戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (1語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 nt patients (-23.9+/-4.9 bpm) (P<.001 versus cardiac transplants).
2 an increasingly important complication after cardiac transplant.
3 ilitate opioid withdrawal in children with a cardiac transplant.
4 cement, in a 33-year old woman who underwent cardiac transplant.
5  end point of death, HF hospitalization, and cardiac transplant.
6  monitoring for rejection in recipients of a cardiac transplant.
7 ndition, which compromises half of all human cardiac transplants.
8 se or contribute to coronary vasculopathy in cardiac transplants.
9 ompatibility complex-mismatched vascularized cardiac transplants.
10 tration delays rejection of fully allogeneic cardiac transplants.
11 ally induces donor-specific tolerance to rat cardiac transplants.
12 and maintaining allograft rejection in human cardiac transplants.
13 lograft recipients of islet and vascularized cardiac transplants.
14 cant percentage of sudden cardiac deaths and cardiac transplants.
15 features resemble those observed in rejected cardiac transplants.
16 l disease (GAD) in totally allogeneic murine cardiac transplants.
17 ate coronary artery constriction in men with cardiac transplants.
18  an adjunctive tool in routine monitoring of cardiac transplants.
19 stocompatibility complex class II-mismatched cardiac transplants.
20  in antibody-mediated rejection of renal and cardiac transplants.
21  tumors) into mice with fully MHC mismatched cardiac transplants.
22  to mediate rejection of alphaGal expressing cardiac transplants.
23 n liver transplant patients than in renal or cardiac transplants; (2) pravastatin is safe and efficac
24 hickening after balloon injury and in rabbit cardiac transplant allografts.
25 ver the 20-year follow-up (11%), 4 underwent cardiac transplant and 7 died (3 suddenly).
26 de ventricular support to bridge patients to cardiac transplant and may provide an improved quality o
27 tic smooth cell neoplasm occurring following cardiac transplant and the development of two sequential
28 fectious agent to screen for in pig-to-human cardiac transplants and a good model for xenozoonosis.
29 composite of cardiovascular death and urgent cardiac transplant, and secondary end point was all-caus
30 PAL FINDINGS: Specimens from 32 autopsies, 8 cardiac transplants, and an excised coronary aneurysm we
31 ischemia is associated with poor survival of cardiac transplants, and ischemic changes in early postt
32      In addition to immediate application in cardiac, transplant, and vascular surgery, the mechanism
33 ring fractional flow reserve (FFR) to assess cardiac transplant arteriopathy has not been evaluated.
34            These data suggest that the human cardiac transplant arteriopathy is associated with reduc
35                                              Cardiac transplant arteriosclerosis or cardiac allograft
36 total of 380 patients undergoing their first cardiac transplant at 24 centers in the United States, C
37 art histology for all patients who underwent cardiac transplant at our center from April 2008 to July
38   A total of 380 patients undergoing de novo cardiac transplants at 24 centers in the United States,
39 ild-type mice receiving fully MHC-mismatched cardiac transplants became tolerant and showed long-term
40  group consisted of 68 patients who received cardiac transplants between 1989 and 1996 and who were a
41 udy, we use a novel system of semiallogeneic cardiac transplants between parental donors and F1 hybri
42 in mRNA concentrations were analyzed from 38 cardiac transplant biopsies divided into 3 groups accord
43  long-term survival of vascularized skin and cardiac transplants but not conventional skin grafts.
44 gold standard in rejection surveillance post cardiac transplant, but is invasive, with risk of compli
45 years) with end-stage heart failure who were cardiac transplant candidates eligible for HeartMate imp
46 rounding the use of mechanical assistance in cardiac transplant candidates often leads to multiple bl
47                       Selection criteria for cardiac transplant candidates with diabetes mellitus (DM
48 for the retransplant cohort included overall cardiac transplant center volume, the use of a ventricul
49 d retrospectively from a single, high-volume cardiac transplant center.
