ライフサイエンスコーパス: carbon footprint

1 concrete to alleviate its energy impact and carbon footprint.

2 8 min, implying a corresponding reduction in carbon footprint.

3 -liquid-(solid) reactors with lower cost and carbon footprint.

4 le, supplied continuously, and has a minimal carbon footprint.

5 s contributes significantly to health care's carbon footprint.

6 roaches to ammonia production and reduce its carbon footprint.

7 n electrochemical cells, resulting in a high carbon footprint.

8 fuels, and to pave the way towards reducing carbon footprint.

9 dly trained, leading to a considerably lower carbon footprint.

10 e of resource use efficiencies and increased carbon footprint.

11 as they produce abundant protein with a low carbon footprint.

12 ness, intervention carbon footprint, and SSI carbon footprint.

13 ntion carbon footprint, highest possible SSI carbon footprint.

14 providing high-quality freshwater with a low carbon footprint.

15 the transportation sector reduces its global carbon footprint.

16 chemical production on-demand and with zero carbon footprint.

17 ethod for chemical production with a reduced carbon footprint.

18 ntervention carbon footprint, and lowest SSI carbon footprint.

19 implications in reducing health care-related carbon footprint.

20 waste materials can help reduce the overall carbon footprint.

21 et the nutritional requirements and minimize carbon footprint.

22 have more technologies that can help reduce carbon footprint.

23 gy's supposedly large energy consumption and carbon footprint.

24 d its use can offset a wastewater facility's carbon footprint.

25 plished cleanly in all respects and with low carbon footprint.

26 environmental impact, and in particular, its carbon footprint.

27 es with a higher energy efficiency and lower carbon footprint.

28 health impacts, health care must address its carbon footprint.

29 risk and similar nitrogen use efficiency and carbon footprint.

30 viding sustainable wireless links with a low carbon footprint.

31 h is a significant contributor to the global carbon footprint.

32 ower plants seem to effectively reduce their carbon footprints.

33 r thermal or electrothermal methods with low carbon footprints.

34 to identify and close the gaps in corporate carbon footprints.

35 talytic conversions that minimize energy and carbon footprints.

36 etal pressure on companies to disclose their carbon footprints.

37 NHANES were also correlated to these dietary carbon footprints.

38 , renewable process which reduces subsequent carbon footprints.

39 ds (0.153 kWh); and also achieved a negative carbon footprint (72.6 g CO2).

40 ently associated with a lower wound-specific carbon footprint across all countries.

41 was associated with a reduced wound-specific carbon footprint across all country income settings.

42 However, we found substantial variation in carbon footprints across facilities, treatments, and emi

43 individual life cycle stages, as standard in carbon footprinting analysis.

44 ment in price is associated with 21 g higher carbon footprint and 5 L higher water footprint per 100

45 in freshwater production due to its minimal carbon footprint and adaptability to diverse water sourc

46 Parallelly, the carbon footprint and biocapacity of the landfill were ca

47 Plant-based diets had a 63%-81% lower carbon footprint and biodiversity loss (~98%).

48 obal greenhouse gas emissions, to reduce its carbon footprint and build resiliency.

49 brid conferences have the potential to slash carbon footprint and energy use by two-thirds.

50 cling LIBs after their electric vehicle use, carbon footprint and energy use of LIBs recycled after t

51 nd manufacturing in North America reduce the carbon footprint and freshwater toxicity of the NMC811 C

52 a dataset of 244 purchases, their estimated carbon footprint and information on the contextual, dist

53 ide (CORR) is promising to reduce the global carbon footprint and obtain high-value products.

54 ecarbonize plastic production given its high carbon footprint and rapid growth in demand.

55 For some crops a trade-off between the carbon footprint and the induced water stress is observe

56 ogy can potentially be applied to reduce the carbon footprint and to save the organic carbon consumpt

57 of respondents were keen to reduce their own carbon footprint and were willing to explore alternative

58 h energy efficiency, low capital cost, small carbon footprint, and continuous operation mode.

59 indicators were considered: embodied energy, carbon footprint, and eutrophication potential.

