ライフサイエンスコーパス: cardiopulmonary resuscitation

1 or return of circulation via extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation).

2 69.7% male, and 58.0% receiving lay-rescuer cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

3 ts who suffered cardiac arrest and underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

4 to guide resuscitation during uninterrupted cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

5 mild elevation of the head and chest during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

6 th unfavorable outcomes after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

7 ypeople and healthcare providers who perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

8 for cardiogenic shock, and 3) extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

9 n for respiratory failure and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

10 xygenation, and 412 underwent extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

11 en and were less likely to receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

12 rsus 89% (8/9) after more than 30 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

13 attempted after 30 minutes of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

14 on leak and vehicle were administered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

15 n wild-type mice subjected to cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

16 asive cerebral oxygenation monitoring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

17 determined at 24 hours after cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

18 vival rate and neurocognitive recovery after cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

19 est and discuss the role of thrombolytics in cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

20 st five minutes of emergency medical service cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

21 lation, a witnessed arrest, or had bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

22 eceived surface cooling at the initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

23 e ICU, compared with receiving a pamphlet on cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

24 ced cardiac arrest followed by 90 seconds of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

25 .5 mg of epinephrine at 4.5 and 9 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

26 ty were highly associated with pre-operative cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

27 cal ventilation, vasopressors, dialysis, and cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

28 n patients who have undergone extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

29 ced cardiac arrest followed by 90 seconds of cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

30 onitoring of physiological parameters during cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

31 val to discharge and with markers of quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

32 (bradycardia with poor perfusion) requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

33 onary resuscitation (7/10) than depth-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (1/12; p = 0.006).

34 strategies (hippocampus: sham, 0.4 +/- 0.2; cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 1.7 +/- 0.4; extracorpore

35 Following experimental cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation: 1) continuous hypertonic

36 Of 147 children receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 125 (85.0%) had a preexis

37 , the reason for cardiac arrest to assist in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (1B-2C depending on rhythm

38 y resuscitation, 1.7 +/- 0.4; extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 2.3 +/- 0.2; extracorpore

39 y resuscitation, 2.5 +/- 0.4; extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 2.4 +/- 0.2; CO-E-CPR, 1.

40 0.05) and heme oxygenase-1 (sham, 1 +/- 0.1; cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 2.5 +/- 0.4; extracorpore

41 scitation, 426 +/- 169 pg/mL; extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 240 +/- 61 pg/mL; CO-E-CP

42 Caspase-3 activity (cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 426 +/- 169 pg/mL; extrac

43 tnessed event (87% versus 53%; P<0.001) with cardiopulmonary resuscitation (44% versus 25%; P=0.001)

44 versus 65.3 years), received less bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (49.1% versus 54.9%), and

45 me was more likely with hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (7/10) than depth-guided c

46 n alpha-Syn mice subjected to cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation, 7.5% hypertonic saline tr

47 th myoclonus had longer time to professional cardiopulmonary resuscitation (8.6 vs 7.0 min; p < 0.001

48 ecompression plus impedance threshold device cardiopulmonary resuscitation alone, in the setting of i

49 ation with 1) arterial blood pressure during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 2) survival outcomes.

50 ST, 224 (55.7%) patients had chosen to limit cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 214 (53.2%) had chosen

51 d the number of BLS (firefighters performing cardiopulmonary resuscitation and applying automated ext

52 County-level rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external def

53 Additional adjustment of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automated external def

54 he association between bystander treatments (cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automatic external def

55 ghborhoods had the lowest rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and automatic external def

56 mendations on the use of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiac arrest centers

57 are group received a standard pamphlet about cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiopulmonary resusc

58 n from the MRI suite, before the delivery of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and defibrillation, potent

59 on Resuscitation International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

60 life support and 1 pediatric Consensuses on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

61 annual series of International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

62 ican Heart Association Guidelines Update for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

63 Importance: The 2015 cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascul

64 This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

65 This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

66 rican Heart Association (AHA) Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