50  it was limited to select and usually larger cardiac transplant centers and suffered from substantial
51              Questionnaires were sent to 130 cardiac transplant centers in the United States register
52 iac transplant recipients attending the Mayo cardiac transplant clinic in 2000 to 2001, mean of 4.7 y
53 nel was validated using an independent adult cardiac transplant cohort (n = 21 no rejection; n = 42 r
54 ts in the care of patients who have received cardiac transplants, coronary allograft vasculopathy (CA
55           Competitive template RT-PCR on the cardiac transplants demonstrated similar levels of IL-1-
56 ly consequences of tobacco smoke exposure in cardiac transplant donors and recipients with an emphasi
57 ults identified, 3 died suddenly and 1 had a cardiac transplant due to heart failure.
58                  We report on 417 orthotopic cardiac transplants during a 17-year period.
59                            Extended criteria cardiac transplant (ECCT) programs expand the transplant
60 the patients who underwent standard criteria cardiac transplant, ECCT patients were older (median, 66
61  was a sample of 82 HF patients referred for cardiac transplant evaluation at an academic medical cen
62                         Approximately 50% of cardiac transplants fail in the long term, and currently
63      At a median follow-up of 56 months from cardiac transplant, five of seven patients are alive wit
64         We developed a treatment strategy of cardiac transplant followed by ASCT.
65 lin (ATG) is used as induction therapy after cardiac transplant for enhancing immunosuppression and d
66 11 433 patients aged 18 to 45 who received a cardiac transplant from 2000 to 2017.
67 rans of CD4(+) T cells in vivo, we performed cardiac transplants from B7-1/B7-2-deficient mice to rec
68      We performed heterotopic MHC class I/II cardiac transplants from BALB/c mice into C57BL/6 mice.
69  systemic inflammation, would correlate with cardiac transplant graft survival.
70              Changes in the RSN rate of both cardiac transplant groups (early, -13.0+/-4.0 bpm; late,
71  baroreflex gains for the DSN and RSN in the cardiac transplant groups were compared with those of th
72 gulated in graft-infiltrating lymphocytes in cardiac-transplanted humans and mice.
73 ay significant roles in the armamentarium of cardiac transplant immunosuppression.
74 tients, partial resection in 21 (23.6%), and cardiac transplant in 4 (4.5%).
75                            First, we studied cardiac transplants in fully MHC-mismatched mice that we
76  inhibition induces accommodation of hamster cardiac transplants in nude rats.
77                        Long term survival of cardiac transplants in rats treated with the tolerizing
78 erformed vascularized heterotopic allogeneic cardiac transplants in TNF-R1-deficient (TNF-R1(-/-)) an
79              We performed heterotopic murine cardiac transplants in total allogeneic or major histoco
80  data were extended by performing allogeneic cardiac transplants into ICAM or LFA recipients treated
81                      In contrast, allogeneic cardiac transplants into IL-6-deficient recipients do no
82        We now recognize that early injury of cardiac transplants involves a newly described form of p
83                                              Cardiac transplant is hindered by donor shortage and pre
84 nts with left ventricular assist devices and cardiac transplant is uncertain.
85 megalovirus (CMV) infection in recipients of cardiac transplants is associated with higher rates of m
86 as well as other composite end points (death/cardiac transplant/left ventricular assist device implan
87 experienced the composite end point of death/cardiac transplant/left ventricular assist device implan
88 r and macrovascular disease in patients with cardiac transplants, likely indicating divergent pathoge
89 s such as mechanical circulatory support and cardiac transplant may be limited.
90 ft survival in a fully MHC mismatched murine cardiac transplant model in the absence of exogenous imm
91 (STAT)4 and STAT6 as recipients in our mouse cardiac transplant model of chronic rejection.
92 effect of this agent, it was tested in a rat cardiac transplant model of chronic rejection.
93                 We used a murine heterotopic cardiac transplant model to identify inflammatory modula
94                        The mouse heterotopic cardiac transplant model was employed to evaluate the ef
95            A vascularized murine heterotopic cardiac transplant model was used to test whether periop
96 on blockade induced long-term tolerance in a cardiac transplant model, and this tolerance was depende
97                                In the murine cardiac transplant model, peritransplant administration
98            Using a pig-to-baboon heterotopic cardiac transplant model, we examined the role of antibo
99 ponse in the setting of cold I/R in a murine cardiac transplant model.
100 +) Treg following CD154 blockade in a murine cardiac transplant model.
101  induce transplantation tolerance in the rat cardiac transplant model.