60 rvention effectiveness, highest intervention carbon footprint, and lowest SSI carbon footprint.

61 ns in protective gown use, associated costs, carbon footprint, and plastic waste generation with no a

62 rs: intervention effectiveness, intervention carbon footprint, and SSI carbon footprint.

63 ing from home can reduce up to 58% of work's carbon footprint, and the impacts of IT usage are neglig

64 nmental pressures (greenhouse gas emissions: carbon footprint; appropriation of biologically producti

65 ive cooling and evaporative cooling with low carbon footprint are regarded as promising passive cooli

66 O(2) equivalent units, the currency in which carbon footprints are expressed.

67 nd households to reduce grocery supply chain carbon footprints are identified and discussed.

68 g in more accessible software with a reduced carbon footprint, as compared to previous approaches.

69 s disclosure, the low resolution of existing carbon footprint assessment does not account for the com

70 Carbon footprint assessment of retail is necessary to op

71 In LMICs, the difference in carbon footprints between the intervention and control g

72 s takes place by not only reducing their own carbon footprint but also by educating future leaders an

73 restaurant meal selections and reduce their carbon footprint, but this potential remains largely unt

74 d to reduce the uncertainty in natural gas's carbon footprint, but understanding system-level climate

75 eam EV battery manufacturing will reduce the carbon footprint by 15% and energy use by 5 to 7%.

76 a system of 20 solutions could cut Georgia's carbon footprint by 35% in 2030 relative to a business-a

77 al conferencing can substantially reduce the carbon footprint by 94% and energy use by 90%.

78 among the top 23.7% emitters reduces global carbon footprints by 10.4 gigatons CO(2)e.

79 Average per-patient wound-specific carbon footprint, calculated as the sum of the carbon fo

80 emolition scenarios whose lifecycle cost and carbon footprint can be quantified and optimized simulta

81 Bioelectrodes with low carbon footprint can provide an innovative solution to t

82 , commonly referred to with the popular term carbon footprints (CFP), are a widely used metric of cli

83 iet recall data to obtain insights into food carbon footprints (CFs) may neglect the diverse food pur

84 hat meet nutritional requirements with lower carbon footprints compared to more restrictive dietary s

85 ength of stay was a large contributor to the carbon footprint, comprising ~27% of OR-TAVR, 25% of CAT

86 nt environmental, health, energy, water, and carbon-footprint consequences.

87 Carbon footprints constituted 28.01-99.98% of total EF,

88 am Adult Treatment Panel III guidelines, and carbon footprint emissions as an environmental metric us

89 tly reduced environmental impact in terms of carbon footprint emissions compared with the control gro

90 ially heterogeneous variability in water and carbon footprint estimates across attribution methods.

91 re, we evaluate the sensitivity of water and carbon footprints estimates among seven commonly used me

92 With this alarming carbon footprint, food protein waste not only contribute

93 ative route to ethene which could reduce the carbon footprint for its production, however, the commer

94 Total life cycle carbon footprint for OR-TAVR, CATH-TAVR, and SAVR was 28

95 Life cycle analysis confirmed a negative carbon footprint for the products.

96 ly overestimated or underestimated water and carbon footprints for every city.

97 teel mill off-gases depends on electricity's carbon footprint: For the current electricity grid mix,

98 rotein waste is anticipated to transform its carbon footprint from positive to negative and, more gen

99 Total carbon footprint from SAVR (n = 10) and TAVR (n = 10 OR-

100 rce of CO2, dedicated wells, has the largest carbon footprint further confounding prospects for ratio

101 These features incur a considerable carbon footprint, generate substantial waste, and can in

102 reenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and reduce the carbon footprint generated by animal production.

103 ge, many promising technologies with minimum carbon footprint have been proposed.

104 s that were used to derive average household carbon footprints (HCF) for U.S. zip codes, cities, coun

105 effectiveness, lowest possible intervention carbon footprint, highest possible SSI carbon footprint.

