

161 t, since incomplete removal of supragingival calculus may expose these reservoirs of possible pathoge

162 a notch in the root at the apical extent of calculus; mechanical root planing; conditioning with cit

163 integrated with previously published dental calculus microbiome data.

164 Age, calculus, NIDDM status, time to follow-up examination, a

165 ion of the region coronal to the base of the calculus notch showed evidence of regeneration (new ceme

166 roportion of teeth with pocket, bleeding, or calculus; number of DMFT; toothbrushing frequency; blood

167 odel of the brain which we call the Assembly Calculus, occupying a level of detail intermediate betwe

168 ve a data-based core, which can be used as a calculus of evidence.

169 xamination of starch grains preserved in the calculus of human teeth from these sites that provides d

170 remains and proteins preserved in the dental calculus of individuals who lived during the second mill

171 sis of the starch record entrapped in dental calculus of Mesolithic human teeth at the site of Vlasac

172 iths and starch grains recovered from dental calculus of Neanderthal skeletons from Shanidar Cave, Ir

173 In addition, the proposed calculus of revenge is less sensitive to absolute magnit

174 rticularly high, as it was determined by the calculus of the hypothalamus quotient, suggesting that t

175 Methods from the geometric calculus of variations are useful for studying a number

176 e most efficient channel cross section using calculus of variations for the given flow area at the mi

177 g: (1) analysis of phase space geometry, (2) calculus of variations, and (3) analysis of responses to

178 The construction uses Kuperberg's calculus of webs on marked surfaces with boundary.

179 ingival fibroblast attachment to subgingival calculus on contaminated root surfaces.

180 nician's ability to identify the presence of calculus on digital radiographs.

181 Extracted teeth (n = 22) with heavy calculus on root surfaces were selected.

182 was classified as a phlebolith or a ureteral calculus on the basis of clinical and imaging findings a

183 As area of calculus on the root surface and size of calculus deposi

184 The residual calculus on the root surface of each tooth was measured

185 ts and percents of the surfaces covered with calculus on the scaled and unscaled teeth.

186 d t tests showed that mean percent remaining calculus on treated versus control surfaces was HAND 4.6

187 tes with gingival bleeding and supragingival calculus only and subgingival calculus with or without s

188 of human gingival fibroblasts to subgingival calculus or contaminated root surfaces.

189 bleeding (OR = 1.99; 95% CI: 0.21 to 18.94), calculus (OR = 2.05; 95% CI: 0.91 to 4.61), and plaque (

190 or =10% versus <10% sites with supragingival calculus (OR = 3.6).

191 Dental calculus, or mineralized plaque, represents a record of

192 anical bowel obstruction caused by a biliary calculus originating from a bilioenteric fistula.

193 original images in identifying radiographic calculus (P > 0.05).

194 ngival bleeding (P <0.05), and supragingival calculus (P <0.0001) than normal subjects.

195 ined for individual calculi and at least one calculus per examination.

196 The mean calculus per root surface for groups 1, 2, and 3 was 3.0

197 lus and that the mean percentage of residual calculus per root surface was 4.41% following root plani

198 rectly datable and nearly ubiquitous, dental calculus permits the simultaneous investigation of patho

199 al attachment loss (CAL), pocket depth (PD), calculus, plaque, and bleeding.

200 Calculus, pocket, or bleeding presence at age 24 years s

201 ed the presence of the prevalent conditions (calculus/pockets > or = 3 mm).

202 lysis was used to determine percent residual calculus present in a masked fashion.

203 ant, photographed at 10X, and the percent of calculus present in the area of the pocket or on a compa

204 Subgingival calculus present on the 22 teeth was classified into six

205 Calcified dental plaque (dental calculus) preserves for millennia and entraps biomolecul

206 Calculus prevalence = 85%: corresponding PPV(Clean) = 88

207 arginal bleeding index, supragingival dental calculus, probing depth (PD), clinical attachment level

208 gival plaque, gingival bleeding, subgingival calculus, probing depth, clinical attachment level (CAL)

209 work science, control theory, and fractional calculus provide us with mathematical tools necessary fo

210 t utilizes the language of Region Connection Calculus (RCC-5) to produce consistent alignments of nod

211 e analyse ancient proteins from human dental calculus recovered from geographically diverse locations

212 ely provides clinical benefits in plaque and calculus reduction over a manual brush even in subjects

213 ence in some domains of mathematics, such as calculus, relies on symbolic representations that are un

214 Calculus remained on the roots surfaces after they were

215 he results of this study showed that percent calculus remaining was <5% with all the instruments give

216 There were no differences in percent calculus remaining, surface roughness, or time spent amo

217 Calculus remains on root surfaces judged to be calculus

218 Several studies have found incomplete calculus removal during periodontal treatment with tradi

219 istically significant overall improvement in calculus removal during SRP, which was most evident in d

220 The results demonstrated effective calculus removal in all treatment groups with no differe

221 These results indicate that subgingival calculus removal in deep pockets is enhanced with short-

222 l SRP provided no significant improvement in calculus removal in multirooted molar teeth.

223 Efficient calculus removal is a primary goal in periodontal therap

224 Endoscopic renal calculus removal is associated with up to >90% calculus

225 The mean time required for clinical calculus removal was 29.7 seconds for DIs, 91.9 seconds

226 In vitro calculus removal was faster with DIs, followed by HIs an

227 d the speed and effectiveness of subgingival calculus removal with new diamond-coated ultrasonic tips

228 or the total amount of calculus removed, the calculus removed from individual surfaces, and the calcu

229 us removed from individual surfaces, and the calculus removed from various probing depth levels.