102 t arteriosclerosis, in the LEW into F344 rat cardiac transplant model.
103 cessory and immune effector cells in a mouse cardiac transplant model.
104 e used NOS2 knockout mice as recipients in a cardiac transplant model.
105 hibited by pravastatin in a well-defined rat cardiac transplant model.
106 lerance in the nonfunctional rat heterotopic cardiac transplant model.
107 xpression, and iNOS enzyme activity in a rat cardiac transplant model.
108 splantation in a BALB/c into B6 vascularized cardiac transplant model.
109                                   Two murine cardiac transplant models were used, B10.D2 (minor misma
110                        Using murine skin and cardiac transplant models, the authors demonstrate that
111  acute and chronic rejection in experimental cardiac transplant models.
112 nct temporal and spatial patterns in two rat cardiac transplant models: either with antigenic challen
113   Among selected patients who had received a cardiac transplant more than 6 months previously and who
114 bubbles to rejecting versus nonrejecting rat cardiac transplant myocardium can be detected ultrasonic
115 sudden death, n=71; and noncardiac, n=22) or cardiac transplant (n=36).
116 psies (n=3), endomyocardial biopsy (n=1), or cardiac transplants (n=2) showed marked myocyte hypertro
117 , 15 eligible RCTs involving 643 patients (9 cardiac transplants [n=250 patients], 2 kidney transplan
118 ubject to tissue-specific autoimmunity) with cardiac transplants (not subject to tissue-specific auto
119 ican Americans, with an adjusted RR of death/cardiac transplant of 1.95 (95% CI = 1.21-3.13) for hete
120 in survival with a relative risk of death or cardiac transplant of 4.81 (P < 0.001) compared with tho
121                                     Need for cardiac transplant (one of 13 [8%]) and death (three of
122 based protocol and inspection at the time of cardiac transplant or corrective surgery.
123 not candidates for advanced therapies (i.e., cardiac transplant or mechanical circulatory support).
124 ompatibility complex-mismatched vascularized cardiac transplants or skin transplants were performed u
125 of Science databases using the search terms "cardiac transplant" or "heart transplant," and "statin"
126 ionship between increasing center volume and cardiac transplant outcomes.
127 h biomarkers declined (80% to 84%) following cardiac transplant (p < 0.001 for both).
128  in Neoral-treated de novo renal, liver, and cardiac transplants (P<0.05).
129      During this meeting, two main topics in cardiac transplant pathology were addressed: (a) Improve
130 ulmonary and cerebral phaeohyphomycosis in a cardiac transplant patient due to a newly identified spe
131 are an indication for cholecystectomy in the cardiac transplant patient.
132 culating endothelin-1 and acute rejection in cardiac transplant patients (sensitivity of 100% and spe
133 of cyclosporine has improved the survival of cardiac transplant patients as a result of reduced morbi
134                             More than 20% of cardiac transplant patients go on to require permanent p
135                                              Cardiac transplant patients had significantly lower BMD
136 to combination immunosuppressive regimens in cardiac transplant patients has resulted in significant
137                  Approximately one fourth of cardiac transplant patients require permanent pacing.
138 tigated endomyocardial biopsy specimens from cardiac transplant patients to determine whether apoptos
139 N) in the innervated remnant right atrium in cardiac transplant patients were compared with heart rat
140                                  Sixty-eight cardiac transplant patients were randomized to receive e
141 en June 1999 and November 2004, 94 pediatric cardiac transplant patients were screened for the presen
142                   In a sequential study, 240 cardiac transplant patients were treated with either MMF
143 lticenter, randomized, double-blind study in cardiac transplant patients were: to compare the efficac
144 -control study nested within a cohort of 189 cardiac transplant patients who had blood samples obtain
145 ponin-T concentrations were obtained from 68 cardiac transplant patients who were followed for 68.8+/
146  in a significant proportion of asymptomatic cardiac transplant patients with normal angiograms.