106 The carbon footprint hotspots in China identified are the ke

107 rce recovery in terms of embodied energy and carbon footprint; however, the community scale was shown

108 next to entrees and appetizers with a lower carbon footprint (ie, below the median of 1.625 kg of ca

109 ocally is only a good strategy to reduce the carbon footprint if no greenhouse heating with fossil fu

110 This research investigates carbon footprint impacts for full fleet electrification

111 vides a spatially explicit mapping of global carbon footprint in China-the world's largest CO(2) emit

112 1% of the land area holds 75% of the global carbon footprint in China.

113 It is thus critical to quantify carbon footprint in order to identify better alternative

114 ed for battery cell design targeting reduced carbon footprints in manufacturing.

115 cities ( approximately 40 tCO2e) and higher carbon footprints in outlying suburbs ( approximately 50

116 owever, existing research rarely goes beyond carbon footprints in quantifying the effects of such a s

117 are accounted for the largest portion of the carbon footprint, including ~170 kg CO2e for OR-TAVR (55

118 ve than prevalent existing strategies (e.g., carbon footprint information).

119 different types of foods despite exposure to carbon footprint information.

120 ons, even after accounting for the increased carbon footprint involved in their manufacture and dispo

121 In such situations, carbon footprint is a poor representative of the environ

122 A carbon footprint is the sum of greenhouse gas emissions

123 However, estimating carbon footprints is a complex task, given the diversity

124 ribution to global greenhouse gas emissions (carbon footprint) is considerably higher than traditiona

125 cing hospital footfall and possibly reducing carbon footprint) is likely to be one of the important c

126 the impact of two behavioral interventions, carbon footprint labeling, and product categorization, t

127 llected from 2,359 US participants show that carbon footprint labels increased the selection of plant

128 Environmental indicators (carbon footprint, land use, water footprint, and biodive

129 mass is a potential source of renewable, low-carbon-footprint liquid fuels.

130 a new food source solution, due to their low carbon footprint, low reliance on land, water and season

131 addressing complex challenges like reducing carbon footprint, lowering energy cost, and making indus

132 A model for carbon footprints, measured in kilograms of CO2 equivale

133 ent Goals by reducing chemical use, lowering carbon-footprints, minimizing pollution, and enhancing s

134 x operations through a cradle-to-retail gate carbon footprinting model and by capturing variability i

135 ased on the dynamic energy cost function and carbon footprint models, LTCM is expected to save 44.9%

136 The US military's eye-watering carbon footprint must be mitigated, argues a political s

137 the energy embedded in the microalgae with a carbon footprint of 0.74-1.67 kg of CO2/kg of microalgae

138 he Bitcoin network consumed 31.29 TWh with a carbon footprint of 17.29 MtCO(2)-eq, an estimate that i

139 Our results estimate a nuclear carbon footprint of 21.30 gCO2e/kWh, of which 89% comes

140 ntially increases the energy consumption and carbon footprint of a desalination plant.

141 S: This decision analytic model compared the carbon footprint of a glove and instrument change interv

142 First, we estimate the carbon footprint of a hypothetical nuclear facility in S

143 This review found that the carbon footprint of a single operation ranged 6-814 kg c

144 able additional reductions in the cumulative carbon footprint of about 12-24 million tons of CO(2) ov

145 een AI, which promotes focus on reducing the carbon footprint of AI, at the forefront of sustainable

146 ; $1.02) per participant, and it will have a carbon footprint of approximately 140 g CO(2) equivalent

147 ce a Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis of the carbon footprint of both shale and conventional natural

148 Lowering the carbon footprint of buildings requires the development o

149 aluates specific opportunities to reduce the carbon footprint of combined cycle gas turbine (CCGT) ge

150 nd thereby to reduce indirectly the enormous carbon footprint of concrete.

151 e change contributed 45.8-65.8% of the total carbon footprint of dairy.

152 analysis is increasingly used to assess the carbon footprint of final consumption.

153 le regional meeting locations may reduce the carbon footprint of future meetings.

154 tprint represents less than 25% of the total carbon footprint of gas, the efficiency of producing hea

155 rbon footprint, calculated as the sum of the carbon footprint of glove and instrument change and SSI.