67 For this 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

68 20 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

69 This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascul

70 (116 +/- 4 vs 143 +/- 7 s; p < 0.001) during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and enhanced myocardial pe

71 Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and era were not independe

72 A video depicting cardiopulmonary resuscitation and explaining resuscitati

73 Control Corporation, Redmond, WA) mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation and impedance threshold de

74 ent on the length of cardiac arrest prior to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and is mediated by myocard

75 nvolved in the application of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and its potential impact o

76 ompare female and male rescuers in regard to cardiopulmonary resuscitation and leadership performance

77 During phase 1, quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation and patient outcomes were

78 e been significant improvements in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival outcome for o

79 Significant variation in rates of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survival were observed

80 oped acute brain injury after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the most common type w

81 n cardiac arrest is poor despite advances in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and the use of therapeutic

82 y resuscitation versus standard depth-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation and to compare brain and h

83 ha-Syn mice were subjected to cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation and treated with either a

84 We examined views on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and withholding/withdrawin

85 ment therapy, extracorporeal life support or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and appearance of patholo

86 ing ventricular fibrillation cardiac arrest, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and epinephrine administr

87 rity of illness scores, higher prevalence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and greater resource util

88 anical ventilation, ejection fraction, prior cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and lactate.

89 heart beat, weanability from extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and left ventricular syst

90 edications, advanced airways, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and post-cardiac arrest c

91 ected to 4-minute cardiac arrest followed by cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and randomized either to

92 ing renal insufficiency, cardiac arrest with cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and ventricular arrhythmi

93 fing; and the use of social media to improve cardiopulmonary resuscitation application.

94 ch on assessing predictors of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation-associated brain injury is

95 s, cardiac arrest characteristics, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, automated external defibr

96 Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (B-CPR) delivery and survi

97 ta on the prevalence or outcome of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) in children 18 year

98 ients and 33% of the patients had history of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ECLS implantation.

99 dication for ECMO after a cardiac procedure, cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ECMO placement, and

100 pital mortality were age (odds ratio, 1.02), cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ICU admission (odds

101 were metastatic disease (odds ratio, 1.99), cardiopulmonary resuscitation before ICU admission (odds

102 nd with greater than or equal to 1 minute of cardiopulmonary resuscitation before venoarterial extrac

103 cerebral oxygenation greater than 50% during cardiopulmonary resuscitation best predicted cerebral pe

104 ral oxygenation during the last 5 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation best predicted the return

105 lmonary resuscitation, extension of advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation beyond futility for organ

106 The head-up/torso-up cardiopulmonary resuscitation bundle was feasible and as

107 ma following experimental cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation by exerting its effect via

108 1 million units, and control extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (c-ECPR), which did not re

109 n improves outcomes after cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CA/CPR).

110 donors with a history of cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CACPR) leads to inferior

111 Post-cardiopulmonary resuscitation cardiac dysfunction was no

112 emergency medical services arrival, and some cardiopulmonary resuscitation characteristics, but were

113 lude the immediate provision of high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation combined with rapid defibr

114 th increased mortality during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation compared with normoxia (od

115 resuscitation alone, in the setting of intra-cardiopulmonary resuscitation cooling.

116 The quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) affects hemodynamics

117 t is associated with low survival, but early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation c

118 p) holds the potential to increase bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and defibrillation i

119 he American Heart Association guidelines for cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardio

120 This 2020 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) and Emergency Cardio

121 To describe temporal trends in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and first-responder

122 alized children in the United States receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) annually.

123 Early access to 9-1-1 and early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) are the first 2 link

124 lity, but the extent of staff involvement in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) efforts and its asso

125 Outcomes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in hospitalized pati

126 Bystander-initiated cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) increases patient su

127 On the basis of laboratory cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) investigations and l

128 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is initiated in hosp

129 of-hospital cardiac arrest receive bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) less often than men.