147                                              Cardiac transplant patients with pretransplant T- and/or
148 ease, a major cause of late graft failure in cardiac transplant patients, is associated with the pres
149  mortality from gallstone disease is high in cardiac transplant patients, particularly immediately po
150 dies to evaluate the role of statins in post-cardiac transplant patients, specifically examining the
151 ed the beneficial effects of statins in post-cardiac transplant patients, these were relatively small
152                                  Its role in cardiac transplant patients-including its incidence, mec
153 uman endomyocardial biopsies (n=101) from 10 cardiac transplant patients.
154 tase inhibitors for the prevention of GVD in cardiac transplant patients.
155 uble-blind study to confirm these results in cardiac-transplant patients.
156 ncluding cardiac recovery, time to recovery, cardiac transplant, persistent dysfunction, and death, w
157 rmine the incidence of cardiac pacing in our cardiac transplant population and identify characteristi
158                                  The current cardiac transplant population differs from earlier perio
159 c distinction between these 2 different post-cardiac transplant processes should prove useful to card
160                              Rats undergoing cardiac transplants received NOX-100, a water-soluble ni
161 t a case of fatal infection in a 78-year-old cardiac transplant recipient and discuss pitfalls in the
162                                       Twenty cardiac transplant recipient rabbits were treated with e
163   Our first case involved a 40-year-old male cardiac transplant recipient with multiple localized ski
164  has been reported only once previously in a cardiac transplant recipient.
165                      Five hundred thirty-one cardiac transplant recipients (age >/=18 years) were eva
166 cise tests performed in 57 clinically stable cardiac transplant recipients (mean age, 45 +/- 2 years)
167           CNI was substituted with SRL in 78 cardiac transplant recipients (SRL group) of whom 58 (gr
168                    We recruited 90 renal and cardiac transplant recipients and 72 age-matched control
169               We reviewed medical records of cardiac transplant recipients and compared baseline char
170 ting plasma homocysteine was measured in 189 cardiac transplant recipients and in healthy controls, a
171           Published experiences with PTLD in cardiac transplant recipients are limited to relatively
172 ng pathways during IRI, we treated syngeneic cardiac transplant recipients at 1-hour posttransplant w
173  assessment of non-HLA antibodies identifies cardiac transplant recipients at risk of rejection.
174  blood T lymphocytes obtained from pediatric cardiac transplant recipients at the time of biopsy and
175 e blood samples were obtained from pediatric cardiac transplant recipients at the time of cardiac bio
176 easurements via a conductance catheter in 20 cardiac transplant recipients at the time of clinically-
177 scending coronary artery was performed in 30 cardiac transplant recipients at year 1 and 2 after tran
178 ained and stored from a cross-section of 112 cardiac transplant recipients attending the Mayo cardiac
179        This multicenter, randomized study of cardiac transplant recipients documented less severe rej
180  levels may play a role in the management of cardiac transplant recipients during the first year post
181 coronary endothelial dysfunction observed in cardiac transplant recipients during treatment with simv
182  report here the first use of bortezomib for cardiac transplant recipients in four pediatric heart re
183 biopsy enables prospective stratification of cardiac transplant recipients into risk categories for p
184  antibodies (DSA) and positive crossmatch in cardiac transplant recipients is associated with increas
185                                      PTLD in cardiac transplant recipients is associated with low lon
186    Humoral or antibody-mediated rejection in cardiac transplant recipients is mediated by donor-speci
187    Graduated substitution of CNI with SRL in cardiac transplant recipients is safe and improves renal
188 he efficacy and tolerability of ezetimibe in cardiac transplant recipients receiving cyclosporin.
189 resents experience with 274 cases of PTLD in cardiac transplant recipients reported to the Israel Pen
190 ithdrawal of CNI and replacement with SRL in cardiac transplant recipients results in a decrease in L
191 etection and treatment of acute rejection in cardiac transplant recipients significantly improves lon
192 etimibe is both efficacious and tolerable in cardiac transplant recipients taking cyclosporin.