230 r results were found for the total amount of calculus removed, the calculus removed from individual s

231 DNA preserved within dental calculus represents a notable source of information abou

232 s between bone density, CAL, and subgingival calculus require further research, particularly in longi

233 ticle and proteomic analysis of human dental calculus samples (n = 42) from victims of the famine.

234 al microbiome from the well-preserved dental calculus samples of four human individuals who lived dur

235 ng to examine oral microbiota from 19 dental calculus samples recovered from wild chimpanzees (Pan tr

236 Similar results were obtained from whole calculus samples using CLSM.

237 ults of this study do not support the use of calculus scaling gel as an adjunct to root instrumentati

238 The effect of a calculus scaling gel was evaluated as an adjunct to inst

239 n gingival index (P=0.0001), and higher mean calculus score (P=0.003) were found in the transplanted

240 s < or =6 mm was significantly less residual calculus seen in roots treated with endoscopy (P = 0.020

241 urolithiasis in patients with an obstructing calculus), sensitivities of US and CT increased to 92% a

242 Calculus size based on US and CT measurements was concor

243 bacteria may be present within supragingival calculus, specifically within the internal channels and

244 ial profiles observed in four ancient dental calculus specimens previously analyzed by amplicon seque

245 Renal calculus (tau = 98.7%; kappa = 0.97) and obstructive upp

246 oth surfaces formerly covered by subgingival calculus than all other groups (P <0.001).

247 surfaces, test roots had 2.63% less residual calculus than control roots (P = 0.003), whereas test ro

248 hereas test roots had slightly more residual calculus than controls at buccal/lingual surfaces (0.36%

249 gingival calculus, and more teeth with total calculus than females.

250 antly more gingival bleeding and subgingival calculus than the controls.

251 ion over tooth surfaces, and the subgingival calculus that enables the enlargement of the gingival su

252 he detection threshold size (ie, the size of calculus that had a 50% probability of being detected) r

253 a maximum-entropy path-integral variational calculus ("the principle of least exertion", entirely co

254 ning (SRP) in patients free of supragingival calculus, the chip was placed in target sites with PD 5

255 ots were notched at the apical extent of the calculus, the osseous defects were thoroughly debrided,

256 oking, race, education, body mass index, and calculus, there was no association between number of tee

257 Among women without subgingival calculus, there were consistent inverse associations bet

258 Among women with subgingival calculus, there were no associations between systemic BM

259 The application of differential calculus to a model of oxygen physiology of patients wit

260 ret that information through a sophisticated calculus to achieve optimum responses to any nutritional

261 lem, using this knowledge with probabilistic calculus to combine multiple lines of evidence, and mini

262 Finally, we formulate a calculus to compute on distributions that is complete fo

263 o with only a 655-nm diode laser that causes calculus to fluoresce.

264 e calculus-a generalization of multivariable calculus to infinite-dimensional vector spaces, in which

265 microbial and dietary information of dental calculus to reconstruct oral microbiomes and lifestyle o

266 p-based harmonic analysis (e.g., convolution calculus) to deal with problems concerning the truncated

267 d at mucous membranes followed by removal of calculus using curets (full-mouth GPAP) or scaling and r

268 With 3D spiral CT, calculus volumes were determined with a mean error of -4

269 Overall, the mean percentage of residual calculus was 6.3% for DIs, 5.4% for PIs, and 3.1% for HI

270 Presence or absence of subgingival calculus was a strong effect modifier.

271 entage of the marked root surface containing calculus was calculated.

272 Radiographic presence of calculus was determined by two examiners.

273 The percentage of residual calculus was determined via stereomicroscopy and digital

274 Supramarginal on submarginal calculus was found only in the Indo-Pakistani group.

275 More residual calculus was found with the DIs; however, the 1% to 3% d

276 at the buccal than mesial surfaces, whereas calculus was most often present at the mesial than bucca

277 The percentage of sites with supragingival calculus was not different between the groups, but varie

278 Subgingival calculus was present in 67% of the population.

279 The presence of calculus was recorded for each evaluated site.

280 Remaining calculus was reduced after burnishing for 30 seconds wit

281 A 5-mm(2) area containing calculus was scribed on each root.

282 The Mueller calculus was used to model the polarization optics of SL

283 The marked areas were root planed until no calculus was visible with 3.5x surgical loupes.

284 ucoperiostal flap was performed, subgingival calculus was visualized, and photographic images were ta

285 Subgingival calculus was zoned: coronal, mid, and apical.

286 ximal surfaces, mean differences in residual calculus were 1.30% (P <0.015) and 2.93% (P < 0.001), re

287 val recession, gingival bleeding, and dental calculus were assessed at the mesio-buccal and mid-bucca

288 al area treated and the area of the residual calculus were calculated using an imaging analysis progr

289 cession level, periodontal pocket depth, and calculus were made by dental examiners.

290 lap in each quadrant, subgingival plaque and calculus were removed.

291 Socioeconomic status, smoking, and dental calculus were significant risk indicators of aggressive

292 arette smoking and presence of supragingival calculus were the factors most significantly associated

293 In experiment 2, teeth with subgingival calculus were treated with DHV, VC, scaling and root pla

294 In experiment 1, teeth with subgingival calculus were treated with either doxcycycline hyclate i

295 bing) and oral hygiene effectiveness (dental calculus) were evaluated by calibrated dentists through

296 and extent of gingival recession and dental calculus, whereas Mexican Americans had the highest prev

297 in a form allowing analysis by differential calculus, which allows broader conclusions to be drawn t

298 These are clinically termed microislands of calculus, which are removed by the use of a chelating ag

299 supragingival calculus only and subgingival calculus with or without supragingival calculus.

300 probability to correctly detect subgingival calculus with the laser (accuracy) was 0.82 (CI(0.025) 0