130 induction of therapeutic hypothermia during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) may improve neurolog

131 ide a paradigm when it is ethical to perform cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) on patients during t

132 nalyzed risks according to whether bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) or defibrillation wa

133 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by bystand

134 Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) significantly improv

135 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training in high sch

136 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training rates in th

137 e emergency response system, early bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with an emphasis on

138 the potential to help maintain high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but despite their i

139 End-tidal CO(2) (EtCO(2)) is used to monitor cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), but it can be affec

140 enhances oxygenation and circulation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

141 hree million people in Sweden are trained in cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR).

142 Conversations about goals of care and cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR)/intubation for patie

143 (UMN) ECPR protocol (transport with ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR] to the cardiac cathe

144 review of the effects of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (DA-CPR) on survival of in

145 minutes of basic life support with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, and if ne

146 minutes of basic life support with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, and if ne

147 Cardiac arrest is potentially reversible by cardiopulmonary resuscitation, defibrillation, cardiover

148 red that duration of cardiac arrest prior to cardiopulmonary resuscitation determined postresuscitati

149 Distribution of cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration differed by outco

150 iation seems more predictive of outcome than cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration or absence of ret

151 For cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration up to 37.0 minute

152 Median cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration was 21 minutes (i

153 The median extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation duration was 3.2 days (int

154 ed airways, vasopressors, and extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiac arrest.

155 epinephrine to sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiopulmonary res

156 ters should offer and instruct bystanders in cardiopulmonary resuscitation during out-of-hospital car

157 Although extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (E-CPR) can result in surv

158 However, the ability of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) to modulate this de

159 suggested that women are inferior leaders of cardiopulmonary resuscitation efforts.

160 In particular, measurement of cardiopulmonary resuscitation elements and neurological

161 rends, increasing use of dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, emerging field treatments

162 c arrest rhythm, witnessed status, bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, episode location, epineph

163 t and pediatric patients with a nonpulseless cardiopulmonary resuscitation event from 2000 to 2018.

164 insufficiency, longer time from onset of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation event to extracorporeal me

165 The median time from onset of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation event to extracorporeal me

166 Longer time from onset of the cardiopulmonary resuscitation event to extracorporeal me

167 51%) had subsequent pulselessness during the cardiopulmonary resuscitation event.

168 Regional and temporal trends in bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, event survival, and survi

169 The relative incidence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation events was higher for card

170 this practice poses: termination of advanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation, extension of advanced car

171 onstrates that sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation facilitates intra-cardiopu

172 Animals received manual cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 10 minutes before the

173 on cardiac arrest followed by extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for 6 hours.

174 l blood pressures between children receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation for bradycardia and poor p

175 utcome 1 year after receiving extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation for in-hospital arrest.

176 0,078 children enrolled, 139 (1.4%) received cardiopulmonary resuscitation for more than or equal to

177 iac arrests and pediatric patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation for poor perfusion (nonpul

178 Cardiogenic shock following cardiopulmonary resuscitation for sudden cardiac arrest

179 ic patients (<=18 years of age) who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation from January 2000 to Decem

180 st, age 18 years old or older, and prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation greater than or equal to 5

181 itation in the sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation group (83+/-15 mL/min vs 2

182 nutes of advanced life support with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation; group B-3 minutes of basi

183 ction of the 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines in the United S

184 Influence of cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines on nationwide s

185 he impact of 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines on survival.

186 he change in 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines was associated

187 ation of the 2010 American Heart Association cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines, 1.25% ([95% CI

188 nge in survival trends before and after 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines.

189 ant change in survival before and after 2010 cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines.

190 iation/Emergency Cardiovascular Care updated cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines.

191 monary arrest, sepsis survivors who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation had a greater risk of all-

192 Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation has shown survival benefit

193 he vasopressors, and shockable rhythm during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, hospital level, and socio

194 stomy, gastrostomy, artificial nutrition, or cardiopulmonary resuscitation); however, it was associat

195 1.79 (95% CI, 1.17-2.76); and (5) bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, HR, 1.38 (95% CI, 1.02-1.