193        Posttransplantation nephrotoxicity in cardiac transplant recipients treated with CsA for a lon
194                           Thirty-eight adult cardiac transplant recipients underwent coronary angiogr
195                                   Forty-five cardiac transplant recipients were converted to sirolimu
196                                  Twenty-nine cardiac transplant recipients were converted to SRL 3.8+
197                                      Seventy cardiac transplant recipients were converted to SRL, 5.7
198                                          Yet cardiac transplant recipients were generally free of opp
199 performed at LDS and University Hospitals in cardiac transplant recipients were reviewed and compared
200                        Forty-six consecutive cardiac transplant recipients were sampled at 1, 3, 6, a
201                                              Cardiac transplant recipients who engaged in an exercise
202 fects of nitric oxide on heart rate in human cardiac transplant recipients who possess a denervated d
203                    Seventy-three consecutive cardiac transplant recipients who received an OKT3-based
204                    We studied 99 consecutive cardiac transplant recipients who were referred for rout
205 e role of MMF therapeutic drug monitoring in cardiac transplant recipients will be discussed.
206                                  Thirty-four cardiac transplant recipients with a previous history of
207 l vascular endothelial function is normal in cardiac transplant recipients with antecedent nonischemi
208                       Long-term treatment of cardiac transplant recipients with cyclosporine results
209                            The proportion of cardiac transplant recipients with preexisting sensitiza
210 hat there is an increased mortality risk for cardiac transplant recipients with prior HD who have und
211 (n = 10) or ischemic cardiomyopathy (n = 7), cardiac transplant recipients with prior nonischemic car
212  the positive and negative effects of ISM in cardiac transplant recipients with PTLD.
213                  In 53 cases of asymptomatic cardiac transplant recipients without angiographically s
214 end of the first posttransplantation year in cardiac transplant recipients without resumption of rapi
215                       Among the group of 195 cardiac transplant recipients, actuarial survival was 72
216                          Tobacco exposure in cardiac transplant recipients, before and after transpla
217 iae DNA is detectable by PCR in up to 30% of cardiac transplant recipients, but this does not correla
218 termine short-term and long-term outcomes of cardiac transplant recipients, including an increased in
219 ely matched to endomyocardial biopsies in 98 cardiac transplant recipients, who survived >/=3 months
220 d replacement with sirolimus (SRL) in stable cardiac transplant recipients.
221 onal advantage from the use of everolimus in cardiac transplant recipients.
222 on-related coronary artery disease (TCAD) in cardiac transplant recipients.
223 F in renal-sparing regimens and in pediatric cardiac transplant recipients.
224 tant implications for ISM in PTLD therapy in cardiac transplant recipients.
225 te cyclosporine-associated nephrotoxicity in cardiac transplant recipients.
226 ly to prevent allograft rejection, mostly in cardiac transplant recipients.
227  ameliorate CsA-associated nephrotoxicity in cardiac transplant recipients.
228 n is safe and highly effective in sensitized cardiac transplant recipients.
229  peripheral vascular endothelial function in cardiac transplant recipients.
230 ociated with subsequent allograft failure in cardiac transplant recipients.
231  and donor cause of death on survival in 500 cardiac transplant recipients.
232 ar rejection in endomyocardial biopsies from cardiac transplant recipients.
233 mens are still inadequate in the majority of cardiac transplant recipients.
234  immune activation and possible rejection in cardiac transplant recipients.
235 rs, and clinical outcome was evaluated among cardiac transplant recipients.
236 ic AR and lower 2 year allograft survival in cardiac transplant recipients.
237 o be an important immunosuppressive agent in cardiac transplant recipients.
238 l failure, requiring hemodialysis in 6.5% of cardiac transplant recipients.
239 nt recipients prompted a randomized trial in cardiac transplant recipients.
240 d during the 14-day OKT3 induction course in cardiac transplant recipients.
241 tudy used the explanted hearts of five human cardiac transplant recipients.
242 ant risk factor for coronary vasculopathy in cardiac transplant recipients.
243 neated in the left ventricles (LVs) of human cardiac transplant recipients.
244 ty cTnI assay seems useful to rule out AR in cardiac transplant recipients.
245 exes of diastolic performance in a cohort of cardiac transplant recipients.
246 with invasively-demonstrated LV stiffness in cardiac transplant recipients.
247  compared between ECCT and standard criteria cardiac transplant recipients.
248  an important adjunct to treatment of AMR in cardiac transplant recipients.
249 pendent predictor of graft loss in pediatric cardiac transplant recipients.
250 , and IgA concentrations were measured in 33 cardiac-transplant recipients transplanted before the ag
251                                We studied 14 cardiac-transplant recipients who had normal coronary ar
252 ipients and, in a single-center trial, among cardiac-transplant recipients.
