戻る
「早戻しボタン」を押すと検索画面に戻ります。 [閉じる]

コーパス検索結果 (１語後でソート)

通し番号をクリックするとPubMedの該当ページを表示します
1 th flow reversal was recently introduced for carotid stenting.
2 with excessively high 30-day mortality after carotid stenting.
3 statin-treated patients undergoing protected carotid stenting.
4  when performed by physicians experienced in carotid stenting.
5 rative monitor in carotid endarterectomy and carotid stenting.
6  training for physicians learning to perform carotid stenting.
7 emporary surgical standard for comparison to carotid stenting.
8 tients (604 hemispheres/arteries) undergoing carotid stenting.
9  low (2.7%) risk of procedural strokes after carotid stenting.
10 , and outcome data on patients who underwent carotid stenting.
11  and 4721 symptomatic patients who underwent carotid stenting.
12 s, thrombolytics, and (in selected patients) carotid stenting.
13                       In patients undergoing carotid stenting, a strategy using both a 600-mg clopido
14 ed by 1792 new operators who first performed carotid stenting after the CMS national coverage decisio
15 e recruited, including 55 patients receiving carotid stenting and 43 receiving endarterectomy.
16 ring completion that may resolve the role of carotid stenting and carotid endarterectomy in primary a
17 d stenosis were selected randomly for CEA or carotid stenting and followed for two years.
18 eficiaries aged 65 years or older undergoing carotid stenting between 2005 and 2007.
19  study, physicians with varied experience in carotid stenting can achieve similar short- and longer-t
20       It has been demonstrated recently that carotid stenting can be performed safely in patients > o
21  single group of operators demonstrates that carotid stenting can be performed with an acceptable 30-
22 ry disease, carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting (CAS) are treatment options.
23  outcomes of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid stenting (CAS) in elderly and young patients.
24 reventing embolic neurological events during carotid stenting (CAS).
25             The study examined the effect of carotid stenting (CS) on contralateral carotid Doppler-d
26                           When compared with carotid stenting, endarterectomy patients demonstrated p
27 th asymptomatic carotid stenosis are offered carotid stenting for the prevention of carotid occlusion
28                                              Carotid stenting had similar peri-interventional mortali
29                                              Carotid stenting has an increased risk of adverse cerebr
30                     Although the efficacy of carotid stenting has been established in clinical trials
31           Coverage and reimbursement for the carotid stenting has been severely restricted to include
32                        Over the past decade, carotid stenting has emerged as a viable alternative to
33      Optimal clopidogrel loading dose during carotid stenting has not been investigated; in addition,
34                                              Carotid stenting is a less invasive percutaneous procedu
35                    The evolving technique of carotid stenting is being evaluated as an alternative to
36                                              Carotid stenting is equivalent to CEA in reducing caroti
37                                              Carotid stenting is established as the treatment of choi
38                                              Carotid stenting is problematic because the severity of
39              Among older patients undergoing carotid stenting, lower annual operator volume and early
40                   These results suggest that carotid stenting may be comparable to carotid endarterec
41                                              Carotid stenting may be considered a revascularization o
42  compared to nonmagnetic controls in the rat carotid stenting model.
43 uring this procedural developmental phase of carotid stenting, neurological complications were highly
44                                              Carotid stenting (odds ratio 6.49, P = 0.020) and age gr
45 tween surgical carotid revascularization and carotid stenting or angioplasty (low and insufficient SO
46  carotid occlusion is well below the risk of carotid stenting or endarterectomy and has decreased mar
47 utcomes in the largest prospective cohort of carotid stenting patients.
48                    Therefore, the benefit of carotid stenting should be tempered by the potential for
49                            The International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) is a multicentre, internat
50 rtery stenosis included in the International Carotid Stenting Study (ICSS) were randomly allocated to
51 -term data from the randomised International Carotid Stenting Study comparison of these treatments.
52 maging (MRI) substudy of ICSS (International Carotid Stenting Study), 231 patients with symptomatic c
53 y versus Endarterectomy trial, International Carotid Stenting Study, and Carotid Revascularization En
54                                      Type of carotid stenting (TCAR vs TF-CAS).
55 ch, highlighting the perceived importance of carotid stenting therapies in this patient population.
56                                          For carotid stenting to reach its full potential, an accepta
57 , single-arm BEACH (Boston Scientific EPI: A Carotid Stenting Trial for High-Risk Surgical Patients)
58                                              Carotid stenting was associated with increased incidence
59          Patients who underwent transfemoral carotid stenting were excluded.
60  Endarterectomy Versus Stent Trial comparing carotid stenting with carotid endarterectomy.
61                 Although previous reports of carotid stenting with embolic protection (CAS) have focu
62 iously reported that, in a randomized trial, carotid stenting with the use of an emboli-protection de
63 d-artery stenosis and coexisting conditions, carotid stenting with the use of an emboli-protection de
64 esent article provides an in-depth review of carotid stenting, with special emphasis on the process o