196 diopulmonary resuscitation facilitates intra-cardiopulmonary resuscitation hypothermia.

197 Survival trends after in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ICPR) for cardiac arrest

198 duce cooling, primarily of the brain, during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ie, intra-arrest).

199 Hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves short-term surviv

200 ygenation was deployed during extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 31 patients (21% of the

201 arrest in 53.8%, 51.1%, and 52.1%; bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 44.7%, 30.3%, and 23.4%

202 rdiac dysfunction in 3,005 patients (66.5%), cardiopulmonary resuscitation in 877 patients (19.4%), a

203 ry resuscitation, the role of extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in adults and children, va

204 Most children receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation in ICUs had an initial rhy

205 or impedance threshold device with standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac

206 ogy death (CED) immediately after successful cardiopulmonary resuscitation in patients without ST-seg

207 in pediatric cardiac arrest, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation in pediatric cardiac arres

208 tubation in the last 30 days of life, and no cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the last 30 days of lif

209 Carotid blood flow was higher during cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the sodium nitroprussid

210 has improved for pediatric events requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation in the United States, with

211 ruption at 24 hours following cardiac arrest/cardiopulmonary resuscitation in wild-type mice but not

212 These data establish that contemporary PICU cardiopulmonary resuscitation, including long durations

213 diatric cardiac arrest, hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation increases rates of 24-hour

214 O in elderly patients and patients requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation indicates that less invasi

215 icular function recovered within 72 hours of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, indicative of myocardial

216 Mdivi-1 administration during cardiopulmonary resuscitation inhibited dynamin-related

217 tients who progressed to pulselessness after cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation had lower intra

218 than 35 degrees C beginning from the time of cardiopulmonary resuscitation initiation.

219 e the quality of chest compressions, shorten cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruptions, guide resus

220 tation guideline recommendations to minimize cardiopulmonary resuscitation interruptions.

221 ly, trained physicians can lead high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation irrespective of gender.

222 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation is a lifesaving technique

223 Higher cerebral oxygenation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is associated with return

224 ts, real life female physician leadership of cardiopulmonary resuscitation is not associated with inf

225 ventricular dilatation on ultrasound during cardiopulmonary resuscitation is particularly associated

226 MACE were defined as death, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, life-threatening arrhythm

227 , age, witnessed status, attempted bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation, location of arrest, chest

228 ary embolism and use of thrombolytics during cardiopulmonary resuscitation may need to be more routin

229 partially be explained by fewer unsolicited cardiopulmonary resuscitation measures and inferior fema

230 e in different domains and fewer unsolicited cardiopulmonary resuscitation measures compared with mal

231 d treatment with either hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 10; compression depth

232 fusion pressure >= 20 mm Hg) or depth-guided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n = 12; depth 1/3 chest d

233 ent protocols: sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n=8), sodium nitroprussid

234 n=73/112) and 74.6% in patients who required cardiopulmonary resuscitation (n=91/122).

235 cluding studies that included extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation, no significant difference

236 Pre-operative cardiopulmonary resuscitation occurred in 43.2% of patie

237 he risk-adjusted odds of receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (odds ratio [OR], 2.96; 95

238 variate regression identified extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (odds ratio, 3.674; 95% CI

239 iated with improved knowledge of in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation options and cardiopulmonar

240 ge of patients with OHCA receiving bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation or a lay automatic externa

241 of naloxone or flumazenil, nonmechanical or cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or endotracheal intubatio

242 efined as PE- or bleeding-related mortality, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or intensive care unit ad

243 re female and male code leaders in regard to cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcomes in a real-world c

244 One in four extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients achieved good neu

245 Among extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation patients, the median age w

246 resuscitation and measured durations of all cardiopulmonary resuscitation pauses.