156 n the process of estimating and modeling the carbon footprint of healthcare.

157 he magnitude and sources of variation in the carbon footprint of hemodialysis treatment, we estimated

158 rners are responsible for 36% of the current carbon footprint of households; the discourse should add

159 e is known about the association between the carbon footprint of individual self-selected diets in th

160 y cooling to heating protocols to reduce the carbon footprint of industrial furnaces.

161 The average per-capita carbon footprint of infrastructures in industrialized co

162 Despite the large carbon footprint of livestock production, animal protein

163 stimated the nutritional quality, price, and carbon footprint of major Japanese dishes and examined 1

164 impacts of Marcellus gas and U.S. coal: The carbon footprint of Marcellus gas is 53% (80% CI: 44-61%

165 The energy requirement and associated carbon footprint of microalgae harvesting reported here

166 s mitigates plastic pollution and lowers the carbon footprint of naphtha-derived aromatics.

167 nmental impact assessments that compares the carbon footprint of online and store purchases.

168 In this study, we estimate the carbon footprint of operating theatres in hospitals in t

169 ture research should focus on optimizing the carbon footprint of operating theatres through streamlin

170 ealthier items), nutrient content, and total carbon footprint of participants' entree and appetizer s

171 This study assesses the material and carbon footprint of potential OWF locations in the North

172 and socioeconomic drivers have impacted the carbon footprint of primary metals.

173 d clinical trial, menu ecolabels reduced the carbon footprint of restaurant meal selections without w

174 s expected to achieve > 90% reduction in the carbon footprint of salbutamol pMDI versus the currently

175 The carbon footprint of SAVR is about twice as high as those

176 y uses life cycle assessment to quantify the carbon footprint of setting up a reforestation plot in t

177 e, the upper bound estimate of the lifecycle carbon footprint of shale gas in China could be approxim

178 We find the mean lifecycle carbon footprint of shale gas is about 30-50% lower than

179 The point at which the higher carbon footprint of some nutrient-dense foods is offset

180 Overall, the carbon footprint of surgery in the three countries studi

181 It was possible to reduce the carbon footprint of surgery through improving energy-eff

182 evaluate existing literature calculating the carbon footprint of surgical operations, determining opp

183 on using today's energy mix could reduce the carbon footprint of the cement industry by 44% or even u

184 Hence, CO(2) mineralization could reduce the carbon footprint of the cement industry via two mechanis

185 We, therefore, analyze the carbon footprint of the combined CO(2) mineralization an

186 Here, we estimated the carbon footprint of the existing global infrastructure s

187 y of petroleum resources and diversified the carbon footprint of the global oil supply(1).

188 The large carbon footprint of the Haber-Bosch process, which provi

189 s of energy, which contribute to the overall carbon footprint of the health care system.

190 utsized contribution of surgical care to the carbon footprint of the health sector, we aim to underst

191 issions from fossil-fueled power plants, the carbon footprint of the industrial sector represents a c

192 of stake (PoS) is a step toward reducing the carbon footprint of the NFT sector.

193 lack of recycling, together with the sizable carbon footprint of the polymer industry, has led to maj

194 factors must be considered, such as the net carbon footprint of the process, the market size, locati

195 ation sites can be minimized, decreasing the carbon footprint of the treatment technology.

196 Some studies highlight the substantial carbon footprint of training and using LLMs, while other

197 There are strategies to reduce the carbon footprint of using natural gas for MHDVs, ranging

198 ion technology sector can further reduce the carbon footprint of virtual conferences.

199 t nitrogen removal can drastically lower the carbon footprint of wastewater treatment facilities by d

200 O) emissions account for the majority of the carbon footprint of wastewater treatment plants (WWTPs).

201 sing the equivalent of 14-26% of the overall carbon footprint of wastewater treatment plants.