253 ptor (daclizumab) was performed in 70 adult, cardiac-transplant recipients.
254 splant Study (1993 to 2002, n = 367) and the Cardiac Transplant Registry Database (1990 to 2002, n =
255 imaging technique for the detection of acute cardiac transplant rejection and other processes charact
256   Noninvasive techniques for detecting acute cardiac transplant rejection are limited.
257 uced immune-mediated tissue injury following cardiac transplant rejection, an in vivo model of intens
258 ases of the heart, including myocarditis and cardiac transplant rejection, are important causes of mo
259 echanism that may play a significant role in cardiac transplant rejection.
260 ildren and may be a potential contributor to cardiac transplant rejection.
261 cells into the heart during inflammation and cardiac transplant rejection.
262 mote cardiovascular diseases including acute cardiac transplant rejection; however, the contribution
263 ial biopsy is the major method for detecting cardiac transplant rejection; however, this approach is
264 of these and other events is the goal of the Cardiac Transplant Research Database group.
265                  Utilizing the data from the Cardiac Transplant Research Database, the clinician may
266 , and results of the published data from the Cardiac Transplant Research Database.
267        Current practice in the monitoring of cardiac transplants revolves around the use of the endom
268 th periodate-oxidized ATP promotes long-term cardiac transplant survival in 80% of murine recipients
269 y investigates the role of these pathways in cardiac transplant survival in recipients treated with a
270  baseline characteristics, standard criteria cardiac transplant survival was higher than ECCT at 1 (8
271 ovel clinically relevant strategy to prolong cardiac transplant survival.
272                                 Mouse-to-rat cardiac transplants survive long term after transient co
273  transplant processes should prove useful to cardiac transplant teams.
274              In patients who have received a cardiac transplant, the denervated donor heart responds
275 O-1 suppresses the rejection of mouse-to-rat cardiac transplants through a mechanism that involves th
276 suppressive regimen that allows mouse-to-rat cardiac transplants to survive long term (i.e., cobra ve
277 ovel mechanism of donor ECDI-SPs in inducing cardiac transplant tolerance and provide several targets
278 ospot, signaling studies, and a rat model of cardiac transplant tolerance induced by administration o
279  randomly assigned 434 recipients of a first cardiac transplant treated with standard immunosuppressi
280                                Initial human cardiac transplant trials suggest that OKT4A does not ca
281                                              Cardiac transplant was associated significantly with hig
282                        Long-term survival of cardiac transplants was associated with reduced T-cell a
283                  Using intravital imaging of cardiac transplants, we uncover that ferroptosis orchest
284                             Both DST and the cardiac transplant were necessary to generate the regula
285                                 In contrast, cardiac transplants were not rejected by aly/aly-spl(-)
286 iac allografts in large animals, heterotopic cardiac transplants were performed across a class I MHC
287     Between April 1985 and October 2000, 518 cardiac transplants were performed at Ochsner Foundation
288                                          The cardiac transplants were performed first.
289                    Rat heterotopic abdominal cardiac transplants were performed using a Lewis to Fisc
290  (BALB/c into C57/B16) heterotopic abdominal cardiac transplants were performed.
291 0 consecutive eligible recipients of primary cardiac transplants were randomly assigned to standard t
292 us transgenic CD46 pig-to-baboon heterotopic cardiac transplants were reanalyzed for baseline immunos
293             CBA/CaJ to C57BL/6J vascularized cardiac transplants were treated with murine CTLA4Ig del
294 urthermore, 11 of 31 affected males needed a cardiac transplant while none of 22 affected females req
295    We treated mice with HLA-mismatched mouse cardiac transplant with atorvastatin and dasatinib and s
296 stribution of B cells and plasma cells in 16 cardiac transplants with advanced chronic rejection that
297 ncreased in coronary arteries dissected from cardiac transplants with arteriopathy, but the prevelanc
298 cted class II disparate and fully allogeneic cardiac transplants with similar kinetics.
299 rospectively recruited patients who received cardiac transplants within the same period as the interv
300 ement for left ventricular assist device, or cardiac transplant] within the first 2 years of presenta

 
Page Top