247 training and rapid response teams; measuring cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance, feedback devi

248 ences, with female rescuers showing inferior cardiopulmonary resuscitation performance, which can par

249 upport with active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus an impedance threshol

250 itation (n=8), sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus epinephrine (n=10), a

251 Control and sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus epinephrine groups re

252 he control and sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation plus epinephrine groups, r

253 hlet about cardiopulmonary resuscitation and cardiopulmonary resuscitation preference options plus ro

254 lity were age, severity of illness, previous cardiopulmonary resuscitation, previous ICU admission, m

255 odds ratio for each 5 additional minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to extracorporeal me

256 te ischemic cardiomyopathy and 66% underwent cardiopulmonary resuscitation prior to venoarterial extr

257 bundled approach including use of mechanical cardiopulmonary resuscitation provided at a head-up angl

258 tives to promote cardiac arrest recognition, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, public access defibrillat

259 ender of code leader was not associated with cardiopulmonary resuscitation quality.

260 nhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation during cardiopulmonary resuscitation reduced its improvement in

261 thors used data from SWEDEHEART, the Swedish Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Registry, and the Swedish

262 Outcomes after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation reported by linking two na

263 Hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation resulted in higher intra-a

264 Hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation resulted in higher OXPHOSC

265 y resuscitation, including long durations of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, results in high rates of

266 radycardia and poor perfusion as the initial cardiopulmonary resuscitation rhythm.

267 tions summary articles that will include the cardiopulmonary resuscitation science reviewed by the In

268 on has initiated a near-continuous review of cardiopulmonary resuscitation science that replaces the

269 uous review of new, peer-reviewed, published cardiopulmonary resuscitation science.

270 teams are readily available, extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation should be considered for p

271 e addition of thrombolytic to extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation significantly improved car

272 (n = 3,207) of sepsis patients who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation survived to discharge.

273 to two experimental groups: t-extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (t-ECPR) group, which rece

274 objective of this study was to determine if cardiopulmonary resuscitation-targeted to arterial blood

275 al cardiopulmonary resuscitation options and cardiopulmonary resuscitation terminology among patients

276 survivors of sepsis who received in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation than in those who did not,

277 rdiac arrest centers and dispatcher-assisted cardiopulmonary resuscitation, the role of extracorporea

278 During cardiopulmonary resuscitation, these patients had lower

279 Specifically, greater than or equal to 60% cardiopulmonary resuscitation time with regional cerebra

280 ance of survival during the first minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation to enable prompt orientati

281 remained more frequent in nonextracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation venoarterial extracorporea

282 d to hospital discharge after 1-3 minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus 28% (9/32) after mo

283 iac arrest treated with hemodynamic-directed cardiopulmonary resuscitation versus standard depth-guid

284 e overall survival rate after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was 29% (95% CI, 0.26-0.33

285 Shorter duration of cardiopulmonary resuscitation was associated with higher

286 Extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation was not independently asso

287 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation was ongoing during REBOA i

288 -year postdischarge survival rates following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were 28%, 23%, and 14%, re

289 utcomes of ICU sepsis survivors who received cardiopulmonary resuscitation were compared with those o

290 sk factors for long-term mortality following cardiopulmonary resuscitation were male sex, older age,

291 thm, witnessed cardiac arrest, and bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation were more likely to surviv

292 ry OH VF/VT cardiac arrest requiring ongoing cardiopulmonary resuscitation were transported by emerge

293 phrine administration as bolus (e.g., during cardiopulmonary resuscitation), were excluded.

294 36% strongly agreed with declining to offer cardiopulmonary resuscitation when not indicated.

295 sociate ventilation rates during in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation with 1) arterial blood pre

296 us circulation after three shocks, automated cardiopulmonary resuscitation with a Lund University Car

297 y resuscitation, 2.3 +/- 0.2; extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation with carbon monoxide appli

298 Cardiopulmonary resuscitation with extracorporeal circul

299 othesized that sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation would decrease the time re

300 ephrine during sodium nitroprusside-enhanced cardiopulmonary resuscitation would mitigate heat exchan