コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)
通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 ember 2020 to February 2022 were assessed by capsule endoscopy.
2 cused on the use of small-bowel CE and colon capsule endoscopy.
3 cular lesions, of whom 11 agreed to a second capsule endoscopy.
4 a second-look endoscopy before proceeding to capsule endoscopy.
5 iew the clinical applications of small bowel capsule endoscopy.
6 n recognized as a risk factor for incomplete capsule endoscopy.
7 ceptional future developments of small bowel capsule endoscopy.
8 suggestive of lymphoma were identified with capsule endoscopy.
9 or gastrointestinal bleeding during wireless capsule endoscopy.
10 asses was significantly greater than that of capsule endoscopy.
11 ularly in patients with negative findings at capsule endoscopy.
12 rrectly identify three lesions undetected at capsule endoscopy.
13 s, such as colonoscopy; upper endoscopy; and capsule endoscopy.
14 raphy was significantly greater than that of capsule endoscopy (88% [14 of 16 patients] vs 38% [six o
19 n this review, we will address the question 'capsule endoscopy and balloon-assisted endoscopy: compet
20 E ADVICE 5: Perform small bowel imaging with capsule endoscopy and computed tomography or magnetic re
23 nteroclysis compares favorably with wireless capsule endoscopy and double-balloon endoscopy in the di
24 77.4 [7.1] years; 18 [75.0%] male) underwent capsule endoscopy, and vascular lesions were present in
26 single-centre study, 900 patients underwent capsule endoscopy between 2002 and 2015 for different in
28 ata expand previous findings confirming that capsule endoscopy can be performed safely even in very o
33 ctive analysis of the efficacy and safety of capsule endoscopy (CE) in patients aged over 80 years.
48 study primarily evaluated demographic data, capsule endoscopy findings, and mucosal visualization.
50 Multiple studies have shown the potential of capsule endoscopy for identification of the bleeding sou
51 n diagnosis and treatment include the use of capsule endoscopy for screening and the minimally invasi
52 dy analyzed data from patients who underwent capsule endoscopy for suspected small bowel bleeding at
62 g accounted for 62.1% of all indications for capsule endoscopy in group B, compared to 95.2% in group
66 sts, blinded to clinical data and results of capsule endoscopy, interpreted images from CT enterograp
68 CD8 T cells, interleukin-2, symptoms, video capsule endoscopy, intraepithelial leukocytes, and tissu
72 ant diagnostic challenge for clinicians, and capsule endoscopy is currently considered the investigat
75 f prospective studies have demonstrated that capsule endoscopy is the most sensitive imaging modality
76 CE 5: Routine small bowel investigation (ie, capsule endoscopy) is not advised in patients with spora
77 6 % vs. 1 %; p = 0.075), while the option of capsule endoscopy led to a fourfold increase of screenin
81 ificant improvement in diagnostic yield with capsule endoscopy may not translate into improved outcom
83 the reference standard; the results of video-capsule endoscopy (n = 36) and clinical follow-up (n = 5
85 'diagnostic yields' for Crohn's disease from capsule endoscopy of over 70% in patients with negative,
86 Despite a lag in its use in paediatrics, capsule endoscopy offers an accurate and effective means
87 d push enteroscopy were randomly assigned to capsule endoscopy or dedicated small bowel contrast radi
92 of orally administered erythromycin prior to capsule endoscopy results in a higher completion rate co
93 ns and diagnostic yield of small-bowel video capsule endoscopy (SB-VCE) are communicated in recent cl
104 excluding known risk factors for incomplete capsule endoscopy such as hospitalization and previous a
106 linical indications and practical aspects of capsule endoscopy that are of interest to the paediatric
107 nts have also passed the way for small bowel capsule endoscopy to become a therapeutic instrument.
110 omarker assessment every 3 months, and video capsule endoscopy (VCE) at baseline and every 6 months f
113 A series of studies have shown that video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is superior to barium radiograph
116 evaluation with MR enterography (MRE), video capsule endoscopy (VCE), CRP, fecal calprotectin and CDA
121 zed implantable (SDCPI) antenna for wireless capsule endoscopy (WCE) application having two separate
123 ve jejunitis in celiac disease, diagnosed by capsule endoscopy, which was not associated with refract
124 omplementary technologies?' RECENT FINDINGS: Capsule endoscopy will effect clinical management in abo
125 ulose double-contrast barium enteroclysis to capsule endoscopy with review of the literature has show