202 trategy to reduce the energy consumption and carbon footprint of ZLD is through the use of a hybrid d

203 cal suites studied were found to have annual carbon footprints of 5 187 936 kg of CO2 equivalents (CO

204 We evaluate and make available the water and carbon footprints of electricity consumption for every c

205 Our results show that the carbon footprints of foreign regions in China are concen

206 ter use, ultimately increases the energy and carbon footprints of irrigated agriculture.

207 Measuring the value chain carbon footprints of listed companies is essential for c

208 there is an increasing trend in terms of the carbon footprints of listed companies over the period 20

209 Given the high energy and carbon footprints of LSLAs and concerns over local energ

210 In this study, we analyze the carbon footprints of the residents living in new housing

211 e results show that the most likely upstream carbon footprints of these types of natural gas producti

212 life cycle analysis framework for estimating carbon footprints of vehicles, fuels, and infrastructure

213 nalysis to quantify the costs and life-cycle carbon footprints of virgin and chemically recycled poly

214 U.S. by calculating the average "employment carbon footprint" of close-to every job in the U.S. econ

215 wer operating costs and decrease the process carbon footprint on a system-specific basis.

216 Although RCA offers a way to reduce the carbon footprint on concrete via raw resource recycling,

217 icient process, leaving very little, if any, carbon footprint or byproducts.

218 isclosure to build a database of 866 product carbon footprints (PCFs), from 145 companies, 30 industr

219 are energy-intensive and lead to significant carbon footprint penalties.

220 The results indicate that energy use and carbon footprint per cubic meter of wastewater treated,

221 y up to 39% even with electricity having the carbon footprint per MWh available in the United States

222 Mean total carbon footprint per salbutamol inhaler (based on 100-ye

223 With the pressing urgency to reduce carbon footprint, photocatalytic carbon dioxide reductio

224 utine COVID-19 care, including reductions in carbon footprint, plastic waste generation, and cost sav

225 Life-cycle assessment shows a 53% carbon footprint reduction over fossil-based methods, wh

226 or energy cost and energy consumption (e.g., carbon footprint) reduction on system performance at two

227 found that UF generated meagre food-related carbon footprint reductions (1.1-2.9% of baseline 2211 k

228 Oat has a low carbon footprint, substantial health benefits and the po

229 size, composition, and location of household carbon footprints suggest the need for tailoring of gree

230 online purchases generally generate a lower carbon footprint than store purchases, but only in the c

231 sions; P < .001; Cohen d = -0.12) with lower carbon footprints than the selections of participants in

232 ages: in particular, they can have a massive carbon footprint, they are time-consuming, and the high

233 y embodied or captured, and by exploring the carbon footprint throughout an energy-intensive activate

234 ero- or low-carbon electricity can lower the carbon footprint to make hydrogen projects qualified for

235 rgo landfill's fugitive emissions caused the carbon footprint to rise by 2130 global hectares (4460 t

236 balance and the fossil fuel-derived gaseous carbon footprint, to track carbon coming into, being add

237 virtual, and hybrid conferences and consider carbon footprint trade-offs between in-person participat

238 Reported carbon footprints varied widely across procedures and se

239 However, the carbon footprint varies greatly within the case study de

240 on footprints, yet the distribution of their carbon footprints varies significantly.

241 e to achieve faster remediation with a lower carbon footprint via pyro-catalytic treatment.

242 Approximate intraoperative carbon footprint was 100 kg CO2e for OR-TAVR, 103 kg CO2

243 ed, and 4-fold product-based increase in the carbon footprint was observed during the 20th century, d

244 environmental impact of eye care procedures (carbon footprint, waste, and energy use) and assess the

245 etals' extraction in THR leads to the lowest carbon footprint, water consumption, and toxicity.

246 The smallest carbon footprints were found in newly built outer and pe

247 Carbon footprints were independently verified by the Car

248 dependency on fossil fuels and reducing the carbon footprint while providing chemicals and fuels.

249 e potential for firms to lower their overall carbon footprints while improving customer satisfaction

250 es to reduce their food waste and associated carbon footprint whilst educating individuals about the

251 tend to have a greater volume of value chain carbon footprints, yet the distribution of their carbon